BJP MP Anurag Thakur on Thursday accused a Trinamool Congress member of using an e-cigarette inside the Lok Sabha during Question Hour, prompting the Speaker to warn MPs about maintaining decorum. E-cigarettes are fully banned in India under the Prohibition of Electronic Cigarettes Act, 2019.

What triggered the row in Lok Sabha

Raising the matter before Speaker Om Birla, Thakur questioned whether e-cigarettes were permitted inside the House. After Birla said they were not allowed, Thakur alleged that a Trinamool MP had been “smoking e-cigarettes in the House for the past several days” and urged an immediate inquiry. His remarks led several BJP MPs to join the protest, briefly disrupting proceedings.

Birla responded by reminding members to uphold parliamentary traditions and stressed that any such violation would invite action.

Centre reminds of complete ban on e-cigarettes

E-cigarettes are electronic or battery-operated devices that heat liquid—often containing nicotine and flavouring—into an inhalable aerosol. Their manufacture, sale, distribution, import and even possession are illegal in India.

Textiles Minister Giriraj Singh also termed the alleged incident “unfortunate”, noting that the law applies to everyone, including MPs.

Despite the nationwide ban, illegal sales continue in many parts of the country, including near educational institutions, prompting the Centre to issue fresh advisories to states in 2023.

Smoking is also prohibited anywhere within the Parliament complex, as the Parliament Rule Book explicitly states that smoking is “strictly forbidden”.

Delhi-based restaurateurs Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra, wanted in connection with the Goa nightclub fire that claimed 25 lives, have been detained in Thailand. Images circulating online show the brothers with their hands tied, holding their passports, as they stand beside Thai police officials.

Brothers held in Phuket as India seeks deportation

The Luthra brothers, who run the Romeo Lane chain across multiple cities and countries, left for Phuket just hours after a massive blaze gutted their ‘Birch by Romeo Lane’ nightclub in north Goa’s Arpora. They are facing charges including culpable homicide not amounting to murder and negligence. Indian agencies are now preparing to push for their deportation so they can be tried in Goa.

Deadly fire triggered by flammable decor and safety lapses

The late-night blaze erupted during a musical event attended by around 100 people, most of them tourists. The use of electric firecrackers during a performance is suspected to have triggered the fire. The venue’s heavy use of flammable décor and absence of functional fire extinguishers or alarms turned it into a death trap.

A narrow access road further delayed fire engines, forcing responders to park nearly 400 metres away, significantly hindering rescue operations. By the time the blaze was doused, 25 people — including five tourists and 20 staff members — had died, most due to toxic smoke inhalation in the basement.

Police pursuit and legal battle

Following the incident, four staff members were arrested and a search began for the Luthras. Investigators from Goa and Delhi discovered the brothers had booked their tickets soon after the fire and left the country within hours. Their business partner, Ajay Gupta, has already been arrested in Delhi.

The brothers have moved a Delhi court seeking anticipatory bail, arguing they were licensees, not owners, of the building. They claimed they were not present at the nightclub when the fire occurred and said their travel to Thailand was for a business meeting, not to evade investigation. Their plea seeks four weeks of protection from arrest upon their return to India.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi were locked in a sharp confrontation in the Lok Sabha during the ongoing debate on electoral reforms. The exchange intensified when Gandhi challenged the Home minister to engage in a direct debate over his press conferences alleging irregularities in voter lists.

Shah counters allegations over voter rolls

During his address, Amit Shah criticised the Opposition for raising doubts about existing voter lists while simultaneously objecting to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process. He remarked that concerns over voter rolls often emerged only when the Opposition performed poorly in elections. Taking aim at Gandhi’s earlier briefings on alleged discrepancies—one of which had been described as a “Hydrogen Bomb”—Shah accused certain political families of practicing “generational vote theft”.

As Gandhi intervened, demanding Shah explain the immunity provided to Election Commissioners and challenging him to debate the content of his press conferences, the Home minister firmly stated that Parliament would not run as per Gandhi’s directions and that he would decide the order of his responses.

Rahul Gandhi accuses Home minister of avoiding key questions

Unconvinced by Shah’s reply, Gandhi labelled the minister’s remarks “defensive and fearful”. Shah responded that he would not be provoked and asserted that “vote theft” happens when electoral mandates are overturned.

Attack on Nehru-Gandhi family escalates tensions

Amit Shah intensified his criticism by invoking historical examples. He claimed the first instance of “vote theft” occurred during the selection of India’s first Prime Minister, alleging that Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel had secured more votes than Jawaharlal Nehru from provincial Congress units. Shah also referenced the 1975 court verdict that struck down Indira Gandhi’s election from Rae Bareli, calling the events that followed a major attempt at “vote theft”.

He further mentioned a court case alleging that Sonia Gandhi had cast a vote before becoming an Indian citizen—a point immediately contested by Congress MPs.

Opposition walks out after EVM, SIR remarks

Shah asserted that the Opposition’s objections to Electronic Voting Machines and resistance to SIR were attempts to retain ineligible names, including illegal immigrants, on voter lists. This led to a walkout by Opposition MPs.

Outside Parliament, Gandhi reiterated that the minister had not addressed core issues such as transparency in voter lists, clarity on the EVM architecture, or the evidence he presented in his press conferences.