English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

India’s military strength fourth in Global Firepower index, China, at third, close behind Russia, US tops; Pakistan 13th

Published

on

India's military strength fourth in Global Firepower index, China, at third, close behind Russia, US tops; Pakistan 13th

India is the fourth strongest military power in the world, behind China which, at third position is close behind Russia in the Global Firepower rankings. US tops the list.

Other countries in the top ten are France, UK, Japan, Turkey and Germany.

Neighbouring Pakistan, placed 13th, got into the top 15 last year. India’s position has remain unchanged at fourth.

Meanwhile, China has crept up behind Russia and is poised to take the second place soon, reported The Indian Express. It has more aircraft and naval ships than Russia but is hugely outnumbered in total tanks in service.

The rankings for the index are based on 50 parameters, including military resources, natural resources, industry and geographical features and available manpower. The large number of military personnel with India and China are an important factor in the higher rankings of these countries. “Available manpower is a key consideration; nations with large populations tend to rank higher,” said Global Firepower..

According to GFP’s assessment, India leads China in terms of total armed personnel with India’s 4,207,250 personnel against China’s 3,712,500. China, however, leads in terms of active personnel with 2,260,000 troops compared to India’s 1,362,500. India’s reserve components were assessed to be 2,844,750 while China’s were estimated to be 1,452,500.

The index didn’t count nuclear stockpiles for the ranking but gave points for nuclear capability, whether recognised or suspected.

Another aspect for consideration was the defence budget allocation with China allocating over three times the amount India set aside for its military.

When compared with Pakistan, India led the way on all aspects except the number of attack helicopters, self-propelled artillery and waterway coverage.

On their assessment methodology, Global Firepower said, “Geographical factors, logistical flexibility, natural resources and local industry influence the final ranking.”

“Our formula allows smaller, though more technologically-advanced, nations to compete with larger, lesser-developed ones. Modifiers (in the form of bonuses and penalties) are added to further refine the list,” it said.

In terms of airpower, the US surges ahead of the competition, with the data showing it in the possession of over 13,000 aircraft that are assigned for military use. These include fighters, transporters and helicopters. India is shown as having 2102 aircraft in service.

On the Naval side, the rankings show up a surprise with North Korea ranked the highest in terms of total strength of vessels. This may, however, be misleading as most of these are smaller craft that North Korea uses for shore defence like patrol vessels and minesweepers, said a report in The Print.

The data also seems misleading when it comes to India, as it shows the Navy with strength of three aircraft carriers. Even if the INS Jalashwa is considered as a helicopter carrier (which it is not), India has only one aircraft carrier in service – the INS Vikramaditya, said the report.

In terms of budget allocations for defence, India emerges as one of the top spenders on the military globally, with Russia ranked far below. The data says India spends $51 billion on defence while Saudi Arabia is ranked one above at $56 billion. Even though a constant complaint within Indian military circles has been on the relatively low allocations for defence in terms of GDP, the global data shows India as a big spender. Pakistan is ranked at number 28, below nations like Norway and Afghanistan.

Here are the details of Indian military strength, as considered by the global index for ranking.

Available manpower: Data shows India as having some of the most abundant manpower in the world (See above)

Airpower: India is listed as having 676 fighter aircraft and 809 attack aircraft – numbers that seem unrealistically high, according to media reports.

Army power: Data shows India with over 4,400 tanks.

Naval power: Data incorrectly shows India with three aircraft carriers, said The Print.

TOP TEN

Total Fighter / Interceptor Aircraft Strength

1 United States  2,296

2 China 1,271

3 Russia 806

4 India 676

5 North Korea 458

6 South Korea 406

7 Egypt 337

8 Pakistan 301

9 France 296

10 Japan 288

Tank Strength

1 Russia 20,216

2 China 6,457

3 United States 5,884

4 North Korea 5,025

5 Syria 4,640

6 India 4,426

7 Egypt 4,110

8 Pakistan 2,924

9 South Korea 2,654

10 Israel 2,620

Total Naval Strength

1 North Korea 967

2 China 714

3 United States 415

4 Iran 398

5 Russia 352

6 Egypt 319

7 India 295

8 Finland 270

9 Colombia 234

10 Indonesia 221

Total Available Active Military Manpower

1 China 2,260,000

2 United States 1,373,650

3 India 1,362,500

4 North Korea 945,000

5 Russia 798,527

6 Pakistan 637,000

7 South Korea 627,500

8 Iran 534,000

9 Algeria 520,000

10 Egypt 454,250

Defence spending (in USD):

1 United States  587,800,000,000

2 China  161,700,000,000

3 Saudi Arabia  56,725,000,000

4 India  51,000,000,000

5 United Kingdom 45,700,000,000

6 Russia 44,600,000,000

7 Japan 43,800,000,000

8 South Korea 43,800,000,000

9 Germany 39,200,000,000

10 France 35,000,000,000

Latest world news

US urges calm after Pahalgam attack, seeks Pakistan’s cooperation in probe

In the wake of the deadly Pahalgam terror attack, the United States has called on India and Pakistan to exercise restraint, urging both nations to avoid escalation and focus on cooperation against terrorism.

Published

on

Amid heightened tensions in South Asia following the devastating terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam region that killed 26 civilians, the United States has urged India and Pakistan to exercise restraint and avoid further escalation. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has made separate calls to Indian Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, emphasizing the need for cooperation and regional stability.

US calls for collaborative counter-terrorism approach

Rubio expressed deep sorrow over the loss of lives in the Pahalgam attack, labeling it as “unconscionable,” and conveyed his solidarity with India. During his conversation with Jaishankar, he reiterated Washington’s commitment to combat terrorism in partnership with New Delhi. However, he also urged India to proceed with caution, especially in light of the accusation that Pakistan-backed elements were responsible for the attack.

