English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Uttarakhand Assembly Election Result 2022: Constituency wise live result updating

Voters in Uttarakhand’s Assembly Elections 2022 voted in a single phase for 70 constituency seats on February 14. This year, 62.5 percent of eligible voters cast votes. The results of the election will be announced on March 10.

Published

on

Uttarakhand Assembly Election Result 2022

Voters in Uttarakhand’s Assembly Elections 2022 voted in a single phase for 70 constituency seats on February 14. This year, 62.5 percent of eligible voters cast votes. The results of the election will be announced on March 10. The counting process will be more exciting this year because a number of powerful leaders and individuals with strong political experience are running. The Bharatiya Janata Party, Congress, and Aam Aadmi Party are all significant parties.

Here is a list of full candidates of BJP, Congress and AAP in all 70 constituencies:

Purola–  Durgeshwar Lal (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 6,296 votes)

Yamunotri – Kedar Singh Rawat (BJP),  Deepak Bijalwan (Congress), Manoj Kohli Shyam (AAP)

Gangotri –  Suresh Chauhan (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 8,029 votes)

Badrinath – Mahendra Bhatt (BJP)- Leading, Rajendra Singh Bhandari (Congress)- Trailing, Bhagwat Prasad Mandoli (AAP)

Tharali – Bhopal Ram Tamta (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 8,302 votes)

Karanprayag – Anil Nautiyal (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 6,715 votes)

Kedarnath- Shaila Rani Rawat (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 8,463 votes)

Rudraprayag – Bharat Singh Chaudhary (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 9,802 votes)

Ghansali – Shakti Lal Shah (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 10,285 votes)

Deoprayag- Vinod Kandari (BJP), Mantri Prasad Naithani (Congress), Uttam Bhandai (AAP)

Narendranagar- Subodh Uniyal (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 1,798 votes)

Pratapnagar- Vikram Singh Negi (Congress) (WINNER by a margin of 2,341 votes)

Tehri- Kishore Upadhyay (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 951 votes)

Dhanolti- Pritam Singh Pawar (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 4,684 votes)

Chakarta- Pritam Singh (Congress) (WINNER by a margin of 9,436 votes)

Vikasnagar- Munna Singh Chauhan (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 5,193 votes)

Sahaspur– Sahdev Singh Pundir (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 8,355 votes)

Dharampur- Vinod Chamoli  (BJP), Dinesh Agarwal (Congress), Yogendra Chauhan (AAP)

Raipur– Umesh Sharma Kawu (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 30,052 votes)

Rajpur Road– Khajan Dass (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 11,163)

Dehradun Cantt– Savita Kapoor (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 20,938 seats)

Mussoorie– Ganesh Joshi (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 15,325 votes)

Doiwala– Brij Bhushan Gairola (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 29,021 votes)

Rishikesh– Prem Chand Aggarwal (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 19,057 votes)

Haridwar– Madan Kaushik (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 15,237 votes)

BHEL Ranipur- Adesh Chauhan (BJP)- Trailing, Rajbir Singh Chauhan (Congress)- Leading, Prashant Rai (AAP)

Jwalapur-  Suresh Rathore (BJP), Er. Ravi Bahadur (Congress), Mamta Singh (AAP)

Bhagwanpur- Mamta Rakesh (Congress) (WINNER by a margin of 4,811 votes)

Jhabrera- Rajpal Singh (BJP), Vivendra Kumar (Congress), Rajoo Singh (AAP)

Pirankaliyar- Munish Kumar Saini (BJP), Furkan Ahmad (Congress), Sadab Alam (AAP)

Roorkee– Pradeep Batra (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 2,277 votes)

Khanpur- Kunwarani Devyani Singh (BJP), Subhash Singh Coudhary (Congress), Manorma Tyagi (AAP)

Manglaur- Dinesh Pawar (BJP), Qazi Mohammad Nizamuddin (Congress), Navneet Kumar (AAP)

Laksar- Sanjay Gupta (BJP), Dr Antriksh Saini (Congress), Mohd Yusuf (AAP)

Haridwar Rural- Swami Yatishwaranand (BJP), Anupama Rawat (Congress), Naresh Sharma (AAP)

Yamkeshwar- Renu Bisht (BJP), Shailendar Singh Rawat (Congress), Aviral (AAP)

Pauri- Raj Kumar Pori (BJP), Naval Kishor (Congress), Manohar Lal (AAP)

Srinagar- Dr Dhan Singh Rawat (BJP), Ganesh Godiyal (Congress), Gajendra Chauhan (AAP)

