English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Trending

Odisha: Man pours acid on grandfather for denying money to buy liquor, arrested

The IIC of the Kendrapada Town Police Station Tapan Nayak informed victim Jaganbandhu Nayak has been admitted to the district headquarters hospital in Kendrapada. 

Published

on

Odisha Liquor case

A 32-year-old man was detained by the Odisha Police for pouring acid on his 80-year-old grandfather as the man was denied money for buying alcohol by his grandpa. The incident took place in Balagandi village of Kendrapada district of the state.

Mayna Nayak, the grandmother of the accused, filed a complaint at the Kendrapada town police station. In the complaint, she mentioned that her husband, Jaganbandhu Nayak was attacked with acid by their grandson, Niranjan Nayak. The reason told for the acid attack is the denial of money to the accused for buying alcohol by his grandpa. 

The IIC of the Kendrapada Town Police Station Tapan Nayak informed victim Jaganbandhu Nayak has been admitted to the district headquarters hospital in Kendrapada. 

The Kendrapada police detained the accused under IPC Section 307 (attempted murder) and 326 of IPC Section ( Voluntarily throwing or trying to hurl acid).  The bail request by the accused Niranjan, was denied by the Judge on Wednesday when he was presented to the court. The court directed the police to keep him in prison. 

The government of India has made strict rules to prevent incidents of acid attacks in India, Section 326A of the IPC provides for a minimum of 10 years imprisonment and it is extendable to life and with a fine. The fine is not rigidly fixed but it has to be just and reasonable to meet the medical expenses of treatment of the victim.

According to the data of the National Crime Records Bureau(NCRB), there were 102 acid attack cases in 2021, as compared to 105 in 2020 and 150 cases recorded in 2019. Though there seems a fall in such cases, it is almost negligible. 

West Bengal and Uttar Pradesh top the list of states with the high number of acid attack cases and these two states recorded the highest number of those cases, accounting for nearly 50% of all cases in the country year on year.

Even though, in 2019, the charge sheeting rate of acid attack cases was 83% but the conviction rate is at 54% only. In 2020, the conviction rate shows remarkable growth and the figures were recorded at 86% and 72% respectively. But, In 2021, conviction rate figures were very disappointing as the figures stood at 89% and 20% respectively.

Cricket news

India’s batting reshuffle under Gautam Gambhir draws sharp criticism after 2nd T20I loss

Former players Robin Uthappa and Dale Steyn criticised Gautam Gambhir’s batting shuffle after India’s 51-run defeat in the second T20I against South Africa.

Published

on

Gautam Gambhir

India’s heavy 51-run defeat against South Africa in the second T20I at Mullanpur has sparked intense scrutiny of head coach Gautam Gambhir’s tactical calls, particularly the decision to reshuffle the batting order. Former cricketers Robin Uthappa and Dale Steyn openly questioned the move, calling it a significant error that unsettled the Indian batting line-up

Experts question changes in India’s batting order

India’s chase of a daunting target never gained momentum after early wickets. Captain Suryakumar Yadav did not come in at his usual position, instead walking in after Axar Patel, and managed only five runs. The experiment raised eyebrows among experts, who felt India lost stability at a crucial phase of the innings.

Speaking during the post-match analysis, Robin Uthappa recalled Gambhir’s earlier comments about flexibility in the batting order but said the approach did not suit a high-pressure chase. He argued that when pursuing a big total, the team’s most dependable batters should take responsibility early rather than being pushed down the order.

Uthappa also pointed out that if Axar Patel was used as a pinch-hitter, the role demanded a far more aggressive approach. According to him, India needed calm and assurance after early setbacks, something the shuffled order failed to provide.

Dale Steyn calls decision a ‘major mistake’

Former South Africa pacer Dale Steyn echoed similar concerns, terming the move a “major mistake”. He stressed that Suryakumar Yadav is among India’s best batters and should not be treated as part of a trial-and-error strategy in a competitive T20I.

Steyn questioned the logic behind the left-right combination, noting that a right-handed batter had been dismissed, yet India ended up with two left-handers at the crease. He suggested that experimentation might be understandable in less critical situations, but not in a match where India had a chance to take a 2-1 lead in the series.

Call for clarity in top-order roles

Concluding his analysis, Uthappa urged Gambhir to settle on a fixed top three in the batting order. He emphasised that clarity of roles is essential in T20 cricket, especially during the powerplay overs. While flexibility can work later in the innings, constant changes at the top could harm the team’s rhythm.

