English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Swiss Banks at the Losing End with Flight of Offshore Accounts

Published

on

Swiss National Bank

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]~Rashme Sehgal

There has been a large flight of capital from Swiss banks even prior to the introduction of the Automatic Exchange of Common Information (AECI) from 2018 signed by over 50 countries who are members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Developments (OECD).

The Swiss banking system has paid a heavy price for handling these unaccounted for offshore deposits especially since several of the smaller Swiss banks had specialised in handling such deposits. The blanket of secrecy surrounding Swiss banking transactions had ensured could they look after deposits of largely unaccounted wealth from well-heeled clients across the globe including India. But this is not going to be the case any longer.

Pressure on the Swiss government to provide details of all account holders has resulted in the outflow of millions of dollars of deposits from these banks thereby causing many of the smaller Swiss banks to shut shop. One such high profile Swiss bank that was forced to file for bankruptcy was Hottinger and Cie which was founded in 1786.

A KPMG study showed that 30 per cent of private banks had recorded losses in 2014-15 which resulted in several thousand bankers being laid off from their jobs.

“The smaller private banks dealing with off shore accounts posted huge losses and the result was that bankers handling these account lost their jobs under the restructuring process,” pointed out Louis Tari, a Geneva-based banking and tax advisor.

“With the introduction of the AECI, information of all non-Swiss residents belonging to the OECD countries will be automatically sent to the federal tax authorities in Berne who in turn will despatch this information to the relevant countries. The authorities in these countries can in turn check if the account holder has declared his income or not,” Tari added.

Zurich based banker Hanspeter Baumgartner pointed out, “What is very significant is that Swiss banks have frozen all accounts of account holders with ‘black’ money informing these holders that they should either regularise their account in their country or else their asset will be frozen. The flip side is that Swiss nationals who had accounts in the Bahamas or in Panama have had to declare their accounts.”

“This has seen an influx of francs into Switzerland but the amount is not very large,” Baumgartner added.

The amount of money of Indian national in Swiss banks has been steadily declining and in 2016 amounted to a mere Rs 4482 crore according to data released by Switzerland’s central bank, the Swiss National  Bank. In 2015, the money deposed was Rs 8135 crore while in 2014 it was Rs 12,350 crore.

The figures being projected by the Indian government that billions of dollars had been stashed in Swiss banks by Indian citizens was largely overstated, analysts believe, as Switzerland never saw such massive deposits from any country.

Nathalie Bersier, a lawyer who works as a consultant for Swiss investments in India, said, “From 2009,  the Indian government has been highlighting the issue of black money without realising that the easiest thing to do  is for a client to close a bank account and transfer the money out. Such a flight of capital has already occurred.”

Bersier believes, “In Switzerland, two years ago the perception was that Indian assets were between $ 900 million to $4 billion. Today I would say, the amount would be less than even $900 million.”

“More than half the undeclared money from India that was stashed in Swiss banks has been moved to Dubai and Singapore from where it would have been invested in real estate, gold or re-entered India through the hawala route,” Bersier maintains.

Former Swiss state secretary for International Financial Matters Jacques de Watteville who had visited India in 2016 to negotiate with his counterparts in the Ministry of Finance had refused to hazard a guess about just how much money has been moved out of Swiss banks to be invested in Dubai or Singapore. “There are no official figures on the assets transferred out of Switzerland,” says Watteville.

While in India he had emphasised that, “Combating the menace of black money and tax evasion is also our shared priority. We discussed the need for an early and expeditious exchange of information to bring to justice the tax offenders.”

Many Indian analysts believe some of this money has been routed to the US with the US government actively encouraging foreigners to deposit money in US banks, no questions asked. Some US states and cities have emerged as veritable tax havens. 

South Dakota, to cite an example, has been described by some analysts as the ‘new Switzerland’ and mention of its role as a tax haven was emphasised in the Panama Papers which highlighted that US offshore assets remain anonymous.

The city of Delaware is also said to be another tax haven with over one million registered entities claiming to operate from there.

The fact is that while international disclosure rules comprising the AECI  have been accepted  by the OECD countries, thhe US has refused to accept them and is not a signatory to it. The US NGO Tax Justice Network has pointed out how the US does not practise what it preaches.

In fact, a Swiss financial analyst on condition of anonymity, has accused the US of having crushed Swiss banks. Since trusts can operate as shell companies in some US states, it is ironical that a Swiss trust company has gone ahead and opened an office in South Dakota. The analyst feels that some of the flight of capital from Switzerland has ended up in the US.

This is because while non-US banks and financial institutions across the world have to reveal American account details, this is not the case with US deposits by offshore account holders.

Bersier does not see too much emerging from the Federal Council consultations with the Indian government on the need to detect, recover and repatriate illegal deposits.

“The key issue is what pressure the Indian government can exert on the Swiss government,” says Bersier. “The US threatened to close all Swiss banks operating in the US which led to the Swiss immediately signing a treaty with the US and UK. There are no Swiss banks operating in India.”

On the subject of the AEOI Information between the Swiss and Indian governments expected to be operationalised by 2018, she remains equally cynical.

Erecting the AEOI platform is all very well, she feels, but it is too little too late. Berseir believes that by the time it becomes operational, all the illegal deposits will have been moved out. There are any number of countries where this money can be moved to.

While some signatories of the AEOI are committed to sharing information from 2017, others will start providing information from 2018. Till then, we have to wait and watch.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

S Jaishankar calls Pakistan a “serial practitioner of terrorism” at UN

S Jaishankar criticised Pakistan at the UN General Assembly, referring to a “serial practitioner of terrorism” and warning against attempts to normalise terrorism.

