English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Obama, Bush launch veiled attack against Donald Trump

Published

on

Obama Bush

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]On campaign trail for Democrat Governor nominees in New Jersey and Virginia, Obama red flagged racial politics while in a separate event Bush talked of prejudice in public life

Former United States presidents Barack Obama and George W Bush have voiced concern about the current political climate in the US, in comments seen as their veiled, albeit definitely uncoordinated, attack against Donald Trump and his administration.

While Obama, who returned to the campaign trail for Democratic gubernatorial nominee Phil Murphy in New Jersey on Thursday, urged Americans to reject the politics of “division” and “fear”,  his predecessor Bush – who belongs to Trump’s Republican party – spoke at an event in New York where he criticised the practice of “bullying and prejudice” in public life in today’s America.

Though neither of the former presidents mentioned Donald Trump by name, the remarks are being seen as their veiled attack at the incumbent US president. The comments of Obama and Bush also highlight the fact that concerns over Trump’s presidency are shared by political leaders cutting across the Republican-Democrat divide of American politics.

Trump, who has been critical of his two predecessors in the past, has not yet responded to the comments even though he is usually very prompt with rebuttals to attacks – even veiled ones – made against him though his Twitter and Facebook accounts.

Ex-presidents traditionally shy away from commenting publicly on their successors. Obama, who demitted office as President of the United States in January this year had said then that he would extend this courtesy for a time to Trump, as George W Bush Jr had to him.

Obama has only occasionally broken his silence on the functioning of his successor and the Trump administration, mostly to comment on issues of national importance, such as immigration, health care and climate change. He had issued statements on Trump’s efforts to dismantle Obamacare, as well as the US president’s controversial travel ban directed against Muslim-majority nations and his decision to abandon the Paris climate accord.

Speaking at the Democratic campaign event in Newark, New Jersey, Obama said Americans should “send a message to the world that we are rejecting a politics of division, we are rejecting a politics of fear…What we can’t have is the same old politics of division that we have seen so many times before that dates back centuries. Some of the politics we see now, we thought we put that to bed. That’s folks looking 50 years back. It’s the 21st Century, not the 19th Century. Come on.”

He touched on similar themes at another event later in Richmond, Virginia, saying: “We’ve got folks who are deliberately trying to make folks angry, to demonise people who have different ideas, to get the base all riled up because it provides a short-term tactical advantage.”

Speaking just hours earlier before Obama at a function in New York, Bush said: “Bigotry seems emboldened. Our politics seems more vulnerable to conspiracy theories and outright fabrication. There are some signs that the intensity of support for democracy itself has waned – especially among the young.”

Bush, whose own tenure as US president had been marked with severe criticism for his alleged war-mongering, the war against Iraq and in Afghanistan, said that Americans have “seen our discourse degraded by casual cruelty” and added that: “At times it can seem like the forces pulling us apart are stronger than the forces binding us together. We’ve seen nationalism distorted into nativism, forgotten the dynamism that immigration has always brought to America.”

Before his election last year, Trump had been highly critical of both Obama and Bush, describing each of them at one time or another as “perhaps the worst president in the history” of the US.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Salwan Momika, who burnt Quran in 2023, shot dead in Sweden

The controversy surrounding Momika extended beyond the immediate reactions to his acts. His actions sparked a broader debate regarding freedom of speech, religious tolerance, and the potential for such acts to incite hatred and violence.

Published

on

Salwan Momika, a 38-year-old Iraqi immigrant residing in Sweden, became a controversial figure in 2023 due to his repeated public burning of the Quran. These actions, filmed and widely circulated online, ignited fierce condemnation and protests across the Muslim world. He has been shot dead in Sweden, according to reports.

The desecration of Islam’s holy book prompted outrage and unrest in numerous countries, with demonstrations ranging from peaceful protests to violent riots. Governments and religious leaders issued strong statements of disapproval, highlighting the deeply offensive nature of Momika’s actions to billions of Muslims globally.

The controversy surrounding Momika extended beyond the immediate reactions to his acts. His actions sparked a broader debate regarding freedom of speech, religious tolerance, and the potential for such acts to incite hatred and violence.

While Sweden, like many Western democracies, upholds freedom of expression as a fundamental right, the line between this right and the potential for incitement to hatred and violence remains a complex and contentious issue. Critics argued that Momika’s actions crossed this line, deliberately provoking religious sensibilities and contributing to a climate of hostility. Conversely, proponents of his right to protest emphasized the importance of protecting free speech, even when the content is deeply offensive to others.

