English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

How Congress in Goa snatched defeat from the jaws of victory

Published

on

Manohar Parrikar has taken oath as Goa CM and will face a floor test on March 16

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Though they got 17 seats and was the single largest party, the BJP which secured only 13 had by Sunday sewn up deals with the Maharashtrawadi Gomantak Party (3) and Goa Forward Party (3) and some independents to present to the governor a list of 22 legislators

~By Sujit Bhar[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]The Goa situation has come to a critical point. As Governor Mridula Sinha called the BJP to form government—Chief Minister designate Manohar Parrikar had already resigned from his post at Defence Minister and taken oath as chief minister on March 14—Congress took time to realise that the BJP was actually the party that finished second at the hustings in the state. While the Congress got 17 seats, BJP managed 13.

Neither had the magic number of 21 to claim independent hold of the 40-member assembly of the state. By Sunday, and way before the Congress could get out of their slumber and move, the BJP had sewn up deals with the Maharashtrawadi Gomantak Party or MGP (3) and Goa Forward Party (3) and some independents (3 independents have won) to present to the governor a list of 22. While the governor should have traditionally called the largest party to show its strength, this quick response of the BJP (and no official claim by the Congress) had her in a bind. She called the BJP to form government and asked it to prove its strength on the floor of the assembly in 15 days.

That got the Congress’ goat. They rushed to the Supreme Court and demanded justice. The court is on vacation, but considering the urgency of the situation, the Chief Justice of India, JS Khehar, called a three-judge bench—others on the bench being Justices Ranjan Gogoi and R K Agrawal—to handle the case. The Supreme Court agreed that the floor test will have to be held on March 15 itself—the Congress had argued that the 15-day window was too large, fearing rampant “horse-trading”—but then came down heavily on the Congress. The court also refused to stop the oath-taking by Parrikar.

Senior Congress lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi petitioned as follows: “Election results were known by 11th evening. INC got the majority seats of 17 seats. On 12th Congress selected the CM but by then, on 12th evening, BJP’s Mr Parrikar goes to governor and same day he was appointed by governor as CM of Goa.”

His claim: “Extravagant discretion exercised by governor is not allowed as per Constitution. The governor should not have appointed without consulting the single largest party. Democracy is part of basic structure. We have now 21 members supporting the Congress party.
We had written to the governor that we will form the government.
The governor should have called us before appointing the CM.”

That was when the CJI interjected, saying: “You saw them saying they have the majority. But you never said you have the majority nor have you mentioned in this petition. You have not brought the affidavits of these people who are with you. You failed to show that the people who are mentioned in their list are with you.”
The court said: “If you had the numbers, you would have held a dharna at the Governor’s house.”

As counsel Singvi submitted that “It’s constitutionally and legally wrong,” Justice Gogoi replied: “Healthy constitutional practice should be followed, not the just the convention of calling the largest party.”

With things not so bright, Singhvi pleaded: “How can you give a window of 15 days to second largest party? Let there be a floor test today (March 14) or tomorrow.”

The Chief Justice said: “You could have demolished their case in 30 seconds. You could have just shown that they are with you. You are putting us also in the position of the governor. You have not shown that three people are with you.”

Singhvi admitted the lapse. He said: “I made a mistake by not showing that I agree. Our second prayer is to hold the floor test. What is the difficulty in holding the floor test today or tomorrow?”

Finally, the court acceded to his request and issued the order, the relevant section of which is as follows: “We … hereby direct, that all pre-requisite formalities for holding a floor test, including the formalities required to be completed by the Election Commission, be completed by 15.03.2017. We request the Governor of the State of Goa to ensure, that a floor test is held on 16.03.2017, and the only agenda for the day would be, the holding of a floor test to determine whether the Chief Minister administered the oath of office, has support of the majority. The floor test shall be held on 16.03.2017, as early as possible, but surely during the course of the same day.”

It’s not over

The Supreme Court may have acceded to the plea and ordered a floor test on Thursday. However, that is definitely not the end of the problems for Congress.

