English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

The Media Will Not “Crawl” Ever Again, Cry Voices Against Media Oppression

Published

on

The Media Will Not “Crawl” Ever Again, Cry Voices Against Media Oppression

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The protest meeting on press freedom at Press Club of India on Friday, June 9 turned out to be a mega affair, where the top media personalities of the country lashed out at not just the CBI raids on NDTV, but on the atmosphere of suppression prevailing in the country.

Prominent among those at the meeting included veteran journalists Kuldip Nayyar, Arun Shourie, HK Dua, Prannoy Roy and eminent jurist Fali S Nariman. Journalists at the meeting agreed that silence was not an option today and the media should not again “crawl”, the term used by LK Advani for its approach during Indira Gandhi’s time.

Referring to attempts to curb media freedom and suppress free speech, eminent jurist Fali S Nariman, said: “Freedom after speech is what freedom of speech is all about.”  He said no one was immune from being prosecuted under a criminal offence, “but the manner, circumstances give me reason to believe all of this is unjustified attack on press and media freedom”.

“On June 2, an FIR is lodged by the CBI, seven years after the event… Not on any discovery of its own, but information supplied by one individual Sanjay Dutt… Why was it not brought to light earlier was not mentioned earlier in the complaint? The CBI did not bother to find out,” said Nariman.

“The first thing the CBI is expected to do, once such a complaint is filed, is seek NDTV’s response. But that wasn’t done. When any government agency files a complaint against a media company, it must first enquire from the owners what they have to say in the matter before conducting raids… This is not a matter of courtesy or favour, but a constitutional duty,” he added.

He drew attention to the context and the purported trigger for CBI’s action. “It is important to mark the events preceding the letter and raids. On June 1, when Sanjay Hazarika was speaking on an NDTV show, Sambit Patra interrupted and said: ‘I interrupt people only on NDTV, and I need to do that because NDTV has an agenda.’ It was after these allegations by Patra that the offices and residences were raided,” he said.

“There were similar attacks on the media under Mrs Indira Gandhi. About 120 criminal complaints were filed against the Indian Express for not filing returns. Ultimately, we won in the Supreme Court… Whenever there is a majoritarian government, there is this tendency. We must resist it,” said Nariman.

One after the other a number of leading personalities flayed the government for suppressing media freedom:

Kuldip Nayar (Senior Journalist): “During the Emergency, nobody had to tell anybody what to do. Everybody knew what to do… The Indian Express became the symbol at the time… Today, when we are facing more or less the same situation – not to that extent – all of us have to ensure we don’t allow anybody to muzzle free speech. Press is the foundation of democracy. Idea of India is democratic and secular. Let us commit ourselves to the idea of India.”

Arun Shourie (Former Minister, and former editor) said, “I must express deep gratitude to Narendra Modi. He has brought so many friends together… I have a couplet for him: ‘He who was occupying this throne before you. He also had a similar belief that he was God.’ First they used incentives like ads, then a subterranean atmosphere of fear. Now, they are using a third instrument of overt pressure. They have made NDTV an example of that. This will intensify in the coming months because of the nature of the regime – its genes are totalitarian.”

“Anybody who has tried to lay a hand on the press in India, has had their hand burnt… The CBI has not been able to answer the facts put out by NDTV. There is even an article on The Wire. The facts are irrefutable…,” said Shourie.

Addressing journalists, he said, “You must help your friend because they will try to divide. Do not become instruments… Nothing demoralises more than not having the support of the peers. I have seen this in civil service… It is my grievance against my colleagues in the press that we haven’t been as vigilant as we should have been… It is very sad we have not reacted the way we should to the choking of the RTI.

“Raj (Kamal Jha, Editor, The Indian Express) told me almost all RTI applications of the Indian Express are being rejected these days. Only in appeal stages do they get access,” he said.

Referring to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s penchant for social media, Shourie said, “Narendra Modi has a whole team in his office led by a boy called Hiren Joshi who keeps a watch on social media. That is his weakness… You must raise your voice on social media…”

Talking about the pliant media organisations, he said, “Some people think by giving ministers air time, they will have protection during a crisis. But this is not true… This government is not a government of ministers. Yeh dhai aadmio ki Sarkar hai… During the Defamation Bill struggle, we effectively used boycott as a useful approach against Rajiv Gandhi’s ministers… Thatcher said publicity is the oxygen of terrorists. I say it is also of ministers… Every time something inconvenient happens, the government tries to distract the attention. Don’t become instruments of distracting your readers and viewers.

“Redouble the work that is annoying the government. We have only three protections: our solidarity, the court, the protection of our own readers and viewers. One day people will understand the difference between what the government advertises and what it does on the ground. And that is the reason why it suppresses all dissenting voices. We should stand up against every attempt at suppression of the media anywhere in the country. Report any attempt by the government to undermine the judiciary,” said Shourie.

