English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Changed anti-corruption law tightens rules for prosecuting officials, penalises bribe givers

Published

on

Changed anti-corruption law tightens rules for prosecuting officials, penalises bribe givers

The amended anti-graft law passed by the Lok Sabha on Tuesday provides for punishment to bribe takers as well as bribe givers and extends the requirement of prior sanction for prosecution to former public officials as well.

The Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill, 2018 has already been passed by Rajya Sabha last week.

The Bill provides for imprisonment from three to seven years, besides fine, to those convicted of taking bribes. Bribe givers have also been included in the legislation for the first time and they can be punished with imprisonment up to seven years, fine, or both.

The Bill provides for jail terms of three to seven years, besides fine, to those convicted of taking or giving bribes to public officials.

The Bill also extends the ambit of public servants who will be protected by the provision of a prior government sanction for prosecution. There is also a provision now to get prior permission for starting an investigation and that has prompted many to say that the law has been “diluted” from its original draft.

In a departure from the earlier anti-corruption law, the current law makes a distinction between “collusive bribe givers” and those who are “coerced.”

In such cases, the Bill seeks to protect those who report the matter within seven days. However, taking note of the concerns raised by many members that the seven-day window was too short, the minister of state for personnel, public grievances and pensions Jitendra Singh said during his reply that the government would look at ways to “extend this period while framing the rules.”

In his reply, the minister said the Bill provides safeguards to officers who perform their duties with honesty. “We have brought amendments so that honest performing officer does not get intimidated or his initiatives get killed,” he said.

Singh said the “historic legislation” has provisions to ensure speedy trial in corruption cases.

“For any corruption case, we will bring guidelines for decision to be ordinarily given in two years,” he said. The minister said the government aimed at taking strict measures against corruption while also ensuring good work atmosphere.

Referring to delay in appointment of Lokpal, he said the blame lay with Congress as it did not get enough seats for its leader to be recognised as the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha.

The Leader of Opposition is a member of Lokpal selection panel. Singh said the government had sought to include the leader of the largest opposition party in the meetings concerning appointment of Lokpal.

At a time when many former and current bankers are under the scrutiny of investigative agencies for their decisions to grant loans that have since turned into NPAs, the amended law seeks to make a distinction between action and intention.

Public servants cannot be booked under the act unless they have accumulated assets disproportionate to their income or have misappropriated assets entrusted to them.

The move, minister of state for personnel Jitendra Singh said, is aimed at protecting “decisions that have gone bad” and penalise only corrupt practices.

Many members who took part in the debate stressed on the need for electoral reforms to curb corruption.

Some opposition members accused the government of “diluting” the anti-corruption act through the amendments and also cautioned the government over the provision to punish the bribe giver.

Shiv Sena member Arvind Ganpat Sawant targeted the Modi government over demonetisation and asked if its stated objectives had been achieved. Citing some other decisions related to the government, he said “it is easy to talk about corruption and difficult to walk the talk”.

He alleged that the “BJP used investigating agencies like Enforcement Directorate (ED) to pressure political rivals and make them join their party.”

He also asked if expenses of a party meeting addressed by the prime minister or a chief minister are borne by the exchequer or the political party concerned.

“Election is den of corruption, school admission is den of corruption,” he said.

Congress MP Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, while supporting the Bill, said despite the government’s claim of corruption-free governance, there had been many such allegations, including the multi-core Rafale deal, bank frauds by Nirav Modi, Mehul Choksi and Vijay Mallya. “They talk about zero tolerance against corruption… but the reality is diametrically opposite. There is maximum corruption, minimum prevention,” said Mr. Chowdhury. He questioned the delay in appointing a Lokpal.

India News

Fire breaks out after gas cylinder blasts in truck at Dharavi, four vehicles damaged, no casualties

Panic gripped Mumbai’s Dharavi area after a truck carrying LPG cylinders caught fire following multiple explosions. No injuries were reported, and the fire was brought under control.

Published

on

Dharavi fire, Dharavi gas cylinder explosion, Mumbai fire news, Maharashtra LPG cylinder blast,

A fire broke out in Mumbai’s Dharavi on Monday night after multiple gas cylinders exploded in a parked truck, triggering panic and traffic chaos. Fortunately, no injuries were reported in the incident, which took place near Maharashtra Nature Park on the Sion Dharavi Link Road.

According to officials, the fire erupted around 9.50 pm after a series of blasts from a truck loaded with LPG cylinders near PNGP Colony. The blaze was categorized as a level II (medium emergency) and brought under control by 19 fire tenders deployed to the site.

Deputy chief fire officer Santosh Sawant stated that an LPG cylinder used for home delivery services was the first to explode, which escalated the fire. The situation led to damage to at least four nearby vehicles, but swift evacuation and emergency response ensured no injuries occurred.

“The explosion led to the fire’s escalation. We dispatched five fire engines following level II protocol. No reports of injuries have been received so far,” Sawant said.

