English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Late Meeting with the Late Naipaul

Published

on

Late Meeting with the Late Naipaul

~By Dilip Bobb

Well before the encounter actually took place, meeting Vidia Naipaul seemed a daunting prospect. That was mainly because of the interviews he had given or remarks he had made where he came across as cantankerous old man with inherent biases and complexes. He had also showed, on innumerable occasions, a dislike for journalists who asked him awkward questions about women, other writers, his love/hate relationship with India and his dark, unsparing view of the world around him.  Naipaul, or ‘Sir Vidia’ as he liked to be called, was no stranger to India—his India trilogy was proof enough—-but I met him face to face when he was passing through Delhi en route to Goa to be the star attraction at Tarun Tejpal’s Thinkfest in Goa. Naipaul had proved a major benefactor to Tejpal’s Tehelka magazine and he had agreed for a quiet dinner with a small group of invitees, which included me. The dinner took place in a reserved area at the Park Hotel in central Delhi and when I arrived, according to Delhi Time, I was clearly late—Sir Vidia was already ensconced in a corner table with his wife Nadira hovering protectively over him. Tarun, an old friend and former colleague, took me over and introductions were made but it was obvious that it was Nadira, his second wife and 20 years his younger, would act as his mouthpiece and steer us away from conversations he was averse to.  I had spoken to her earlier, on the telephone during a visit to London where I wanted to interview him, and she had made it clear that she controlled access to him and decided whom he should and should not meet.

At the Park hotel, she was playing that role effectively, and the much awaited meeting with Naipaul was turning into a farce, till she got up from her chair to bring dinner for her celebrated husband from the buffet table. I quickly slipped into her seat and asked the Man how he was enjoying Delhi. “I have not stepped out of the hotel,” he said gruffly, going into a rather descriptive account of a stomach ailment and Delhi’s ‘poisonous air’ and ‘unhygienic habits’ which reminded me of his Indian trilogy, starting with An Area of Darkness, his deeply pessimistic work which was almost banned for its excessively negative portrayal of India. In fact, when an attractive young hostess from the restaurant approached him to inquire if he wanted a refill of his glass of red wine, he brusquely brushed her away. It reminded me of his famous, or infamous, remark that ‘Indian women wear a coloured dot on their foreheads to say “my head is empty’. His misogyny was well known so it was no surprise, but when I asked him his views on Indian writers his self-centred disdain was again in evidence, saying he had read very few of them, but did grudgingly, acknowledge individual works by Vikram Seth and the late R.K. Narayan. Tarun had joined us by now and I ventured to ask Naipaul if he was looking forward to Goa. “It sounds very exhausting,’ he said, looking up at Tarun Tejpal. “I am getting too old for this kind of caper.” He had just celebrated his 80th birthday and looked quite fed up, literally and figuratively, barely an hour into our private dinner. I got up before Fearless or Fearsome Nadira returned to boss over him, and left with no feeling at all of having met the literary genius who wrote A House for Mr Biswas,   The Enigma of Arrival and In a Free State. As a writer, he was a giant. As a person, he was far less than the sum of his fame. I was immediately reminded of a passage in the obituary on him in the New York Times. “Naipaul was a difficult man. He cultivated an air of superciliousness. He treated interviewers the way cats treat mice, condescending to them and pouncing on their, in his view, naïve and ridiculous questions.” Quite.

India News

YouTuber Jaspreet Singh questioned by Assam Police over case for promoting obscenity

Of the accused, only Apoorva Makhija has yet to appear, having previously cited being out of the country alongside Singh in emails to the police, prompting fresh summons.

Published

on

Stand-up comedian and YouTuber Jaspreet Singh appeared before the Assam Police’s Crime Branch in Guwahati on Saturday, April 12, for questioning in a case accusing him and four others of promoting obscenity through a publicly accessible online show. The case, filed on February 10, alleges that the content featured sexually explicit and vulgar discussions, offending public decency and morality.

A police officer confirmed that Singh met with the investigating officer (IO) in the afternoon, where his statement was recorded. “He was examined thoroughly as part of the ongoing probe,” the officer stated. Singh’s appearance follows that of fellow YouTuber Samay Raina, who was questioned on April 5.

Of the accused, only Apoorva Makhija has yet to appear, having previously cited being out of the country alongside Singh in emails to the police, prompting fresh summons.

The Guwahati Police initiated the case against Singh, Raina, Ranveer Allahabadia, Ashish Chanchlani, Makhija, and others, including the owner of the venue where the controversial show was filmed.

The charges fall under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the Information Technology Act, the Cinematograph Act of 1952, and the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act of 1986, reflecting the severity of the allegations.

Allahabadia faced questioning on March 7, cooperating fully during a session lasting over four hours and pledging continued assistance, including future visits to Guwahati if required.

