English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

The Media Will Not “Crawl” Ever Again, Cry Voices Against Media Oppression

Published

on

The Media Will Not “Crawl” Ever Again, Cry Voices Against Media Oppression

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The protest meeting on press freedom at Press Club of India on Friday, June 9 turned out to be a mega affair, where the top media personalities of the country lashed out at not just the CBI raids on NDTV, but on the atmosphere of suppression prevailing in the country.

Prominent among those at the meeting included veteran journalists Kuldip Nayyar, Arun Shourie, HK Dua, Prannoy Roy and eminent jurist Fali S Nariman. Journalists at the meeting agreed that silence was not an option today and the media should not again “crawl”, the term used by LK Advani for its approach during Indira Gandhi’s time.

Referring to attempts to curb media freedom and suppress free speech, eminent jurist Fali S Nariman, said: “Freedom after speech is what freedom of speech is all about.”  He said no one was immune from being prosecuted under a criminal offence, “but the manner, circumstances give me reason to believe all of this is unjustified attack on press and media freedom”.

“On June 2, an FIR is lodged by the CBI, seven years after the event… Not on any discovery of its own, but information supplied by one individual Sanjay Dutt… Why was it not brought to light earlier was not mentioned earlier in the complaint? The CBI did not bother to find out,” said Nariman.

“The first thing the CBI is expected to do, once such a complaint is filed, is seek NDTV’s response. But that wasn’t done. When any government agency files a complaint against a media company, it must first enquire from the owners what they have to say in the matter before conducting raids… This is not a matter of courtesy or favour, but a constitutional duty,” he added.

He drew attention to the context and the purported trigger for CBI’s action. “It is important to mark the events preceding the letter and raids. On June 1, when Sanjay Hazarika was speaking on an NDTV show, Sambit Patra interrupted and said: ‘I interrupt people only on NDTV, and I need to do that because NDTV has an agenda.’ It was after these allegations by Patra that the offices and residences were raided,” he said.

“There were similar attacks on the media under Mrs Indira Gandhi. About 120 criminal complaints were filed against the Indian Express for not filing returns. Ultimately, we won in the Supreme Court… Whenever there is a majoritarian government, there is this tendency. We must resist it,” said Nariman.

One after the other a number of leading personalities flayed the government for suppressing media freedom:

Kuldip Nayar (Senior Journalist): “During the Emergency, nobody had to tell anybody what to do. Everybody knew what to do… The Indian Express became the symbol at the time… Today, when we are facing more or less the same situation – not to that extent – all of us have to ensure we don’t allow anybody to muzzle free speech. Press is the foundation of democracy. Idea of India is democratic and secular. Let us commit ourselves to the idea of India.”

Arun Shourie (Former Minister, and former editor) said, “I must express deep gratitude to Narendra Modi. He has brought so many friends together… I have a couplet for him: ‘He who was occupying this throne before you. He also had a similar belief that he was God.’ First they used incentives like ads, then a subterranean atmosphere of fear. Now, they are using a third instrument of overt pressure. They have made NDTV an example of that. This will intensify in the coming months because of the nature of the regime – its genes are totalitarian.”

“Anybody who has tried to lay a hand on the press in India, has had their hand burnt… The CBI has not been able to answer the facts put out by NDTV. There is even an article on The Wire. The facts are irrefutable…,” said Shourie.

Addressing journalists, he said, “You must help your friend because they will try to divide. Do not become instruments… Nothing demoralises more than not having the support of the peers. I have seen this in civil service… It is my grievance against my colleagues in the press that we haven’t been as vigilant as we should have been… It is very sad we have not reacted the way we should to the choking of the RTI.

“Raj (Kamal Jha, Editor, The Indian Express) told me almost all RTI applications of the Indian Express are being rejected these days. Only in appeal stages do they get access,” he said.

Referring to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s penchant for social media, Shourie said, “Narendra Modi has a whole team in his office led by a boy called Hiren Joshi who keeps a watch on social media. That is his weakness… You must raise your voice on social media…”

Talking about the pliant media organisations, he said, “Some people think by giving ministers air time, they will have protection during a crisis. But this is not true… This government is not a government of ministers. Yeh dhai aadmio ki Sarkar hai… During the Defamation Bill struggle, we effectively used boycott as a useful approach against Rajiv Gandhi’s ministers… Thatcher said publicity is the oxygen of terrorists. I say it is also of ministers… Every time something inconvenient happens, the government tries to distract the attention. Don’t become instruments of distracting your readers and viewers.

“Redouble the work that is annoying the government. We have only three protections: our solidarity, the court, the protection of our own readers and viewers. One day people will understand the difference between what the government advertises and what it does on the ground. And that is the reason why it suppresses all dissenting voices. We should stand up against every attempt at suppression of the media anywhere in the country. Report any attempt by the government to undermine the judiciary,” said Shourie.

HK Dua (Journalist, Former Rajya Sabha Member): “Last time, most of the press community did not stand up. They crawled, as Advani famously said. Then came the defamation bill. We got together, it became a national movement. Rajiv Gandhi sought talks but we refused. The unity of the press won the battle. The bill had to be withdrawn as the people were against it. Similar signs are visible now… This is a wake-up call, we have to be vigilant and cautious of such attacks.”

