English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Tahawwur Rana demands Quran, pen and paper in NIA custody: Reports

On Sunday, NIA officials confirmed that Rana has been cooperative but reserved, providing limited details so far. “We’re analyzing his responses meticulously,” an officer told reporters, declining to elaborate.

Published

on

Tahawwur Rana, a key figure in the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, was placed under strict suicide watch after his extradition to India and sent to 18-day custody to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) a few days ago. Lodged in a high-security cell at NIA headquarters in Delhi, Rana is monitored round-the-clock by personnel and CCTV to ensure his safety.

Rana has been granted minimal provisions: a soft-tip pen and paper for writing, under strict supervision to prevent self-harm, and a copy of the Quran at his request, Hindustan Times reported.

The Pakistani-Canadian, closely linked to 26/11 mastermind David Coleman Headley, is accused of collaborating with Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Harkat-ul-Jihadi Islami (HUJI), and Pakistan-based operatives to orchestrate the three-day assault that killed over 166 people.

He reportedly performs Namaz five times daily in his cell. “He’s made no other demands,” an NIA official told Hindustan Times. Court orders allow him to meet a Delhi Legal Services Authority (DLSA) lawyer every other day, always in the presence of NIA staff, and mandate medical checkups every 48 hours.

Rana, 64, landed in Delhi on Thursday. The move came after Rana exhausted all legal avenues to block his transfer, including appeals in US courts that argued against his surrender due to prior convictions.

Special NIA Judge Chander Jit Singh granted the custody, with the agency arguing that Rana’s interrogation is crucial to unearth fresh evidence and explore his links to other terrorists, including Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Harkat-ul-Jihadi Islami (HUJI) operatives.

“His statements could unlock significant discoveries,” the NIA told the court, emphasizing his role in the November 26-29, 2008, attacks that killed over 166 people and injured hundreds across Mumbai’s landmarks like the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel and Nariman House.

Rana’s role in 26/11

A close associate of David Coleman Headley (alias Daood Gilani), the US citizen who conducted reconnaissance for the attacks, Rana is accused of providing logistical and financial support to LeT, the Pakistan-based terror group behind the siege.

Operating through his Chicago-based immigration business, First World Immigration Services, Rana allegedly facilitated Headley’s travels and helped establish a Mumbai office as a cover for surveillance. US prosecutors convicted him in 2011 for supporting terrorism, though he was acquitted of direct involvement in the Mumbai attacks. India, however, pursued his extradition to face charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and Indian Penal Code for conspiracy, murder, and terrorism.

Rana’s extradition follows years of diplomatic efforts, with India pressing the US since his 2009 arrest in Chicago alongside Headley. Released on compassionate grounds in 2020 after contracting COVID-19, Rana was re-arrested in 2023 after a US court upheld India’s extradition request, citing sufficient evidence of his complicity. The NIA now aims to confront him with digital records, intercepted communications, and Headley’s testimony, which detailed Rana’s knowledge of LeT’s plans.

Security and investigation updates

According to reports, Rana’s cell is fortified to prevent any escape or external contact, with restricted access even for jail staff. The NIA is cross-referencing his statements with data from Headley’s plea deal and intercepted LeT communications, hoping to trace financial trails and identify Pakistan-based handlers. The agency is also investigating whether Rana had ties to other terror plots, including a foiled attack on a Danish newspaper.

On Sunday, NIA officials confirmed that Rana has been cooperative but reserved, providing limited details so far. “We’re analyzing his responses meticulously,” an officer told reporters, declining to elaborate.

The agency has deployed forensic experts to examine devices linked to Rana’s business, aiming to uncover encrypted communications. Meanwhile, security around Tihar Jail, where Rana may be transferred post-custody, has been heightened, with Delhi Police on alert for potential threats.

India News

DU VC Prof Yogesh Singh entrusted with additional charge of AICTE Chairman

Published

on

By

Prof. Yogesh Singh, Vice Chancellor of the University of Delhi, has been entrusted with the additional charge of the post of Chairman, AICTE till the appointment of a Chairman of AICTE or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

It is noteworthy that AICTE Chairman Prof. TG Sitharam was relieved of his duties after his term ended on December 20, 2025. According to a letter issued by the Ministry of Education, Government of India, on Monday, Prof. Yogesh Singh’s appointment is until the appointment of a regular AICTE Chairman or until further orders whichever is earlier.

Prof. Yogesh Singh is a renowned academician with excellent administrative capabilities, who has been the Vice-Chancellor of University of Delhi since October 2021. He has also served as the Chairperson of the National Council for Teacher Education. In August 2023, he was also given the additional charge of Director of the School of Planning and Architecture (SPA).

Prof. Yogesh Singh served as the Vice-Chancellor of Delhi Technological University from 2015 to 2021; Director of Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Delhi from 2014 to 2017, and before that, he was the Vice-Chancellor of Maharaja Sayajirao University, Baroda (Gujarat) from 2011 to 2014. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from the National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra. He has a distinguished track record in quality teaching, innovation, and research in the field of software engineering.

Continue Reading

India News

Goa nightclub fire case: Court extends police custody of Luthra brothers by five days

A Goa court has extended the police custody of Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra, owners of the nightclub where a deadly fire killed 25 people, by five more days.

Published

on

Luthra brothers

A court in Goa on Monday extended the police custody of Saurabh Luthra and Gaurav Luthra, the owners of the Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub, by five more days in connection with the deadly fire incident that claimed 25 lives on December 6.

The order was passed as investigators sought additional time to question the two accused in the case linked to the blaze at the Anjuna-based nightclub.

Owners were deported after fleeing abroad

According to details placed before the court, the Luthra brothers had left the country following the incident and travelled to Thailand. They were subsequently deported and brought back to India on December 17, after which they were taken into police custody.

Advocate Vishnu Joshi, representing the families of the victims, confirmed that the court granted a five-day extension of police custody for both Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra.

Another co-owner sent to judicial custody

The court also remanded Ajay Gupta, another owner of the nightclub, to judicial custody. Police did not seek an extension of his custody, following which the court passed the order, the victims’ counsel said.

The Anjuna police have registered a case against the Luthra brothers for culpable homicide not amounting to murder along with other relevant offences related to the fire incident.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi High Court issues notice to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi in National Herald case

Delhi High Court has sought responses from Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on the ED’s plea challenging a trial court order in the National Herald case.

Published

on

The Delhi High Court has sought responses from Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on a petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the National Herald case. The petition challenges a trial court order that refused to take cognisance of the agency’s prosecution complaint.

Justice Ravinder Dudeja issued notices to the Gandhis and other accused on the main petition, as well as on the ED’s application seeking a stay on the trial court’s December 16 order. The high court has listed the matter for further hearing on March 12, 2026.

The trial court had ruled that taking cognisance of the ED’s complaint was “impermissible in law” because the investigation was not based on a registered First Information Report (FIR). It observed that the prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) was not maintainable in the absence of an FIR for a scheduled offence.

According to the order, the ED’s probe originated from a private complaint rather than an FIR. The court further noted that since cognisance was declined on a legal question, it was not necessary to examine the merits of the allegations at that stage.

The trial court also referred to the complaint filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy and the summoning order issued in 2014, stating that despite these developments, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) did not register an FIR in relation to the alleged scheduled offence.

The ED has accused Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, and a private company, Young Indian, of conspiracy and money laundering. The agency has alleged that properties worth around Rs 2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Limited (AJL), which publishes the National Herald newspaper, were acquired through Young Indian.

The agency further claimed that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi held a majority 76 per cent shareholding in Young Indian, which allegedly took over AJL’s assets in exchange for a Rs 90 crore loan.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com