English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Uttarakhand Assembly Election Result 2022: Constituency wise live result updating

Voters in Uttarakhand’s Assembly Elections 2022 voted in a single phase for 70 constituency seats on February 14. This year, 62.5 percent of eligible voters cast votes. The results of the election will be announced on March 10.

Published

on

Uttarakhand Assembly Election Result 2022

Voters in Uttarakhand’s Assembly Elections 2022 voted in a single phase for 70 constituency seats on February 14. This year, 62.5 percent of eligible voters cast votes. The results of the election will be announced on March 10. The counting process will be more exciting this year because a number of powerful leaders and individuals with strong political experience are running. The Bharatiya Janata Party, Congress, and Aam Aadmi Party are all significant parties.

Here is a list of full candidates of BJP, Congress and AAP in all 70 constituencies:

Purola–  Durgeshwar Lal (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 6,296 votes)

Yamunotri – Kedar Singh Rawat (BJP),  Deepak Bijalwan (Congress), Manoj Kohli Shyam (AAP)

Gangotri –  Suresh Chauhan (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 8,029 votes)

Badrinath – Mahendra Bhatt (BJP)- Leading, Rajendra Singh Bhandari (Congress)- Trailing, Bhagwat Prasad Mandoli (AAP)

Tharali – Bhopal Ram Tamta (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 8,302 votes)

Karanprayag – Anil Nautiyal (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 6,715 votes)

Kedarnath- Shaila Rani Rawat (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 8,463 votes)

Rudraprayag – Bharat Singh Chaudhary (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 9,802 votes)

Ghansali – Shakti Lal Shah (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 10,285 votes)

Deoprayag- Vinod Kandari (BJP), Mantri Prasad Naithani (Congress), Uttam Bhandai (AAP)

Narendranagar- Subodh Uniyal (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 1,798 votes)

Pratapnagar- Vikram Singh Negi (Congress) (WINNER by a margin of 2,341 votes)

Tehri- Kishore Upadhyay (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 951 votes)

Dhanolti- Pritam Singh Pawar (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 4,684 votes)

Chakarta- Pritam Singh (Congress) (WINNER by a margin of 9,436 votes)

Vikasnagar- Munna Singh Chauhan (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 5,193 votes)

Sahaspur– Sahdev Singh Pundir (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 8,355 votes)

Dharampur- Vinod Chamoli  (BJP), Dinesh Agarwal (Congress), Yogendra Chauhan (AAP)

Raipur– Umesh Sharma Kawu (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 30,052 votes)

Rajpur Road– Khajan Dass (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 11,163)

Dehradun Cantt– Savita Kapoor (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 20,938 seats)

Mussoorie– Ganesh Joshi (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 15,325 votes)

Doiwala– Brij Bhushan Gairola (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 29,021 votes)

Rishikesh– Prem Chand Aggarwal (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 19,057 votes)

Haridwar– Madan Kaushik (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 15,237 votes)

BHEL Ranipur- Adesh Chauhan (BJP)- Trailing, Rajbir Singh Chauhan (Congress)- Leading, Prashant Rai (AAP)

Jwalapur-  Suresh Rathore (BJP), Er. Ravi Bahadur (Congress), Mamta Singh (AAP)

Bhagwanpur- Mamta Rakesh (Congress) (WINNER by a margin of 4,811 votes)

Jhabrera- Rajpal Singh (BJP), Vivendra Kumar (Congress), Rajoo Singh (AAP)

Pirankaliyar- Munish Kumar Saini (BJP), Furkan Ahmad (Congress), Sadab Alam (AAP)

Roorkee– Pradeep Batra (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 2,277 votes)

Khanpur- Kunwarani Devyani Singh (BJP), Subhash Singh Coudhary (Congress), Manorma Tyagi (AAP)

Manglaur- Dinesh Pawar (BJP), Qazi Mohammad Nizamuddin (Congress), Navneet Kumar (AAP)

Laksar- Sanjay Gupta (BJP), Dr Antriksh Saini (Congress), Mohd Yusuf (AAP)

Haridwar Rural- Swami Yatishwaranand (BJP), Anupama Rawat (Congress), Naresh Sharma (AAP)

