English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Flynn’s last nail

Published

on

Flynn’s last nail

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]He is now under Pentagon lens for money received after retirement as US Army general from Russian, Dutch and Turkish interests

By Sujit Bhar

Lt Gen Michael Flynn, a retired US Army general and former National Security Adviser to President Donald Trump, is in more trouble. Apart from his exposed close links and discussions with Russia during the Republican Presidential candidate’s campaign, leading to Flynn’s resignation from his top presidential post, he is now being investigated by a Pentagon body on monies that Flynn had received after retirement as general from Russian, Turkish and Dutch interests.

This does not add credit to Trump’s position as the chief executive of the country, having positioned Flynn in one of the most sensitive government chairs despite protests and warnings from top officials. Little affects ‘duckback’ Trump, but this is a matter national security and a matter of rules being flouted.

All US top brass, including top politicians, up to the level of past Presidents, take up major consultative positions that earn them millions. They write books, do lecture tours and are paid as lobbyists for other countries. This is an accepted norm in that country and nobody raises eyebrows.

However, the situation is a little different for a retired US Army general. The US Constitution’s emoluments clause states that he may be called back to duty in an emergency. Keeping this in mind, the Pentagon advises all retiring army generals to get all foreign monies that he may receive, cleared by it.

Initial findings have indicated that Flynn had taken huge sums of money from Russian, Dutch and Turkish interests.

Now the Pentagon has said, and a Washington Post  report reveals, that Flynn had “received $ 45,000 to appear in 2015 with Russian President Vladimir Putin at a gala dinner for RT, a Kremlin-controlled media organization. He also worked as a foreign agent representing Turkish interests for a Netherlands-based company, which paid him $530,000 last fall.”

Those are big sums of money. And money, especially from Russia, which definitely is not a US “ally”, was sure to be looked upon with suspicion, even if Flynn had not decorated the National Security Adviser post thereafter.

The Democrats are delighted with this find, and the Post report says that on Thursday Democratic representative Elijah E Cummings, who is on the Oversight Committee, released for all an October 8, 2014 letter of the Defense Department that carried a clear warning from a lawyer of the department to Flynn, warning him against taking money from foreign sources without prior permission.

If the reason for Flynn’s sacking from the top government post was not enough—lying to the Vice-President about his connections with Russia and about talking sensitive matters with them—this looks like the last nail in Flynn’s political coffin.

Corruption allegations are something that politicians around the world take in their stride. They are like those minor angina stings that a pill can take care of. Hazards of the profession, they say. However, when it is about national security, and when it involves “Russia”, a country whose position in American eyes is going from bad to worse, there is a possibility of all hell breaking loose.

If that happens, Trump, too, will not remain immune. As it is his public approval rating has been falling over the weeks and his recent executive orders (especially on corporate tax cuts) have received flak from all corners, including the mainline media.

The Post report adds a layer of issues. It says that, according to Flynn’s lawyer Robert K Kelner, Flynn had informed the Defense Intelligence Agency (his department before retirement) before and after that trip. However, it is being said that the problem lies in the money received and not the trip per se. That part was not discussed.

Let us see this in the light of India-Pakistan relations. There have been instances where former Pakistani bureaucrats have earned through work in India. Television Appearances occasionally pay. However, if these were to be done under cover, especially when relation between two countries is at a low, problems are bound to arise.

Financial gratification comes through services rendered. When monies received are large, one would expect large services rendered. Just a gala dinner with President Putin cannot be the basis of a payment.

Hence the probe. Hence the ticking time bomb for President Trump. If he fails to own up to his faults and change his stance, he is sure to be clean bowled.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Trump calls PM Modi friend, says had very good conversation amid West Asia tensions

Trump described PM Modi as a friend after a 40-minute call focusing on Iran tensions, trade and strategic ties.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

US President Donald Trump described Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a “friend” and said the two leaders had a “very good conversation” during a recent phone call held amid rising tensions in West Asia.

The call, which lasted around 40 minutes, comes shortly after developments in the ongoing Iran-related conflict and diplomatic efforts in the region. During the conversation, both leaders discussed key issues including regional security, trade, and bilateral cooperation.