 

Aroon Purie (Editor-in-Chief, India Today Group): (The message sent by him was read out ay the meeting) “I strongly believe the freedom of the media is inviolable in a democracy… Such a move also undermines basic tenets of free speech.”

 

Shekhar Gupta (Senior Journalist): “It is one of those times when we have to forget our organisational and institutional affiliations. This is an issue that concerns the mother of all our institutions – the free press. This is an assault on the free press… Please stop self-flagellating. Social media got us all disoriented.

“Per capita there are far better people in journalism than other professions… Nobody is a presstitute. Don’t get intimidated by this storm of abuse… When the IE was being bombarded by cases, Ramnath Goenka’s response to all cases was, ‘What difference does it make? We have broken all laws except murder.’ I hope NDTV will continue to do what it is doing. Our job is to speak truth to power. Too many of us have become megaphones for power.”

 

Om Thanvi (Senior Journalist): “If the media is not united today, this can happen to anybody… What has happened is not new. It has happened a lot during the Congress days, Atalji’s days… When Modi government completed 3 years, Ravish Kumar did an entire show to call out their lies… The time to fight has come. And journalists should fight by themselves.”

 

Prannoy Roy (Co-Founder, NDTV) started by saying that he was forced by his wife, Radhika Roy, “the boss at work and at home” to participate in the meeting. He said, “We are here today because of these gentlemen. We grow in their shadow.” Talking about the freedom Indian media had enjoyed,  he said, “Once I went to China, they asked me aren’t you a bit jealous of our skyscrapers? I said we have the best skyscraper: free space.”

Talking about the CBI raids on his premises, he said, “This is not just a flimsy case against NDTV. It is a signal to all of us: we can suppress you even if you haven’t done anything… Free press is the best thing about India. Their message is: crawl, or we’ll come for you. I say: Stand up and they’ll never do.

“We are not fighting the agencies. They are institutions of India. But it is the politicians. The officials tell us why they have to do this… Our fight is also not against Sanjay Dutt (the person whose complaint was basis for the CBI case). He is also a tool and a person being used… Sanjay Dutt’s mother is a wonderful human being. She called five of us together, including Sanjay. She said, ‘Beta, these are good people. You have made a mistake. Fix your mistake. When I pray, I pray more for them than for you’.

“Please don’t believe there cannot be smoke without fire. Politicians can make smoke without fire… I am ashamed of our politicians that we can make such allegations (GE money laundering)… We will answer to all charges. We only request for a time-bound charges… In three years, the government has requested for 21 adjournments…” Getting emotional, he said, “I commit to you here Radhika, I, NDTV have never touched one rupee of black money, have never bribed any official… I want to say we will die knowing we have never touched black money and most importantly we will live happily ever after.”

Rajdeep Sardesai (Senior Journalist) said. “I believe in the present atmosphere, silence is not an option… we have to be on the right side of history.”

Raj Chengappa (Senior Journalist): “We are deeply concerned of what has happened. Any attack or raid is a serious threat particularly if residences and offices are being raided in such a manner.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Delhi Police offers 11-person limit for CJP’s Connaught Place protest

Delhi Police has offered to facilitate a group of 11 people at Central Park in Connaught Place for the Cockroach Janata Party’s October 16 protest, while warning that violations of prohibitory orders could invite legal action.

Published

on

CJP protest to continue

Delhi Police has proposed allowing a group of 11 people to carry the national flag and sing the national anthem at Central Park in Connaught Place on October 16, ahead of a protest called by the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) over alleged electoral fraud.

The police said it could facilitate the group at a suitable place in the park, while appealing to the public not to join the proposed gathering in large numbers. The offer comes amid prohibitory orders in Connaught Place and adjoining areas under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).

CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke has called on people to assemble at Central Park at 5 pm on Friday with the national flag. The proposed demonstration, named “Lehra Do Tiranga”, follows the detention of CJP members Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka during an earlier protest.

Why Delhi Police proposed limiting the gathering

In its statement, Delhi Police cited the prevailing security and law-and-order situation in the area. It also referred to information from the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) that Central Park would remain closed on October 16 and 17 for administrative reasons.

Deputy Commissioner of Police Neha Yadav said the NDMC had informed the police about the closure and had asked that no gathering be allowed near the park.

The police also cited representations from trader and market associations in Connaught Place and surrounding areas. According to the police, the associations had raised concerns about unlawful assemblies and their impact on businesses, particularly during the festive season.

Police warned that violations of Section 163 BNSS would invite appropriate legal action. It also stressed that the national flag must be displayed and carried, and the national anthem sung, in the prescribed manner with due respect and dignity.

Delhi High Court declines to stop CJP protest

The proposed gathering reached the Delhi High Court after a vendor sought intervention over concerns about disruption to businesses and public movement in Connaught Place.

On Thursday, the court declined to restrain the CJP from holding the protest. It recorded the police’s assurance that all possible measures under the law would be taken to regulate the gathering and maintain peace.

