English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Tarun Tejpal charged with rape, sexual harassment; trial from Sep. 28

Published

on

Tarun Tejpal charged with rape, sexual harassment; trial from Sep. 28

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Accusations have been brought by Tejpal’s former employee, a woman, who also happens to be a friend of Tejpal’s daughter. The incident dates back to November 2013

A trial court in North Goa’s Mapusa, on Thursday, fixed the hearing for September 28 on the order of framing of charges against former Tehelka magazine editor-in-chief Tarun Tejpal, who has been accused of raping a junior colleague in 2013.

“Final charges are 354 (A), 354 (B), 341, 342, 376(2) F, 376(2) K. Section 376 is not there. The court will frame the charge and then we will see and examine the order and will decide the next course of action,” Tarun Tejpal’s lawyer Pramod Dubey told news agency ANI, soon after the court announced the charges and said that the trial will commence on September 28.

Stringent provisions of Sections 376(2)F and 376(2)K of the Indian Penal Code, introduced in the law after the 2012 Nirbhaya gangrape and murder case, say a person who is in position of power and trust will face a maximum of life imprisonment for rape.

The accusations have been brought by Tejpal’s former employee, a woman, who also happens to be a friend of Tejpal’s daughter. The incident took place in an elevator of a five star hotel in Goa, where Tehelka and Tejpal were conducting a function, THiNK 2013 in November of that year.

The allegations by the rape survivor had kicked up a nationwide outrage, forcing Tejpal, who had admitted to “bad lapse of judgment” and an “awful misreading of the situation”, to quit the magazine he founded.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1504789887587{padding-top: 5px !important;padding-right: 5px !important;padding-bottom: 5px !important;padding-left: 5px !important;background-color: #d1d1d1 !important;border-radius: 15px !important;}”]

Mentioned below are the charges under IPC that have been slapped against Tejpal:

354 (A): Sexual harassment, involving a man committing any of the following acts—

–        Physical contact and advances involving unwelcome and explicit sexual overtures; or

–        A demand or request for sexual favours; or

–        Showing pornography against the will of a woman; or

–        Making sexually coloured remarks, shall be guilty of the offence of sexual harassment.

354 (B): Assault or use of criminal force to woman with intent to disrobe (Any man who assaults or uses criminal force to any woman or abets such act with the intention of disrobing or compelling her to be naked)

341: Wrongful restraint

342: Wrongful confinement

376(2)F: Rape (being a relative, guardian or teacher of, or a person in a position of trust or authority towards the woman, commits rape on such woman)

376(2)K: Rape (being in a position of control or dominance over a woman, commits rape on such woman)[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Earlier in June, the Mapusa Court restricted the media from reporting any proceedings in the case against Tejpal. The court passed the order under 327 (3) barring the media from covering the proceedings until completion of the trial.

FILE PHOTO OF PROTESTS AGAINST TEJPAL FOLLOWING THE CASE

FILE PHOTO OF PROTESTS AGAINST TEJPAL FOLLOWING THE CASE

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]On Thursday, in its 48-page order, the court has detailed previous judgments before arriving at the decision that Tejpal needs to go on trial for all charges.

Initially, Tejpal was booked under 354-A, 376 and 376(2)(k) IPC  by crime branch. The probe later added sections 341 and 342, 376 (2) (f), 376C and Section 354 of the IPC.

The hearings took over three years, with the defence claiming material evidence to prepare its side. It was only in June that the prosecution asked for an additional IPC section of 354B, which punishes criminal intent to disrobe a woman. When asked if they were satisfied with the order, public prosecutor Francisco Tavora said, “Well the court has considered all our arguments. The court has made reference to whatever precedence they could rely on. We had to establish prima facie case and this is more than a prima facie case.”

Local media channels reported that Tejpal gave a small laugh when the court decided on the date. He was accompanied by his family.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

ED summons Pinarayi Vijayan in money laundering case

The Enforcement Directorate has summoned former Kerala chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan for questioning in a money-laundering investigation linked to alleged payments by Cochin Minerals and Rutile Ltd to his daughter’s company, Exalogic Solutions.

Published

on

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has summoned former Kerala chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan for questioning in connection with a money-laundering investigation linked to Cochin Minerals and Rutile Ltd (CMRL). Officials said he has been asked to appear before the agency at its Kochi office on October 23.

The summons has been issued under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The investigation concerns alleged payments by CMRL to Exalogic Solutions, a now-defunct company associated with Vijayan’s daughter, Veena T.

The development comes after Kerala’s Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) registered cases against Vijayan and members of his family in connection with the alleged bribery case.

What is the CMRL-Exalogic case?

The case centres on alleged payments made by CMRL to Exalogic Solutions under the guise of information technology consultancy services.

According to the ED, CMRL allegedly made fraudulent payments of Rs. 2.78 crore to the company. The agency is examining the financial transactions as part of its money-laundering investigation. These remain allegations and should not be treated as established criminal wrongdoing.