Uthappa warned that prolonged experimentation might backfire at crucial moments in major tournaments, stressing that India cannot afford such uncertainty heading into high-stakes events.

Continue Reading

Cricket news

India vs South Africa 2nd T20I: Early collapse leaves India in trouble during 214 chase

India’s chase of 214 faltered early in the 2nd T20I as Shubman Gill and Abhishek Sharma fell inside two overs after South Africa posted 213/4, led by Quinton de Kock’s explosive 90.

Published

on

India’s chase of 214 began on a disastrous note in the second T20I in Mullanpur, with Shubman Gill and Abhishek Sharma falling inside two overs, putting immense pressure on skipper Suryakumar Yadav and the middle order.

India’s run chase unravelled quickly after South Africa posted 213/4, powered by a blistering 90 from Quinton de Kock, supported by Donovan Ferreira and David Miller’s late cameos. Varun Chakravarthy stood out with two wickets, while Jasprit Bumrah and Arshdeep Singh endured difficult spells, conceding 99 runs between them.

India stumbled early when Shubman Gill departed for a golden duck, edging one to slip. Abhishek Sharma tried counter-attacking with two sixes but soon fell to Marco Jansen’s sharp swing, leaving India at 19/2.

In a surprising move, Axar Patel walked in at No. 3—an aggressive tactical decision from the management. He struck a boundary but India remained under pressure at 25/2 after three overs.

Suryakumar Yadav, battling a lean patch, opened his account with a stylish four through backward point, trying to steady the chase.

South Africa, meanwhile, used Lungi Ngidi and Jansen effectively, tightening control after the early breakthroughs. India reached 32/3 by 3.5 overs and still needed 182 off 97 deliveries at 11.25 runs per over.

South Africa’s batting dominance sets India a stiff target

Quinton de Kock headlined the innings with 90 off 46 balls, smashing seven sixes. Ferreira and Miller capitalised late, while Bumrah’s last over leaked 18 runs. Arshdeep, struggling with his rhythm, bowled seven wides in a single over and finished with nine wides overall.

South Africa crossed 200 in the 20th over, closing on 213/4 and putting India under immense scoreboard pressure.

Continue Reading

Cricket news

Hardik Pandya calls selflessness his biggest USP after match-winning knock vs South Africa

Hardik Pandya’s blistering half-century and his emphasis on team-first cricket shaped India’s dominant win over South Africa in the first T20I in Cuttack.

Published

on

Hardik Pandya delivered a clinical all-round performance as India secured a dominant win over South Africa in the first T20I in Cuttack. His unbeaten 59 off just 28 balls not only revived India’s innings but also earned him the Player of the Match award. Speaking after the victory, Pandya said his ability to put the team’s needs above everything else remains his strongest asset.

Pandya reflects on his explosive knock and mindset

Walking in at a tense moment, Pandya counterattacked with calculated aggression, helping India post 175/6 — a total that eventually proved far beyond South Africa’s reach. He said adapting to the pitch quickly and trusting his game was key.

“I had to back my shots. I realised the wicket had a bit of spice. It was more about timing the ball, not breaking the ball,” Pandya said. He added that he was satisfied with how he paced his innings.

Pandya, who has spent the past several months working on his fitness, described the performance as personally rewarding. “These last 50 days, being away from loved ones, being at NCA, making sure that all these things are covered… it was satisfying when the results come like this,” he said.

‘What India wants, not what Hardik Pandya wants’

Pandya stressed that his biggest strength lies in being flexible and team-centric.
“As a cricketer, I have never been fussy about what roles I have. It doesn’t matter what Hardik Pandya wants, it is about what India wants. That is my biggest USP and that is what has helped me,” he stated.

He also explained the approach behind attacking spinner Keshav Maharaj, saying he simply capitalised when the ball entered his hitting zone.

India dominate with ball to seal 1-0 lead

India’s total, built by crucial contributions from Tilak Varma (26), Axar Patel (23) and Pandya’s late flourish, proved more than enough. Lungi Ngidi picked three wickets for South Africa, while Lutho Sipamla claimed two.

South Africa faltered early in the chase and were bowled out for 74 in 12.3 overs, with Dewald Brevis offering the only brief resistance. India’s bowlers — Jasprit Bumrah, Arshdeep Singh, Varun Chakravarthy and Axar Patel — all picked two wickets each, while Pandya and Shivam Dube took one apiece.

With leadership presence and batting brilliance, Pandya played a defining role in giving India a 1-0 advantage in the five-match series.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com