{"id":66127,"date":"2019-08-19T15:58:57","date_gmt":"2019-08-19T10:28:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/apnlive.com\/?p=66127"},"modified":"2019-08-19T16:03:36","modified_gmt":"2019-08-19T10:33:36","slug":"jammu-kashmir-ex-defence-officers-bureaucrats-petition-supreme-court-govt-move-article-370","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apnlive.com\/india-news\/jammu-kashmir-ex-defence-officers-bureaucrats-petition-supreme-court-govt-move-article-370\/","title":{"rendered":"J&K: Ex defence officers and bureaucrats petition SC against Govt move on Art 370"},"content":{"rendered":"
A group of retried defence personnel and bureaucrats have moved the Supreme Court challenging the Presidential orders through which the special status granted to J&K was revoked and the state bifurcated into two Union territories.<\/p>\n
This is the seventh petition filed in the Supreme Court challenging the Centre\u2019s revocation of J&K\u2019s special status under Article 370. Earlier, six other petitions have already been filed and are still pending before the apex court.<\/p>\n
The petitioners include Air Vice Marshal Kapil Kak, Major Gen (Retd) Ashok Mehta, former civil servants Hindal Haidar Tyabji, Amitabha Pande, Gopal K Pillai and Radha Kumar \u2013 one of the interlocuters appointed by the Home Ministry in 2010, according to media reports.<\/p>\n
The petition was drawn by advocates Arjun Krishnan, Kaustubh Singh and Rajalakshmi Singh and settled by Senior Advocate Prashanto Sen, said reports.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe petitioner has stated that the erstwhile State of Jammu & Kashmir, though an integrated part of India, enjoyed a special autonomous status which was concretized in Article 370 of the Constitution of India.\u201d, the report says.<\/p>\n
Alleging violation of the principles of federalism, the petition says that the Union government has undermined the basic principles of democracy by its action \u201cwithout ascertaining the will of the people either through its elected government or legislature or through public means such as referenda\u201d, the report said.<\/p>\n