English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

BJP’s ‘margdarshak mandal’ member Yashwant Sinha rips apart Modi, Jaitley on economy

Published

on

Yashwant Sinha

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]In an editorial for The Indian Express, the former finance minister indicts Jaitley for making a “mess” of the Indian economy, says he’s working “over-time” to ensure that all Indians see poverty at close quarters

In a no-holds barred critique of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union finance minister Arun Jaitley’s handling of the Indian economy, former finance minister and member of the BJP’s ‘margdarshak mandal’ Yashwant Sinha has echoed sentiments that until now were being voiced largely by members of the Opposition and some economic experts.

Sinha’s editorial in the Indian Express titled ‘I need to speak up now’ could not have come at a more opportune or worse time for the Modi government – depending on whose side the beholder stands.

While the Modi government has been working over-time to ward off allegations of pushing the Indian economy towards an impending doom with its demonetisation and hasty rollout of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, Sinha has lambasted Jaitley for “working over-time to make sure that all Indians” see poverty from “close quarters”.

The most hard-hitting attacks by the BJP veteran, who served as India’s finance minister during the Atal Bihari Vajpayee regime, have predictably been reserved for Jaitley. Sinha starts off by saying: “I shall be failing in my national duty if I did not speak up even now against the mess the finance minister has made of the economy.”

Interestingly, Sinha’s son Jayant, served briefly as minister of state for finance under Jaitley during the initial days of the Modi government. He was then moved out to the civil aviation portfolio – a shift that seemed to have more to do with his father’s strong views against the Modi government on critical issues than his performance as the junior finance minister – a role, many say, he was perfectly suited to.

Noting that he is convinced that his views are shared by “a large number of people in the BJP and elsewhere”, Sinha says that these people “are not speaking up out of fear”. At a time when almost anyone – including leaders from within the BJP (read: the likes of Sultanpur MP Varun Gandhi) and even ministers in the Modi government (ask Ravi Shankar Prasad) – who doesn’t condone the government or its ‘bhakts’ is subjected to unprecedented abuse on social media platforms like Twitter and stares at the wrath of the Pradhan Sevak, Sinha couldn’t have made a more accurate assumption of the situation.

Troika

Sinha says of the incumbent finance minister: “Arun Jaitley is considered to be the best and the brightest in this government… His losing his Lok Sabha election from Amritsar was not allowed to come in the way of this appointment (as finance minister)… His indispensability was established further when the prime minister rewarded him not only by giving him the finance ministry including the department of disinvestment, but also the ministries of defence and corporate affairs. Four ministries in one go out of which he still retains three.”

The former finance minister then goes on to rip Jaitley’s handling of the finance portfolio to shreds. “I have handled the ministry of finance and know how much hard work there is in that ministry alone. Finance ministry, in the best of times, calls for the undivided attention of its boss if the job has to be properly done. In challenging times it becomes more than a 24/7 job. Naturally, even a superman like Jaitley could not do justice to the task,” Sinha writes.

Claiming that Jaitley – “a lucky finance minister, luckier than any in the post-liberalisation era” wasted the ‘oil bonanza’ that the Modi government benefitted from in wake of the “depressed global crude oil prices (which) placed at his disposal lakhs of crores of rupees” Sinha says, the de-facto number 2 in the Modi cabinet not only allowed legacy problems like stalled projects and bank NPAs (non performing assets) to persist, but made them worse.

Sinha also endorsed the Opposition’s, in particular the Congress party’s, claims that the country’s GDP and growth indices were actually lower than what were being projected by the Modi government but that the current figures being thrown around by the likes of Jaitley, his ministerial colleagues and BJP spokespersons were actually arrived at by cleverly tweaking the manner in which they are calculated.

“The methodology for calculation of the GDP was changed by the present government in 2015 as a result of which the growth rate recorded earlier increased statistically by over 200 basis points on an annual basis. So, according to the old method of calculation, the growth rate of 5.7 per cent is actually 3.7 per cent or less,” Sinha writes.

It may be recalled that even this 5.7 per cent GDP growth rate is actually a three-year low and Jaitley himself had called the slump a “matter of concern.” Yet, the BJP leadership, Jaitley, of course included, had recently during the party’s national executive meet claimed that the Indian economy was actually flourishing under the Modi regime and that India had seen “unprecedented growth and development” since May 2014 – when the NDA stormed to power.

In his summary of the country’s economic condition, Sinha points to a picture that can at best be dubbed as abysmal. “Private investment has shrunk as never before in two decades, industrial production has all but collapsed, agriculture is in distress, construction industry, a big employer of the work force, is in the doldrums, the rest of the service sector is also in the slow lane, exports have dwindled, sector after sector of the economy is in distress, demonetisation has proved to be an unmitigated economic disaster, a badly conceived and poorly implemented GST has played havoc with businesses and sunk many of them and countless millions have lost their jobs with hardly any new opportunities coming the way of the new entrants to the labour market,” Sinha writes.

