English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Justice Chelameswar refuses to hear PIL on allocation of cases in SC, says “reasons are too obvious”

Published

on

Justice Chelameswar refuses to hear PIL on allocation of cases in SC, says “reasons are too obvious”

A Supreme Court Bench led by Justice Jasti Chelameswar on Thursday, April 12, turned down an urgent mentioning to list for hearing a petition seeking clarification on the role of Chief Justice of India (CJI) as ‘master of the roster’ and specify that the CJI’s authority as such should not be reduced to an absolute, singular and arbitrary power.

This comes a day after a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra ruled that constitution of benches of the top court allocation of cases is exclusive prerogative of the CJI.

Justice Chelameswar – the senior-most judge after the Chief Justice – refused to hear the PIL filed on behalf of former Union minister Shanti Bhushan, commenting: “There is nothing much I can do in this. I am sorry. You please understand my difficulty… With two months left, I don’t want to hear that I am trying to grab some office. I do not want another reversal of my order in 24 hours. This is why I can’t do it. Let the nation decide its own course.”

Justice Chelameswar was referring to his earlier order which was quashed on November 10, 2017 by a Constitution Bench headed by CJI in the Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) case.

Justice Chelameswar, who has been critical of Chief Justice Dipak Misra’s handling of the roster and had, along with three other senior judges, held an unprecedented press conference to slam CJI’s allocation of important cases to benches headed by junior judges, said that reasons for him not hearing Shanti Bhushan’s petition were “too obvious”.

A report by news agency PTI quoted Justice Chelameswar as saying: “someone is running a relentless tirade against me that I am up to grab something (sic)… Please understand my difficulty.”

The former law minister’s son and advocate Prashant Bhushan, however, persisted with the request to have the petition heard, claiming that the plea had been filed 10 days ago but the Supreme Court registry was yet to list it before a bench.

A report in The Hindu said that it was then that Justice Chelameswar’s puisne judge, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, to say that retirement is looming for his senior brother judge and Justice Chelameswar should be spared from being dragged into controversy.

Prashant Bhushan was then forced to move to the court of Chief Justice Dipak Misra with his request to have his father’s petition heard. It may be recalled that while filing the PIL, the Bhushans had urged the Supreme Court registry to not list the plea before a bench headed by the Chief Justice.

In Court No. 1, as Prashant Bhushan urged the judges to list the petition for hearing, Justice DY Chandrachud asked: “have the defects (in the petition) been removed?” With Prashant Bhushan replying in the affirmative and adding that he had earlier urged the court of Justice Chelameswar to hear the matter but that his bench conveyed to him that “it could not do anything about it”, Chief Justice Dipak Misra said: “we will look into it.”

The petition by the Bhushans seeks a ruling by the apex court on the administrative authority of the Chief Justice in his capacity as the apex court’s master of roster and for laying down the principles and procedure to be followed while allocation of cases to various benches.

The Wednesday (April 11) verdict delivered by a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra himself against a petition filed by Allahabad-based lawyer Asok Pande ruled that constitution of benches of the top court allocation of cases is exclusive prerogative of the CJI.

Several jurists and former judges of the Supreme Court and various high courts have criticised the verdict, arguing that the CJI should have recused himself from hearing the petition filed by Pande as the petition directly concerned him.

The April 11 verdict, delivered by the bench that also comprised of Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud, reaffirms that the Chief Justice is “the first among equals” and “in the allocation of cases and the constitution of benches… has an exclusive prerogative.”

The 16-page verdict, authored by Justice Chandrachud, had dismissed Pande’s plea terming it as “scandalous” and said: “Underlying the submission that the constitution of Benches and the allocation of cases by the Chief Justice must be regulated by a procedure cast in iron is the apprehension that absent such a procedure the power will be exercised arbitrarily. In his capacity as a Judge, the Chief Justice is primus inter pares: the first among equals… Article 146 reaffirms the position of the Chief Justice of India as the head of the institution… As a repository of constitutional trust, the Chief Justice is an institution in himself… The ultimate purpose behind the entrustment of authority to the Chief Justice is to ensure that the Supreme Court is able to fulfil and discharge the constitutional obligations which govern and provide the rationale for its existence. The entrustment of functions to the Chief Justice as the head of the institution is with the purpose of securing the position of the Supreme Court as an independent safeguard for the preservation of personal liberty. There cannot be a presumption of mistrust. The oath of office demands nothing less.”

