English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Taj Mahal a blot on Indian culture, says BJP MLA Sangeet Som

Published

on

Sangeet Som

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Som, accused of inciting Hindu mobs during Muzaffarnagar riots, says the UNESCO World Heritage site was built by traitors, BJP disowns remarks

Weeks after the Uttar Pradesh government drew flak for excluding the Taj Mahal from its brochure on tourism hot spots in the state, controversial BJP legislator Sangeet Som has once again dragged the UNESCO World Heritage Site into a political debate, claiming that the 17th Century marble mausoleum is a “blot on Indian culture”.

Addressing a function in Sisoli village of UP’s Meerut district on Sunday, Sangeet Som, BJP MLA from the state’s Sardhana constituency, claimed that the Taj Mahal – listed as one of the 7 Wonders of the World – was “built by traitors”.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]JTNDYmxvY2txdW90ZSUyMGNsYXNzJTNEJTIydHdpdHRlci12aWRlbyUyMiUyMGRhdGEtbGFuZyUzRCUyMmVuJTIyJTNFJTNDcCUyMGxhbmclM0QlMjJlbiUyMiUyMGRpciUzRCUyMmx0ciUyMiUzRUJKUCUyNiUyMzM5JTNCcyUyMFNhbmdlZXQlMjBTb20lMjBzYXlzJTJDJTI2JTIzMzklM0JNYW55JTIwd2VyZSUyMHNhZCUyMHdoZW4lMjBUYWolMjBNYWhhbCUyMHdhcyUyMHJlbW92ZWQlMjBmcm9tJTIwaGlzdG9yaWNhbCUyMHBsYWNlcy5XaGF0JTIwaGlzdG9yeSUzRiUyMEl0cyUyMGNyZWF0b3IlMjB3YW50ZWQlMjB0byUyMHdpcGUlMjBvdXQlMjBIaW5kdXMlMjYlMjMzOSUzQiUyMCUzQ2ElMjBocmVmJTNEJTIyaHR0cHMlM0ElMkYlMkZ0LmNvJTJGNU9jcEp3QzRkNyUyMiUzRXBpYy50d2l0dGVyLmNvbSUyRjVPY3BKd0M0ZDclM0MlMkZhJTNFJTNDJTJGcCUzRSUyNm1kYXNoJTNCJTIwQU5JJTIwJTI4JTQwQU5JJTI5JTIwJTNDYSUyMGhyZWYlM0QlMjJodHRwcyUzQSUyRiUyRnR3aXR0ZXIuY29tJTJGQU5JJTJGc3RhdHVzJTJGOTE5NzkyMTY1OTQ5MDE4MTEyJTNGcmVmX3NyYyUzRHR3c3JjJTI1NUV0ZnclMjIlM0VPY3RvYmVyJTIwMTYlMkMlMjAyMDE3JTNDJTJGYSUzRSUzQyUyRmJsb2NrcXVvdGUlM0UlMEElM0NzY3JpcHQlMjBhc3luYyUyMHNyYyUzRCUyMiUyRiUyRnBsYXRmb3JtLnR3aXR0ZXIuY29tJTJGd2lkZ2V0cy5qcyUyMiUyMGNoYXJzZXQlM0QlMjJ1dGYtOCUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRnNjcmlwdCUzRQ==[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Misrepresenting historical facts, the controversial legislator also told the audience that “the person (Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan) who built the Taj Mahal imprisoned his father” and sought to use the architectural marvel as a means to foment communal tension by claiming that “the one who built the Taj targeted many Hindus in Uttar Pradesh and Hindustan”.

Clearly, Som hasn’t read much of history – or at least the history of the Mughal rulers of India – for it wasn’t Shah Jahan who imprisoned his father (Emperor Jahangir). While Jahangir went on to serve as the Mughal ruler until his death in October 1627, it was Shah Jahan who was imprisoned by his son and successor, Aurangzeb in 1658 and kept in confinement for eight years, until his death in 1666.

But then history obviously doesn’t interest Som, who is also accused of inciting Hindu mobs during the Muzaffarnagar riots of 2013 which resulted in the death of at least 42 Muslims and 20 Hindus and left nearly 50,000 people from the western UP district displaced.

The BJP legislator reportedly said at the function, which was organised to inaugurate a statue of the 8th century Hindu king Anangpal Singh Tomar, that: “Many people were worried that the Taj Mahal was removed from the list of historical places in the UP tourism booklet. What history are we talking about? The man who built Taj Mahal… wanted to massacre Hindus. If this is history, then it is very unfortunate and we will change this history, I guarantee you.”

Clearly embarrassed by the row that Som’s remarks triggered, the BJP sought to distance itself from the controversy on Monday. The party’s spokespersons – Nalin Kohli and GVL Narsimha Rao claimed that the remarks were “not the party’s view” on the Taj Mahal but were Som’s “personal views”. Rao, however, claimed that Som was entitled to make the obviously divisive comments as per his right to freedom of speech.

The BJP, however, did not categorically shun Som’s comments for their historical misrepresentation and communal overtones but instead acknowledged the Taj Mahal purely as a “tourist spot”. While Kohli said the Taj Mahal is “part of incredible India”, Rao insisted that “it is a symbol of barbarism and it is a monument.”

However, Sangeet Som’s comments did trigger strong reactions on Twitter with several political leaders and common Twitteratti lashing out the BJP legislator for his remarks and ever wondering if Prime Minister Narendra Modi would stop hoisting the Indian tricolour from the Red Fort – also built by Shah Jahan – onAugust 15 as the red sandstone monument in New Delhi was also part of the legacy of the man who had the Taj Mahal built.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Veeramani POCSO case: Vijay questions Stalin over earlier probe

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay has questioned MK Stalin over the handling of the Veeramani POCSO case, while Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected anyone.

