English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

2G spectrum scam case trial: Delhi court to decide A Raja, Kanimozhi’s fate on Dec 21

Published

on

A-Raja

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

CAG report in 2010 had estimated that 2G spectrum allocation during A Raja’s term as Union telecom minister had cost the exchequer Rs 1.76 lakh crore

A special CBI court in Delhi will, on December 21, decide the fate of former Union telecom minister A Raja, DMK chief M Karunanidhi’s daughter and Rajya Sabha MP Kanimozhi and a host of other high-profile accused, in three cases related to the 2G spectrum scam case.

The case pertains to the alleged irregularities in the allocation of 2G spectrum and licenses to telecom companies during the UPA-I regime of then Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh when DMK leader A Raja was the Union telecom minister.

Raja had been forced to resign from the Manmohan Singh cabinet in November 2010 after a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) claimed that the “arbitrary” allocation of 2G spectrum and licenses by Raja in 2007-2008 had led to a loss of Rs 1.76 lakh crore to the exchequer.

Subsequent investigations into the scam by agencies like the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate had pointed to wide-ranging irregularities by Raja, DMK leaders Kanimozhi and Dayanidhi Maran and a host of head honchos of telecom companies not only in the spectrum allocation process but also in subsequent sale of the finite spectrum and licenses by some telecom companies to others, who reportedly paid a much higher price for buying the spectrum than what the original allottees had paid to the Centre.

Special CBI judge OP Saini had begun hearing three cases related to the 2G spectrum scam in April 2011. Last month, special CBI judge Saini had, at his Patiala House courtroom, postponed the date for fixing a date for the pronouncement of judgment for December 5. Two out of the three cases being adjudicated at the special CBI court have been filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) while the third has been filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).

On Tuesday, in a brief order, judge Saini said: “I have perused the files and will pronounce judgement on December 21 at 10.30 a.m.” The court has also directed all accused in the case as well as the counsel for the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate to be present in the courtroom on judgement day and said that the entry into the courtroom that day will be based on a first-cum-first serve basis in the following order – accused, prosecution and the media.

Raja, who was present at the Patiala House Court premises on Tuesday said that he had “faith in the judiciary” but declined to comment on his expectations from the verdict.

[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Meanwhile, DMK MP Kanimozhi, who had also arrived at the Patiala House Court premises refused to comment on the court’s order or her expectations from the judgement.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]

According to the CBI, which has filed two of the three cases on which judge Saini will pronounce his verdict on December 21, Raja was biased in allocating 2G spectrum waves and operating licences to telecom firms. The CBI chargesheet in the case against Raja and Kanimozhi alleges that Rs. 200 crore were transferred from DB Group to the DMK-controlled Kalaignar TV as kickbacks in lieu of allocation of 2G spectrum to Swan Telecom Pvt Ltd.

The Enforcement Directorate has filed a separate case related to money laundering, alleging that a conspiracy was hatched by Raja, Kanimozhi, DMK patriarch M. Karunanidhi’s wife Dayalu Ammal and others and that Rs. 200 crore was proceeds of the crime.

On December 21, the court will also deliver its judgement in the 2G scam case against Essar and Loop telecom companies. The CBI has alleged that promoters of the Essar Group were the real investors and beneficiaries of the spectrum. Licences were issued to Loop Telecom, a front company of Essar to acquire these along with the 2G spectrum in 2008, the ED has claimed.

Politically, a guilt verdict against Raja and Kanimozhi could give a huge boost to the BJP in cornering the Congress party during the upcoming winter session of Parliament and denting the Opposition’s planned offensive against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the ruling NDA regime. The BJP had been at the vanguard of protests against the then UPA regime when the 2G spectrum scam broke and had alleged that the irregularities were the result of then Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh’s inability to rein in Raja – a member of the DMK which was a key ally in the UPA coalition. The BJP had also sought to paint Manmohan Singh and the Congress as equally responsible for the scam as Raja, asserting that they were “guilty by association” with the DMK’s tainted leader.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

India hits back at Shehbaz Sharif at UN, says terror will have consequences

India hit back at Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s UN speech, with New Delhi warning that terrorism will have consequences.

Published

on

India has responded to Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s remarks at the United Nations, delivering a strong message on terrorism and warning that such actions will have consequences.

The response came after Mr Sharif addressed the UN and raised issues concerning India and Pakistan. New Delhi rejected the narrative presented by the Pakistani prime minister and highlighted the issue of terrorism.

India’s message was delivered by Petal Gehlot, who represented New Delhi in the response to Pakistan.