The Supreme Court granted him protection from arrest but labeled his remarks in the show as “vulgar.” Chanchlani, the first to appear on February 27, secured anticipatory bail from the Gauhati High Court on February 7.

Continue Reading

India News

Sukhbir Singh Badal elected SAD president again

Badal had initially stepped down on November 16; however, the committee urged him to withdraw his resignation, indicating that they would collectively resign if he did not reconsider.

Published

on

Sukhbir Singh Badal, who previously resigned from his position in November of last year, was re-elected unopposed as the president of the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) on Saturday, April 12.

Following a determination by the Akal Takht, which deemed him ‘tankhaiya’ (guilty of religious improprieties) due to “errors” made by the Shiromani Akali Dal and its administration, Badal had been engaged in voluntary service at the Golden Temple. Notably, he survived an assassination attempt in December 2024 during this challenging period.

A total of 524 delegates from Punjab and various other states cast their votes in favor of Sukhbir Singh Badal. His candidacy was put forward by Balwinder Singh Bhundar, the working president of the party, and was seconded by fellow party leader Paramjit Singh Sarna. The election took place at the Teja Singh Samundari hall located within the Sri Darbar Sahib complex in Amritsar, according to reports.

As part of its electoral process, SAD appointed a total of 567 delegates, selecting four representatives from each of the 117 Assembly constituencies across Punjab, as per the reports. Prominent party figures in attendance included Badal’s wife and Bathinda MP, Harsimrat Kaur Badal, former ministers Bikram Singh Majithia and Daljit Singh Cheema, as well as senior leader Mahesh Inder Singh Grewal.

Sukhbir Badal has been leading the Shiromani Akali Dal since 2008, when he took over from his father, the esteemed Parkash Singh Badal. He held this leadership role until his resignation in 2024.

Following his re-election, the party is scheduled to host a political conference on April 13 at Talwandi Sabo (Bathinda), where Badal will address party members, reports further suggested.

On January 10, the SAD working committee formally acknowledged Sukhbir Singh Badal’s resignation from the position of party chief. Badal had initially stepped down on November 16; however, the committee urged him to withdraw his resignation, indicating that they would collectively resign if he did not reconsider.

On December 4, 2024, during a significant security incident at the Golden Temple, Sukhbir Singh Badal was targeted in a shooting while fulfilling his duties as a volunteer (‘sevadar’). Despite being in a wheelchair at the time, he escaped injury, as the bullet struck a nearby wall.

The assailant, identified as Narayan Singh Chaura, was subdued by bystanders outside the Golden Temple. Badal was serving a religious punishment (‘tankhah’) which had been imposed by the Akal Takht—the highest authority within the Sikh community—due to “mistakes” linked to his father, Parkash Singh Badal, during his tenure as Chief Minister from 2007 to 2017.

Following the directive, Sukhbir was required to volunteer at multiple significant Sikh sites, including Takht Damdama Sahib, the Darbar Sahib in Muktsar, Fatehgarh Sahib, and the Golden Temple, dedicating two days to each location.

Continue Reading

India News

Waqf protest turn violent in Bengal, leaves 3 dead, 118 arrests after Murshidabad unrest

Three people were killed and over 100 arrested as anti-Waqf Act protests in West Bengal’s Murshidabad turned violent. CM Banerjee says the state will not implement the law.

Published

on

Bengal Waqf protest

Three people lost their lives in West Bengal’s Murshidabad district on Friday as violent clashes erupted during protests against the recently passed Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025. The situation has sparked tension across several parts of the state, including Malda, South 24 Parganas, and Hooghly.

According to police reports, 118 individuals have been arrested in connection with the violence. The protests, primarily in Muslim-majority areas like Murshidabad and Jangipur, escalated into large-scale confrontations involving arson, stone pelting, and road blockades. Police vehicles were set ablaze, and security forces were targeted with stones.

In response to the unrest, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee made it clear that her government does not support the amended law. In a post on X, she stated, “We have made our position clear on this matter — we do not support this law. This law will not be implemented in our state. So what is the riot about?”

Emphasizing the need for calm, Banerjee appealed for peace and cautioned against using religion for political ends. “Remember, we did not make the law that many are agitating against. The law was made by the central government. So the answer you want should be sought from the central government,” she said.

Director General of Police Rajeev Kumar issued a warning to protestors, stating that the state police would not allow any disruption of law and order under the guise of protests.

Meanwhile, state BJP president Sukanta Majumdar criticized the Trinamool-led administration, urging it to enforce law and order in Murshidabad. He alleged that the violence was a result of the government’s appeasement politics and claimed it was possibly a distraction from the recent Supreme Court verdict that invalidated the jobs of 26,000 school teachers.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com