English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Ideology out for summer vacation, Congress Group of 23 becomes 22 with Jitin Prasada exit but who’s next?

The move comes on the back of his long-running differences with the Congress leadership while other reports claimed Prasada had wanted to be the UP Congress Committee chief.

Published

on

G23 REBELS

The Congress, which is already reeling from successive electoral losses and bickering, suffered another setback on Wednesday as former Union Minister Jitin Prasada joined the BJP. The move comes on the back of his long-running differences with the Congress leadership while other reports claimed Prasada had wanted to be the UP Congress Committee chief. But is this really a setback or a favour for the party?

The two-time MP was among the 23 leaders who had written to then Congress interim president Sonia Gandhi in 2020 demanding organisational changes and for introspection. Formally, the Congress is yet to reply to the letter though some of the so-called rebels found place in inter-party posts. Prasada’s move comes after another Young Turk Jyotiraditya Scindia scrammed into the BJP in 2020 leading to the fall of the Kamal Nath government. Similarly, Sachin Pilot’s rebellion against Ashok Gehlot was managed by the party with some promises that are yet to be fulfilled.

Why Jitin Prasada? Why now?

Jitin Prasada’s move is a different kettle of fish though. A Brahmin face, his move to the BJP mirrors that of Rita Bahuguna Joshi’s in 2016. His injection is expected to balance out the Thakur-Brahmin equation in the BJP which is heading for polls. It is not immediately clear if the BJP will ask Prasada to contest the 2022 polls.

The BJP’s discomfort with the public perception of the Yogi Adityanath government lies at the heart of its efforts to come up with failsafes. Opposition parties have tried to corner Yogi Adityanath on his government’s response to the Covid-19 situation, even as the government says it has efficiently dealt with the brutal second wave. But the heightened political activity in the state indicates that not everyone in the BJP has bought into the defence.

Read Also: Sonam Kapoor turns 36, wishes pour in from Anil Kapoor, Anand Ahuja, and others

Congress cup of woes now down to 22

The Congress G23 list includes five former chief ministers, MPs Shashi Tharoor and Manish Tewari, members of Congress Working Committee and over a dozen former union ministers with years of political experience.

1.    Ghulam Nabi Azad: A former Leader of the Opposition in Rajya Sabha and a party veteran from Sanjay Gandhi days.

2.    Kapil Sibal: Former Chandni Chowk MP and former union minister.

3.    Shashi Tharoor: Thiruvananthapuram MP since 2009.

4.    Manish Tewari: Former Union Minister for Information and Broadcasting.

5.    Anand Sharma: Former Union Minister and had been Deputy Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha, but has been relieved of upper house party duties.

6.    Pallath Joseph Kurian: Former Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha till June 2018, he had been Union Minister several times.

7.    Renuka Chaudhary: Rajya Sabha member from Andhra Pradesh and former union minister.

8. Milind Deora: A former Union Minister of State and was MP from Mumbai in the 15th Lok Sabha.

9. Mukul Wasnik: Former Union Minister.

10. Bhupendra Singh Hooda: Former Chief Minister, Haryana.

11.  Rajinder Kaur Bhattal: A former Punjab Chief Minister.

12. Marpadi Veerappa Moily: A former Karnataka CM and union minister.

13.  Prithviraj Chavan: Former Mhaarshtra CM and former PMO minister.

14.  Ajay Singh, former Leader of Opposition of Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly, also has been elected 5 times from Churhat Vidhan Sabha constituency. Singh is the son of Arjun Singh, former Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh and former Union Minister.

15. Raj Babbar: Actor, three-time Lok Sabha MP and a two-time Rajya Sabha member. He was president of the Uttar Pradesh Congress Committee.

16.  Arvind Singh Lovely: Congress prodigal from Delhi, left party briefly for the BJP in 2017 but now back in.

17. Kaul Singh Thakur: Leader from Himachal Pradesh, he served as PCC president twice despite strong opposition from Virbhadra Singh and Vidya Stokes.

18. Kuldeep Sharma: Former MP from Haryana.

19. Yoganand Shastri: Speaker of Delhi Legislative Assembly from 2008 to 2013.

20. Sandeep Dixit: Son of former Delhi CM Sheila Dikshit, represented East Delhi constituency in Lok Sabha.

21.  Vivek Tankha: Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha, senior advocate at the Supreme Court of India.

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com