English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Constitution debate: Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman takes Balraj Sahni’s arrest as example to slam Congress

She also remarked that the Congress government banned a book, Nehru: A Political Biography, by Michael Edwardes and a film, Kissa Kursi Ka, in 1975 because it questioned Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, her son and also the Information and Broadcasting Minister then.

Published

on

Constitution debate: Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman takes Balraj Sahni’s arrest as example to slam Congress

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Monday launched a scathing attack on the Congress during the debate to mark the Constitution’s 75th anniversary in Rajya Sabha. She accused the grand old party of repeatedly trying to undermine the Constitution through amendments.

Targeting India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, the Finance Minister referred to the first Constitutional amendment in 1951, adding that it was essentially to curb the freedom of speech and expression. Mentioning that though India even today prides itself on the freedom of expression, she claimed that the first interim government came up with a Constitutional amendment to curb the freedom of speech of Indians. She explained the amendment was because the first Prime Minister deplored press scrutiny of his government even as he publicly praised the freedom of press. 

 Additionally, Nirmala Sitharaman also referred to the arrest of poet-lyricist Majrooh Sultanpuri and actor Balraj Sahni in 1949. She pointed out that during one of the meetings organised for mill workers, Majrooh Sultanpuri recited a poem that was written against Jawaharlal Nehru. Therefore, he had to go to jail, she claimed. The Finance Minister asserted that when the poet refused to render an apology and was jailed along with Balraj Sahni, an eminent actor of those days. Taking a swipe at Congress’s Constitution pitch, she added that is the level of tolerance and today they hold the Constitution in their hand and say freedom of speech, there is a sense of fear in our country.

She also remarked that the Congress government banned a book, Nehru: A Political Biography, by Michael Edwardes and a film, Kissa Kursi Ka, in 1975 because it questioned Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, her son and also the Information and Broadcasting Minister then. She added that in 1988 Salman Rushdie’s book The Satanic Verses was banned. So, this spree of curtailing the freedom of expression, containing freedom of press happened before 1949 and continues after 1951, she asserted.

Finance Minister Sitharaman said that the amendments brought by Congress governments were not aimed at strengthening democracy but to shield those in power. She said that in the aftermath of the Second World War, more than 50 countries became independent and framed their Constitution. But while many of them have changed it completely, India’s Constitution has stood the test of time, she exclaimed.

She hailed that today they are extremely proud of the way India’s democracy is growing. She underlined that it is time to reaffirm their commitment to build India, that is Bharat, that shall uphold the spirit enshrined in this sacred document.

She further referred to amendments brought in to nullify an Allahabad High Court judgment in 1975 against Indira Gandhi in an election malpractices case. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman also referred to the Shah Bano case during Rajiv Gandhi’s term as Prime Minister. After the judgment from the Supreme Court in the Shah Bano case, the Congress passed the Muslim Women Protection of Rights on Divorce Act 1986 which denied Muslim women their right to alimony, she noted.

Additionally, referring to the imposition of the Emergency in 1975, she said that the amendments were not about strengthening democracy but protecting those in power.

India News

Saif Ali Khan’s attacker gained entry through house help, Police investigate connection

Published

on

Saif Ali Khan

Mumbai police are deepening their investigation into the stabbing of Bollywood actor Saif Ali Khan, focusing on the disturbing possibility that one of his house helps knew the attacker and facilitated his entry into Khan’s residence. The 54-year-old actor was left with six stab wounds, one dangerously close to his spine, and has undergone successful surgery at Lilavati Hospital.

The police believe that the house help might have connections with the attacker, raising serious concerns about the security measures employed by celebrities in Mumbai’s most affluent areas. The help in question is currently being interrogated to unravel the motive and the exact circumstances leading up to the incident.

CCTV footage from Khan’s residence failed to capture any entry in the two hours preceding the attack, indicating that the assailant had entered the premises earlier and lay in wait. The Mumbai Police, embarrassed by this breach in security in one of the city’s poshest neighborhoods, are now reviewing additional footage to track down the assailant who managed to flee the scene post-attack.

This event has not only shaken the local community but has also ignited political debates concerning the efficacy of the state’s law and order. Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi criticized the state government, pointing to this incident as indicative of a broader failure to protect even the city’s most high-profile residents.

