English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Tamil Nadu files contempt petition against Centre for not taking steps to resolve Cauvery dispute, Centre seeks time

Published

on

Tamil Nadu files contempt petition against Centre for not taking steps to resolve Cauvery dispute, Centre seeks time

The Tamil Nadu government on Saturday, March 31 filed a contempt petition against the Central government a day after the Supreme Court’s six-week deadline to put in place a mechanism to resolve Cauvery dispute ended.

The Supreme Court in its February 16 judgment in the Cauvery dispute had mandated the Central government to frame a scheme to set up a Cauvery Management Board (CMB) and a Cauvery Water Regulation Committee (CWRC) to monitor  the allocation of the river water among Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala and Puducherry.

Tamil Nadu accused the Centre of refusing to act to “protect the interests of the farmers and the larger interests of the State” and urged the apex court to “purge the contempt forthwith” by directing the Centre to frame a scheme in accordance with the judgment by providing for CMB and CWRC vested with all powers to give effect to the decision of the Cauvery Tribunal as well as the judgment of SC.

As per the February 16 judgment in the Cauvery appeals, the Centre had to frame the scheme in six weeks. The deadline ended on March 29. On the eve of the deadline, the Centre moved the Supreme Court for a three-month extension for the implementation of the judgment, citing the model code of conduct due to Karnataka elections. As Karnataka is having Assembly elections on May 12, the Centre wants to deal with the sensitive Cauvery issue after the polls.

The Centre felt that constitution of a scheme under Section 6(A) of the Inter-state River Waters Disputes Act and notification during the assembly election process would lead to massive public outrage, vitiate election process and cause serious law and order problems.

The Centre also sought a clarification on constitution of Cauvery Management Board from the top court asking whether it is open to the Central government to frame the scheme under 6(A) at variance with the recommendations contained in the report of the Cauvery water dispute tribunal regarding Cauvery Management Board.

It also wanted to know whether, if the board as recommended by the tribunal is to be constituted, would the Central government have the flexibility to modify the composition of the board to a mixture of administrative and technical body and not purely a technical body for effect conduct of the business of the board and considering overall sensitivity of the issues involved.

It also wanted a clarification whether the board framed under 6(A) of the act can have functions different from the ones recommended for Cauvery Management Board by the tribunal.

The Centre said in compliance of the February 6 order of the court and in spirit of true federalism, it convened a meeting of the Chief Secretaries of the four states and other officials and initiated consultations for arriving at a consensus. Divergent views were expressed by the states, said the Centre.

Tamil Nadu indicated that the scheme as mentioned by the Supreme Court has been defined in Section 6 which is to implement the final order of the tribunal under the court. The view of Tamil Nadu was that the Central government was mandated to put in place an authority or the body for implementation of the final decision by constituting the board and Cauvery Water Regulation Committee.

Puducherry and Kerala gave similar views but Karnataka was of the opinion that the Supreme Court has left the contents of the scheme to the discretion of the Central government.

It said the contention of Tamil Nadu that the board as formulated by the tribunal should be a part of the Scheme is wholly contrary to the mandate of the judgment and law.

Karnataka also contended that the Scheme contemplated in the Supreme Court judgment is a dispute resolution body as distinct from the management or regulation recommended by the tribunal. Therefore the question of asking Karnataka submit indent does not and should not arise for consideration.

Karnataka said the management and regulation of water of a state namely equitable share of a state determined by the adjudication is the sole prerogative of the state by reference to the entry 17 of the State list to the seventh schedule of the Constitution and therefore a scheme in the form of the board is clearly ultra vires of the Constitution.

Fifthly, Karnataka contended that the Supreme Court has not endorsed or approved the board in its judgment.

On the other hand, Tamil Nadu, which filed the contempt petition through advocate G. Umapathy as soon as the Supreme Court Registry opened on Saturday, reminded that the apex court has clearly, in its February 16 verdict, banned any extension of time to the Centre for framing a scheme.

