English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Cricket news

India’s batting reshuffle under Gautam Gambhir draws sharp criticism after 2nd T20I loss

Former players Robin Uthappa and Dale Steyn criticised Gautam Gambhir’s batting shuffle after India’s 51-run defeat in the second T20I against South Africa.

Published

on

Gautam Gambhir

India’s heavy 51-run defeat against South Africa in the second T20I at Mullanpur has sparked intense scrutiny of head coach Gautam Gambhir’s tactical calls, particularly the decision to reshuffle the batting order. Former cricketers Robin Uthappa and Dale Steyn openly questioned the move, calling it a significant error that unsettled the Indian batting line-up

Experts question changes in India’s batting order

India’s chase of a daunting target never gained momentum after early wickets. Captain Suryakumar Yadav did not come in at his usual position, instead walking in after Axar Patel, and managed only five runs. The experiment raised eyebrows among experts, who felt India lost stability at a crucial phase of the innings.

Speaking during the post-match analysis, Robin Uthappa recalled Gambhir’s earlier comments about flexibility in the batting order but said the approach did not suit a high-pressure chase. He argued that when pursuing a big total, the team’s most dependable batters should take responsibility early rather than being pushed down the order.

Uthappa also pointed out that if Axar Patel was used as a pinch-hitter, the role demanded a far more aggressive approach. According to him, India needed calm and assurance after early setbacks, something the shuffled order failed to provide.

Dale Steyn calls decision a ‘major mistake’

Former South Africa pacer Dale Steyn echoed similar concerns, terming the move a “major mistake”. He stressed that Suryakumar Yadav is among India’s best batters and should not be treated as part of a trial-and-error strategy in a competitive T20I.

Steyn questioned the logic behind the left-right combination, noting that a right-handed batter had been dismissed, yet India ended up with two left-handers at the crease. He suggested that experimentation might be understandable in less critical situations, but not in a match where India had a chance to take a 2-1 lead in the series.

Call for clarity in top-order roles

Concluding his analysis, Uthappa urged Gambhir to settle on a fixed top three in the batting order. He emphasised that clarity of roles is essential in T20 cricket, especially during the powerplay overs. While flexibility can work later in the innings, constant changes at the top could harm the team’s rhythm.

Uthappa warned that prolonged experimentation might backfire at crucial moments in major tournaments, stressing that India cannot afford such uncertainty heading into high-stakes events.

Cricket news

Shreyas Iyer calls India’s T20I struggles a transition phase after England seal series

Shreyas Iyer admitted India failed in execution after England’s nine-wicket victory sealed the T20I series, describing the current squad as one in transition.

Published

on

Shreyas Iyer

England clinched the T20I series against India with a convincing nine-wicket victory, leaving India captain Shreyas Iyer disappointed with his team’s overall performance despite scoring an unbeaten 80.

India posted 158 for 7 after Iyer anchored the innings with the highest score. However, England made light work of the chase, reaching the target in just 13.5 overs to take an unassailable lead in the series.

Iyer rues poor execution across departments

Following the defeat, Iyer admitted India failed to execute their plans with both bat and ball.

He said 158 was not an ideal total on the board and acknowledged that England’s rapid chase reflected India’s shortcomings. According to the skipper, the bowlers were instructed to repeatedly target a difficult length around the top of middle and leg stump, but the team failed to execute those plans consistently.

Although satisfied with his personal contribution, Iyer said individual performances hold little value when the team ends up on the losing side.

He added that his priority is always to contribute to victories and expressed hope of bouncing back in the next match.

‘This is a transition phase,’ says India captain

Iyer described the current Indian side as a team in transition and stressed that mistakes are part of the learning process.

He said the players need to understand the importance of adapting quickly and expressed confidence that the squad has enough quick learners who will assess their performances and improve from the experience.

Harry Brook praises England’s adaptability

England captain Harry Brook credited his team’s success to its ability to adjust to the conditions and the communication between the players and coaching staff.

Brook said the team had enjoyed the contest and was delighted to secure the series against India. He identified adaptability and strong communication as the two biggest reasons behind England’s dominant performances.

The England skipper also praised fast bowlers Jofra Archer and Josh Tongue for once again making an early impact with the ball before expressing his ambition of seeing England rise to the No. 1 spot in the ICC T20I rankings.

England now have the opportunity to complete a 4-0 series sweep in Southampton on Saturday, a result that would also see them replace reigning world champions India at the top of the T20I rankings.

Continue Reading

Cricket news

Anil Kumble criticises India’s batting, team management after 125-run loss to England

Anil Kumble has criticised India’s batting collapse, team management decisions and frequent bowling changes following the 125-run defeat to England in the third T20I.

Published

on

Former India captain and ex-head coach Anil Kumble has strongly criticised India’s performance following their crushing 125-run defeat to England in the third T20I, describing the display as an “abject surrender” by the Shreyas Iyer-led side.