HK Dua (Journalist, Former Rajya Sabha Member): “Last time, most of the press community did not stand up. They crawled, as Advani famously said. Then came the defamation bill. We got together, it became a national movement. Rajiv Gandhi sought talks but we refused. The unity of the press won the battle. The bill had to be withdrawn as the people were against it. Similar signs are visible now… This is a wake-up call, we have to be vigilant and cautious of such attacks.”

 

Aroon Purie (Editor-in-Chief, India Today Group): (The message sent by him was read out ay the meeting) “I strongly believe the freedom of the media is inviolable in a democracy… Such a move also undermines basic tenets of free speech.”

 

Shekhar Gupta (Senior Journalist): “It is one of those times when we have to forget our organisational and institutional affiliations. This is an issue that concerns the mother of all our institutions – the free press. This is an assault on the free press… Please stop self-flagellating. Social media got us all disoriented.

“Per capita there are far better people in journalism than other professions… Nobody is a presstitute. Don’t get intimidated by this storm of abuse… When the IE was being bombarded by cases, Ramnath Goenka’s response to all cases was, ‘What difference does it make? We have broken all laws except murder.’ I hope NDTV will continue to do what it is doing. Our job is to speak truth to power. Too many of us have become megaphones for power.”

 

Om Thanvi (Senior Journalist): “If the media is not united today, this can happen to anybody… What has happened is not new. It has happened a lot during the Congress days, Atalji’s days… When Modi government completed 3 years, Ravish Kumar did an entire show to call out their lies… The time to fight has come. And journalists should fight by themselves.”

 

Prannoy Roy (Co-Founder, NDTV) started by saying that he was forced by his wife, Radhika Roy, “the boss at work and at home” to participate in the meeting. He said, “We are here today because of these gentlemen. We grow in their shadow.” Talking about the freedom Indian media had enjoyed,  he said, “Once I went to China, they asked me aren’t you a bit jealous of our skyscrapers? I said we have the best skyscraper: free space.”

Talking about the CBI raids on his premises, he said, “This is not just a flimsy case against NDTV. It is a signal to all of us: we can suppress you even if you haven’t done anything… Free press is the best thing about India. Their message is: crawl, or we’ll come for you. I say: Stand up and they’ll never do.

“We are not fighting the agencies. They are institutions of India. But it is the politicians. The officials tell us why they have to do this… Our fight is also not against Sanjay Dutt (the person whose complaint was basis for the CBI case). He is also a tool and a person being used… Sanjay Dutt’s mother is a wonderful human being. She called five of us together, including Sanjay. She said, ‘Beta, these are good people. You have made a mistake. Fix your mistake. When I pray, I pray more for them than for you’.

“Please don’t believe there cannot be smoke without fire. Politicians can make smoke without fire… I am ashamed of our politicians that we can make such allegations (GE money laundering)… We will answer to all charges. We only request for a time-bound charges… In three years, the government has requested for 21 adjournments…” Getting emotional, he said, “I commit to you here Radhika, I, NDTV have never touched one rupee of black money, have never bribed any official… I want to say we will die knowing we have never touched black money and most importantly we will live happily ever after.”

Rajdeep Sardesai (Senior Journalist) said. “I believe in the present atmosphere, silence is not an option… we have to be on the right side of history.”

Raj Chengappa (Senior Journalist): “We are deeply concerned of what has happened. Any attack or raid is a serious threat particularly if residences and offices are being raided in such a manner.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Four militants killed as rival Naga groups clash in Manipur village

Four militants were killed in a gunfight between suspected rival Naga groups at Taodaijang village in Manipur’s Noney district on Wednesday.

Published

on

Manipur violence

At least four militants were killed in a gunfight between suspected rival Naga militant groups in Manipur’s Noney district on Wednesday, November 4.

The exchange of fire took place at Taodaijang village in the Khoupum area of the Naga-majority district. According to officials, the cadres involved were suspected to belong to rival Naga militant outfits, including the Zeliangrong United Front-Jenchui (ZUF-J) and the Zeliangrong United Front-Kamson (ZUF-K).

Initial reports indicated that the gunfight continued for several hours, leaving three cadres of ZUF-J and one cadre of ZUF-K dead.

The bodies of the deceased militants were subsequently recovered by local residents.

Residents appeal to armed groups to stop firing

Following the gunfight, local residents, including women, reached the spot in an attempt to prevent further violence between the rival groups.

They also used a public address system to appeal to the armed cadres to stop firing and prevent the situation from escalating further.

Further details about the circumstances surrounding the clash were awaited.

Manipur government reviews security situation

In a separate development, Manipur Chief Minister Yumnam Khemchand Singh directed senior security officials to identify active armed groups suspected of involvement in recent incidents of violence in the state.

The directive excluded groups engaged in peace talks with the state government.

The Chief Minister issued the instructions during a review meeting on the state’s law and order situation on Tuesday night.

