{"id":239608,"date":"2021-12-22T16:45:42","date_gmt":"2021-12-22T11:15:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/apnlive.com\/?p=239608"},"modified":"2021-12-22T17:07:44","modified_gmt":"2021-12-22T11:37:44","slug":"sheena-bora-kashmir-indrani-mukherjea-lady-officer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apnlive.com\/india-news\/sheena-bora-kashmir-indrani-mukherjea-lady-officer\/","title":{"rendered":"Sheena Bora murder case: Woman officer who claimed she met Sheena in Kashmir ready to record statement before CBI, says Indrani Mukherjea’s lawyer"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Sheena Bora murder case again took a major twist as recently Indrani Mukherjea said that a woman officer informed her that she met Sheena Bora on June 24 in Kashmir’s Dal lake.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the latest update, Indrani Mukherjea’s lawyer Sana R Khan said that she have been informed by her client Indrani Mukherjea that a lady officer has informed her that she met Sheena Bora on June 24, and now the officer is ready to record her statement before CBI. She further said that they will file an application directly to CBI to conduct a fair probe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Earlier, Indrani sent a letter to the CBI in which she stated that a woman in Byculla prison told her that she had spotted Sheena in Kashmir some time ago. In the letter, Indrani also requested the investigating agency to look into the possibility of Sheena being alive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Indrani always maintained that Sheena has not been murdered and is alive. She had also said that Sheena had gone abroad for her education in 2012, but she could never prove her claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read Also<\/strong>: Atrangi Re: Dhanush says Sonam Kapoor was better co-actor to Sara Ali Khan<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to reports, Indrani told a few people that she met with a woman in prison who told her that she met Sheena Bora in Kashmir and that is the reason why CBI should look for Sheena in Kashmir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In other news, the Madras High Court <\/a>suspended a lawyer on December 21, 2021, for behaving inappropriately with a woman on a virtual meeting. The ongoing hearing was being presented in front a single judge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n