English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Judiciary and Executive spar in open court over judges’ appointments

Published

on

Judiciary and Executive spar in open court over judges' appointments

A case relating to judges’ vacancies in high courts of states of Manipur, Meghalaya and Tripura on Friday, May 4, witnessed an open clash between the judiciary and the executive in a manifestation of the tension that has built up between the two branches of the State over appointment of judges.

The Supreme Court bench of Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta, hearing a transfer plea of a litigant from Manipur, pulled up the Centre for not clearing the names recommended by the Supreme Court Collegium for appointment as judges, causing undue harassment to litigants. Terming it “an unfortunate situation”, the SC had issued notice to the Centre on April 17.

On Friday the Attorney General KK Venugopal assured the court that appointments to high courts in the northeast would be made soon, but said that will not resolve the problem of vacancies in all high courts. “Collegium has to look at the future. Recommendations need to be made keeping in mind vacancies that will arise six months later,” Venugopal said, pointing out that though some High Courts had 40 per cent vacancy, only a few names were being recommended for appointments. “Collegium doesn’t send us the names and the government is told it is being tardy in processing,” he said.

“Why is the Collegium recommending fewer names when there are so many vacancies in high courts?” asked Venugopal.

The bench told Venugopal that this did not give the government the liberty to sit over names sent long back.

The two-judge bench asked the AG: “Tell us, how many names (recommended by the Collegium) are pending with you.”

The AG replied: “I will have to find out”.

The bench shot back: “This is the problem with you (the government). When it comes to attacking (the) judiciary, you have the data. But when it comes to the government then you say you don’t have the figures.”

The petitioner wanted the Supreme Court’s permission to challenge an order of a single judge of the Manipur High Court before the Gauhati High Court. He claimed he could not file an appeal in the Manipur High Court since it had only two judges, one of whom had given the order. The Supreme Court had sought the Attorney General’s assistance in the matter.

Venugopal said that on April 19, the Collegium recommended a name for appointment as Chief Justice of the Manipur High Court. He said he had spoken to the authorities and they had promised that the appointment would be notified “shortly”.

“Your shortly… can be several months. What are you doing?” the bench asked the AG.

Venugopal replied the government was serious about the appointment and that the same would be done in 10 days, said a report in The Hindustan Times (HT).

The bench said the situation in the North-East was ‘critical’. “In Meghalaya, there is only one judge against four. Even Tripura has just two against four. Recommendation was also made for Meghalaya. What happened to that?… People of North-East are suffering… What are they supposed to do? Should they come here to get their cases transferred to other High Courts and spend money to hire lawyers there?” the bench said.

The Attorney General remarked, in a lighter vein, that the National Judicial Appointments Commission — the NJAC Act was invalidated by the Supreme Court in 2015 — may have been more suitable for dealing with the appointment of judges.

Justice Lokur said the bench was only concerned with appointments to High Courts in the North-East and asked the Attorney General to file an affidavit explaining the position in the next 10 days.

Justice MB Lokur is one of the senior-most judges of the Supreme Court and a member of the collegium that nominates judges to the apex court. This was the first time a member of the collegium has spoken out over the stand-off between the collegium and the government on the appointment of judges, said the HT report.

Last week, while the Centre cleared the appointment of Indu Malhotra as a judge of the Supreme Court, it asked the Collegium to reconsider the recommendation that Justice KM Joseph from the Uttarakhand high court be elevated to the top court. The Collegium had recommended names of both judges together, in the first week of January.

India News

Trinamool Congress hits back after BJP twists Mamata Banerjee’s remark on religion at Eid event

“Efforts are underway to incite riots, but I implore you not to get ensnared by these tactics. The West Bengal government is dedicated to protecting minority rights, and we will not allow tensions to arise in the state,” she asserted.

Published

on

The Trinamool Congress (TMC) on Monday hit back at the BJP after its leaders twisted West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee’s remark on religion during an event on the occasion of Eid in Kolkata.

Dismissing the BJP accusations against Banerjee of insulting the Hindu religion, Trinamool Congress state vice president Jaiprakash Majumdar said that the party supremo has never criticised the Hindu religion but has consistently opposed the BJP’s communal agenda.

“She has always spoken out against the BJP’s divisive politics, positioning itself as the self-appointed custodian of Hindu interests,” Majumdar said.

During an Eid celebration in Kolkata, CM Banerjee stated, “I adhere to the principles of Shri Ramakrishna Paramahansa and Swami Vivekananda, and I do not subscribe to the ‘ganda dharam’ propagated by some factions, including the BJP, who themselves are misaligned with true Hindu values.”

Retorting sharply to Banerjee’s remarks about the BJP’s “divisive politics,” the saffron party accused her of undermining Hindu beliefs, labelling the BJP’s ideology as contrary to the core tenets of Hinduism.

Addressing the gathering at Red Road in Kolkata, Banerjee urged citizens to remain vigilant against provocations that could spark communal unrest, affirming the state’s commitment to maintaining peace and harmony.

In reply, Leader of the Opposition in the West Bengal Assembly, Suvendu Adhikari, challenged Banerjee’s comments, asking, “Which faith are you labelling as ‘ganda’ (dirty)? Is it the Sanatan Hindu Dharma? Why would you use such incendiary language at an Eid celebration? Was this a religious observance or a political statement? Your words are sowing discord and animosity between communities.”