On the issue of how judges must be selected for various benches and to hear different kinds of cases that come before the apex court, the verdict had said: “the petitioner (Asok Pande) seems to harbour a misconception that certain categories of cases or certain courts must consist only of the senior-most in terms of appointment. Every Judge appointed to this Court under Article 124 of the Constitution is invested with the equal duty of adjudicating cases which come to the Court and are assigned by the Chief Justice. Seniority in terms of appointment has no bearing on which cases a Judge should hear… every Judge of the Court is entitled to and in fact, duty bound, to hear such cases as are assigned by the Chief Justice…”

“To suggest that any Judge would be more capable of deciding particular cases or that certain categories of cases should be assigned only to the senior-most among the Judges of the Supreme Court has no foundation in principle or precedent. To hold otherwise would be to cast a reflection on the competence and ability of other judges to deal with all cases assigned by the Chief Justice notwithstanding the fact that they have fulfilled the qualifications mandated by the Constitution for appointment to the office,” the verdict said.

—With inputs from India Legal Bureau and agencies

India News

Pikachu joins protest against Trump and Musk, viral costume becomes symbol of anti-govt anger

A protester in a Pikachu costume became an unexpected face of resistance during the largest anti-Trump demonstrations since his return, with over 1,200 rallies across the US.

Published

on

Pokeman protest against Trump

Amid chants, placards, and impassioned speeches during the largest day of protests since Donald Trump’s return to office, one figure in Washington, D.C. stood out — and it wasn’t a politician. It was Pikachu.

The beloved Pokémon mascot, now apparently moonlighting as a freedom fighter, was spotted bouncing through crowds at the National Mall, joining the wave of resistance against President Trump and his adviser Elon Musk. The appearance comes just days after a similar Pikachu protest scene unfolded in Turkey, where the yellow-costumed figure was seen dodging riot police amid political chaos.

Saturday’s rallies, branded under the “Hands Off!” campaign, spanned all 50 U.S. states, with more than 1,200 protests from Anchorage to Miami. Demonstrators came out in droves to denounce what they see as the Trump administration’s aggressive attempts to gut federal institutions, slash social programs, and muzzle civil liberties.

In Washington, activists took the stage, from Graylan Hagler, who warned, “They’ve woken up a sleeping giant,” to Kelley Robinson, president of the Human Rights Campaign, who declared:

“They’re not just attacking policies. They’re attacking people.”

Protesters voiced anger over layoffs, immigration crackdowns, and the rollback of LGBTQ+ protections. Signs reading “Hands off our democracy” and “Hands off our Social Security” were spotted nationwide — though none quite outshone Pikachu, whose appearance went viral within hours.

Criticism wasn’t just aimed at Trump. Much of the fury centered on Elon Musk, who now leads the Department of Government Efficiency, tasked with overseeing sweeping cuts across government programs. Musk’s defenders say he’s saving taxpayers billions. Protesters say he’s turning public service into a pile of “404 errors.”

The White House responded dismissively, insisting Trump is committed to protecting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid — and accused Democrats of threatening these programs by offering them to undocumented immigrants.

Meanwhile, Boston Mayor Michelle Wu, speaking at another rally, said:

“I refuse to raise my kids in a country where intimidation replaces leadership and diversity is seen as a threat.”

Continue Reading

India News

Hilarious protest signs from Hands Off rallies against Trump, Musk surface on internet

Musk’s aggressive cost-reduction strategies, which propose closing Social Security offices, slashing Medicaid funds, and dismantling the Department of Education, have ignited widespread fury and become the centerpiece of the demonstrations.