Yamkeshwar- Renu Bisht (BJP), Shailendar Singh Rawat (Congress), Aviral (AAP)

Pauri- Raj Kumar Pori (BJP), Naval Kishor (Congress), Manohar Lal (AAP)

Srinagar- Dr Dhan Singh Rawat (BJP), Ganesh Godiyal (Congress), Gajendra Chauhan (AAP)

Chaubattakhal- Satpal Maharaj (BJP), Keshar Singh (Congress), Digmohan Negi (AAP)

Landsdowne- Dileep Singh Rawat (BJP), Anukriti Gusain Rawat (Congress), Narendra Singh (AAP)

Kotdwar- Ritu Khanduri Bhushan (BJP), Surendra Singh Negi (Congress), Arvind Kumar (AAP)

Dharchula- Dhan Singh Dhami (BJP), Harish Singh Dhami (Congress), Narayan Ram (AAP)

Didihat- Bishan Singh Chufal (BJP), Pradeep Singh Pal (Congress), Diwan Singh Mehta (AAP)

Pithoragarh- Chandra Pant (BJP), Mayukh Mahar (Congress), Chandra Prakash Punera (AAP)

Gangolihat- Fakir Ram Tamta (BJP), Khajan Chandra Guddu (Congress), Babita Chandra (AAP)

Kapkot– Suresh Gariya (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 4,046 votes)

Bageshwar– Chandra Ram Das (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 12,141 votes)

Dwarahat- Anil Shahi (BJP), Madan Singh Bisht (Congress), Prakash Chandra (AAP)

Salt- Mahesh Jeena (BJP), Ranjeet Singh Rawat (Congress), Suresh Bisht (AAP)

Ranikhet- Pamod Nainwal (BJP), Karan Mahara (Congress), Nandan Singh Bisht (AAP)

Someshwar- Rekha Arya (BJP), Rajendra Lal (Congress), Harish Chandra (AAP)

Almora- Kailash Sharma (BJP)- Leading, Manoj Tewari (Congress)- Trailing, Amit Joshi (AAP)

Jageshwar- Mohan Singh (BJP), Govind Singh Kunjwal (Congress), Taradutt Pandey (AAP)

Lohanghat– Khushal Singh Adhikari (Congress) (WINNER by a margin of 6,038 votes)

Champawat– Kailash Gahtori (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 5,304 votes)

Lalkuwa- Dr Mohan Singh Bisht  (BJP), Harish Rawat (Congress), Chandra Sekhar Pandey (AAP)

Bhimtaal- Ram Singh Kaira (BJP), Dan Singh Bhandari (Congress), Sanjay Kumar Pandey (AAP)

Nainital- Sarita Arya (BJP), Sanjeev Arya (Congress), Hem Chandra Arya (AAP)

Haldwani– Sumit Hridayesh (Congress) (WINNER by a margin of 7,814 votes)

Kaladhungi– Bansidhar Bhagat (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 23,931 seats)

Ramnagar– Diwan Singh Bisht (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 4,745)

Jaspur– Adesh Singh Chauhan (Congress) (WINNER by a margin of 4,172 seats)

Kashipur- Trilok Singh Cheema (BJP), Narendra Chand Singh (Congress), Deepak Bali (AAP)

Bajpur- Rajesh Kumar (BJP)- Trailing, Yashpal Arya (Congress)- Leading, Sunita Tamta (AAP)

Gadarpur– Arvind Pandey (BJP), Premanand Mahajan (Congress), Jarnail Singh Kali (AAP)

Rudrapur- Shiv Arora (BJP), Meena Sharma (Congress), Nand Lal (AAP)

Kichha- Rajesh Shukla (BJP), Tilak Raj Behar (Congress), Kulvanta Singh (AAP)

Sitarganj– Saurabh Bahuguna (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 10,938 votes)

Nanak Matta- Dr Prem Singh Rana (BJP), Gopal Singh Rana (Congress), Anand Singh Rana (AAP)

Kahtima- Pushkar Singh Dhami (BJP), Bhuwan Chandra Kapri (Congress), SS Kaler (AAP)

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com