English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Babri Masjid demolition case: What happened till now?

Published

on

Babri Masjid case

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Senior BJP leaders LK Advani, Uma Bharati and Murli Manohar Joshi appears before Special Court in Lucknow for framing of conspiracy charges against them.

1949: Idols of Ram Lalla are secretly placed in the Central dome of  Babri Masjid.

1950: Ram Simla Visharad files first case in Faizabad civil court for granting rights to perform pooja to Ram Lalla.

1950: Paramahansa Ramachandra Das files suit for continuing pooja and keeping idols in the structure.

1959: Nirmohi Akhara files third suit, seeking direction to hand over the site. In 1961, Sunni Central Wakf Board files fourth suit, asking for possession. In the name of Ram Lalla Virajiman, Akhara files the fifith suit in 1989.

1986: District judge orders to remove the locks. Site was opened for Hindu worshippers.

1989: The four suits pending were transferred to the High Court.

1990: The then BJP President LK Advani embarks on a cross-country “rathyathra” to garner support for a Ram temple at the site. Bihar government arrests him on his arrival to the state. BJP withdrew its support for the then Janata government.

December 6, 1992: Karsevaks demolish Babri Masjid, thus creates a shock in the secular fabric of India. Two FIRs filed in the Babri Masjid case.

1993: 67 acres around the area was taken up by Government. It seeks Supreme Court’s opinion whether a Hindu worshipping place existed before the structure was built.

October, 1993: CBI files chargesheet and accuses Advani others of “conspiracy”.

1994: Case goes back to Lucknow High Court.

May 4, 2001: Special CBI court judge S.K. Shukla scraps conspiracy charge against 13 accused, including Advani and Kalyan Singh. Bifurcates Crimes 197 and 198.

May 20, 2010: Advani and other leaders absolved of conspiracy charges.

Allahabad High Court upholds May 24, 2001 judgment of scrapping conspiracy charges, dismisses CBI’s revision petition to proceed with conspiracy charges against Acvani and others.

September 30, 2010: Allahabad HC awards two thirds of disputed land to Hindu parties, and one third to Waqf Board.

February, 2011: CBI moves Supreme Court arguing, “the actual demolition of the Babri Masjid and the continuous assault on media persons form a single connected transaction and can well be a concerted conspiracy”.

May 9, 2011: Supreme Court stays Allahabad High Court verdict.

March 6, 2017: The top court indicates it may revive the conspiracy charge and order a joint investigation of crimes 197 and 198.

March 21, 2017: Chief Justice of India JS Khehar suggests an out-of-court rapprochement in the issue instead of a court battle, offering help to settle the issue amicably.

March 23, 2017: The Supreme Court appoints a bench of Justices P.C. Ghose and Rohinton Nariman for detailed hearing on the CBI appeal against the dropping of the criminal conspiracy charge against LK Advani and other BJP top leaders.

6 April, 2017: SC favours time-bound completion of trial in the Babri case and reserves order on CBI’s plea

April 19, 2017: The Supreme Court reinstates conspiracy charges against LK advani and Murli Manohar Joshi and 13 others in the Babri Masjid demolition case.

May 24: The Special CBI Court orders senior BJP leaders LK Advani, Union Minister Uma Bharti and Murli Manohar Joshi to appear before the court for filing conspiracy charges against them. The court in lucknow grants bail to former Shiv Sena MP Satish Pradhan after he surrenders.

May 26: Denying any exemption from appearing, the Special Court directs the BJP leaders Advani, Bharti and Joshi to appear on May 30 for filing charges.

May 30: Former Deputy Prime Minister LK Advani, Union Minister Uma Bharti, Murli Manohar Joshi appears before the court.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Assam makes Muslim marriage registration compulsory under new rules

Assam has approved rules for compulsory registration of Muslim marriages, with couples able to register through government marriage registrars.

Published

on

The Assam Cabinet has approved the Assam Muslim Marriage Registration (Compulsory) Rules, 2026, establishing the procedure for mandatory registration of Muslim marriages in the state.

The rules operationalise the Assam Compulsory Registration of Muslim Marriages and Divorces Act, 2024, which replaced the earlier Assam Muslim Marriages and Divorces Registration Act, 1935.

Who will register Muslim marriages in Assam?

Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said Muslim couples will now be able to register their marriages with government marriage registrars.

The government had earlier decided that kazis would not register Muslim marriages under the new system, but there was uncertainty over who would carry out the registration. The newly approved rules establish the registration mechanism through marriage registrars.

Sarma said that if the number of applications becomes large, the government could give marriage-registration powers to officers at the panchayat level so that applicants do not face difficulties.

What does the 2024 law say?

The 2024 Act made the registration of Muslim marriages and divorces with the government mandatory. It also prohibits registration of marriages that do not meet the legally prescribed minimum age requirements.

The law specifies the minimum marriage age as 18 years for females and 21 years for males.

The legislation was introduced by the Assam government with the stated objective of curbing child marriage and ending the earlier kazi-based registration system.

Under the previous 1935 law, marriage registration was conducted through kazis and was not compulsory. The earlier system also allowed registration involving minors in certain circumstances, while the new law does not permit such registration.

Registration timeline and penalties

The 2024 legislation provides that Muslim marriages should be registered within 30 days of the marriage. It also provides for registration of divorces within one month of their occurrence.

The law also contains penalties for violations. Producing fake or forged certificates can attract imprisonment of up to two years, a fine of up to Rs. 10,000, or both, along with action under relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Registering a marriage in violation of the law can attract imprisonment of up to one year and a fine of up to Rs. 50,000.