He also asked security agencies, including the Army and central paramilitary forces, to submit a detailed report on the involvement of the suspected groups.

The Chief Minister said the state Cabinet could consider declaring such groups unlawful if their involvement in violence against innocent civilians was established.

He also emphasised that necessary action would be initiated against groups continuing to perpetrate violence against civilians.

Continue Reading

India News

Agnipath scheme gets 2-year extension for Agniveers, tenure may rise to 6 years

The Centre has introduced a two-year extension for the remaining 75% of Agniveers under the Agnipath scheme, creating another opportunity for them to seek enrolment in the regular armed forces.

Published

on

The Centre has introduced a significant change to the Agnipath recruitment scheme, offering a two-year extension to Agniveers who were earlier expected to leave the armed forces after completing their initial four-year service.

Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) General NS Raja Subramani announced the decision on Wednesday following a Union Cabinet meeting. Under the revised arrangement, the 75% of Agniveers who were not initially selected for absorption into the regular armed forces will be offered an additional two-year engagement period.

The development creates another opportunity for these personnel to continue serving in the armed forces beyond their original four-year tenure.

What changes under the revised Agnipath scheme?

Under the original Agnipath framework, Agniveers were recruited for a four-year service period, including training. At the end of this tenure, up to 25% of each batch could be selected for permanent enrolment into the regular armed forces, while the remaining 75% were expected to return to civilian life.

The revised arrangement introduces an additional two-year engagement for the latter group. This means their potential service period could increase from four to six years.

The extension also creates another opportunity for Agniveers to seek enrolment into the regular armed forces after completing the additional two years.

What happens after the additional two years?

According to General NS Raja Subramani, Agniveers completing the extended engagement period and willing to continue serving will be considered for enrolment in the regular armed forces.

Their selection will be based on objective criteria.

This creates an additional pathway for those who are not absorbed into the regular forces after their initial four-year tenure. However, the revised arrangement does not mean that every Agniveer will automatically receive permanent enrolment.

Why has the decision been taken now?

The announcement comes as the first batch of Agniveers recruited under the scheme approaches the completion of its initial four-year service period.

The Agnipath scheme was introduced on June 14, 2022, to recruit personnel into the Indian Army, Navy and Air Force for a fixed four-year engagement.

General Raja Subramani said the scheme had been undergoing periodic reviews, with the performance of Agniveers being continuously evaluated. He also indicated that feedback on their performance had been very positive.

The latest Cabinet decision creates an additional route for retaining personnel beyond the initial engagement period.

What was the original Agnipath arrangement?

Under the original framework, the armed forces could retain up to 25% of Agniveers in the regular cadre after their four-year service period, subject to selection.

The remaining 75% were to complete their engagement and transition to civilian life.

With the latest revision, this group will receive an additional two-year engagement opportunity before being considered for enrolment into the regular armed forces under the prescribed selection criteria.

The change therefore modifies the earlier arrangement by providing an additional opportunity for Agniveers to continue their military careers.

Continue Reading

India News

Hardeep Singh Puri set to win Rajya Sabha bypoll unopposed

Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri is set to be elected unopposed to the Rajya Sabha from Madhya Pradesh after the returning officer rejected the nomination papers of two independent candidates.

Published

on

Hardeep Puri

Union Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri is set to enter the Rajya Sabha unopposed from Madhya Pradesh after the nomination papers of two independent candidates were rejected during scrutiny on Tuesday.

The two candidates whose nominations were rejected were Kante Sayanna and Rajkumar Lohani, the latter being backed by the Congress. Their rejection leaves Puri as the only candidate in the contest for the vacant Rajya Sabha seat.

According to an official, the result will be announced on November 5, which is also the last date for withdrawal of nominations.

The Returning Officer, Umesh Sharma, examined the nomination papers on the last day of scrutiny and rejected the two independent candidates’ applications.

Objections raised against Hardeep Puri’s nomination

The nomination papers submitted by Puri also faced objections from the two independent candidates and Congress leader Hemant Katare.

They questioned the validity and completeness of Puri’s affidavit filed in Form 26, raising concerns over whether the mandatory details had been properly furnished.

However, after examining the objections, Returning Officer Umesh Sharma concluded that Puri had not violated any requirements under the Representation of the People Act.

Sharma stated in his order that no defect had been found in Puri’s nomination papers that could justify their rejection.

Following the decision, Katare and Congress MLA Atif Aqeel announced that they would approach the court against the order.

Calling the decision an attack on Indian democracy, the Congress leaders said in a statement that Puri’s nomination should have been rejected despite what they described as significant errors.

Why the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Sabha seat fell vacant

The by-election was necessitated by the resignation of Union Minister L Murugan, which left a Rajya Sabha seat vacant in Madhya Pradesh.

With the nomination papers of both independent candidates rejected and Puri’s nomination cleared, the Union minister is set to be elected unopposed.

The final announcement is expected on November 5, the last day for withdrawal of nominations.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com