English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Ranjan Gogoi book brings back focus on his key judgments

Apart from the sexual harassment case, Gogoi has passed several key decisions either individually or as part of a bench which are a tad controversial.

Published

on

Ranjan Gogoi

By Deeksha Sharma

Former Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi has been in the news recently for his autobiography, Justice for the Judge. The book was released on Wednesday. But it has been a topic for both ridicule and amusement because of its title and its attempt to salvage Gogoi’s reputation.  

Now a nominated Rajya Sabha member, Gogoi said in an interview, “We all make mistakes and I have no difficulty in saying so”, when asked about the propriety of him leading the bench hearing the sexual harassment case against him.

On December 8, Rupa Publications held a grand launch for the book which was released by Gogoi’s successor in the Supreme Court, Justice (retired) S.A. Bobde. 

At the book launch and after, he gave interviews and was asked several questions about his decisions, judgements and, of course, the sexual harassment case levelled against him, in which he himself scheduled the hearing of the case and made observations about the motive and conduct of the complainant and claimed he was being targeted and maligned by vested interests. All in the name of tarnishing the judiciary.

Apart from the sexual harassment case, Gogoi has passed several key decisions either individually or as part of a bench which are a tad controversial.

Sabarimala Judgement

In 2019, the Supreme Court bench led by then Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi reviewed petitions challenging the Apex Court’s 2018 decision to allow women of all ages to enter Sabarimala temple, which said that matter should be considered by a larger bench. 

This decision was taken with a 3-2 majority, Justices R.F. Nariman (now retired) and D.Y. Chandrachud were the dissenters and were part of the majority in the 4-1 verdict of the 2018 order.

In the hearing, Gogoi said whether a court can intervene in matters that are essential to religion is yet to be decided, and this case is in reference to a larger bench of issues.

Rafale clean chit

In the same year, another bench headed by Gogoi gave a clean chit to the Narendra Modi government over allegations of corruption in India’s purchase of 36 Rafale jets from France’s Dassault Aviation. The deal had come under the corruption cloud because the initial contract was for 126 planes. Further, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s chowkidar comment had also queered the pitch. Rafale was the opposition’s main plank in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections but the surgical strike in response to the Pulwama killing of CRPF jawans and the nation rallying behind him saw PM Modi back in the office.

Sexual harassment case levelled against Former CJI Ranjan Gogoi

In 2019, a staffer of the Supreme Court, who was assigned duties at the Gogoi residence said that she had been sexually harassed by him.

Read Also: UKPSC Recruitment 2021: How to apply online for 318 posts? Check last date, eligibility, and salary

After this, he took suo motu cognisance of the matter and titled it as ‘In Re Matter of Great Public Importance Touching Upon the Independence of Judiciary.’ Not only this, he also heard the matter on a holiday and the bench was headed by him. Legal experts have decried Gogoi on several counts for the sheer lack of judicial propriety in his dealing with the case.

NRC

At a media house’s event, Gogoi said, “National Register of Citizens (NRC) is a game, a big game by the politicians.” But this statement is nothing as he himself has part of the game and part of the bench that directed and saw the implementation of the NRC in Assam from 2014 till its finalisation in 2019. 

The NRC is the first of the two-card bogey (the second being the Citizenship Amendment Act) that had put Indian Muslims especially in the Northeast and West Bengal on tenterhooks. The CAA led to several struggles including the now legendary sit-in by Muslim women at Shaheen Bagh.

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com