English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

After 9 years in jail, SC grants bail to Malegaon blast accused Shrikant Purohit

Published

on

Lt Col Shrikant Purohit

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Apex court bench says Bombay High Court erred in refusing bail to Lieutenant Colonel Shrikant Purohit

The Supreme Court bench of Justices Rajesh Kumar Agrawal and Abhay Manohar Sapre, on Monday, set aside a Bombay High Court verdict and granted bail to the 2008 Malegaon blast case accused Lt Col Shrikant Purohit. He will be out after spending nine years behind bars.

In allowing bail, the bench said that the high court erred in refusing him bail. Senior advocate Harish Salve has been appearing for Purohit. The court had reserved its verdict on Thursday, following the hearing on the bail plea.

Salve’s argument for interim bail for Purohit was “for the interest of justice”, while the NIA had argued that there was enough evidence against Purohit and hence there was no question of granting him bail.

The complication in the case arose from Col Purohit’s admission that he had participated in the right-wing extremist organisation Abhinav Bharat’s meetings, but he had insisted that he had done this as an Army intelligence mole. This part (that he was actually an Army informer) was proved by the Commission of Inquiry set up for the purpose.

Salve’s argument, therefore, was based on how Purohit was falsely implicated amid the chaos and within complications that existed when the Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) took up the case.

The apex court bench also said that the cancellation of Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur’s bail also needed detailed consideration. Nisar Ahmed Haji Sayed Bilal, father of one of the blast victims, challenged the Bombay High Court order granting bail to the Sadhvi, while Purohit moved the top court for his bail.

Thakur was granted bail by the high court on April 25, but Bilal had argued that keeping Thakur out of jail would enable the Sadhvi to tamper with evidence because she was an influential person. The high court had found “no prima facie evidence against” her.

This was also the reading of the NIA, which said that while there was enough evidence against Purohit, there wasn’t any against Thakur.

On September 29, 2008, seven were killed in a blast in Nasik’s textile town of Malegaon. The chargesheet named Thakur, Purohit and co-accused Swami Dayanand Pandey as the key conspirators.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Ukraine envoy meets Ajit Doval, S Jaishankar to discuss path to peace

Ukraine’s Rustem Umerov met Ajit Doval and S Jaishankar in New Delhi to discuss the conflict and efforts towards a peaceful resolution.

Published

on

Ukraine envoy meets Ajit Doval

A senior Ukrainian official held high-level meetings with India’s top leadership in New Delhi, focusing on efforts to find a peaceful resolution to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

Rustem Umerov, a top aide to Volodymyr Zelensky, met separately with Ajit Doval and S. Jaishankar during his visit.

In his meeting with Ajit Doval, discussions focused on the evolving situation along the frontline in Ukraine, along with broader security developments related to the conflict.

Talks with External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar covered the ongoing war as well as bilateral ties between India and Ukraine. Both sides exchanged views on diplomatic efforts aimed at ending the conflict.

India reiterated its consistent position that the crisis should be resolved through dialogue and diplomacy, emphasising the need for continued engagement between all parties.

Umerov noted that the discussions also touched on the progress of negotiations and the prospects for achieving a “just, lasting and sustainable peace” in Ukraine. He described the interactions as constructive and highlighted ongoing cooperation between the two countries following earlier high-level engagements.

Continue Reading

India News

Women’s quota bill fails in Lok Sabha as it falls short of two-thirds majority

Women’s reservation proposal failed in Lok Sabha after securing 298 votes, below the required two-thirds majority

Published

on

Parliament

Government secures 298 votes in favour, 230 against; proposal does not pass constitutional threshold

The proposed amendment related to women’s reservation failed to pass in the Lok Sabha on Friday after the government could not secure the required two-thirds majority.

The bill received 298 votes in favour and 230 against, falling short of the constitutional threshold needed for passage. As a constitutional amendment, it required the support of at least two-thirds of members present and voting.

Despite securing a simple majority, the government was unable to gather sufficient support to meet this requirement.

Debate continues over two days

The discussion on the bill extended late into Thursday and continued on Friday, with members from both sides participating in the debate on women’s representation in legislative bodies.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi urged members to support the proposal, calling for wider consensus on the issue.

Implications of the outcome

The failure of the bill underscores the challenges in securing broad political agreement on constitutional amendments, especially those related to representation and electoral reforms.

The proposal was aimed at advancing women’s representation in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies, an issue that has remained under discussion for several years.

Continue Reading

India News

Rahul Gandhi faces FIR order as Allahabad High Court acts on dual citizenship plea

High Court allows plea in Rahul Gandhi citizenship case, paving the way for further legal process.

Published

on

Rahul Gandhi

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has allowed a petition seeking legal action in connection with allegations related to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship status, marking a fresh development in the case.

The petition was filed by a political worker, who had approached the court seeking directions for registration of a case over claims that Gandhi may have held foreign citizenship. The High Court, while hearing the matter, passed directions for further proceedings in accordance with law.

The development comes after a special MP/MLA court in Lucknow had earlier declined to order registration of an FIR, reportedly observing that it lacked jurisdiction in matters concerning citizenship.

Background

The case is linked to allegations that Rahul Gandhi may have held British citizenship. Under Indian law, dual citizenship is not permitted. However, these claims remain part of the petitioner’s submissions and have not been established by any court.

During earlier hearings, the High Court had sought records and considered material presented by the parties involved.

What happens next

With the High Court allowing the plea, the matter is expected to proceed as per due legal process. This may involve examination by the appropriate authority and further judicial review at subsequent stages.

The case carries both legal and political significance given Rahul Gandhi’s role as Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com