India warns Pakistan over terrorism

India’s response focused on Pakistan’s record and its approach towards terrorism. New Delhi made clear that terrorism cannot be separated from its consequences and that those responsible cannot expect such actions to go unanswered.

The Indian side also pushed back against the claims and allegations made by Mr Sharif during his UN speech.

The exchange comes amid continuing tensions between India and Pakistan, with terrorism remaining a major point of disagreement between the two countries.

Shehbaz Sharif’s UN remarks

In his address, Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif spoke about India-Pakistan relations and raised several issues concerning New Delhi.

India subsequently exercised its right of reply to respond to Pakistan’s statements at the United Nations.

New Delhi’s response underlined its position that terrorism remains a serious issue in the relationship and that there would be consequences for terrorist actions.

The latest exchange at the UN adds to the continuing diplomatic confrontation between the two neighbouring countries.

Continue Reading

India News

Veeramani POCSO case: Vijay questions Stalin over earlier probe

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay has questioned MK Stalin over the handling of the Veeramani POCSO case, while Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected anyone.

Published

on

Actor Vijay

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) president C Joseph Vijay has questioned DMK president MK Stalin over the handling of the POCSO case involving Gem Granites founder R Veeramani. The political exchange follows renewed investigation into allegations involving minor girls.

Vijay’s remarks came as the ruling TVK stepped up its questions about how the case was handled during the previous DMK government. The party’s IT wing has alleged that the earlier investigation was weakened and questioned why a final report was filed.

The allegations have been rejected by the DMK. Stalin has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to protect anyone in the case and has called the allegations false and defamatory.

What did Vijay say about the Veeramani case?

Vijay questioned Stalin over the handling of the case and demanded an explanation from the former chief minister.

The TVK has specifically questioned why action was not taken against Veeramani during the previous administration and why the earlier investigation resulted in a closure report.

The party has also raised questions about the role of officials involved in the earlier investigation. These are political allegations made by the TVK and have not been established as facts.

What is the Veeramani POCSO case?

The case concerns allegations of sexual abuse of minors involving R Veeramani, the founder of Gem Granites.

The case came under renewed scrutiny after a special POCSO court rejected an earlier closure report and ordered further investigation. The expanded probe has subsequently identified additional alleged survivors who were minors at the time of the alleged offences, according to current reporting.

The investigation is also examining the circumstances surrounding the earlier probe and whether there were any lapses in how the case was handled.

What has MK Stalin said?

Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected Veeramani.

He has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to shield anyone in the case. Stalin has also said that everyone responsible for the alleged offences, including anyone who aided or attempted to protect the accused, should face the law.

The DMK president has further said that the focus should remain on securing justice for the affected girls rather than making political allegations.

Why has the case become a political issue?

The Veeramani case has become the subject of a political dispute between the ruling TVK and the DMK over the handling of the earlier investigation.

The TVK is questioning the previous government’s handling of the case, while the DMK has denied that it intervened to protect the accused.

At this stage, claims about political interference or deliberate weakening of the earlier investigation should be treated as allegations unless established by the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

Continue Reading

India News

Women wrestlers challenge Brij Bhushan’s acquittal in sexual harassment case

Four women wrestlers have challenged the acquittal of former WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and co-accused Vinod Tomar in a sexual harassment case.

Published

on

Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh

Four women wrestlers have approached a Delhi court challenging the acquittal of former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief and BJP leader Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in a sexual harassment case.

The wrestlers have also challenged the acquittal of co-accused Vinod Tomar. The matter is scheduled to be heard by a Special Judge at the Rouse Avenue Courts.

The appeal challenges the order passed by an Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on August 3, 2026, when Brij Bhushan and Tomar were acquitted in the case.

Wrestlers challenge court’s reasoning

In their appeal, the wrestlers have argued that the acquittal order is legally unsustainable and that the evidence was not assessed appropriately.

They have also alleged that the order relied on assumptions about how victims of sexual assault and harassment were expected to behave instead of assessing the evidence and circumstances of the complainants.

The challenge seeks judicial scrutiny of the findings that resulted in the acquittal of Brij Bhushan and Tomar.

Brij Bhushan was acquitted in August

The Rouse Avenue court acquitted Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh on August 3 in the sexual harassment case involving women wrestlers. The court’s decision followed consideration of the evidence and statements presented during the proceedings.

The case had emerged after several women wrestlers accused the former WFI chief of sexual harassment. The allegations had led to a major protest by wrestlers in 2023.

The latest appeal means the acquittal is now being challenged before a higher court.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com