English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Constitution debate: Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman takes Balraj Sahni’s arrest as example to slam Congress

She also remarked that the Congress government banned a book, Nehru: A Political Biography, by Michael Edwardes and a film, Kissa Kursi Ka, in 1975 because it questioned Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, her son and also the Information and Broadcasting Minister then.

Published

on

Constitution debate: Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman takes Balraj Sahni’s arrest as example to slam Congress

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Monday launched a scathing attack on the Congress during the debate to mark the Constitution’s 75th anniversary in Rajya Sabha. She accused the grand old party of repeatedly trying to undermine the Constitution through amendments.

Targeting India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, the Finance Minister referred to the first Constitutional amendment in 1951, adding that it was essentially to curb the freedom of speech and expression. Mentioning that though India even today prides itself on the freedom of expression, she claimed that the first interim government came up with a Constitutional amendment to curb the freedom of speech of Indians. She explained the amendment was because the first Prime Minister deplored press scrutiny of his government even as he publicly praised the freedom of press. 

 Additionally, Nirmala Sitharaman also referred to the arrest of poet-lyricist Majrooh Sultanpuri and actor Balraj Sahni in 1949. She pointed out that during one of the meetings organised for mill workers, Majrooh Sultanpuri recited a poem that was written against Jawaharlal Nehru. Therefore, he had to go to jail, she claimed. The Finance Minister asserted that when the poet refused to render an apology and was jailed along with Balraj Sahni, an eminent actor of those days. Taking a swipe at Congress’s Constitution pitch, she added that is the level of tolerance and today they hold the Constitution in their hand and say freedom of speech, there is a sense of fear in our country.

She also remarked that the Congress government banned a book, Nehru: A Political Biography, by Michael Edwardes and a film, Kissa Kursi Ka, in 1975 because it questioned Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, her son and also the Information and Broadcasting Minister then. She added that in 1988 Salman Rushdie’s book The Satanic Verses was banned. So, this spree of curtailing the freedom of expression, containing freedom of press happened before 1949 and continues after 1951, she asserted.

Finance Minister Sitharaman said that the amendments brought by Congress governments were not aimed at strengthening democracy but to shield those in power. She said that in the aftermath of the Second World War, more than 50 countries became independent and framed their Constitution. But while many of them have changed it completely, India’s Constitution has stood the test of time, she exclaimed.

She hailed that today they are extremely proud of the way India’s democracy is growing. She underlined that it is time to reaffirm their commitment to build India, that is Bharat, that shall uphold the spirit enshrined in this sacred document.

She further referred to amendments brought in to nullify an Allahabad High Court judgment in 1975 against Indira Gandhi in an election malpractices case. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman also referred to the Shah Bano case during Rajiv Gandhi’s term as Prime Minister. After the judgment from the Supreme Court in the Shah Bano case, the Congress passed the Muslim Women Protection of Rights on Divorce Act 1986 which denied Muslim women their right to alimony, she noted.

Additionally, referring to the imposition of the Emergency in 1975, she said that the amendments were not about strengthening democracy but protecting those in power.

India News

New VB G RAM G Bill set to replace MGNREGA in Parliament

The government has introduced the VB G RAM G Bill in Parliament to replace MGNREGA, proposing higher employment guarantees and time-bound payments.

Published

on

The Central government has introduced a new legislation in Parliament that seeks to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA), setting the stage for a political confrontation during the ongoing Winter Session.

The proposed law, titled The Viksit Bharat Guarantee For Rozgar And Ajeevika Mission (Grameen), has been abbreviated as VB G RAM G. To ensure its passage, a whip has been issued, asking ruling party MPs to remain present in the House.

According to the government, the Bill introduces a fresh framework aligned with the Viksit Bharat 2047 vision, aimed at strengthening employment and livelihood support in rural areas.

What changes under the new Bill

MGNREGA, launched in 2005 under the previous UPA government, guarantees 100 days of employment to rural households and has remained a key rural welfare programme for nearly two decades.

Under the new VB G RAM G Bill, the government has proposed increasing the guaranteed employment period from 100 days to 125 days. The legislation also seeks to streamline wage payments, mandating that workers receive payments within seven to 15 days after completing assigned work.

The Bill further includes a provision for unemployment allowance if payments are not released within the stipulated timeframe, adding an accountability mechanism to the payment process.

Political implications

The introduction of the Bill during the Winter Session is expected to trigger intense debate, given MGNREGA’s long-standing role in rural employment and poverty alleviation. The government maintains that the new legislation is designed to modernise and expand the scope of employment guarantees under a restructured mission framework.

Continue Reading

India News

Chaos mars Lionel Messi’s Kolkata GOAT Tour event as fans protest poor arrangements

Lionel Messi’s brief appearance in Kolkata was overshadowed by chaos as fans alleged mismanagement, prompting an apology and an official enquiry by the state government.