Chaubattakhal- Satpal Maharaj (BJP), Keshar Singh (Congress), Digmohan Negi (AAP)

Landsdowne- Dileep Singh Rawat (BJP), Anukriti Gusain Rawat (Congress), Narendra Singh (AAP)

Kotdwar- Ritu Khanduri Bhushan (BJP), Surendra Singh Negi (Congress), Arvind Kumar (AAP)

Dharchula- Dhan Singh Dhami (BJP), Harish Singh Dhami (Congress), Narayan Ram (AAP)

Didihat- Bishan Singh Chufal (BJP), Pradeep Singh Pal (Congress), Diwan Singh Mehta (AAP)

Pithoragarh- Chandra Pant (BJP), Mayukh Mahar (Congress), Chandra Prakash Punera (AAP)

Gangolihat- Fakir Ram Tamta (BJP), Khajan Chandra Guddu (Congress), Babita Chandra (AAP)

Kapkot– Suresh Gariya (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 4,046 votes)

Bageshwar– Chandra Ram Das (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 12,141 votes)

Dwarahat- Anil Shahi (BJP), Madan Singh Bisht (Congress), Prakash Chandra (AAP)

Salt- Mahesh Jeena (BJP), Ranjeet Singh Rawat (Congress), Suresh Bisht (AAP)

Ranikhet- Pamod Nainwal (BJP), Karan Mahara (Congress), Nandan Singh Bisht (AAP)

Someshwar- Rekha Arya (BJP), Rajendra Lal (Congress), Harish Chandra (AAP)

Almora- Kailash Sharma (BJP)- Leading, Manoj Tewari (Congress)- Trailing, Amit Joshi (AAP)

Jageshwar- Mohan Singh (BJP), Govind Singh Kunjwal (Congress), Taradutt Pandey (AAP)

Lohanghat– Khushal Singh Adhikari (Congress) (WINNER by a margin of 6,038 votes)

Champawat– Kailash Gahtori (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 5,304 votes)

Lalkuwa- Dr Mohan Singh Bisht  (BJP), Harish Rawat (Congress), Chandra Sekhar Pandey (AAP)

Bhimtaal- Ram Singh Kaira (BJP), Dan Singh Bhandari (Congress), Sanjay Kumar Pandey (AAP)

Nainital- Sarita Arya (BJP), Sanjeev Arya (Congress), Hem Chandra Arya (AAP)

Haldwani– Sumit Hridayesh (Congress) (WINNER by a margin of 7,814 votes)

Kaladhungi– Bansidhar Bhagat (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 23,931 seats)

Ramnagar– Diwan Singh Bisht (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 4,745)

Jaspur– Adesh Singh Chauhan (Congress) (WINNER by a margin of 4,172 seats)

Kashipur- Trilok Singh Cheema (BJP), Narendra Chand Singh (Congress), Deepak Bali (AAP)

Bajpur- Rajesh Kumar (BJP)- Trailing, Yashpal Arya (Congress)- Leading, Sunita Tamta (AAP)

Gadarpur– Arvind Pandey (BJP), Premanand Mahajan (Congress), Jarnail Singh Kali (AAP)

Rudrapur- Shiv Arora (BJP), Meena Sharma (Congress), Nand Lal (AAP)

Kichha- Rajesh Shukla (BJP), Tilak Raj Behar (Congress), Kulvanta Singh (AAP)

Sitarganj– Saurabh Bahuguna (BJP) (WINNER by a margin of 10,938 votes)

Nanak Matta- Dr Prem Singh Rana (BJP), Gopal Singh Rana (Congress), Anand Singh Rana (AAP)

Kahtima- Pushkar Singh Dhami (BJP), Bhuwan Chandra Kapri (Congress), SS Kaler (AAP)

India News

LPU students protest over reported rape allegation, police call it rumour

Students at Lovely Professional University protested over a reported rape allegation involving a worker, with police describing the claim as a rumour.

Published

on

Students of Lovely Professional University (LPU) in Punjab staged a protest after an allegation involving the reported rape of a student by a worker at the university surfaced.

The protest led to disruption around the university, with students taking to the streets and blocking the Jalandhar-Phagwara National Highway, according to the report.

The allegation triggered anger among students, who demanded action over the reported incident.

Police describe rape claim as rumour

Police, however, described the rape claim as a rumour, indicating that the allegation had not been established as a confirmed incident.

The distinction is important because the reported sexual assault allegation should not be treated as a confirmed rape unless investigators or other authoritative sources establish that fact.

The protests nevertheless continued as students sought clarity and action over the issue.

