Congress Parliamentary Party meet: Sonia Gandhi lays focus on inflation, Nagaland killing
Sonia Gandhi said the BJP government’s regret ove the Nagaland killing is not enough and demanded credible steps must be taken to prevent recurrence of such tragedies. The Congress also demanded justice for the families of victims of the killings in Nagaland, she said.
Congress president Sonia Gandhi on Wednesday addressed the Congress Parliamentaryt meet in New Delhi and laid his focus on the inflation in the country and recent civilian killings in Nagaland.
Addressing the party meet, Gandhi also slammed the Modi government over the range of isuues including undemocratic repealing of farm laws, selling of government assets, fuel price hike, vaccination, border tension and the suspension of 12 Opposition MPs.
Her speech came minutes ahead of the entire Opposition’s plan to join a sit-in protest by the 12 MPs at the Gandhi statue to express solidarity with them.
Here are the issues that Sonia Gandhi spoke about at CPP meet in New Delhi
The suspension of 12 Rajya Sabha MPs
Speaking about the outrageous suspension of 12 Rajya Sabha MPs, the Congress president Sonia Gandhi called the situation is unprecedented and shook us all. She also said that their suspension from the entire winter session of Parliament violates both the Constitution and the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council of States.
Gandhi also expressed solidarity with Chaya Verma, Phulo Devi Netam, Ripun Bora, Nasir Hussein, Akhilesh Prasad Singh, Rajamani Patel who have been sitting by the Gandhi statue every day.
Inflation and fuel price hike
In her address at CPP meeting, he also criticized the steps that has recently taken by the BJP to reduce petrol, diesel, and cooking gas prices and called such steps are insufficient and inadequate.
Talking about the rising inflation in the country, Gandhi said the prices of edible oils, pulses and vegetables are burning a hole in the monthly budget of every household. The Modi government is busy in selling off precious national assets like banks, insurance companies, public sector enterprises, railways and airports she said.
Nagaland Killings
Sonia Gandhi said the BJP government’s regret ove the Nagaland killing is not enough and demanded credible steps must be taken to prevent recurrence of such tragedies. The Congress also demanded justice for the families of victims of the killings in Nagaland, she said.
Covid Vaccination
Speaking on the slow pace of Covid vaccination, Gandhi said the government does not want to answer difficult questions but it is the right and duty of the Opposition to seek clarifications and explanations from the government and its accoutable bodies.
On the Covid situation in India, she said that the government celebrated the 100-crore mark for vaccination but didn’t say it was for single dose of vaccination and the country is nowhere near the target of innoculating everyone eligible by the year-end.
Border tension
On the issue of border tensions, Gandhi said it is extraordinary that the Parliament has been given no opportunity whatsoever so far to have a discussion on the challenges we continue to face on our borders.
The party sought a full-fledged discussion in Parliament on the border situation, ties with neighbours, the Congress president said.
Students of Lovely Professional University (LPU) in Punjab staged a protest after an allegation involving the reported rape of a student by a worker at the university surfaced.
The protest led to disruption around the university, with students taking to the streets and blocking the Jalandhar-Phagwara National Highway, according to the report.
The allegation triggered anger among students, who demanded action over the reported incident.
Police describe rape claim as rumour
Police, however, described the rape claim as a rumour, indicating that the allegation had not been established as a confirmed incident.
The distinction is important because the reported sexual assault allegation should not be treated as a confirmed rape unless investigators or other authoritative sources establish that fact.
The protests nevertheless continued as students sought clarity and action over the issue.
Protest disrupts traffic
The student demonstration also affected traffic on the Jalandhar-Phagwara National Highway. The protest brought attention to the allegations and the concerns being raised by students at the university.
With police calling the claim a rumour, further verification and investigation would be necessary to establish what actually happened.
INDIA bloc likely to meet on September 30 over Gyanesh Kumar row
INDIA bloc parties are likely to meet in New Delhi on September 30 amid growing opposition to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.