Published

on

S Jayshankar

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar criticised Pakistan during his address to the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, saying that a “serial practitioner of terrorism” had misrepresented facts and that arguments were being made to normalise terrorism. 

Jaishankar’s remarks came a day after Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif addressed the UN General Assembly and spoke about the 2025 military confrontation between India and Pakistan.

Jaishankar’s message to Pakistan

Referring to Pakistan without naming it directly in that remark, Jaishankar said a “serial practitioner of terrorism” had misrepresented facts before the UN General Assembly.

He said arguments were being made to normalise terrorism and claim immunity from its consequences, adding that such an approach would not stand. 

Jaishankar reiterated India’s position that the country would exercise its right to defend itself against terrorism.

He also said that friendship and goodwill could not coexist with terrorism and that understandings based on such circumstances would naturally be called into question. 

“It is for the perpetrator of terrorism to mend its ways,” Jaishankar said.

India stresses zero tolerance on terrorism

Jaishankar described terrorism as a persistent threat to peace and called for governments involved in cross-border terrorism to be held accountable.

He also stressed that there should be no dilution in India’s zero-tolerance approach towards terrorism and particularly called for greater attention to its financial aspects.

His remarks came a day after Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif referred to the 2025 India-Pakistan military confrontation during his UN General Assembly address. 

Jaishankar backs two-state solution for Palestine

During his UN address, Jaishankar also spoke about the situation in West Asia and said India was prepared to contribute to efforts addressing food and energy security amid continuing tensions and violence.

On the Palestine issue, he reiterated India’s longstanding support for a two-state solution.

Jaishankar said India was also contributing humanitarian assistance and relief efforts for the Palestinian people.

He also warned about continuing threats and pressures around the world and stressed the need for greater stability, security and predictability.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump rejects Iran’s 7-day peace plan, says deal can come after US polls

US President Donald Trump rejected Iran’s seven-day proposal to end hostilities and indicated that a deal could come after the US midterm elections in November.

Published

on

Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump has rejected Iran’s latest proposal aimed at bringing an end to the ongoing conflict, while indicating that a possible agreement could come after the US midterm elections in November.

Iran had proposed a seven-day framework under which hostilities could be brought to an end, the Strait of Hormuz could be reopened and negotiations over its nuclear programme could resume.

Iran’s seven-day proposal

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran had put forward the proposal through intermediaries. Under the plan, the Strait of Hormuz would be reopened by the end of the seventh day if specified conditions were met, while broader nuclear discussions would restart.

The proposal was based largely on an earlier understanding reached between Washington and Tehran, but Iran sought to implement the latest framework much faster. The earlier arrangement had provided a longer period for negotiations.

The Strait of Hormuz is a strategically important waterway for global energy shipments, making its reopening a key element of any effort to ease the wider conflict.

Trump points to US midterm elections

Trump, speaking at the United Nations, showed no indication that he was ready to immediately resume negotiations on the terms proposed by Tehran.

He called for the economic isolation of Iran and said he believed a deal could be reached after the US midterm elections in November. Trump also said Iran was waiting to see how he performed in the midterm elections.

The remarks came as Iranian officials signalled that they remained open to diplomacy and described the UN General Assembly as an opportunity to revive negotiations.

Nuclear talks remain part of Iran proposal

Iran’s latest plan links the easing of hostilities with the resumption of negotiations over its nuclear programme.

The proposal follows the collapse of an earlier US-Iran arrangement. According to reporting on the latest proposal, the new framework is intended to compress the timeline for implementing commitments that had previously been discussed by the two sides.

For now, Trump’s remarks indicate that Washington is not accepting Tehran’s seven-day framework as presented, while Iran continues to put diplomacy and negotiations forward as part of its proposal.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Iranian President Pezeshkian at UN says Iranians have been victims of US terrorism

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said at the UN General Assembly that Iranians had been victims of US terrorism and insisted that Iran had acted in self-defence.

Published

on

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian accused the United States of subjecting Iranians to what he described as terrorism while addressing the United Nations General Assembly on Wednesday.

Pezeshkian said Iran had defended itself against attacks and rejected the characterisation of the country as a terrorist actor. His remarks came during a rare wartime appearance at the UN as tensions between Iran and the United States remain high.

Pezeshkian accuses US and Israel of attacks

Speaking at the General Assembly, Pezeshkian said Iranian civilians had been targeted by attacks and described the actions against his country as aggression.

“We have only defended ourselves. We are not terrorists,” he said, according to the report.

Pezeshkian also accused the United States and Israel of attacking Iran, while maintaining that Tehran’s response was an act of self-defence.

The Iranian president displayed photographs of former Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and more than 150 schoolchildren who, according to his account, were killed during the early days of the conflict.

Iran’s message at the UN

Pezeshkian’s address came against the backdrop of the ongoing conflict between Iran and the United States and heightened tensions in the region.

Iranian officials had indicated ahead of the UN visit that they intended to highlight what Tehran considers attacks against its people and raise concerns over the international response to the conflict.

The Iranian delegation’s visit to New York also comes amid restrictions imposed by the United States on the delegation’s movement and other aspects of its stay, according to reporting ahead of the address.

Pezeshkian says Iran defended itself

Pezeshkian’s central message at the UN was that Iran’s military actions should be viewed as a response to attacks rather than terrorism.

His description of the conflict and the allegations against the United States and Israel represent the Iranian government’s position. They should therefore be attributed to Pezeshkian rather than presented as independently established facts.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com