Jaishankar, after the call, took to social media platform X, affirming that those behind the attack—whether perpetrators, planners, or backers—must face justice.

In his dialogue with Prime Minister Sharif, the US Secretary of State asked Pakistan to publicly condemn the April 22 attack and to cooperate fully with the investigation. He urged the resumption of direct communications between the two nations to prevent further deterioration of ties.

India-Pakistan ties sour post-attack

The terror outfit The Resistance Front (TRF), linked to the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam assault. India has firmly blamed Pakistan, prompting swift diplomatic and administrative actions, including the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty and revocation of Pakistani visas. The Wagah-Attari border has also been sealed.

In response, Islamabad has denied involvement and called for a neutral investigation. It also retaliated by closing its airspace to Indian carriers and engaging in border shelling. Pakistan’s defence ministry has warned of an impending Indian military operation, escalating fears of direct conflict.

Strategic ties influence US stance

While the US has expressed open support for India, including condemnations from President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance, it has refrained from criticising Pakistan directly. Experts note that India remains crucial to US Indo-Pacific strategy amid growing concerns over China, even as Pakistan’s relevance has declined post the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

PM Modi won’t attend Russia’s Victory Day celebrations in Moscow, confirms Kremlin

Instead, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh will represent India at the commemorative events marking the Allied victory over Nazi Germany in 1945.

Published

on

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov announced on Wednesday, April 30, that Prime Minister Narendra Modi will not attend the 80th anniversary celebrations of Victory Day in Moscow next month.

Instead, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh will represent India at the commemorative events marking the Allied victory over Nazi Germany in 1945.

“India will be represented by Defence Minister Singh, not at the highest level,” Peskov stated, confirming that India had informed Russia of the decision well in advance. A source elaborated, “An invitation was extended to Prime Minister Modi for the Victory Day Parade in Moscow, but we conveyed that Minister Singh would attend on India’s behalf.”

Modi, who visited Russia twice in 2024 for an annual summit with President Vladimir Putin and the BRICS Summit in Kazan, is not expected to travel for the May 9 event. Meanwhile, Putin is slated to visit India later this year for the annual India-Russia summit, maintaining the tradition of high-level bilateral engagements.

The Moscow parade, held annually at Red Square, will see significant international participation, with Chinese President Xi Jinping confirming his attendance. Russia is preparing to host around 20 foreign leaders for the milestone anniversary.

In a statement reported by Russia’s state-run news agency on Tuesday, Putin reflected on the historical significance of the occasion: “On the Volga’s banks, our forces stopped and defeated the enemy, dealing a critical blow to the Nazi war machine. This turning point paved the way to Berlin and the Great Victory, which we will honor solemnly on May 9.”

Russia has also declared a ceasefire in Ukraine from May 8 to 10 to observe Victory Day, a gesture underscoring the event’s importance. The Victory Day celebrations, a major national event, commemorate the Soviet Union’s pivotal role in defeating Nazi Germany, culminating in the surrender on May 9, 1945.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Mark Carney’s win sparks hope for India-Canada relations reset

Mark Carney’s rise as Canada’s Prime Minister brings a renewed focus on repairing ties with India, as both countries seek cooperation in trade, education, and diplomacy.

Published

on

Mark Carney’s ascension to the role of Canada’s Prime Minister has brought renewed optimism for a diplomatic thaw between New Delhi and Ottawa, a relationship that faced serious setbacks under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Carney, a former central banker and political novice, made it clear during his campaign that rebuilding bilateral ties with India would be among his foreign policy priorities.

Carney signals intent to revive ties

In his pre-election statements, Carney emphasised Canada’s need to diversify trade partnerships with nations that share democratic values—explicitly naming India. He said, “There are opportunities to rebuild the relationship with India. If I am Prime Minister, I look forward to the opportunity to build that.”

This approach marks a significant departure from the Trudeau administration’s strained relations with India, especially following the high-profile controversy in 2023 involving the killing of Khalistani separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar. The diplomatic crisis escalated with the expulsion of six Indian diplomats and reciprocal steps from India, effectively freezing high-level exchanges and trade talks.

The road to reconciliation

Under Trudeau, India frequently accused Canada of harbouring extremist elements within its Sikh diaspora. The Indian government viewed this as a threat to its sovereignty, particularly amid rising incidents of pro-Khalistan demonstrations abroad.

Mark Carney, however, has taken a more pragmatic view, underlining the importance of restoring diplomatic balance and mutual respect. His vision of Canadian sovereignty also extends to redefining international alliances, with a push toward reducing dependency on its largest neighbour—the United States—and strengthening partnerships like the one with India.

Economic and educational prospects

The Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) between the two nations, stalled due to the diplomatic fallout, may see a revival under Carney’s leadership. In 2023, services trade between India and Canada was valued at CAD 13.49 billion. Both countries had been exploring collaboration in emerging sectors like AI, green energy, and education.

India continues to be one of the largest contributors to Canada’s immigrant population, with nearly 2.8 million people of Indian origin living in the country. Carney is likely to continue the liberal immigration policies, particularly benefiting Indian students and professionals. Over 427,000 Indian students currently study in Canada, playing a crucial role in its economy and labour force.

A cautious but hopeful turn

Carney’s victory offers both countries a diplomatic opportunity to reset a troubled chapter. With mutual interests in economic growth, technological advancement, and geopolitical balance, the groundwork is being laid for a more collaborative future.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com