Banerjee, the Trinamool Congress supremo, further said that no religion advocates hatred towards others, criticizing political leaders and parties that exploit communal sentiments for their own gain. She cautioned against attempts to instigate riots, urging the public to resist such provocations.

“Efforts are underway to incite riots, but I implore you not to get ensnared by these tactics. The West Bengal government is dedicated to protecting minority rights, and we will not allow tensions to arise in the state,” she asserted.

Challenging the BJP further, Banerjee asked, “If the BJP has grievances with minorities, do they intend to amend the Constitution of the country?”

Reiterating her commitment to interfaith respect, she condemned the BJP’s divisive strategy, which she termed “jumla politics.”

Additionally, she criticized the Left, stating, “The ideologies of the Left and the BJP have converged, but rest assured, I will not allow any harm to befall you.”

Meanwhile, adding to his party leader in attacking the chief minister, BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya remarked, “Is Mamata Banerjee suggesting that Sanatan Dharma is ‘Ganda Dharam’? Amidst numerous riots targeting Hindus during her tenure, she belittles their faith and offers a platform for further hostility against them, even at an Eid celebration. This is unacceptable.”

Continue Reading

India News

Nidhi Tewari, an IFS officer, appointed personal secretary to PM Modi

Originally from Mehmurganj in Varanasi, which has been Prime Minister Modi’s Lok Sabha constituency since 2014, her professional background adds a layer of significance to her appointment.

Published

on

Nidhi Tewari has been appointed as the private secretary to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as officially announced in a memorandum issued by the central government. Tewari, a 2014-batch Indian Foreign Service (IFS) officer, assumes this critical role following her previous position as Deputy Secretary in the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) since November 2022.

In her earlier role, Tewari worked as an Under Secretary in the Disarmament and International Security Affairs Division at the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA). There, she handled vital responsibilities related to External Affairs, Atomic Energy, and Security Affairs. Additionally, she managed issues pertaining to the state of Rajasthan, showcasing her diverse expertise in both domestic and international matters.

The formal appointment of Tewari, effective immediately, was approved by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet. This decision was documented in a memorandum issued by the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) on March 29, indicating a structured process behind her selection.

Tewari’s journey to this notable position reflects not only her dedication but also her impressive track record in civil services. She secured the 96th rank in the 2013 Civil Services Examination, a testament to her hard work and determination. Originally from Mehmurganj in Varanasi, which has been Prime Minister Modi’s Lok Sabha constituency since 2014, her professional background adds a layer of significance to her appointment.

Before entering the Indian Foreign Service, Tewari worked as an Assistant Commissioner (Commercial Tax) in Varanasi. Balancing her job responsibilities while preparing for the Civil Services Examination speaks volumes about her ability to manage challenging tasks effectively.

With Nidhi Tewari’s appointment, Prime Minister Modi now has his third private secretary, following Vivek Kumar and Hardik Satishchandra Shah, who have both previously held the position. Tewari’s extensive experience and familiarity with various affairs make her well-suited for this influential role, as she steps into a vital position within the Prime Minister’s close circle. Her diverse background and commitment to public service are expected to serve her well in this new capacity.

Continue Reading

India News

Filmmaker Sanoj Mishra arrested for raping woman for 4 years on pretext of marrying her

The case revolves around allegations made by a 28-year-old woman from a small town, who accused Mishra of repeatedly raping her over four years under the false promise of marriage.

Published

on

Sanoj Mishra, a filmmaker known for offering a role to viral sensation Monalisa during the Kumbh Mela, was arrested by the Delhi Police on Monday for allegedly raping an aspiring female actor for over four years on the pretext of marrying her.

The 45-year-old director, who lives with his family in Mumbai, was apprehended in Ghaziabad following extensive intelligence work and technical surveillance.

The arrest came after the Delhi High Court rejected Mishra’s bail application, paving the way for his custody by the Nabi Karim Police Station. The case revolves around allegations made by a 28-year-old woman from a small town, who accused Mishra of repeatedly raping her over four years under the false promise of marriage.

According to the complainant, she had been in a live-in relationship with Mishra in Mumbai while pursuing her dream of becoming a film actor. She further alleged that Mishra coerced her into undergoing abortions on three separate occasions. In her complaint, lodged on March 6, 2024, she also claimed that Mishra betrayed her trust by refusing to fulfill his marriage commitment.

The Delhi Police confirmed that an FIR was registered against Mishra under multiple sections, including rape, assault, causing miscarriage without consent, and criminal intimidation. The woman’s allegations were substantiated during her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). Authorities also collected medical evidence related to the alleged abortions from Muzaffarnagar, strengthening the case.

The incident that prompted the complaint occurred on February 18, 2025, when Mishra allegedly took the victim to Hotel Shiva in Nabi Karim. According to the police, he engaged in physical relations with her during this encounter before abandoning her, which led her to report the matter to the authorities.

Mishra’s arrest marks a significant development in the case, following the Delhi High Court’s decision to deny him bail after a detailed review of the evidence. The filmmaker, who gained attention for his work in the film industry, now faces serious legal consequences as the investigation continues.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com