“Central Government was bound to give effect to the judgment by framing a scheme so that the authorities under the scheme viz. Cauvery management board and Cauvery water regulation committee are put in place within six weeks… It has not taken any concrete steps in this regard,” Tamil Nadu contended.

It pointed that belatedly, after a period of three weeks, the Central government merely convened a meeting of the Chief Secretaries of the party States on 09.03.2018. “The convening of such a meeting does not in any way make any substantial progress in the matter of constitution of a Cauvery management board and Cauvery water regulation committee,” said Tamil Nadu.

Tamil Nadu said it had written to the Centre repeatedly on March 13, March 21 and March 23 for the constitution of a Cauvery management board within the six-week time limit so that farmers do not suffer during the irrigation season commencing from June 1.

“Ensuring timely release of water is apparent in the judgment itself and, therefore, any delay in constituting a Cauvery management board and a Cauvery water regulation committee is to the prejudice to the farmers of State of Tamil Nadu… In the absence of any cogent reasons for not constituting a Cauvery management board and a Cauvery water regulation committee within the time frame and/ or not making any substantial steps in that directions amount to wilful disobedience of the judgment of the Supreme Court,” Tamil Nadu said.

India News

In poll-bound Bihar, Amit Shah reminds people of Lalu Yadav’s era from 1990 to 2005, RJD reminds of Gujarat’s jungle raj

Tejashwi Yadav, Leader of Opposition in the Bihar Assembly, dismissed Shah’s claims, questioning the tangible benefits of the alleged financial aid.

Published

on

In a charged political atmosphere ahead of the Bihar Assembly polls, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, addressing a public rally in Gopalganj on Sunday, launched a scathing attack on Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) supremo Lalu Prasad Yadav, accusing him of plunging the state into chaos during his tenure from 1990 to 2005.

Shah, who arrived in Patna on Saturday, also held a meeting with National Democratic Alliance (NDA) leaders at the Chief Minister’s residence.

Speaking to a large crowd, Shah alleged that the Lalu-Rabri regime was synonymous with “jungle raj,” marked by lawlessness, murders, abductions, and the infamous fodder scam.

“Lalu Prasad did nothing for Bihar’s rural economy or development. Several sugar mills shut down, and the state suffered under his misrule,” Shah claimed, asserting that people reject the return of such disorder. He predicted a landslide victory for the NDA in the upcoming elections.

The Home Minister contrasted this with the BJP-led NDA’s efforts, claiming that while the previous United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government at the Centre allocated only ₹2.80 lakh crore to Bihar, the NDA provided ₹9.23 lakh crore, focusing on the state’s overall growth.

RJD leaders hit back fiercely. Shakti Singh Yadav, an RJD leader, accused Shah of hypocrisy, labelling him the “hero of Gujarat’s jungle raj and atank raj.” He pointed to the alleged deterioration in law and order under the BJP-JD(U) government in Bihar over the past two decades, citing rising crime rates.

Tejashwi Yadav, Leader of Opposition in the Bihar Assembly, dismissed Shah’s claims, questioning the tangible benefits of the alleged financial aid. “Big promises are made during elections, but they vanish post-polls. If Modi has given money, specify the sectors and show the work done in 20 years,” he challenged.

RJD MP Misa Bharti defended Lalu Prasad, highlighting his contributions as Railway Minister, including setting up three factories and establishing six universities in Bihar during his and Rabri Devi’s tenure.

The verbal duel escalated as Shah accused RJD supremo Prasad of involvement in multiple scams, including the fodder, bitumen, and flood relief material scams, alleging that those who “ate up fodder” could not prioritize public welfare.

The fodder scam, exposed in the 1990s when Jharkhand was part of Bihar, saw crores fraudulently withdrawn from state treasuries, with Lalu Prasad among those convicted.

