English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

“Nothing new in BJP poll manifesto”

Published

on

“Nothing new in BJP poll manifesto”

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Panellists feel that parties should be careful about making false claims

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) today released its poll manifesto for the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. The photograph of prime minister Narendra Modi is on the cover, and it is titled, “Sankalp Bharat Sashakt Bharat”, with promises to double farmers’ incomes and to build the Ram mandir, among others. APN’s popular debate Mudda discussed the BJP poll manifesto. Anchorperson Akshshay posed the questions to panellists, including the Congress’s Pawan Dikshit, BJP’s Raghvendra Singh, SP’s Ratansen Singh, noted scribe Shishpal Gosain, and APN consultant Govind Pant Raju.

Raju said: “This time the BJP has presented a careful manifesto, not making empty tall promises. The BJP knows this is a prestige election. BJP has taken the earlier line on the Ram mandir issue, and nothing new has been announced.”

Raghvandra Singh said: “BJP came to power with the slogan ‘Sabka sath, sabka vikas’. For the BJP, it is first nation and then party. Education, health, triple talaaq, all of these have been BJP’s priorities.”

Akshay wanted to know about unemployment. To this, Singh said: ”We have already made huge progress on that.”

Dikshit said:”It is a khokla patr, full of empty promises. There is no mention of unemployment. The BJP is scared. Nothing was done on the proposed Smart City project. Beti Bachao was another poster campaign only. BJP has been telling lies after raising people’s expectations. The promised pension for small businessmen will be another farce.”

Akshay asked SP’s Ratansen Singh about SP’s poll manifesto. He said: ”Bullet train, Smart City…where are these? I have been waiting for that. Black money is still rampant. Unemployment is rampant. Modi wanted only 60 months to change the nation’s destiny. We are still to see that. Our manifesto makes no such false promises.”

Gosain said: “I agree with Raju that BJP has said nothing new. It has avoided the mention on employment. Today unemployment is the highest-ever in many decades.”

Dikshit said: “Since 1947, Congress has been in power and understands governance very well. The people of Kashmir have to be taken into account for Art 370. BJP can’t ride roughshod on people’s wishes. BJP has to sit down to understand what people in Kashmir want.”

Raju said: “Art 35 A and Art 370 are two separate issues. There has been talk of scrapping Art 370. Parties have to ensure that they should be making promises that can be fulfilled. Kashmir Pandits have been promised that they will be relocated to Kashmir again, but how is that to happen?”

Ratansen Singh: “Art 370 cannot be scrapped wilfully. And same with Art 35 A. SP’s mudda is farmers, electricity and water.”

Gosain said: “BJP manifesto came after the Congress’s. There should be no compromise on the nation’s security. In the Kashmir attack a month ago, many soldiers and officers died. Government has to make sure such attacks don’t happen again.”

Raghvendra Singh said:”Congress has been a bad loser. When out of power, Indira Gandhi had shown support or Bindranwale. Vikas is now done in a better way.”

Dikshit said: “Eight months we spent making the manifesto, we first made a blueprint and then made it public. Tax structure has gone lopsided, there is a lot of scope there. We will not be spending on simply branding of programs, like what has been done by the BJP with its Beti Bachao programme, and many others as well.”

Gosain said:”People should be given time to judge what they should be choosing, after going through the manifesto.”

Raghvendra Singh said:”There is large scope of employment generation in the unorganised sector. BJP will be looking at that too improve employment figures.”

Raju said: “Government plans to keep its liabilities down. BJP has not purposefully kept the employment level down. Many things happen in the course of governance. For instance, after much talk, common minimum income could not take off in the way it was planned.”

Compiled By: Niti Singh Bhandari [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

DU VC Prof Yogesh Singh entrusted with additional charge of AICTE Chairman

Published

on

By

Prof. Yogesh Singh, Vice Chancellor of the University of Delhi, has been entrusted with the additional charge of the post of Chairman, AICTE till the appointment of a Chairman of AICTE or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

It is noteworthy that AICTE Chairman Prof. TG Sitharam was relieved of his duties after his term ended on December 20, 2025. According to a letter issued by the Ministry of Education, Government of India, on Monday, Prof. Yogesh Singh’s appointment is until the appointment of a regular AICTE Chairman or until further orders whichever is earlier.

Prof. Yogesh Singh is a renowned academician with excellent administrative capabilities, who has been the Vice-Chancellor of University of Delhi since October 2021. He has also served as the Chairperson of the National Council for Teacher Education. In August 2023, he was also given the additional charge of Director of the School of Planning and Architecture (SPA).

Prof. Yogesh Singh served as the Vice-Chancellor of Delhi Technological University from 2015 to 2021; Director of Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Delhi from 2014 to 2017, and before that, he was the Vice-Chancellor of Maharaja Sayajirao University, Baroda (Gujarat) from 2011 to 2014. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from the National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra. He has a distinguished track record in quality teaching, innovation, and research in the field of software engineering.

Continue Reading

India News

Goa nightclub fire case: Court extends police custody of Luthra brothers by five days

A Goa court has extended the police custody of Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra, owners of the nightclub where a deadly fire killed 25 people, by five more days.

Published

on

Luthra brothers

A court in Goa on Monday extended the police custody of Saurabh Luthra and Gaurav Luthra, the owners of the Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub, by five more days in connection with the deadly fire incident that claimed 25 lives on December 6.

The order was passed as investigators sought additional time to question the two accused in the case linked to the blaze at the Anjuna-based nightclub.

Owners were deported after fleeing abroad

According to details placed before the court, the Luthra brothers had left the country following the incident and travelled to Thailand. They were subsequently deported and brought back to India on December 17, after which they were taken into police custody.

Advocate Vishnu Joshi, representing the families of the victims, confirmed that the court granted a five-day extension of police custody for both Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra.

Another co-owner sent to judicial custody

The court also remanded Ajay Gupta, another owner of the nightclub, to judicial custody. Police did not seek an extension of his custody, following which the court passed the order, the victims’ counsel said.

The Anjuna police have registered a case against the Luthra brothers for culpable homicide not amounting to murder along with other relevant offences related to the fire incident.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi High Court issues notice to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi in National Herald case

Delhi High Court has sought responses from Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on the ED’s plea challenging a trial court order in the National Herald case.

Published

on

The Delhi High Court has sought responses from Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on a petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the National Herald case. The petition challenges a trial court order that refused to take cognisance of the agency’s prosecution complaint.

Justice Ravinder Dudeja issued notices to the Gandhis and other accused on the main petition, as well as on the ED’s application seeking a stay on the trial court’s December 16 order. The high court has listed the matter for further hearing on March 12, 2026.

The trial court had ruled that taking cognisance of the ED’s complaint was “impermissible in law” because the investigation was not based on a registered First Information Report (FIR). It observed that the prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) was not maintainable in the absence of an FIR for a scheduled offence.

According to the order, the ED’s probe originated from a private complaint rather than an FIR. The court further noted that since cognisance was declined on a legal question, it was not necessary to examine the merits of the allegations at that stage.

The trial court also referred to the complaint filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy and the summoning order issued in 2014, stating that despite these developments, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) did not register an FIR in relation to the alleged scheduled offence.

The ED has accused Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, and a private company, Young Indian, of conspiracy and money laundering. The agency has alleged that properties worth around Rs 2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Limited (AJL), which publishes the National Herald newspaper, were acquired through Young Indian.

The agency further claimed that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi held a majority 76 per cent shareholding in Young Indian, which allegedly took over AJL’s assets in exchange for a Rs 90 crore loan.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com