Published

on

Messy event Chaos kolkata

Lionel Messi’s much-anticipated appearance in Kolkata turned chaotic on Saturday after thousands of fans alleged mismanagement at the Yuva Bharati Krirangan, leaving many unable to even see the Argentine football icon despite holding high-priced tickets

Fans express anger over limited access

The Kolkata leg of the G.O.A.T. Tour was billed as a special moment for Indian football fans, with ticket prices ranging between Rs 5,000 and Rs 25,000. However, discontent grew rapidly inside the stadium as several attendees claimed their view of Messi was obstructed by security personnel and invited guests positioned close to him.

As frustration mounted, some fans resorted to throwing chairs and bottles from the stands, forcing organisers to intervene and cut the programme short.

Event cut short amid disorder

Messi reached the venue around 11:15 am and remained there for roughly 20 minutes. He was expected to take a full lap of the stadium, but that plan was abandoned as the situation deteriorated soon after he emerged from the tunnel.

The disorder also meant that prominent personalities, including actor Shah Rukh Khan, former India cricket captain Sourav Ganguly and West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, could not participate in the programme as scheduled.

Organisers whisk Messi away

With fans breaching security and some vandalising canopies set up at the Salt Lake Stadium, the organisers, along with security personnel, escorted Messi out of the venue to prevent further escalation.

Several attendees described the event as poorly organised, with some fans calling it an “absolute disgrace” and blaming mismanagement for spoiling what was meant to be a celebratory occasion.

Mamata Banerjee apologises, orders enquiry

Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee later issued a public apology to Messi and the fans, expressing shock over the mismanagement. She announced the formation of an enquiry committee headed by retired Justice Ashim Kumar Ray, with senior state officials as members.

The committee has been tasked with conducting a detailed probe, fixing responsibility and suggesting steps to ensure such incidents are not repeated in the future.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi enforces new law to regulate fees in private schools

Delhi has notified a new law to regulate private school fees, capping charges, banning capitation fees and mandating transparent, committee-approved fee structures.

Published

on

Delhi School fees

The Delhi government has officially brought into force a new law aimed at regulating fees in private schools, notifying the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fee) Act, 2025. The notification was issued on Wednesday, nearly four months after the Bill was cleared by the Delhi Assembly and received approval from Lieutenant Governor V K Saxena.

The Act establishes a comprehensive framework to govern how private unaided schools fix and collect fees, with a clear emphasis on transparency, accountability and relief for parents facing repeated fee hikes.

What the new Act provides for

Under the legislation, private unaided recognised schools can charge fees only under clearly defined heads such as registration, admission, tuition, annual charges and development fees. The law caps registration fees at Rs 25, admission charges at Rs 200 and caution money at Rs 500, which must be refunded with interest. Development fees have been restricted to a maximum of 10 per cent of the annual tuition fee.

Schools have also been directed to disclose all fee components in detail and maintain separate accounts for each category. Any fee not specifically permitted under the Act will be treated as an unjustified demand.

The law strictly prohibits the collection of capitation fees, whether direct or indirect. It further mandates that user-based service charges must be collected strictly on a no-profit, no-loss basis and only from students who actually use the service.

Accounting norms and restrictions on surplus funds

To ensure financial transparency, schools are required to follow prescribed accounting standards, maintain fixed asset registers and make proper provisions for employee benefits. The transfer of funds collected from students to any other legal entity, including a school’s managing society or trust, has been barred.

Any surplus generated must either be refunded to parents or adjusted against future fees, according to the notification.

Protection for students and parents

The Act also places restrictions on punitive action by schools in fee-related matters. Schools are prohibited from withholding results, striking off names or denying entry to classrooms due to unpaid or delayed fees.

The law applies uniformly to all private unaided schools in Delhi, including minority institutions and schools not built on government-allotted land.

School-level committees to approve fees

A key feature of the legislation is the mandatory formation of a School-Level Fee Regulation Committee by July 15 each year. The committee will include five parents selected through a draw of lots from the parent-teacher association, with compulsory representation of women and members from Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and socially and educationally backward classes.

A representative from the Directorate of Education will also be part of the panel, while the chairperson will be from the school management.

Schools must submit their proposed fee structure to the committee by July 31. The committee can approve or reduce the proposed fees but cannot increase them. Once finalised, the fee structure will remain fixed for three academic years.

The approved fees must be displayed prominently on the school notice board in Hindi, English and the medium of instruction, and uploaded on the school website wherever applicable.

The Delhi government had earlier described the legislation as a significant step towards curbing arbitrary fee hikes after widespread complaints from parents at the start of the academic session.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com