The matter came before the Kerala High Court, which on October 9 directed the VACB to register a case based on material submitted by the ED. The state agency subsequently registered cases involving Vijayan and his family members.

Pinarayi Vijayan challenges FIR order

Vijayan approached the Supreme Court on October 16, challenging the Kerala High Court order directing the registration of an FIR against him.

The legal challenge followed developments in the state courts concerning the alleged CMRL-Exalogic transactions. The ED’s summons is a separate step in its investigation under the anti-money-laundering law.

The case involves allegations of financial irregularities linked to payments to Exalogic Solutions. The investigation and legal proceedings are ongoing; the summons itself does not establish guilt.

Continue Reading

India News

LK Advani, 98, hospitalised in Delhi with chest infection

Veteran BJP leader LK Advani, 98, has been admitted to Delhi’s Indraprastha Apollo Hospital with a chest infection. Hospital officials said his condition was stable.

Published

on

Veteran Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and former Deputy Prime Minister Lal Krishna Advani has been admitted to Indraprastha Apollo Hospital in Delhi with a chest infection. Hospital officials have said that his condition is stable.

The 98-year-old leader was brought to the hospital at around 7.30 pm on Friday, October 16, and admitted to its pulmonary department. He is receiving treatment and remains under observation by a team of doctors, with medical tests underway.

LK Advani’s recent hospitalisation

Advani was previously admitted to Apollo Hospital in May 2026 because of age-related health complications. He remained under medical care for a few days before being discharged, according to the report.

In December 2024, the veteran BJP leader was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Indraprastha Apollo Hospital for medical management and investigations. He received treatment under the supervision of a neurologist, and the hospital had described his condition as stable at the time.

On December 17, 2024, the hospital reported gradual improvement and indicated that he was likely to be moved out of the ICU within the next one to two days.

Advani’s political career

Advani has been a prominent figure in the BJP’s rise in Indian politics. He served as the party’s president on multiple occasions and played a significant role in expanding its organisational presence.

His 1990 Ram Rath Yatra became a major event in the country’s political history. He later served as Union Home Minister and was India’s Deputy Prime Minister from 2002 to 2004 in the government led by Atal Bihari Vajpayee.

In recognition of his contribution to public life, Advani was awarded the Bharat Ratna, India’s highest civilian honour, in 2024. He had previously received the Padma Vibhushan in 2015.

Continue Reading

India News

Centre sends 3 letters to Punjab government after anti-drug activist’s killing

The Centre has sought reports from the Punjab government on three incidents linked to allegations surrounding drug-related activities, including the killing of anti-drug activist Parvinder Singh Jhota.

Published

on

Amit Shah

The Union government has sought detailed explanations from the Punjab government regarding three incidents linked to concerns over drug-related activities in the state. The move follows the killing of anti-drug activist Parvinder Singh Jhota in Mansa and comes amid renewed scrutiny of the state’s drug problem and law-and-order situation.

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) sent three letters to the Punjab chief secretary on October 16, with copies to the state’s director general of police. The communications sought information about Jhota’s killing, the fatal attack on Bikramjit Singh in Gurdaspur district, and the reported suicide of Gulzar Singh in September.

What the Centre’s three letters cover

The first letter concerned the October 13 killing of Parvinder Singh, popularly known as Jhota, who was known for raising concerns about drug abuse and alleged illegal sales of intoxicating substances in Punjab.

The ministry sought a comprehensive factual report on the incident and details of the steps taken by the state government following his death. It also asked about action taken on the Union government’s Vision Document on Narcotics Control for 2026–2029.

The document outlines measures to strengthen anti-narcotics enforcement, including dedicated anti-narcotics task forces, financial investigations, prosecution under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, and action against transnational drug networks.

The second letter concerned the attack in Mari Panwan village in Gurdaspur district, in which Bikramjit Singh died and Nishan Singh and Gurmukh Singh were critically injured.

According to accounts cited in the report, the three men had objected to alleged drug peddling in their village before being attacked with sharp-edged weapons. However, police have denied that the incident was motivated by drug-related disputes and said an investigation was underway. Bikramjit’s relatives have also disputed the police account that the murder followed a dispute over a mobile phone.

The third letter sought details about Gulzar Singh’s death on September 8. The ministry referred to reports that he had raised concerns about the availability of synthetic drugs and had faced pressure and harassment from the local village panchayat. These allegations form part of the circumstances the Centre has asked the state government to examine and report on.

Amit Shah raises questions over Punjab’s law and order

Union Home Minister Amit Shah also raised concerns about the situation in Punjab, referring to the challenges posed by drugs, gangsterism and organised crime.

Questioning the Bhagwant Mann-led government over public safety, Shah called for action against the drug trade, protection for young people and strict measures against criminals.

The Centre’s requests place the three incidents under scrutiny, although the alleged links between the attacks or deaths and opposition to drug-related activities remain subject to the specific circumstances and investigations in each case.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com