The petition was filed by a vendor at Palika Bazar in Connaught Place, who raised concerns about the potential impact of the demonstration on traders and others working in the area.

Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, appearing for the authorities, told the court that steps had already been taken to regulate the proposed protest.

CJP’s protest call follows detention of party members

Dipke’s October 16 protest call follows earlier demonstrations over alleged electoral fraud. CJP members Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka are in jail on trespass charges after raising the national flag at Jantar Mantar earlier this week, according to the report.

The party has been protesting over alleged electoral fraud and has raised questions about the Election Commission.

Dipke has urged people to gather at Central Park with the national flag, arguing that raising the Tricolour should not be treated as a crime.

The police’s proposal to facilitate a group of 11 people came as the authorities sought to prevent a larger gathering at the site. The CJP’s response to the police’s offer was still awaited in the report published on October 15.

Continue Reading

India News

Actor Imran Khan asked to leave India after CJP protest

Actor Imran Khan has been asked to leave India by October 28, days after participating in a protest called by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) in Mumbai.

Published

on

Actor Imran Khan, nephew of Bollywood star Aamir Khan, has been asked to leave India by the Mumbai Police, days after participating in a protest organised by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) in Mumbai.

According to the notice, the actor has been given until October 28 to leave the country. The development follows his participation in the demonstration, which brought the actor into the spotlight over his involvement in a political protest.

Imran Khan is believed to hold US citizenship and an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card rather than full Indian citizenship, according to the report.

What led to the notice against Imran Khan?

The notice came days after Imran Khan joined a protest called by the CJP in Mumbai. The group, described as a satirical political organisation, had called for the demonstration.

The actor’s participation was followed by action from the authorities, with the Mumbai Police directing him to leave India by the specified deadline.

The notice does not, by itself, mean that the actor has already left the country or has been deported. October 28 is the deadline mentioned for his departure.

Imran Khan and his citizenship status

Imran Khan is known for his work in Hindi films, including Jaane Tu… Ya Jaane Na and Delhi Belly. He is also the nephew of actor Aamir Khan.

The report states that Imran Khan is believed to be a US citizen and hold an OCI card. OCI status does not confer Indian citizenship, although it provides eligible foreign citizens of Indian origin with specified privileges under Indian law.

The notice directing the actor to leave India follows his participation in the Mumbai protest. The reported development has brought attention to the intersection of immigration rules and the participation of foreign nationals in political demonstrations.

Continue Reading

India News

Election Commission orders voter roll revision in 17 states, UTs

The Election Commission has ordered a Special Summary Revision of electoral rolls in 17 states and Union Territories. Draft rolls are scheduled for November 12, with final rolls due on January 4, 2027.

Published

on

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has ordered a Special Summary Revision (SSR) of electoral rolls in 17 states and Union Territories, with the exercise aimed at facilitating voter registration and including eligible electors who may have been left out during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR).

The order was issued on Thursday, October 15, amid continuing political controversy over the SIR process and concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the exclusion of names from electoral rolls.

Under the announced schedule, January 1, 2027, will be the qualifying date for the revision. The draft electoral rolls are scheduled to be published on November 12, while the final rolls are due on January 4, 2027. Uttar Pradesh and Punjab, two states included in the exercise, are scheduled to go to the polls by February 2027.

Which states and Union Territories are covered?

The Special Summary Revision will cover the following 17 states and Union Territories:

  • Andaman and Nicobar Islands
  • Assam
  • Bihar
  • Chhattisgarh
  • Goa
  • Gujarat
  • Kerala
  • Lakshadweep
  • Madhya Pradesh
  • Manipur
  • Puducherry
  • Punjab
  • Rajasthan
  • Tamil Nadu
  • Uttar Pradesh
  • Uttarakhand
  • West Bengal

The Election Commission’s order follows earlier instructions issued to state election officials on September 29 to undertake a special drive to enrol eligible voters who had been left out, along with young and first-time electors.

Why has the Election Commission ordered the revision?

The announcement comes amid protests and political disagreements over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. Opposition parties have raised concerns about names being excluded during the exercise.

Another point of contention has been an additional declaration required from applicants submitting Form 6 for voter enrolment while the SIR was underway. The declaration required applicants to map their parents to the last SIR, which was conducted around 20 years ago.

The Election Commission had clarified on October 7 that the additional declaration applied only in states and Union Territories where the SIR was being conducted. It said the regular forms prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, would apply outside the SIR period.

The latest SSR order refers to applications for inclusion through Form 6 but does not mention the additional declaration.

What happens in states not covered by the current schedule?

The Election Commission has said that the schedule for the Special Summary Revision will be announced later in states and Union Territories where the SIR is ongoing or has recently been completed.

These include Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Chandigarh, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu, Haryana, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, the National Capital Territory of Delhi, Odisha, Sikkim, Tripura and Telangana.

For Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh, where the SIR has not yet started, the schedule for electoral roll revision will be announced in due course, taking local weather conditions into account.

The Election Commission’s latest order sets out a separate timeline for the 17 states and Union Territories covered by the current SSR exercise, while leaving the schedules for the other regions to be announced later.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com