English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Tesla slump, Elon Musk signals break with Donald Trump over China tariffs

Elon Musk made a personal appeal to Donald Trump to withdraw new tariffs on Chinese goods, but the talks remain unsuccessful amid rising tensions.

Published

on

Musk Trump over China tarrif

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and a prominent advisor to former US President Donald Trump, has reportedly urged Trump to roll back new tariffs on Chinese imports — but his appeals have so far been unsuccessful. According to reports, Musk held private talks with Trump and made a personal appeal, warning that escalating tariffs could disrupt global trade and harm American businesses.

The controversy arose after Trump threatened to add a fresh 50% tariff on Chinese imports, building on an earlier hike of 34%. In response, Musk — who heads the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in Trump’s circle — attempted to convince Trump to soften the tariff plan, but “has not brought success so far”.

While keeping formal diplomacy behind closed doors, Musk subtly signaled disagreement with Trump’s protectionist stance by posting a video of Milton Friedman, the late conservative economist, on X (formerly Twitter). In the video, Friedman explains the benefits of free trade and global collaboration, using the example of a pencil to illustrate economic interdependence.

Before the new tariffs took effect, Musk voiced his concerns during a conversation with Italy’s Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, stating, “I hope it’s agreed that both Europe and the United States should move ideally, in my view, to a zero-tariff situation. That has certainly been my advice to the president.”

Musk has consistently opposed tariffs, citing their negative impact on global supply chains and companies like Tesla, which operate in both the US and China. His earlier attempts to combat tariff policies include filing a lawsuit during Trump’s first term to challenge duties imposed on Tesla imports from China.

Tensions rise amid Tesla’s declining market value

This rift comes at a turbulent time for Musk. Tesla’s stock dropped by over 2.5%, closing at $233.29 following a broader market slump, and has lost more than 38% of its value this year. Analysts attribute part of the decline to Musk’s growing political involvement, which some believe has distracted from Tesla’s core operations.

In another sign of strain, Musk took a swipe at Peter Navarro, Trump’s trade adviser, by mocking his Harvard PhD credentials, calling it “a bad thing, not a good thing” — a move that drew attention but not yet a response from Navarro himself.

Meanwhile, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt defended Navarro, emphasizing that Trump encourages diverse viewpoints within his team.

A high-profile disagreement

Musk’s challenge to a core Trump policy marks one of the most visible disputes between the former president and a top advisor, particularly significant given that Musk reportedly contributed nearly $290 million to Trump’s last election campaign. The disagreement also comes ahead of Musk’s expected departure from DOGE, further signaling a possible shift in alignment.

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com