Published

on

Witty and humorous protest signs from the Hands Off rallies targeting Trump and Musk have gone viral on the internet. On April 5, an impressive half-million Americans on April 5 flooded the streets in a powerful display of opposition during the nationwide “Hands Off!” protests, marking one of the most significant collective standouts against the Trump administration yet.

From the bustling streets of Washington, DC, to the sprawling cities of Los Angeles, Chicago, and Seattle, people from all walks of political life united to challenge federal job cuts, the erosion of vital social frameworks, and assaults on fundamental freedoms.

This massive outcry was spearheaded by a diverse alliance of civil rights organizations, labor unions, LGBTQ+ supporters, veterans, and election reform advocates, all zeroing in on their disapproval of President Donald Trump and his newly appointed head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Elon Musk.

Musk’s aggressive cost-reduction strategies, which propose closing Social Security offices, slashing Medicaid funds, and dismantling the Department of Education, have ignited widespread fury and become the centerpiece of the demonstrations.

Demonstrators brandished an array of signs and banners, voicing their concerns over everything from reversed climate policies to threats against immigrant rights. Infusing their protests with wit and satire, the crowd’s creativity shone through in their messaging.

One viral sign playfully twisted Trump’s discredited assertions about Haitian immigrants, reading, “They’re eating the dogs. They’re eating the cats?”—a cheeky critique of diminishing governmental oversight.

Another sign humorously protested, “Don’t tax the penguins,” poking fun at Trump’s odd tariffs on distant Antarctic islands.

The ingenuity continued with slogans like “Orange Lies Matter,” “Even the introverts are here. That’s how bad it is,” and “Sorry World. We’re trying.” A particularly amusing sign came from a protest dog, proudly displaying, “I sniffed better policies on a fire hydrant.”

Another jabbed at political figures with, “JD Vance thinks I’m a miserable cat lady—and he’s half right.”

Continue Reading

India News

Protesters across US and Europe voice anger against Donald Trump’s trade policies and leadership style

Tens of thousands marched across the US and Europe protesting Donald Trump’s policies on government cuts, civil liberties, and trade, with rallies held in over 1,000 cities.

Published

on

Anti Trump protest

In a fiery show of defiance, tens of thousands took to the streets across the United States and Europe on Saturday, unleashing the largest wave of anti-Trump protests since his return to the White House.

From Washington’s National Mall to New York, Los Angeles, and London, demonstrators railed against Donald Trump’s aggressive downsizing of the government, crackdown on civil liberties and global trade wars.

The demonstrations were organized by a broad coalition of progressive groups under the banner “Hands Off,” with events held in over 1,000 locations across the US and even in parts of Europe. Issues cited by protestors ranged from government downsizing, civil liberties concerns, and abortion rights, to fears of economic instability due to aggressive trade measures.

In Washington, a large crowd gathered at the National Mall, with speakers from across the country criticizing what they described as a dangerous and authoritarian shift in American politics. Representative Jamie Raskin, who played a key role in Trump’s second impeachment, addressed the demonstrators, warning against a “dictator who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.”

In New York, protestor Shaina Kesner criticized the leadership as privileged and unaccountable. Meanwhile, demonstrators in Los Angeles used creative symbolism, including dressing as characters from The Handmaid’s Tale to protest restrictive reproductive laws.

Across the Atlantic, rallies in cities such as London and Berlin echoed the disapproval. Protestors called out Trump’s foreign policies and his approach to global trade. In Berlin, one retiree went as far as to label Trump a “lunatic,” while others in London warned of global economic fallout.

One common thread across all protests was concern over the perceived erosion of civil rights and increasing authoritarian tendencies. Protestors warned against the jailing of opponents, attacks on immigrants, and pressure on democratic institutions. “We’re out here to stop the, honestly, fascism,” said Dominic Santella in Boston.

The economic direction under Trump also drew criticism. Many blamed his trade tariffs and diplomatic confrontations for market instability and international strain.

Despite the scale of the protests and dropping approval ratings, the White House has largely dismissed the unrest. President Trump remained defiant, stating, “My policies will never change,” reaffirming his stance on key issues.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com