Continue Reading

India News

Ballia woman death: Family rejects police claim of suicide, demands CBI probe

Authorities claim she was distressed and had viewed a YouTube video about suicide prior to her death.

Published

on

In Ballia, police have arrested two individuals in connection with the suspicious death of a young woman whose body was discovered hanging from a tree with her hands restrained. The incident has been classified as a potential suicide, but the victim’s family is adamant that she was murdered and is advocating for a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) inquiry.

The deceased, identified as Pooja, aged 20, was found in the Sarya Gulab Rai village within the jurisdiction of the Nagara police station on March 23. Police reports suggest that Pooja took her own life after her boyfriend blocked her number, as she was set to marry another man on April 25. Authorities claim she was distressed and had viewed a YouTube video about suicide prior to her death.

On Saturday, two men, Lalu Chauhan from Pooja’s village and Ram Dulare from Mau district, were taken into custody for their alleged roles in abetting her suicide and have since been remanded in jail. Superintendent of Police Omveer Singh indicated that Pooja had reached out to these individuals regarding her distress, but they failed to inform her family or the police of her situation.

The police investigation, based on a post-mortem report and other evidence, has led them to conclude that the case is leaning towards suicide. However, the family has lodged a complaint against four villagers, questioning the circumstances of Pooja’s death and alleging murder.

The formal autopsy was recorded on video and conducted by a panel of medical professionals, revealing no external injuries that would suggest foul play. Despite this, the family remains skeptical. Pooja’s sister, Neha, voiced her concerns in front of reporters, asserting that the police narrative is misleading and that the claim about watching a suicide video is unfounded given the restrictions on such content.

Neha is calling for a CBI investigation, citing a lack of trust in local law enforcement. Pooja’s father, Dharamraj, who himself works as a security guard at a police station, questioned how a suicide could occur under such bizarre circumstances, notably with the victim’s hands and feet tied.

The investigation continues, with officials stating that the evidence collected thus far does not strongly implicate the individuals named in the initial complaint, although they are pursuing all avenues in this complex case.

Continue Reading

India News

At least 1 dead, several injured after 11 coaches of the Bangaluru-Kamakhya Express derails in Odisha

The accident occurred around 11:54 AM in the Cuttack-Nergundi Railway Section under the Khurda Road Division of East Coast Railway, as per the reports.

Published

on

In a tragic incident on Sunday, at least one passenger lost their life, and eight others sustained injuries when 11 coaches of the Bengaluru-Kamakhya AC Superfast Express derailed near Nergundi station in Odisha’s Cuttack district.

The accident occurred around 11:54 AM in the Cuttack-Nergundi Railway Section under the Khurda Road Division of East Coast Railway, as per the reports.

Subash Chandra Ray, the Administrative Officer of SCB Medical College and Hospital, confirmed that “one body has been recovered, and three teams of doctors have been engaged to treat the injured passengers”. The identity of the deceased remains unknown.

Odisha Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi expressed his concern on the social media platform X, stating, “Deeply concerned about the derailment of Kamakhya Express near Nergundi station in #Cuttack. Grateful that all passengers are safe. Authorities are on-site, ensuring assistance and restoring normalcy at the earliest. Helplines activated for support.”

In response to the crisis, the National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) and fire services were promptly mobilized, and a relief train was dispatched to the site, as per Ashok Kumar Mishra’s statement to India Today.

Railway authorities, including the Divisional Railway Manager (DRM) Khurda Road, the General Manager of ECoR, and other senior officials, rushed to the location. An accident relief and medical relief train were also sent to the spot, according to PTI.

Due to the derailment, several train routes have been diverted, and ECoR officials are making alternate arrangements to ensure passengers reach their destinations, after which restoration works will commence, reported by media. The Railways have issued helpline numbers for assistance: 8455885999 and 8991124238.

The cause of the derailment is currently under investigation, and railway authorities are working tirelessly to restore normalcy on the affected track section, as per the reports.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com