At the time of his death, Momika was awaiting a court ruling on charges of inciting ethnic hatred. This legal case further highlighted the complex legal and ethical ramifications of his actions. The Swedish judicial system was tasked with navigating the delicate balance between safeguarding free speech and preventing incitement to violence.

The outcome of the trial, which was ultimately postponed following his death, would have had significant implications for the interpretation and application of hate speech laws in Sweden and potentially beyond.

The shooting death of Salwan Momika adds another layer to this already complex and controversial situation. While the circumstances surrounding his death remain under investigation, it is undeniably a significant event with potential ramifications for the ongoing debate surrounding freedom of speech, religious sensitivities, and the prevention of religiously motivated violence.

The incident highlights the volatile nature of the issues at stake and the ongoing challenges in balancing individual rights with the need for social harmony and respect for different religious beliefs.

Continue Reading

India News

ChatGPT outage affects thousands of users globally, OpenAI reacts

OpenAI swiftly acknowledged the outage, publishing updates on their dedicated status page. This transparency, while offering little in the way of immediate solutions, served to reassure users that the company was actively addressing the situation.

Published

on

On January 23, OpenAI’s popular AI chatbot, ChatGPT, suffered a significant global outage, leaving millions of users unable to access the service. The disruption affected multiple access points, including the web interface, the mobile application, and even integrations on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter). This widespread failure quickly drew significant attention, with reports flooding in from users worldwide.

The outage tracking website, Downdetector, registered a surge in user reports, exceeding a thousand complaints within a short period. This volume underscored the scale of the disruption and the significant impact on ChatGPT’s user base.

The majority of these reports indicated a complete inability to use the chatbot, highlighting the severity of the problem. A smaller percentage of users reported encountering difficulties with the website or API, suggesting a less comprehensive but still noticeable impact.

OpenAI swiftly acknowledged the outage, publishing updates on their dedicated status page. This transparency, while offering little in the way of immediate solutions, served to reassure users that the company was actively addressing the situation.

The official statements consistently described the problem as “degraded performance” and “elevated error rates” within the API, hinting at underlying technical issues that required investigation. However, specific details regarding the root cause remained undisclosed, pending a more thorough examination.

According to reports, the outage commenced around 5 PM IST and persisted for several hours. The lack of a definitive timeline and the ongoing nature of the disruption underlined the complexity of the problem and the challenges faced by OpenAI’s engineering teams in resolving the issue.

As of the latest updates, the exact cause of the outage remains under investigation by OpenAI. The company is actively working to restore full functionality and provide a more comprehensive explanation once the underlying problem has been identified and rectified.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Prince Harry, Rupert Murdoch’s UK group reach settlement in surveillance case

The relentless media attention, he has claimed, also contributed to the intense pressure that led him and his wife, Meghan Markle, to step back from royal duties and relocate to the United States in 2020.

Published

on

Prince Harry has reached a settlement with Rupert Murdoch’s News Group Newspapers (NGN), bringing an abrupt end to a high-profile lawsuit alleging widespread phone hacking and unlawful surveillance.

The settlement, announced just as the trial was about to commence, includes substantial financial compensation for the Duke of Sussex and a formal, unequivocal apology from NGN. This marks a significant victory for Harry, who had accused the media giant of years of intrusive and illegal activities targeting his private life.

The apology, issued directly to Harry’s legal team, explicitly acknowledged the serious breach of privacy inflicted by both The Sun and the defunct News of the World. It detailed unlawful actions perpetrated between 1996 and 2011, including phone hacking, surveillance, and the use of private investigators to obtain sensitive information.

The statement specifically addressed the intrusive activities carried out by private investigators employed by The Sun, emphasizing the severity of the intrusion into Harry’s private life during his formative years. The apology extended to the distress caused to his late mother, Princess Diana, highlighting the impact of the media’s actions on the young prince.

This settlement represents one of three lawsuits filed by Harry against British media outlets, all stemming from accusations of privacy violations. He has consistently blamed the media for the relentless pursuit of his mother, Princess Diana, ultimately leading to her tragic death in a car crash in Paris while being chased by paparazzi.

The relentless media attention, he has claimed, also contributed to the intense pressure that led him and his wife, Meghan Markle, to step back from royal duties and relocate to the United States in 2020.

The case underscores the wider issue of phone hacking and media intrusion, exemplified by the notorious scandal that forced the closure of News of the World in 2011. The hacking of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler’s phone, during the police investigation into her disappearance, remains a particularly egregious example of the unethical practices employed by some sections of the British press.

Harry’s legal battle has brought renewed focus to this issue and the need for greater accountability within the media industry. The settlement, while ending this particular legal chapter, leaves a lasting legacy concerning media responsibility and the rights of public figures to privacy.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com