English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

26 years after his arrest, Perarivalan, convicted in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, gets 30 day parole

Published

on

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Dravidian parties in Tamil Nadu welcome Edappadi Palaniswami government’s decision to allow Rajiv’s assassin to walk out of Vellore prison to visit his ailing father, DMK appeals for extension of parole

 Nearly 26 years after he was arrested and subsequently convicted to a life term for his involvement in the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan, was released on a 30-day parole, on Friday, under orders of the Tamil Nadu government, to visit his ailing father.

The development comes after the Edappadi Palaniswami (EPS) government held extensive discussions with its law officers for nearly 3 months on the proposal to release Perarivalan on ‘ordinary leave’. Chief Minister Palaniswami had informed the Tamil Nadu Assembly on July 9 that his government had held consultations with the Advocate General about the possibility of granting parole to the life-term convict.

In a letter dated August 24, the TN government’s Additional Chief Secretary (home) Niranjan Mardi, had written to the state’s Deputy Inspector General of Prisons citing the opinion of the Advocate General of Tamil Nadu that with regard to the scope of Rule 22 of Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982, there was no restriction for granting parole to Perarivalan.

Perarivalan’s mother Arputham Ammal had earlier written to the TN government seeking one-month parole for her son. She had claimed that her husband – 74-yearold Gnanasekaran – was suffering from different ailments and doctors had advised the family that he be taken from Jolarpet to Chennai for further treatment. Perarivalan had moved a similar appeal seeking his release on parole on compassionate grounds and stated that he was required to take his father for treatment to Chennai.

After having rejected several similar petitions filed by Arputham in the past, the EPS government finally obliged, while ordering the state police authorities to ensure that a strong police escort is provided to Perarivalan alias Arivu.

26 years after his arrest, Perarivalan, convicted in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, gets 30 day parole

Both key Dravidian parties in the state – the ruling AIADMK and its arch rival, the DMK have welcomed Perarivalan’s release. DMK working president MK Stalin, who had been pressing for the convict’s release on compassionate grounds for some time, has now appealed to the EPS government that Perarivalan should be granted an extension of parole and demanded that the federal and state government should both work towards steps that will ensure his permanent release from Vellore jail.

DMK spokesperson TKS Elangovan termed the parole as a great relief for Perarivalan and his family. “It is a good thing. We welcome this. We have been demanding this as he was in prison for a long time. Parole will be great relief to him and his family. His mother will be happy that his son came home after a long time,”Elangovan told reporters in Chennai on Friday.

Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) founder S Ramadoss also took to twitter to express happiness at the development.

Perarivalan’s mother too has expressed gratitude to all political parties for their support in her struggle to get her son released with a special mention of the late chief minister J Jayalalithaa.

“After 26 years of struggle, my son will be returning from the jail. I thank late J. Jayalalithaa for helping us through this. All political parties have shown support in this matter. Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam’s (DMK) MK Stalin too,” Arputham told the media.

Tamil Nadu’s Law minister, CV Shanmugam informed media persons in Chennai that “chief minister Palaniswami considered the pleas of Perarivalan’s mother on compassionate grounds. There were also requests from various quarters to release Perarivalan as he has already served a long sentence… He has been a convict since he was a 19-year-old and never got relief even once in his 26 years of sentence. You must also remember, our Amma (Jayalalithaa) had passed a resolution on the floor of the TN assembly for release of all the convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case”.

26 years after his arrest, Perarivalan, convicted in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, gets 30 day parole

Perarivalan and six others associated with the Sri Lankan terror outfit LTTE were arrested in 1991 for the assassination of Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi during an election rally.

In 1998, the Supreme Court had sentenced Perarivalan to death. The judgement had said, “AG Perarivalan alias Arivu (A-18) was sentenced to death for purchasing the 9-volt battery used in the belt-bomb which Dhanu (the woman LTTE operative who acted as the suicide bomber to kill Rajiv) strapped around her waist. A single passage in his confessional statement made clear that this battery was used in the bomb. Since the only way he could have known this was prior to the blast, and on the basis of corroborative evidence, the judges came to the conclusion that Arivu had prior knowledge of the assassination attempt.”

After multiple mercy petitions, the Supreme Court had commuted Perarivalan’s death sentence to life imprisonment in February 2014.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com