The interaction marks one of the first high-level engagements between the two leaders following recent ceasefire-related developments involving the United States and Iran. The evolving situation in West Asia, including concerns around stability and global energy routes, was a significant focus of the discussion.

Officials indicated that the leaders also reviewed progress in India-US ties and reiterated their commitment to strengthening the strategic partnership across multiple sectors.

The phone call reflects continued coordination between New Delhi and Washington as geopolitical tensions persist in the Middle East, with both sides maintaining close communication on global and regional issues.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Israel-Lebanon ceasefire to begin within hours as Trump announces 10-day truce

Israel and Lebanon may begin a 10-day ceasefire within hours after a proposal announced by Donald Trump amid ongoing tensions.

Published

on

Donald Trump

A temporary halt in hostilities between Israel and Lebanon is expected to begin within hours after US President Donald Trump announced a proposed 10-day ceasefire between the two sides, amid ongoing tensions in the region.

According to his statement, the ceasefire is likely to take effect around 5 p.m. Eastern Time, although independent confirmation from both sides is still awaited.

The development follows discussions involving Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, with mediation efforts led by the United States.

Officials indicated that the proposed truce is aimed at creating a limited window to reduce violence and potentially pave the way for broader diplomatic engagement. The situation along the Israel-Lebanon border has remained tense in recent weeks, with escalation linked to the activities of Hezbollah.

Diplomatic efforts have intensified in recent days, with discussions facilitated by the United States, including the involvement of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. However, details of the agreement and the extent of coordination between the parties remain unclear.

The situation remains fluid, and the success of the ceasefire will depend on adherence by all sides involved. The conflict has already led to significant humanitarian and geopolitical consequences, including displacement and disruption in affected areas.

While the proposed ceasefire is being seen as an important step toward de-escalation, broader negotiations involving regional stakeholders are expected to be necessary for any lasting resolution.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

US ends oil sanctions waiver for Iran and Russia, impact likely on India’s energy imports

The US decision to end the Iran and Russia oil waiver may impact India’s oil imports, fuel prices and global energy markets.

Published

on

US oil tanker

The United States has decided not to extend a temporary sanctions waiver that allowed limited trade in Iranian and Russian oil, marking a shift towards stricter enforcement of economic restrictions.

The waiver, introduced in March 2026, had permitted the sale of oil already loaded on ships to stabilise global supply during heightened geopolitical tensions. However, it is now set to expire around mid-April without renewal.

US officials have indicated that the move is part of a broader strategy to increase pressure on both Iran and Russia amid ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions.

What the waiver did and why it mattered

The short-term waiver allowed millions of barrels of oil—estimated at around 140 million barrels—to enter global markets, helping ease supply shortages and prevent sharp price spikes.

It also enabled countries like India to purchase discounted crude oil from Russia and resume limited imports from Iran after years of restrictions.

Impact on India

India, one of the world’s largest oil importers, is expected to feel the impact of the decision in several ways:

  • Reduced access to discounted oil
    India had been buying cheaper Russian crude and recently resumed Iranian imports under the waiver. Its end may limit these options.
  • Potential rise in fuel costs
    With fewer discounted supplies available, India may need to rely more on costlier sources, which could increase domestic fuel prices.
  • Supply diversification pressure
    India may need to explore alternative suppliers in the Middle East, Africa, or the US to maintain energy security.
  • Geopolitical balancing challenge
    The move adds pressure on India to align with US sanctions while managing its own economic interests.

Global energy market concerns

The end of the waiver comes at a time when global oil markets are already under stress due to conflict in West Asia and disruptions in key routes like the Strait of Hormuz.

Analysts warn that tightening sanctions could:

  • Reduce global oil supply
  • Increase price volatility
  • Intensify competition among major buyers like India and China

Bigger picture

The US decision reflects a broader shift from temporary relief measures to stricter enforcement of sanctions, even if it risks tightening global energy markets.

For India, the development highlights a recurring challenge—balancing affordable energy access with geopolitical realities.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com