Amidst growing public concern for safety in Bandra, a hub for many such celebrities, actress Pooja Bhatt has publicly called for increased police presence in the area, highlighting a sense of diminishing security in what is often dubbed the ‘queen of the suburbs’.

This incident, marking another high-profile attack in Mumbai, raises critical questions about the safety of public figures and the effectiveness of their personal security arrangements. The community, alongside local authorities, is hopeful for swift justice and reassurances of enhanced security measures.

Continue Reading

India News

Saif Ali Khan critically injured in stabbing incident at Mumbai home

Published

on

Image of Lilavati Hospital where Saif Ali Khan is being treated following a stabbing incident.

Bollywood actor Saif Ali Khan was hospitalized early this morning after being stabbed multiple times at his Bandra residence in an apparent burglary attempt. The incident occurred around 2 AM at his Satguru Sharan building home, with the actor sustaining six stab wounds, two of which are critically deep, according to Lilavati Hospital officials.

Dr. Niraj Uttamani, Chief Operating Officer at Lilavati Hospital, confirmed that one of the wounds is perilously close to Khan’s spine. “He was rushed to the hospital at 3:30 AM and immediately taken into surgery,” stated Dr. Uttamani. The surgical team, led by neurosurgeon Dr. Nitin Dange, alongside cosmetic surgeon Dr. Leena Jain and anesthesiologist Dr. Nisha Gandhi, worked extensively to address the injuries.

Although the neurosurgery has concluded, plastic surgeons are still repairing the other severe wounds. “Saif is out of danger now, and we expect to provide a more detailed report soon,” added Dr. Uttamani.

An official statement from Mr. Khan’s team shed light on the circumstances surrounding the incident, revealing that the actor was attacked by an intruder during an attempted robbery. The statement also urged the media and fans for patience as it is now a police matter.

Police have launched a full investigation, registering an FIR against the assailant who managed to flee the scene. The Mumbai Crime Branch has taken up a parallel investigation, with seven teams deployed to locate the suspect, including scrutinizing CCTV footage and conducting area searches.

This alarming event has not only shaken the Bollywood community but also highlighted concerns over celebrity safety in the city. More updates are expected as the investigations progress and as Mr. Khan’s condition stabilizes.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi Police files case against BJP’s Parvesh Verma on EC’s direction for distributing shoes

Following a complaint filed by a lawyer, the Returning Officer for the New Delhi constituency sent a letter to Mandir Marg police station on Wednesday requesting the registration of an FIR against the BJP leader.

Published

on

Trouble is brewing for BJP’s Parvesh Verma after the Delhi Police filed a case against him on Wednesday regarding the distribution of shoes to voters. The Returning Officer for the New Delhi Assembly Constituency alerted the Station House Officer (SHO) Mandir Marg Police Station about this issue on January 15.

The controversy arose from the BJP candidate’s distribution of shoes at Valmiki Temple, just days before the assembly polls scheduled for February 5 in the national capital. The Returning Officer requested the SHO to register a First Information Report (FIR) and initiate an immediate investigation following a complaint against Parvesh Sahib Singh Verma.

A video shared by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) on X showed Verma, the son of former Delhi Chief Minister Sahib Singh Verma and a two-term MP from West Delhi, placing shoes on elderly women’s feet and then seeking their blessings while his supporters chanted “Long live Parvesh Verma.”

In its post featuring the video, filmed at the Valmiki Temple near Mandir Marg in the New Delhi constituency, AAP stated, “Can’t the Election Commission see democracy being undermined? On one hand, BJP candidate Parvesh Verma is openly distributing shoes on the streets while posing for photos and videos. On the other hand, the District Election Officer remains silent. If the Election Commission does not take action against this blatant violation of the code of conduct, what does it mean for elections and the democratic process?”

Following a complaint filed by a lawyer, the Returning Officer for the New Delhi constituency sent a letter to Mandir Marg police station on Wednesday requesting the registration of an FIR against the BJP leader.

The Returning Officer noted, “According to Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, any gift, offer, or promise made by a candidate or their agent, or by any other person with the candidate’s or their election agent’s consent, constitutes corrupt practices.”

He added, “Consequently, I direct that an immediate investigation be conducted into this matter, appropriate action be taken for the violation of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC), and that a report on the actions taken be submitted to me at the earliest.” In response to the Returning Officer’s letter, an FIR has now been registered against Verma.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com