While Congress leader P Chidambaram tweeted: “The BJP is stealing elections in Goa, Manipur (in Manipur, too, the BJP has been invited to form government). Party that comes second has no right to form government,” Union Minister Nitin Gadkari, who is in charge of Goa affairs shot back: “The Congress was busy in Goa with five to six candidates claiming leadership. So they did not have time to discuss with alliance partners.”

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has reportedly said: “Governor in Goa had only one claim of 21 MLAs out of 40 with Parrikarji as leader. 17 MLAs of Congress did not even make a claim.”

The issue has boiled over to the Congress MLAs—many of them first-timers—who are reportedly furious that despite having the numbers, they could not stake claim. They were surprised and frustrated that the party was not able to get the support just four legislators from other parties to show a minimum of 21.

A visibly frustrated Jennifer Monserrate, an elected Congress MLA from Taleigao (North Goa) was reportedly heard saying: “It is miserable and horrible… people trusted the Congress and voted for us… we get a clear 17 seats and we still couldn’t manage to form government… we are the laughing stock.”

This is the level of degeneration and decadence that the Grand Old Party seems to have gone into. The rheumatic behaviour is so apparent that the party today can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Tension erupts at University of Hyderabad amid protests against redevelopment plans

Published

on

By

universityofhyderabad

Tensions escalated at the University of Hyderabad on Sunday as police clashed with students protesting the Telangana government’s plan to redevelop 400 acres of land adjacent to the campus. The situation quickly turned confrontational, resulting in a political uproar with the opposition Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) accusing law enforcement of using excessive force, including dragging students by their hair.

Students, who alleged bulldozers and earthmovers had been deployed for the redevelopment project, gathered to oppose the initiative. Although several demonstrators were taken into custody, they were later released.

The state government’s redevelopment plan aims to establish an IT park on the land bordering the university. Reports indicate the government issued a proposal to auction this land, prompting environmental concerns among students who argue that the proposal threatens both ecological balance and their academic environment.

In response, student protesters rallied at the site after witnessing the arrival of heavy machinery, voicing their opposition with slogans including “go back.” A separate group of marching students was heard chanting “police raj murdabad”.

Footage on social media depicted scenes of police confronting students and forcibly detaining them. The BRS, led by former CM K. Chandrashekhar Rao, claimed numerous bulldozers were brought to the site under police protection to clear the land. The party reported that students opposing the plan faced violent treatment, with allegations of physical assaults against them.

“Girls were left in tears after their clothes were torn during the clash, with authorities disregarding their distress as they were taken to the police station,” the BRS stated, citing that around 200 individuals had been arrested during the upheaval. They criticized the police for their actions, condemning the violent nature of the response to peaceful protests. The party further accused the Congress and Rahul Gandhi of hypocrisy, likening their political promises to a “market of betrayal,” contrasting with their prior campaign rhetoric.

In defence, Hyderabad Police reported that they had taken 53 students into preventive custody for obstructing government officials. Officials claimed that some students had even assaulted police officers during the protests, indicating that charges would be filed against them.

The university student union condemned the police crackdown, asserting that they had engaged in a peaceful demonstration and held the right to protest democratically. They accused law enforcement of forceful detentions and mishandling.

Responding to these events, Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy denied the students’ assertions of wrongful treatment, suggesting they were incited to protest. He reiterated that the land in question is part of the city’s IT hub and has been under government ownership since 1974, thus having no ties to the university.

Continue Reading

India News

In poll-bound Bihar, Amit Shah reminds people of Lalu Yadav’s era from 1990 to 2005, RJD reminds of Gujarat’s jungle raj

Tejashwi Yadav, Leader of Opposition in the Bihar Assembly, dismissed Shah’s claims, questioning the tangible benefits of the alleged financial aid.

Published

on

In a charged political atmosphere ahead of the Bihar Assembly polls, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, addressing a public rally in Gopalganj on Sunday, launched a scathing attack on Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) supremo Lalu Prasad Yadav, accusing him of plunging the state into chaos during his tenure from 1990 to 2005.

