English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Iraq not to allow US military bases to save sovereignty

Published

on

Iraq not to allow US military bases to save sovereignty

Washington worried over Baghdad growing ties with Moscow

In a major setback to Washington, Iraq has denied permission to US for setting up its permanent military bases on its territory under “any circumstances” as it would be a violation of its sovereignty.

Iraq’s foreign minister Ibrahim Jaafari, while talking to journalists in Moscow during his extended visit on Friday said, “Baghdad firmly rejects the construction of US military bases on its soil”. He asserted that Iraq will “not stand on ceremony” when it comes to the protection of its sovereignty.

Jaafari told that Moscow and Baghdad exchange information on a regular basis and Iraq is receiving assistance from Russia in ensuring security.

TASS had quoted Iraqi foreign minister saying on Wednesday that “It is difficult for a country to be restored after the war alone. Russia is also providing assistance in security area”.

During his interaction with media in Moscow, Iraq’s foreign minister said that in 2014, when Baghdad asked for international help in fighting against Daesh terrorists, it said the potential contribution had to meet the requirements of Iraq’s sovereignty and independence. “Iraq’s sovereignty is our red line” he said.

Iraq not to allow US military bases to save sovereignty

Iraqi foreign minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari further said that the presence of permanent US military bases in “South Korea, Turkey, Japan and many other countries” long after the end of World War II were in violation of those countries’ sovereignty.

Earlier on Tuesday, Jaafari told reporters in Moscow that Baghdad was thoroughly considering  to purchase Russia’s surface-t—air S-400 missile defense systems.

A report from Baghdad said on Thursday that Iraq’s parliament had voted to urge the government to set a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign troops from the country, two months after it declared victory over Daesh (IS) militants.

Earlier in February, Saad al-Hadithi, a spokesperson of the Iraqi cabinet, said that it was logical that (the US-led) coalition would reduce the number of its troops in Iraq after the victory was declared over Daesh (IS) in December.

According to US government there are about 9000 American troops in Iraq. However Department of Defense puts the number far lower. Recently there were reports of moving US troops from Iraq to Afghanistan. However, exact figures about the forces’ redeployment are no clear.

In 2003, US invaded Iraq to topple Saddam Hussein regime under the false pretext of Baghdad possessing weapons of mass destruction. Iraq is the first country in the history of US military presence worldwide where Baghdad virtually forced Washington to withdraw its forces from its territory in December 2011, the first announced withdrawal schedule.

Nuri al-Maliki, the then PM had made it clear that Iraqi parliament could not evolve consensus for their longer stay and asked Washington to withdraw their troops as announced earlier.  Maliki had to leave the office after persistent pressure build up by media campaign projecting him to be responsible for so-called mass killings of Sunni Muslims.

In Late February, Heather Neuert, the spokeswomen of US State Department had warned Iraq for the consequences of extending military cooperation with Russia and striking deals to purchase advanced weapons, especially the S-400 missile systems.

Observers believe that generally US administration succeeds in ‘convincing the host government’ to formally request for extension of their stay. But due to irrevocable Iranian influence in Baghdad no extension was given to the US military presence.

In the recent years Tehran has build up its influence in Iraq and Syria by sending its military advisors and weapons in their fight against Daesh and other armed groups.

Latest world news

Trump says Iran wants talks amid protests, warns US may act before meeting

Donald Trump claims Iran’s leadership wants negotiations amid mass protests, but says the US may take action before any talks are held.

Published

on

US President Donald Trump has claimed that Iran’s leadership has reached out to his administration seeking negotiations, even as large-scale anti-government protests continue across the country and Washington signals possible military action.

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said Iranian leaders had contacted him after his recent warnings. “The leaders of Iran called yesterday,” he said, adding that a meeting was being planned. However, he cautioned that the United States “may have to act before a meeting.”

The remarks come amid reports of deaths during protests in several Iranian cities. Trump accused Iran’s rulers of maintaining control through force, saying there were indications that people had been killed who “aren’t supposed to be killed.”

He said the US military was closely monitoring developments and that senior officials were reviewing what he described as “very strong options.” Trump said he was receiving hourly briefings on the situation and that a decision would be made after assessing all factors.

When asked if Iran had crossed a red line, Trump declined to provide operational details, saying he would not disclose how or where the US might act. “We’re gonna make a determination,” he said.

Addressing reports of fatalities among protesters, Trump suggested that some deaths occurred due to crowd stampedes, while others involved gunfire. He did not provide specific figures or details.

Trump also issued a strong warning against any retaliation by Iran or its allied groups. He said any such response would be met with unprecedented force, stating that the US would strike “at levels that they’ve never been hit before.”

The US President said Iran should already be aware of Washington’s resolve, referring to previous American actions against high-profile militant leaders and what he described as the elimination of Iran’s nuclear threat.

Trump did not clarify whether the US had coordinated with allies on a potential response or outline a timeline for further action.

Iran has witnessed repeated waves of unrest in recent weeks, with thousands of people participating in protests against the current regime in cities across the country.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump again threatens forceful takeover of Greenland citing US security concerns

Donald Trump has again suggested the US could use force to take control of Greenland, brushing aside Denmark’s sovereignty and linking the move to Arctic security concerns.

