English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest Politics News

Article 370 scrapped, state bifurcated in two UTs: J&K with Assembly, Ladakh without

Published

on

Amit Shah

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The unprecedented troops build up and clampdown in Jammu and Kashmir over the last few days came to a dramatic denouement today, Monday, August 5, with Narendra Modi government scrapping Article 370 of the Constitution that gave the state a special status.

The move, that evoked sharp reactions from many as well as fulsome praise from others, also proposed bifurcation of the state into two union territories, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. While J&K would have a Legislative Assembly like Delhi and Puducherry, Ladakh would not have an Assembly – like Chandigarh, Andaman & Nicobar, Daman & Diu, Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Lakshadweep.

This has been on the agenda of BJP and Sangh parivar right from the start, from the time Article 370 was drafted in 1947.

Today, Home Minister Amit Shah has moved a resolution seeking to introduce a Bill revoking provisions of Article 370.

Before this announcement, PM Narendra Modi called up NDA allies. A presidential order has withdrawn the 1954 order applying provisions of the Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir with modifications. A gazette notification to the effect was issued.

Shah said that President Ram Nath Kovind had signed an order that would come into force “at once”.

“The president on the recommendation of Parliament is pleased to declare as from 5th of August 2019, all clauses of the said Article 370 shall cease to be operative… ,” stated the resolution moved by the Home minister.

The announcement came after Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a meeting of his cabinet at his house this morning.

In addition, Home Minister Amit Shah also introduced a Bill bifurcating the State of Jammu of Kashmir into Union Territory of Ladakh and the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir.

Jammu and Kashmir will also be “reorganised,” said the Home Minister, with the state’s bifurcation into two union territories, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, the former with a legislature and the latter without one.

Also Read: Union Home Ministry asks states to put security forces on high alert

The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Bill, which is expected to be passed in Rajya Sabha today, will be brought to Lok Sabha tomorrow.

BSP, BJD, YSRCP, Shiv Sena, AAP have extended support to the government’s move while Congress, TMC, DMK, MDMK and JD(U) have opposed the Bill till now.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1565004127423{border-top-width: 10px !important;border-right-width: 10px !important;border-bottom-width: 10px !important;border-left-width: 10px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-right: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;padding-left: 10px !important;background-color: #b5b5b5 !important;border-radius: 10px !important;}”]

Article 370

Clause 7 of the Instrument of Accession signed by Maharaja Hari Singh declared that the State could not be compelled to accept any future Constitution of India. The State was within its rights to draft its own Constitution and to decide for itself what additional powers to extend to the Central Government. The Article 370 was designed to protect those rights.

According to the constitutional scholar AG Noorani, the Article 370 records a ‘solemn compact’. Neither India nor the State can unilaterally amend or abrogate the Article except in accordance with the terms of the Article.

Article 370 embodied six special provisions for Jammu and Kashmir:

It exempted the State from the complete applicability of the Constitution of India. The State was allowed to have its own Constitution.

Central legislative powers over the State were limited, at the time of framing, to the three subjects of defence, foreign affairs and communications.

Other constitutional powers of the Central Government could be extended to the State only with the concurrence of the State Government.

The ‘concurrence’ was only provisional. It had to be ratified by the State’s Constituent Assembly.

The State Government’s authority to give ‘concurrence’ lasted only until the State Constituent Assembly was convened. Once the State Constituent Assembly finalised the scheme of powers and dispersed, no further extension of powers was possible.

The Article 370 could be abrogated or amended only upon the recommendation of the State’s Constituent Assembly.

Once the State’s Constitutional Assembly convened on 31 October 1951, the State Government’s power to give `concurrence’ lapsed. After the Constituent Assembly dispersed on 17 November 1956, adopting a Constitution for the State, the only authority provided to extend more powers to the Central Government or to accept Central institutions vanished. Noorani states that this understanding of the constitutionality of the Centre-State relations informed the decisions of India till 1957, but that it was abandoned afterwards. In subsequent years, other provisions continued to be extended to the State with the ‘concurrence’ of the State Government.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Anticipating trouble, the centre has moved 8,000 paramilitary troops from different parts of the country to Kashmir, said reports.