India were bowled out for just 76 while chasing, suffering one of their heaviest defeats in T20Is. The result also left them without a win in the five-match series at that stage, meaning they could only level the contest by winning the remaining two matches.

Reacting to the defeat, Kumble questioned the batting approach and said the players failed to show the patience required under pressure.

“It was an abject surrender by the Indian team. You don’t expect a world champion side to cave in like that,” Kumble said on JioHotStar.

He added that although the required run rate was above 10 an over, one of the batters needed to anchor the innings instead of everyone opting for an attacking approach.

“The Indian batters needed to show more patience and application, but everyone just tried to attack instead of absorbing the pressure. Yes, the required rate was over 10, but someone had to take responsibility and bat deep. Instead, they went the aggressive route and paid the price with a batting collapse,” he said.

Kumble questions batting order decision

The former India skipper also criticised the team management’s decision to promote Harshit Rana ahead of Shivam Dube during the run chase.

According to Kumble, India should have backed one of their established batters instead of sending a lower-order player into a difficult situation.

“In T20 cricket, you put your best batters up front. Sending out Harshit Rana to bat ahead of a more complete batter like Shivam Dube was wrong. You can’t expect a number eight guy to win you a game by sending him to bat ahead of a proven guy. That’s not how things work in modern-day cricket,” he said.

Calls for consistency in bowling selection

Kumble also expressed concern over India’s frequent changes to the bowling attack, saying constant chopping and changing could affect players’ confidence.

He pointed out that Prasidh Krishna was dropped after one poor outing against Ireland, while Prince Yadav impressed with three wickets in the second T20I but still found himself in a side that lost the match.

“The Indian team has made too many changes to its lineup, and that needs to stop. The bowlers keep changing. Prasidh Krishna was dropped after one bad game against Ireland. Prince Yadav came in, bowled well, and picked three wickets in the second T20I, but India still lost that game. As a new captain, you need to stick with your five bowlers. Batters will score runs, but bowlers win you matches,” Kumble said.

He further stressed the importance of backing players through difficult phases rather than dropping them after isolated failures.

“When you pick players, you need to keep backing them. Ups and downs are part and parcel of life. They keep happening, but that doesn’t mean failures end up with you getting dropped from the squad,” he added.

Continue Reading

Cricket news

Shreyas Iyer calls India’s record T20 defeat atrocious after England rout visitors

Shreyas Iyer termed India’s performance “atrocious” after England handed the visitors a record 125-run defeat in the third T20I, taking a 2-0 lead in the series.

Published

on

Shreyas Iyer

India captain Shreyas Iyer did not hold back while assessing his team’s performance after England handed the visitors their biggest-ever defeat by runs in T20 Internationals. Following the crushing 125-run loss at Trent Bridge, Iyer described India’s display as “atrocious” and admitted the team failed to execute its plans in all departments.

England posted a competitive 201/7 before dismantling India’s batting line-up, bowling them out for just 76 in 11.4 overs to move 2-0 ahead in the five-match T20I series after the opening game was washed out.

India register their heaviest T20 defeat

Chasing 202, India struggled from the outset against England’s pace attack. Jofra Archer and Josh Tongue consistently generated high pace and troubled the top order with the new ball.

Tongue produced career-best figures of 4/28, while Archer picked up 3/29 as India were bundled out for their second-lowest T20I total. The defeat surpassed India’s previous biggest T20 loss by runs, an 80-run defeat against New Zealand in 2019.

The result also came after India suffered a 2-0 T20I series defeat against Ireland last month.

Iyer admits India’s execution was poor

Speaking after the match, Iyer criticised his team’s overall approach and execution.

“It was atrocious. I can’t use a better word. Losing by such a big margin isn’t acceptable,” the India skipper said.

He acknowledged that England’s bowlers exploited the surface effectively but admitted India failed to respond.

According to Iyer, the batting unit could not build partnerships or establish a clear approach during the chase, leading to a rapid collapse.

England dominate with bat and ball

Earlier in the evening, Phil Salt anchored England’s innings with a well-made 70 after Jos Buttler had provided an aggressive start with 36. Salt accelerated after a cautious beginning, reaching his half-century in 36 deliveries, while Sam Curran remained unbeaten on 41 to help England cross the 200-run mark.

England captain Harry Brook praised Salt’s contribution and credited the bowlers for executing simple but effective plans with the new ball.

India’s innings never recovered after early wickets. Abhishek Sharma, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi and Ishan Kishan all departed cheaply before Archer dismissed both Iyer and Axar Patel to leave the visitors reeling. Will Jacks, Adil Rashid and Tongue shared the remaining wickets as England completed a comprehensive victory.

India look to bounce back in fourth T20I

Despite the heavy defeat, Iyer urged his teammates to move on quickly and focus on the remaining matches.

He said the team had played poor cricket but viewed the next game as an opportunity to respond positively and learn from the mistakes made in Nottingham.

England can seal the series with another victory in the fourth T20I at Bristol.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com