Published

on

donald trump

US President Donald Trump has once again raised the possibility of using force to take control of Greenland, dismissing Denmark’s sovereignty over the autonomous Arctic island and framing the issue as a matter of US national security.

Speaking at a White House meeting with oil executives on Friday, Trump said the United States would act on Greenland “whether they like it or not,” reiterating his long-standing interest in acquiring the mineral-rich territory.

“I would like to make a deal, the easy way. But if we don’t do it the easy way, we’re going to do it the hard way,” Trump said when asked about Greenland.

Trump links Greenland control to Arctic security

Trump argued that Washington cannot allow rival powers to gain a foothold in Greenland, citing increased military activity by Russia and China in the Arctic region.

“We’re not going to have Russia or China occupy Greenland. That’s what they’re going to do if we don’t,” he said, adding that the US would act either “the nice way or the more difficult way.”

While Russia and China have stepped up their presence in the Arctic in recent years, neither country has made any territorial claim over Greenland.

Denmark and allies react with concern

Trump’s remarks have sparked strong reactions in Denmark and among European allies. Denmark, which governs Greenland as an autonomous territory, has expressed shock over the repeated threats.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned that any invasion of Greenland would bring an end to “everything,” referring to NATO and the post-World War II security framework.

The United States already operates a military base in Greenland, underscoring its existing strategic presence in the region.

Trump dismisses Danish sovereignty claims

Despite the backlash, Trump played down Denmark’s concerns and questioned its historical claim over the island.

“I’m a fan of Denmark, too,” he said, adding that the country had been “very nice” to him. However, he remarked that Denmark’s historical presence did not automatically translate into ownership of Greenland.

“The fact that they had a boat land there 500 years ago doesn’t mean that they own the land,” Trump said.

Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is scheduled to meet Denmark’s foreign minister and representatives from Greenland next week, as diplomatic tensions over the issue continue.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Anti-Khamenei protests intensify across Iran as Reza Pahlavi issues rallying call

Anti-regime protests have intensified across Iran amid soaring inflation and an internet shutdown, with demonstrators chanting against Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei as unrest spreads nationwide.

Published

on

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

Anti-government protests against Iran’s Islamic regime have intensified across Tehran and other parts of the country, with demonstrators chanting slogans against Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei amid a deepening economic crisis and widespread restrictions imposed by authorities.

As night fell on Thursday, neighbourhoods across the Iranian capital echoed with chants after exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi called on people to protest at 8 pm local time. Witnesses said crowds gathered despite heavy security presence, with slogans including “Death to the dictator” and “Death to the Islamic Republic” heard in multiple areas.

Internet shutdown and warnings from authorities

Iranian authorities cut off internet access and international telephone calls as the demonstrations gained momentum. The judiciary and security forces warned of a harsh response, even as protesters continued chanting calls for freedom.

Pahlavi accused the government of attempting to silence dissent by shutting down communication networks. He said landlines, internet services and possibly satellite signals had been disrupted to prevent images and voices from reaching the outside world.

The exiled prince urged European leaders to join US President Donald Trump in holding the Iranian regime accountable and called for technical and diplomatic efforts to restore communication access for Iranians.

Support for monarchy slogans resurfaces

Some demonstrators were heard chanting slogans in praise of Iran’s former monarchy, including “This is the last battle, Pahlavi will return.” While such chants were once punishable by death, their re-emergence reflects growing anger over economic hardship and political repression.

It remains unclear whether the slogans indicate direct support for Reza Pahlavi or a broader rejection of the system established after the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

Protests spread nationwide, casualties reported

Demonstrations have continued to spread to cities and rural towns across Iran, with markets and bazaars shutting down in solidarity. At least 42 people have been killed and more than 2,270 detained since the unrest began, according to human rights groups based outside Iran.

Reports have also emerged of security personnel being killed or injured during clashes. Iranian media have reported fatal attacks on police officers and security forces in multiple provinces, including Tehran’s outskirts, Kermanshah, and northeastern regions.

Economic crisis fuels unrest

The current wave of protests, the largest in three years, began in Tehran’s Grand Bazaar after shopkeepers protested the sharp fall of the national currency. Iran’s inflation rate stood at 52 per cent year-on-year in December, according to official data.

The rial has continued to weaken, with one US dollar now costing around 1.4 million rials. Protesters have blamed economic mismanagement, sanctions, and restrictions on social and political freedoms for their worsening living conditions.

President Masoud Pezeshkian has acknowledged the economic pain faced by citizens and described protesters’ demands as legitimate, though he admitted the government’s ability to reverse the currency collapse is limited.

Leaderless movement and uncertain outcome

Despite the scale of the unrest, the protests remain largely leaderless. Analysts note that the absence of a clear alternative leadership has weakened previous protest movements in Iran, with many potential leaders having been arrested, exiled or silenced over the years.

Authorities have yet to launch a full-scale crackdown, though past internet shutdowns have often preceded harsher measures.

Trump issues warning to Tehran

US President Donald Trump warned Iran last week against violently suppressing peaceful protesters, saying the country would “pay hell” if security forces killed demonstrators. He stopped short of confirming any direct engagement with Pahlavi, stating that it was too early to determine who might emerge as a leader of the movement.

As protests continue and communication restrictions remain in place, the situation inside Iran remains tense, with uncertainty over how the regime will respond in the coming days.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com