Shah, who arrived in Patna on Saturday, also held a meeting with National Democratic Alliance (NDA) leaders at the Chief Minister’s residence.

Speaking to a large crowd, Shah alleged that the Lalu-Rabri regime was synonymous with “jungle raj,” marked by lawlessness, murders, abductions, and the infamous fodder scam.

“Lalu Prasad did nothing for Bihar’s rural economy or development. Several sugar mills shut down, and the state suffered under his misrule,” Shah claimed, asserting that people reject the return of such disorder. He predicted a landslide victory for the NDA in the upcoming elections.

The Home Minister contrasted this with the BJP-led NDA’s efforts, claiming that while the previous United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government at the Centre allocated only ₹2.80 lakh crore to Bihar, the NDA provided ₹9.23 lakh crore, focusing on the state’s overall growth.

RJD leaders hit back fiercely. Shakti Singh Yadav, an RJD leader, accused Shah of hypocrisy, labelling him the “hero of Gujarat’s jungle raj and atank raj.” He pointed to the alleged deterioration in law and order under the BJP-JD(U) government in Bihar over the past two decades, citing rising crime rates.

Tejashwi Yadav, Leader of Opposition in the Bihar Assembly, dismissed Shah’s claims, questioning the tangible benefits of the alleged financial aid. “Big promises are made during elections, but they vanish post-polls. If Modi has given money, specify the sectors and show the work done in 20 years,” he challenged.

RJD MP Misa Bharti defended Lalu Prasad, highlighting his contributions as Railway Minister, including setting up three factories and establishing six universities in Bihar during his and Rabri Devi’s tenure.

The verbal duel escalated as Shah accused RJD supremo Prasad of involvement in multiple scams, including the fodder, bitumen, and flood relief material scams, alleging that those who “ate up fodder” could not prioritize public welfare.

The fodder scam, exposed in the 1990s when Jharkhand was part of Bihar, saw crores fraudulently withdrawn from state treasuries, with Lalu Prasad among those convicted.

Continue Reading

India News

Ballia woman death: Family rejects police claim of suicide, demands CBI probe

Authorities claim she was distressed and had viewed a YouTube video about suicide prior to her death.

Published

on

In Ballia, police have arrested two individuals in connection with the suspicious death of a young woman whose body was discovered hanging from a tree with her hands restrained. The incident has been classified as a potential suicide, but the victim’s family is adamant that she was murdered and is advocating for a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) inquiry.

The deceased, identified as Pooja, aged 20, was found in the Sarya Gulab Rai village within the jurisdiction of the Nagara police station on March 23. Police reports suggest that Pooja took her own life after her boyfriend blocked her number, as she was set to marry another man on April 25. Authorities claim she was distressed and had viewed a YouTube video about suicide prior to her death.

On Saturday, two men, Lalu Chauhan from Pooja’s village and Ram Dulare from Mau district, were taken into custody for their alleged roles in abetting her suicide and have since been remanded in jail. Superintendent of Police Omveer Singh indicated that Pooja had reached out to these individuals regarding her distress, but they failed to inform her family or the police of her situation.

The police investigation, based on a post-mortem report and other evidence, has led them to conclude that the case is leaning towards suicide. However, the family has lodged a complaint against four villagers, questioning the circumstances of Pooja’s death and alleging murder.

The formal autopsy was recorded on video and conducted by a panel of medical professionals, revealing no external injuries that would suggest foul play. Despite this, the family remains skeptical. Pooja’s sister, Neha, voiced her concerns in front of reporters, asserting that the police narrative is misleading and that the claim about watching a suicide video is unfounded given the restrictions on such content.

Neha is calling for a CBI investigation, citing a lack of trust in local law enforcement. Pooja’s father, Dharamraj, who himself works as a security guard at a police station, questioned how a suicide could occur under such bizarre circumstances, notably with the victim’s hands and feet tied.

The investigation continues, with officials stating that the evidence collected thus far does not strongly implicate the individuals named in the initial complaint, although they are pursuing all avenues in this complex case.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com