Opposition parties belonging to the INDIA bloc are set to meet in New Delhi on September 30 to discuss concerns surrounding the Election Commission, the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and a proposed removal motion against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.
The proposed meeting comes amid growing coordination among opposition parties over the functioning of the poll panel and demands for action against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The parties are also discussing a possible joint response to the developments.
Why is the INDIA bloc meeting being planned?
The INDIA bloc meeting on September 30 comes amid reports of objections within the Election Commission over certain decisions and orders related to the SIR exercise.
According to the report, Opposition leaders have been discussing a coordinated response to their concerns over the Election Commission and the electoral-roll revision process.
The issue is also expected to be discussed at the Congress Working Committee meeting scheduled for September 29, a day before the proposed INDIA bloc meeting.
Gyanesh Kumar removal demand in focus
The demand for the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar has become a major point of contention between the Opposition and the Election Commission.
The CPI(M), CPI and CPI(ML)-Liberation have demanded Kumar’s removal and an immediate halt to the SIR exercise. Congress has also intensified its criticism of the CEC.
Opposition parties are also working on a fresh removal motion against Gyanesh Kumar. The September 30 meeting is expected to finalise the strategy for the motion, including the collection of signatures. According to the report, this would be the Opposition’s third such attempt.
What is the SIR controversy?
The political dispute is linked to the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, or SIR.
The controversy intensified following a report that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had recorded objections on several occasions concerning decisions and orders related to the SIR process.
The Election Commission has said that differing views and observations are part of normal deliberations in a multi-member constitutional body. The poll panel has also maintained that its orders have legal sanction and follow statutory procedures, while stating that the final decisions on the SIR were taken unanimously.
TMC and Left parties coordinate over the issue
The developments have also brought the Trinamool Congress and the CPI(M) together on the Election Commission issue, despite their political differences in West Bengal.
CPI(M) general secretary M A Baby proposed an immediate meeting to discuss a joint strategy. According to the report, Mamata Banerjee spoke with M A Baby and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, after which the leaders settled on September 30 for the meeting.
What could be discussed at the September 30 meeting?
The proposed meeting is expected to focus on:
Concerns surrounding the Election Commission
The Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls
Opposition demands concerning CEC Gyanesh Kumar
A possible fresh removal notice against the CEC
A coordinated response by INDIA bloc parties
The exact agenda and participation will depend on the discussions among the opposition parties before the proposed meeting.
The parents of IIT Bombay student Sahil Wakode have appealed to students to continue raising their voices and fighting for justice following their son’s death.
Sahil Wakode, a second-year student at IIT Bombay, died in his hostel room on September 18. His death has led to student protests and an ongoing investigation by the Mumbai Crime Branch.
What Sahil Wakode’s parents have alleged
Sahil’s parents have alleged that their son faced caste-based discrimination and harassment at IIT Bombay before his death. They have sought action against those they hold responsible and have demanded a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death.
The family has also called for a CBI inquiry and has sought the arrest of officials named in the case. These remain allegations and are part of the ongoing investigation.
The Mumbai Crime Branch took over the probe after an FIR was registered following the complaint by Sahil’s parents.
IIT Bombay’s position
IIT Bombay has said that Sahil was allegedly caught using a mobile phone during a mid-semester examination and had uploaded the question paper to ChatGPT to seek answers.
The institute has maintained that no disciplinary action had been initiated against him. It said the matter had been discussed with him by the instructor and the Head of the Department, who counselled him and assured him that the incident would not adversely affect his academic career.
The circumstances surrounding Sahil’s death are being investigated by the appropriate authorities.
Investigation continues
The case remains under investigation, with the Mumbai Crime Branch examining the circumstances surrounding Sahil’s death and the allegations made by his family.
His parents have continued to demand justice and action against those they believe were responsible, while the investigation is expected to establish the facts surrounding the case.
APN News is today the most watched and the most credible and respected news channel in India. APN has been at the forefront of every single news revolution. The channel is being recognized for its in-depth, analytical reportage and hard hitting discussions on burning issues; without any bias or vested interests.