Residents of nearby buildings, including Raju Darshan A1 and B2, rushed out in panic after hearing the loud explosions. Ansarul Shaikh, a local resident, claimed that around 20 cylinders exploded, although officials have not confirmed this figure.

“The blasts caused panic, and many ran for cover. Fortunately, pedestrians were on the other side of the road. The police managed crowd control, and the fire brigade acted promptly,” Shaikh added.

The incident also caused a traffic jam along the busy Sion Dharavi Link Road. Crowds gathered at the site, many capturing videos of the blaze, which quickly circulated on social media.

Probe underway

Authorities have identified the truck driver and are in the process of apprehending him. Investigations are ongoing to determine the exact cause of the cylinder explosions.

Officials assured that the situation is now under control and urged the public not to panic. Further updates are expected once forensic analysis and the fire department’s full report are available.

Continue Reading

India News

No FIR, no probe: Experts, politicians demand transparency in Justice Varma mysterious cash case

The controversy surrounding Justice Yashwant Varma over unaccounted cash and a suspicious fire has triggered rare political consensus and raised serious questions on judicial transparency.

Published

on

Yashwant Varma, justice verma cash controversy, Supreme Court collegium, corruption probe

In a rare show of political consensus, both ruling and opposition parties have come together demanding answers in the controversy involving Justice Yashwant Varma, after the alleged recovery of unaccounted cash from his residence and a subsequent mysterious fire. However, the incident, which unfolded without an FIR or any formal police investigation, has ignited a larger debate on judicial transparency.

Questions over transparency

Justice Varma, who has denied knowledge of the cash recovered from his residence, has been relieved of his duties in the Delhi High Court and repatriated to the Allahabad High Court, a move that was met with resistance from the local Bar Association. Meanwhile, a Supreme Court-formed three-member committee is investigating the matter.

Despite the high-profile nature of the case, no FIR has been lodged, and no formal forensic or police report has emerged to clarify the cause of the fire or the source of the cash. Legal experts and senior officials argue that such developments would normally lead to immediate action under income tax and anti-corruption laws for ordinary citizens.

Legal experts question silence

Legal voices across the board have called for equal treatment under the law. Several experts also pointed out that the police are obliged to investigate the discovery of unclaimed or suspicious assets under Section 102 of the CrPC (now BNSS). A retired judge emphasized that the law should compel an investigation into the ownership and potential criminal origin of the cash.

Calls for CBI probe

As demands for a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe grow louder, many believe the matter cannot be brushed aside. A senior advocate from Allahabad High Court alleged that something more serious might be hidden beneath the surface and warned against scapegoating.

The incident has also reignited the debate over the collegium system of judicial appointments. Justice L Narasimha Reddy, former Chief Justice of the Patna High Court, pointed out that the absence of the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) framework has left the system vulnerable to opacity and lack of accountability.

A test of judicial equality

The controversy has now become more than a singular issue. It is being viewed as a test of whether the justice system will uphold the fundamental principle of equality before the law. Experts and political leaders alike are demanding that judicial integrity be preserved through transparency and lawful action.

As the investigation awaits further clarity, the silence from enforcement agencies continues to fuel public suspicion, raising the core question: Can the law truly be equal for all?

Continue Reading

India News

Journalist arrested for remarks against Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and son

Journalist Prashant Koratkar, accused of making offensive remarks about Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and Chhatrapati Sambhaji, has been arrested in Telangana and is being brought to Kolhapur.

Published

on

Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj

Maharashtra police have arrested journalist Prashant Koratkar in Telangana for allegedly making derogatory remarks about 17th-century Maratha ruler Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and his son, Chhatrapati Sambhaji. The arrest follows widespread outrage over a viral audio clip and legal proceedings that culminated in the rejection of his anticipatory bail.

Arrest follows legal battle and public outrage

According to police, Koratkar was taken into custody in Telangana and is being brought to Kolhapur for further legal procedures. Kolhapur Superintendent of Police Mahendra Pandit confirmed the development, stating that the journalist will now face the legal process in Maharashtra.

The case stems from an audio conversation between Koratkar and Kolhapur-based historian Indrajeet Sawant, in which Koratkar allegedly made objectionable remarks. The recording, shared by Sawant on social media, sparked strong public backlash and demands for Koratkar’s arrest.

Koratkar was initially booked on February 26 under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita provisions for promoting enmity between groups. Despite being granted interim protection from arrest by a sessions court until March 1, the Kolhapur police challenged the decision in the Bombay High Court, seeking cancellation of the relief.

On March 18, Additional Sessions Judge D V Kashyap in Kolhapur rejected Koratkar’s anticipatory bail plea. In his defense, Koratkar claimed his phone was hacked and the viral audio was doctored. He also issued a public apology and alleged that the audio was released with the intent to stir communal tension.

Maharashtra CM denies police inaction

Amid political criticism, Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis dismissed claims that police were shielding Koratkar, who hails from his hometown of Nagpur. Fadnavis asserted that law enforcement was actively pursuing the case and would take action wherever Koratkar was found.

With his arrest now confirmed, Koratkar will face further legal proceedings in Kolhapur as authorities continue their investigation.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com