The government’s step comes after a massive build-up of troops in the sensitive Kashmir Valley and a night where senior leaders including former Chief Ministers Omar Abdullah and Mehbooba Mufti were placed under house arrest.

Internet and phone lines have been forced out of service in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Thousands of paramilitary troops have been sent to Kashmir after the government said it was cancelling the Amarnath Yatra, an annual pilgrimage, and asked tourists and outsiders to leave the state.

All educational institutions and offices are closed and groups have been banned from gathering in Kashmir and Jammu.

The announcement led to an uproar.

Former Attorney General Soli Sorabjee said it is not a wise decision taken by the Central government.

“I don’t think there is anything revolutionary here. It’s a political decision, even though it is not a wise decision,” Sorabjee told ANI.

Sorabjee also stated that it was “very unpleasant” to allegedly house arrest PDP chief Mehbooba Mufti and National Conference leader Omar Abdullah. “I think it’s very unnecessary. If not unnecessary, it is very unpleasant. It sent a wrong signal to the people of Kashmir. I don’t think it was so necessary to put them under the house arrest,” he said.

PDP chief and former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Mehbooba Mufi said India had failed Kashmir in keeping its promises.

She said the government’s unilateral decision “to scrap Article 370″ is illegal and unconstitutional.

It will make India an occupational force in Jammu and Kashmir, Mehbooba said on Twitter.

“It will have catastrophic consequences for the subcontinent. GOIs intentions are clear. They want the territory of J&K by terrorising its people. India has failed Kashmir in keeping its promises,” Mehbooba, under house arrest in Srinagar, said on Twitter.

“Not sure how long I’ll be able to communicate. Is this the India we acceded to?” she asked.

National Conference leader Omar Abdullah echoed her outrage, also labelling the government’s move “unilateral”.

“Government of India (GOI)’s unilateral and shocking decisions today are a total betrayal of the trust that the people of Jammu & Kashmir had reposed in India when the state acceded to it in 1947. The decisions will have far-reaching and dangerous consequences. This is an aggression against people of the State as had been warned by an all-parties meeting in Srinagar yesterday,” he said.

The government, he said in a statement, had resorted to “deceit and stealth” to lay the ground for these disastrous decisions.

“Those of us who gave democratic voice to the people of Jammu & Kashmir, are incarcerated as lakhs of armed security personnel have been put on the ground… A long and tough battle lies ahead. We are ready for that,” he said.

In BJP and its allies, the mood was triumphant.

Senior BJP leader and former finance minister Arun Jaitley called it a monumental decision towards national integration.

His party colleague Ram Madhav also hailed the decision. “What a glorious day. Finally the martyrdom of thousands starting with Dr Shyam Prasad Mukherjee for complete integration of J&K into Indian Union is being honoured and the seven decade old demand of the entire nation being realised in front of our eyes; in our lifetime. Ever imagined?” he tweeted moments after Shah’s announcement.

Party spokesperson Shahnawaz Hussain said the move had opened the path of growth and development for Jammu and Kashmir.

Congress leader Ghulam Nabi Azad, calling it a dark day” in Indian democracy, said, “The BJP is drunk on power and the government acted like thieves in the night. Article 370 has been scrapped to help BJP get more votes. We had never thought that the state of Jammu and Kashmir would be destroyed this way.  BJP has wiped out Jammu and Kashmir’s identity and destroyed democracy. They’ve cut off head of the country. The party is playing with the integrity of the state.”

NCP leader Sharad Pawar told news agency ANI: “I think Govt of India should have taken them (leaders of the valley) into confidence which unfortunately the govt didn’t do. And then they should have taken the decision (to revoke 370).”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

AAP drops minister, sitting MLAs from second Punjab list, gives tickets to 2 MPs

AAP has released its second list of 31 candidates for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections. The list leaves out a minister and several sitting MLAs while giving Assembly election tickets to two MPs.