The BJP margdarshak also took a sharp swipe at BJP national president Amit Shah for recently declaring that the slump in the GDP was due to “technical reasons” and not because of Modi’s demonetisation or the GST rollout.

“Even the SBI, the largest public sector bank of the country, has stated with unusual frankness that the slowdown is not transient or “technical”, it is here to stay. It has openly contradicted what the BJP president said just a few days ago that the slowdown in the last quarter was on account of “technical” reasons and will be corrected soon. According to the SBI chairman, the telecom sector is the latest entrant to the long list of stressed sectors,” Sinha writes.

Sinha also raised doubts on whether Modi’s recent decision to revive and reconstitute the UPA-era Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, with NITI Aayog member Bibek Debroy as its head, would prove worthy of the ominous task of bringing the economy out if the doldrums.

“The prime minister is worried”, Sinha notes, adding that a “meeting convened by the prime minister with the finance minister and his officials appears to have been postponed indefinitely”. He goes on to then mock at the EAC saying: “Like the five Pandavas they (the five EAC members) are expected to win the new Mahabharat war for us.”

In the backdrop of the large scale raids that agencies like the CBI, Enforcement Directorate and the Income Tax department have been forced to undertake across India after demonetisation and the GST rollout to nab alleged black money hoarders and tax evaders, Sinha says: “Instilling fear in the minds of the people is the name of the new game.”

“We protested against raid raj when we were in opposition. Today it has become the order of the day. Post demonetisation, the income tax department has been charged with the responsibility of investigating lakhs of cases involving the fate of millions of people. The Enforcement Directorate and the CBI also have their plates full,” the BJP veteran says.

Adding his weight behind the Opposition’s argument that the Modi government is all about making tall claims and delivering little, if not nothing, Sinha says of the government’s proposed moves to revive the economy: “A hard landing appears inevitable. Bluff and bluster is fine for the hustings, it evaporates in the face of reality.”

The former finance minister clearly kept his ‘best for the last’, ending his piece with a sarcastic swipe at both Modi and Jaitley. “The prime minister claims that he has seen poverty from close quarters. His finance minister is working over-time to make sure that all Indians also see it from equally close quarters,” Sinha writes.

Evidently, the Opposition, especially the Congress party, is overjoyed at the BJP insider’s vociferous criticism of the Modi government.

Former finance minister and Congress leader P Chidambaram took to Twitter to endorse Sinha’s critique.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Congress vice president too took an effective dig at the BJP, using Sinha’s editorial as ammunition.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]The BJP and the Modi government are yet to reply to Sinha’s attack but given their past record one can expect a full panel of senior ministers and party spokespersons surfacing in television news studios and for briefings to hit back with “bluff and bluster”.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Delhi Police offers 11-person limit for CJP’s Connaught Place protest

Delhi Police has offered to facilitate a group of 11 people at Central Park in Connaught Place for the Cockroach Janata Party’s October 16 protest, while warning that violations of prohibitory orders could invite legal action.

Published

on

CJP protest to continue

Delhi Police has proposed allowing a group of 11 people to carry the national flag and sing the national anthem at Central Park in Connaught Place on October 16, ahead of a protest called by the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) over alleged electoral fraud.

The police said it could facilitate the group at a suitable place in the park, while appealing to the public not to join the proposed gathering in large numbers. The offer comes amid prohibitory orders in Connaught Place and adjoining areas under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).

CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke has called on people to assemble at Central Park at 5 pm on Friday with the national flag. The proposed demonstration, named “Lehra Do Tiranga”, follows the detention of CJP members Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka during an earlier protest.

Why Delhi Police proposed limiting the gathering

In its statement, Delhi Police cited the prevailing security and law-and-order situation in the area. It also referred to information from the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) that Central Park would remain closed on October 16 and 17 for administrative reasons.

Deputy Commissioner of Police Neha Yadav said the NDMC had informed the police about the closure and had asked that no gathering be allowed near the park.

The police also cited representations from trader and market associations in Connaught Place and surrounding areas. According to the police, the associations had raised concerns about unlawful assemblies and their impact on businesses, particularly during the festive season.

Police warned that violations of Section 163 BNSS would invite appropriate legal action. It also stressed that the national flag must be displayed and carried, and the national anthem sung, in the prescribed manner with due respect and dignity.

Delhi High Court declines to stop CJP protest

The proposed gathering reached the Delhi High Court after a vendor sought intervention over concerns about disruption to businesses and public movement in Connaught Place.

On Thursday, the court declined to restrain the CJP from holding the protest. It recorded the police’s assurance that all possible measures under the law would be taken to regulate the gathering and maintain peace.

The petition was filed by a vendor at Palika Bazar in Connaught Place, who raised concerns about the potential impact of the demonstration on traders and others working in the area.

Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, appearing for the authorities, told the court that steps had already been taken to regulate the proposed protest.