The Assam Cabinet’s approval of the 2026 rules provides the administrative framework for implementing the compulsory registration system.

Continue Reading

India News

Trump-Xi Summit: Trade, Taiwan and AI among key takeaways

Trade, Taiwan, artificial intelligence and strategic rivalry were among the key issues highlighted during Donald Trump’s summit with Xi Jinping in Washington.

Published

on

Trump-Xi Summit

US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping met at the White House amid discussions on trade, artificial intelligence and the broader strategic relationship between the United States and China.

The summit came as Washington and Beijing continued to navigate disagreements over tariffs, Chinese purchases, rare-earth supplies, technology restrictions and Taiwan.

Here are five key takeaways from the Trump-Xi summit.

Trade truce gets an extension

The United States and China agreed to extend their trade truce by two months, giving both sides additional time for negotiations.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the extension would provide Washington and Beijing more time to work on economic issues. However, several major questions remain part of the negotiations, including tariffs, Chinese purchases, rare-earth supplies and technology restrictions.

Bessent said China was meeting its earlier commitment to buy 25 million tonnes of US soybeans but was behind its pledge to purchase $17 billion worth of other agricultural goods.

US officials have also said that Chinese rare-earth deliveries were falling short.

Taiwan remains a major point of tension

Taiwan was another important issue during the discussions.

Xi Jinping pressed Trump on Taiwan and urged the United States to handle the issue with “prudence”, according to China’s official news agency. Its English-language service also said Xi hoped Washington would oppose Taiwanese independence.

The report noted that the US has traditionally said it does not support Taiwanese independence, while avoiding an explicit statement that it opposes it.

There was no immediate White House readout of the exchange on Taiwan.

Trump and Xi differ on AI

Artificial intelligence was another area where the two leaders expressed different positions.

Trump has said he wants to avoid new AI guardrails and instead rely on the US Department of Justice. He has also maintained that China shares this approach.

Xi, however, said the United States and China have both the capability and responsibility to develop and manage AI for good.

He said AI development should remain under human control and serve people’s well-being.

The contrasting positions underline the importance of AI and technology in the broader US-China relationship.

Strategic rivalry remains a concern

Xi also referred to the “Thucydides Trap”, a theory associated with the risk of conflict between a rising power and an established one.

He argued that competition between the United States and China should be about catching up rather than a contest in which one side must defeat the other.

Xi said the risks could be overcome and called for regular military dialogue and stronger mechanisms to prevent crises.

Trump, meanwhile, highlighted areas where the two countries could cooperate, referring to their shared wartime history and common interests.

Summit also featured elaborate ceremony

The White House visit was accompanied by an elaborate display of ceremony.

The programme included military performances, fighter jets and bombers flying overhead, as well as the recently redesigned South Lawn and a large helipad bearing the presidential seal.

The highly publicised setting contrasted with the unresolved differences between Washington and Beijing on trade, Taiwan, technology and strategic issues.

The summit therefore highlighted both the effort to maintain dialogue between the two powers and the significant issues that remain unresolved.

Continue Reading

India News

 Akhilesh Yadav launches SP’s 2027 UP poll campaign from Rahul Gandhi’s seat

Akhilesh Yadav launched the Samajwadi Party’s 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly election campaign from Rae Bareli, represented by Rahul Gandhi in the Lok Sabha.

Published

on

Akhilesh Yadav

Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav has formally begun the party’s campaign for the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections, launching the outreach from Rae Bareli, the Lok Sabha constituency represented by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi.

Yadav travelled through the area on the party’s newly launched PDA Rath before addressing a public meeting. The campaign vehicle carries the Samajwadi Party’s PDA messaging, referring to its focus on backward classes, Dalits and minorities.

Akhilesh Yadav discusses alliance with Congress

During his Rae Bareli visit, Yadav said the Samajwadi Party would contest the 2027 election as part of an alliance and indicated that seat-sharing would be decided on the basis of winnability.

He said the party would give a seat to whichever alliance partner is considered capable of winning it. The remarks come against the backdrop of the SP and Congress having contested the 2024 Lok Sabha election together in Uttar Pradesh.

Rae Bareli has particular political significance for the Congress as Rahul Gandhi is its sitting Lok Sabha MP. Yadav’s decision to begin the campaign from the constituency therefore placed the SP’s alliance with the Congress in focus.

PDA Rath becomes centrepiece of campaign

The PDA Rath was rolled out as part of the SP’s mobilisation ahead of the 2027 Assembly election. The vehicle prominently carries the party’s PDA messaging, with PDA standing for Pichhde, Dalit and Alpsankhyak.

The campaign is aimed at taking the SP’s social-justice messaging to voters across Uttar Pradesh as the party prepares for the Assembly election.

During the programme, Yadav also attacked the BJP and raised issues including the Election Commission and what he described as the alleged misuse of election machinery. These are political allegations made by the SP chief and should be understood as such.

BJP reacts to Akhilesh Yadav’s campaign

The launch of the PDA Rath comes as political activity intensifies in Uttar Pradesh ahead of the 2027 Assembly election.

The BJP has responded to Yadav’s campaign and his political messaging, while the SP has continued to focus its outreach on the PDA social coalition and its alliance strategy with the Congress.

The 2027 contest is still ahead, with parties using the period before the election to strengthen their organisational networks, public outreach and alliance arrangements.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com