Published

on

The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has announced its second list of 31 candidates for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections, taking the total number of constituencies for which it has declared nominees to 71. The latest list includes two sitting Members of Parliament (MPs), while several sitting MLAs have been replaced.

The party has also cancelled the ticket of Cabinet Minister Gurmeet Singh Khuddian, fielding Randhir Singh Dhira Khuddian instead from Lambi.

The development comes as the ruling party steps up preparations for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections. 

AAP’s second list follows 40-candidate announcement

AAP had announced its first list of 40 candidates on October 31. The party had renominated all 40 sitting MLAs included in that list.

Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann was named as the candidate from Dhuri, while Assembly Speaker Kultar Singh Sandhwan was fielded from Kotkapura.

Three AAP MLAs quit the party shortly after the announcement of the first list, leaving Samana, Sanaur and Amritsar North among the constituencies requiring a fresh look.

Minister Gurmeet Khuddian loses Lambi ticket

One of the significant changes in the second list is in Lambi, where AAP has fielded Randhir Singh Dhira Khuddian instead of sitting MLA and Cabinet Minister Gurmeet Singh Khuddian.

Gurmeet Singh Khuddian had defeated former Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal from the constituency in the 2022 Assembly elections.

Two sitting MPs get Assembly tickets

AAP has fielded two sitting MPs in the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections. Sangrur MP Gurmeet Singh Meet Hayer will contest from Barnala, his former constituency, while Hoshiarpur MP Dr Raj Kumar Chabbewal has been named as the candidate from Phagwara.

Meet Hayer returns to Barnala, where Congress won the 2024 bypoll.

Focus shifts to candidate selection ahead of Punjab polls

The second list indicates that the party is making further changes to its candidate selection as it prepares for the 2027 Assembly elections.

Giving tickets to two MPs also marks an important development in its electoral preparations.

The candidate announcements come as political parties begin preparing for the next electoral contest in Punjab, where the AAP will seek another term in government.

Continue Reading

India News

Chandrashekhar Azad to be CM candidate of alliance with Owaisi for Uttar Pradesh elections

Asaduddin Owaisi and Chandrashekhar Azad have joined hands ahead of the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections, bringing together the AIMIM and Azad Samaj Party in an effort to consolidate Dalit and Muslim voters.

Published

on

Asaduddin Owaisi’s All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) and Chandrashekhar Azad’s Azad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram) have joined hands ahead of the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections, seeking to emerge as a third political force and draw support from sections of Muslim and Dalit voters.

As part of the alliance, Owaisi declared Chandrashekhar Azad as the alliance’s Chief Ministerial face for the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections.

Owaisi had been seeking a place in the Opposition alliance for months and had even issued ultimatums to the Samajwadi Party and Congress. However, his efforts did not find takers.

The alliance brings together AIMIM’s focus on Muslim political representation and the Azad Samaj Party’s outreach among Dalit voters. Both parties are seeking to establish a political formation outside the BJP-led NDA and the Samajwadi Party-led opposition.

Why Owaisi and Chandrashekhar Azad joined hands

Uttar Pradesh AIMIM president Shaukat Ali said the party approached Chandrashekhar Azad after its efforts to reach an understanding with the Samajwadi Party, Congress and Bahujan Samaj Party did not succeed.

Ali said AIMIM wanted a broader alliance to prevent the BJP from returning to power in Uttar Pradesh for a third consecutive term.

He also criticised the Samajwadi Party-Congress alliance, questioning its prospects in the next Assembly elections.

Chandrashekhar Azad, the Lok Sabha MP from Nagina, said the partnership would focus on empowering young people, farmers and weaker sections of society.

He also raised concerns over employment opportunities, demonetisation and issues affecting educated youth from Dalit and backward communities.

What the alliance means for Akhilesh Yadav’s PDA strategy

Muslims account for around 20 per cent of Uttar Pradesh’s population, while Dalits constitute approximately 21 per cent.

Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav has used the PDA formulation to bring together backward classes, Dalits and minorities. The AIMIM-Azad Samaj Party alliance is seeking support among two important sections of this broader social grouping.

Muslims account for around 20 per cent of Uttar Pradesh’s population, while Dalits constitute approximately 21 per cent.

What the parties’ previous election performance shows

Both AIMIM and the Azad Samaj Party have struggled to establish a significant presence in Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections.

In the 2022 Assembly elections, AIMIM contested more than 90 seats but secured less than 0.5 per cent of the total votes. The Azad Samaj Party contested more than 100 seats and received approximately 0.13 per cent of the votes.

Chandrashekhar Azad, however, won the Nagina Lok Sabha constituency in 2024, giving his party its first elected representative in Parliament.

The alliance is now attempting to combine AIMIM’s support among sections of Muslim voters with Azad’s outreach among Dalit communities.

Its electoral prospects will depend on the seat-sharing arrangement, local leadership and whether the two parties can translate their combined social outreach into electoral support.

SP leaders respond to the alliance

Samajwadi Party MP from Ayodhya, Awadhesh Prasad, dismissed the electoral significance of the AIMIM-Azad Samaj Party alliance. He said that people in Uttar Pradesh had lost faith in the BJP government and described Akhilesh Yadav as the only leader capable of removing the BJP from power in 2027.

The alliance’s formation could therefore become an important factor in the political discussions ahead of the 2027 Assembly elections, particularly because both leaders are seeking support among communities that the Samajwadi Party also hopes to bring together through its PDA formulation.

Continue Reading

India News

Sonia Gandhi’s memoir timing not linked to 2029 polls, says N Ram

N Ram said Sonia Gandhi’s memoir was not written with the 2029 Lok Sabha election in mind, explaining that she had been working on it for years.

Published

on

Sonia Gandhi

Sonia Gandhi’s memoir Belonging: A Journey of Love was released on Tuesday, with N Ram saying its publication was not planned around the 2029 Lok Sabha election despite the book containing several political references that could become relevant to the electoral debate.

In an interview, N Ram, former Editor-in-Chief of The Hindu, said political issues emerged naturally as part of Sonia Gandhi’s narration. He said the memoir was primarily an effort by the former Congress president to tell her own story and portray her family as people she knew and loved.

Why Sonia Gandhi’s memoir was released now

According to N Ram, Sonia Gandhi began jotting down material for the memoir around 10 years ago. He said that although the writing process had periods when she was unable to continue, she devoted the last five years to the project.

He said the timing was driven by her desire to tell her own story after years of others writing about her and her family.

Sonia Gandhi has described the memoir as a personal account rather than a political book. In a statement ahead of its release, she said she wanted to portray her family honestly and share what she had witnessed during more than five decades in India.

Political issues find space in the book

N Ram said the memoir does contain political material that could have a bearing on the 2029 elections.

He specifically referred to Sonia Gandhi’s comments about the BJP and the RSS, concerns about people being restless, allegations of “vote stealing” and her criticism concerning institutions. He also pointed to her references to the Election Commission of India.

However, N Ram said these issues appearing in the book should not be interpreted as evidence that it was deliberately timed for the 2029 elections.

He argued that the 2029 election is still some distance away and said that if the memoir had been intended specifically for the election, its release could have been delayed by another couple of years.

Sonia Gandhi’s own account of the memoir

Sonia Gandhi has said the book emerged from her wish to speak about her own experiences after remaining largely private for much of her life.

The memoir traces her journey from Italy to India, her relationship with Rajiv Gandhi and the Nehru-Gandhi family, the personal losses that shaped her life and her eventual entry into politics. It also covers important political moments, including her decision not to become prime minister after the Congress-led alliance won the 2004 election.

N Ram said Sonia Gandhi had previously discussed the idea of telling her story and had maintained that others had spent decades telling her story, making her feel it was now her turn to do so.

He said the memoir therefore came from a desire to tell her own version of her life rather than from an immediate electoral strategy.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com