CJP’s protest call follows detention of party members

Dipke’s October 16 protest call follows earlier demonstrations over alleged electoral fraud. CJP members Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka are in jail on trespass charges after raising the national flag at Jantar Mantar earlier this week, according to the report.

The party has been protesting over alleged electoral fraud and has raised questions about the Election Commission.

Dipke has urged people to gather at Central Park with the national flag, arguing that raising the Tricolour should not be treated as a crime.

The police’s proposal to facilitate a group of 11 people came as the authorities sought to prevent a larger gathering at the site. The CJP’s response to the police’s offer was still awaited in the report published on October 15.

Continue Reading

India News

Actor Imran Khan asked to leave India after CJP protest

Actor Imran Khan has been asked to leave India by October 28, days after participating in a protest called by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) in Mumbai.

Published

on

Actor Imran Khan, nephew of Bollywood star Aamir Khan, has been asked to leave India by the Mumbai Police, days after participating in a protest organised by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) in Mumbai.

According to the notice, the actor has been given until October 28 to leave the country. The development follows his participation in the demonstration, which brought the actor into the spotlight over his involvement in a political protest.

Imran Khan is believed to hold US citizenship and an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card rather than full Indian citizenship, according to the report.

What led to the notice against Imran Khan?

The notice came days after Imran Khan joined a protest called by the CJP in Mumbai. The group, described as a satirical political organisation, had called for the demonstration.

The actor’s participation was followed by action from the authorities, with the Mumbai Police directing him to leave India by the specified deadline.

The notice does not, by itself, mean that the actor has already left the country or has been deported. October 28 is the deadline mentioned for his departure.

Imran Khan and his citizenship status

Imran Khan is known for his work in Hindi films, including Jaane Tu… Ya Jaane Na and Delhi Belly. He is also the nephew of actor Aamir Khan.

The report states that Imran Khan is believed to be a US citizen and hold an OCI card. OCI status does not confer Indian citizenship, although it provides eligible foreign citizens of Indian origin with specified privileges under Indian law.

The notice directing the actor to leave India follows his participation in the Mumbai protest. The reported development has brought attention to the intersection of immigration rules and the participation of foreign nationals in political demonstrations.

Continue Reading

India News

Election Commission orders voter roll revision in 17 states, UTs

The Election Commission has ordered a Special Summary Revision of electoral rolls in 17 states and Union Territories. Draft rolls are scheduled for November 12, with final rolls due on January 4, 2027.

Published

on

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has ordered a Special Summary Revision (SSR) of electoral rolls in 17 states and Union Territories, with the exercise aimed at facilitating voter registration and including eligible electors who may have been left out during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR).

The order was issued on Thursday, October 15, amid continuing political controversy over the SIR process and concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the exclusion of names from electoral rolls.

Under the announced schedule, January 1, 2027, will be the qualifying date for the revision. The draft electoral rolls are scheduled to be published on November 12, while the final rolls are due on January 4, 2027. Uttar Pradesh and Punjab, two states included in the exercise, are scheduled to go to the polls by February 2027.

Which states and Union Territories are covered?

The Special Summary Revision will cover the following 17 states and Union Territories:

  • Andaman and Nicobar Islands
  • Assam
  • Bihar
  • Chhattisgarh
  • Goa
  • Gujarat
  • Kerala
  • Lakshadweep
  • Madhya Pradesh
  • Manipur
  • Puducherry
  • Punjab
  • Rajasthan
  • Tamil Nadu
  • Uttar Pradesh
  • Uttarakhand
  • West Bengal

The Election Commission’s order follows earlier instructions issued to state election officials on September 29 to undertake a special drive to enrol eligible voters who had been left out, along with young and first-time electors.

Why has the Election Commission ordered the revision?

The announcement comes amid protests and political disagreements over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. Opposition parties have raised concerns about names being excluded during the exercise.

Another point of contention has been an additional declaration required from applicants submitting Form 6 for voter enrolment while the SIR was underway. The declaration required applicants to map their parents to the last SIR, which was conducted around 20 years ago.

The Election Commission had clarified on October 7 that the additional declaration applied only in states and Union Territories where the SIR was being conducted. It said the regular forms prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, would apply outside the SIR period.

The latest SSR order refers to applications for inclusion through Form 6 but does not mention the additional declaration.

What happens in states not covered by the current schedule?

The Election Commission has said that the schedule for the Special Summary Revision will be announced later in states and Union Territories where the SIR is ongoing or has recently been completed.

These include Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Chandigarh, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu, Haryana, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, the National Capital Territory of Delhi, Odisha, Sikkim, Tripura and Telangana.

For Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh, where the SIR has not yet started, the schedule for electoral roll revision will be announced in due course, taking local weather conditions into account.

The Election Commission’s latest order sets out a separate timeline for the 17 states and Union Territories covered by the current SSR exercise, while leaving the schedules for the other regions to be announced later.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com