Published

on

Actor Vijay

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) president C Joseph Vijay has questioned DMK president MK Stalin over the handling of the POCSO case involving Gem Granites founder R Veeramani. The political exchange follows renewed investigation into allegations involving minor girls.

Vijay’s remarks came as the ruling TVK stepped up its questions about how the case was handled during the previous DMK government. The party’s IT wing has alleged that the earlier investigation was weakened and questioned why a final report was filed.

The allegations have been rejected by the DMK. Stalin has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to protect anyone in the case and has called the allegations false and defamatory.

What did Vijay say about the Veeramani case?

Vijay questioned Stalin over the handling of the case and demanded an explanation from the former chief minister.

The TVK has specifically questioned why action was not taken against Veeramani during the previous administration and why the earlier investigation resulted in a closure report.

The party has also raised questions about the role of officials involved in the earlier investigation. These are political allegations made by the TVK and have not been established as facts.

What is the Veeramani POCSO case?

The case concerns allegations of sexual abuse of minors involving R Veeramani, the founder of Gem Granites.

The case came under renewed scrutiny after a special POCSO court rejected an earlier closure report and ordered further investigation. The expanded probe has subsequently identified additional alleged survivors who were minors at the time of the alleged offences, according to current reporting.

The investigation is also examining the circumstances surrounding the earlier probe and whether there were any lapses in how the case was handled.

What has MK Stalin said?

Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected Veeramani.

He has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to shield anyone in the case. Stalin has also said that everyone responsible for the alleged offences, including anyone who aided or attempted to protect the accused, should face the law.

The DMK president has further said that the focus should remain on securing justice for the affected girls rather than making political allegations.

Why has the case become a political issue?

The Veeramani case has become the subject of a political dispute between the ruling TVK and the DMK over the handling of the earlier investigation.

The TVK is questioning the previous government’s handling of the case, while the DMK has denied that it intervened to protect the accused.

At this stage, claims about political interference or deliberate weakening of the earlier investigation should be treated as allegations unless established by the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

Continue Reading

India News

Women wrestlers challenge Brij Bhushan’s acquittal in sexual harassment case

Four women wrestlers have challenged the acquittal of former WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and co-accused Vinod Tomar in a sexual harassment case.

Published

on

Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh

Four women wrestlers have approached a Delhi court challenging the acquittal of former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief and BJP leader Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in a sexual harassment case.

The wrestlers have also challenged the acquittal of co-accused Vinod Tomar. The matter is scheduled to be heard by a Special Judge at the Rouse Avenue Courts.

The appeal challenges the order passed by an Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on August 3, 2026, when Brij Bhushan and Tomar were acquitted in the case.

Wrestlers challenge court’s reasoning

In their appeal, the wrestlers have argued that the acquittal order is legally unsustainable and that the evidence was not assessed appropriately.

They have also alleged that the order relied on assumptions about how victims of sexual assault and harassment were expected to behave instead of assessing the evidence and circumstances of the complainants.

The challenge seeks judicial scrutiny of the findings that resulted in the acquittal of Brij Bhushan and Tomar.

Brij Bhushan was acquitted in August

The Rouse Avenue court acquitted Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh on August 3 in the sexual harassment case involving women wrestlers. The court’s decision followed consideration of the evidence and statements presented during the proceedings.

The case had emerged after several women wrestlers accused the former WFI chief of sexual harassment. The allegations had led to a major protest by wrestlers in 2023.

The latest appeal means the acquittal is now being challenged before a higher court.

Continue Reading

India News

Congress protests against Gyanesh Kumar, demands Election chief’s resignation

Congress workers took to the streets against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, with protests and demonstrations held over the party’s allegations concerning the Election Commission.

Published

on

Congress stepped up its campaign against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, with party workers taking to the streets and demanding his resignation amid the ongoing row over the Election Commission.

The protests followed repeated criticism by Congress leaders of the poll panel and its functioning. The party has alleged irregularities in the electoral process and has sought accountability from the Election Commission.

Congress leaders have also targeted Gyanesh Kumar personally, with Rahul Gandhi among those calling for the Chief Election Commissioner to step down.

Congress takes protest to streets

Congress workers staged demonstrations in different places as part of the party’s campaign against the Election Commission.

The protests featured sharp symbolism, including masks and handcuffs, as Congress sought to highlight its allegations against the poll panel and demand action against Gyanesh Kumar.

The demonstrations are part of a wider confrontation between the Congress and the Election Commission over issues related to electoral rolls and the conduct of elections.

Congress demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation

The Congress has repeatedly demanded the resignation of Gyanesh Kumar, accusing the Election Commission of failing to adequately address the concerns raised by the opposition party.

Rahul Gandhi has also stepped up his criticism of the poll panel. In a statement on Thursday, he demanded that Gyanesh Kumar resign and alleged that the Election Commission had acknowledged the issue of “vote theft”. These are allegations made by the Congress and should not be treated as an established finding unless confirmed by the relevant authority.

The dispute comes amid a broader political debate over electoral rolls, voter verification and the functioning of the Election Commission.

Election Commission under opposition scrutiny

The Congress has intensified its campaign against the poll body in recent weeks, with party leaders repeatedly questioning its decisions and procedures.

The Election Commission, meanwhile, has maintained that India’s electoral process is conducted according to the Constitution, electoral laws and prescribed procedures. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar has previously defended the integrity of the electoral system and rejected claims that electronic voting machines can be remotely hacked.

The latest protests add to the continuing political confrontation over the Election Commission and the opposition’s demands concerning the poll panel’s functioning.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com