Protest disrupts traffic

The student demonstration also affected traffic on the Jalandhar-Phagwara National Highway. The protest brought attention to the allegations and the concerns being raised by students at the university.

With police calling the claim a rumour, further verification and investigation would be necessary to establish what actually happened.

Continue Reading

India News

INDIA bloc likely to meet on September 30 over Gyanesh Kumar row

INDIA bloc parties are likely to meet in New Delhi on September 30 amid growing opposition to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.

Published

on

Rahul-Gandhi

Opposition parties belonging to the INDIA bloc are set to meet in New Delhi on September 30 to discuss concerns surrounding the Election Commission, the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and a proposed removal motion against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

The proposed meeting comes amid growing coordination among opposition parties over the functioning of the poll panel and demands for action against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The parties are also discussing a possible joint response to the developments.

Why is the INDIA bloc meeting being planned?

The INDIA bloc meeting on September 30 comes amid reports of objections within the Election Commission over certain decisions and orders related to the SIR exercise. 

According to the report, Opposition leaders have been discussing a coordinated response to their concerns over the Election Commission and the electoral-roll revision process. 

The issue is also expected to be discussed at the Congress Working Committee meeting scheduled for September 29, a day before the proposed INDIA bloc meeting.

Gyanesh Kumar removal demand in focus

The demand for the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar has become a major point of contention between the Opposition and the Election Commission.

The CPI(M), CPI and CPI(ML)-Liberation have demanded Kumar’s removal and an immediate halt to the SIR exercise. Congress has also intensified its criticism of the CEC.

Opposition parties are also working on a fresh removal motion against Gyanesh Kumar. The September 30 meeting is expected to finalise the strategy for the motion, including the collection of signatures. According to the report, this would be the Opposition’s third such attempt. 

What is the SIR controversy?

The political dispute is linked to the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, or SIR.

The controversy intensified following a report that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had recorded objections on several occasions concerning decisions and orders related to the SIR process.

The Election Commission has said that differing views and observations are part of normal deliberations in a multi-member constitutional body. The poll panel has also maintained that its orders have legal sanction and follow statutory procedures, while stating that the final decisions on the SIR were taken unanimously. 

TMC and Left parties coordinate over the issue

The developments have also brought the Trinamool Congress and the CPI(M) together on the Election Commission issue, despite their political differences in West Bengal.

CPI(M) general secretary M A Baby proposed an immediate meeting to discuss a joint strategy. According to the report, Mamata Banerjee spoke with M A Baby and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, after which the leaders settled on September 30 for the meeting. 

What could be discussed at the September 30 meeting?

The proposed meeting is expected to focus on:

  • Concerns surrounding the Election Commission
  • The Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls
  • Opposition demands concerning CEC Gyanesh Kumar
  • A possible fresh removal notice against the CEC
  • A coordinated response by INDIA bloc parties

The exact agenda and participation will depend on the discussions among the opposition parties before the proposed meeting.

Continue Reading

India News

“Will die but won’t give up”: Sahil Wakode’s parents urge IIT students to continue fight 

Sahil Wakode’s parents have appealed to IIT Bombay students to continue their fight for justice amid the ongoing investigation into their son’s death.

Published

on

Sahil Wakode

The parents of IIT Bombay student Sahil Wakode have appealed to students to continue raising their voices and fighting for justice following their son’s death.

Sahil Wakode, a second-year student at IIT Bombay, died in his hostel room on September 18. His death has led to student protests and an ongoing investigation by the Mumbai Crime Branch.

What Sahil Wakode’s parents have alleged

Sahil’s parents have alleged that their son faced caste-based discrimination and harassment at IIT Bombay before his death. They have sought action against those they hold responsible and have demanded a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death.

The family has also called for a CBI inquiry and has sought the arrest of officials named in the case. These remain allegations and are part of the ongoing investigation.

The Mumbai Crime Branch took over the probe after an FIR was registered following the complaint by Sahil’s parents.

IIT Bombay’s position

IIT Bombay has said that Sahil was allegedly caught using a mobile phone during a mid-semester examination and had uploaded the question paper to ChatGPT to seek answers.

The institute has maintained that no disciplinary action had been initiated against him. It said the matter had been discussed with him by the instructor and the Head of the Department, who counselled him and assured him that the incident would not adversely affect his academic career.

The circumstances surrounding Sahil’s death are being investigated by the appropriate authorities.

Investigation continues

The case remains under investigation, with the Mumbai Crime Branch examining the circumstances surrounding Sahil’s death and the allegations made by his family.

His parents have continued to demand justice and action against those they believe were responsible, while the investigation is expected to establish the facts surrounding the case.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com