English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Yogi Adityanath asks Samajwadi Party to expel Abu Azmi, says bring him to UP and will take care

“The Samajwadi Party must decide its position on this matter. Expel this wretched individual from your party and send him to Uttar Pradesh. We know how to deal with such people here,” Adityanath said, escalating his criticism of the SP.

Published

on

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Wednesday launched a scathing attack on the Samajwadi Party (SP) over Maharashtra MLA Abu Azmi’s controversial remarks glorifying Mughal ruler Aurangzeb. Addressing the Legislative Council, Adityanath demanded that the SP take a clear stand on the issue and expel Azmi from the party, accusing the SP of double standards and disrespecting India’s cultural heritage.

“The Samajwadi Party must decide its position on this matter. Expel this wretched individual from your party and send him to Uttar Pradesh. We know how to deal with such people here,” Adityanath said, escalating his criticism of the SP.

The Chief Minister’s remarks came after SP members interrupted him during his speech in the Council. He challenged the party to publicly condemn Azmi’s statements and take decisive action. “Either call him to a public gathering and make him clarify his remarks or send him to Uttar Pradesh. We do not take long to deal with such people here,” Adityanath asserted.

Adityanath questioned Azmi’s loyalty to India, asking, “A person who feels ashamed of the legacy of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj but considers Aurangzeb his hero—does he even have the right to live in India?”

He accused the SP of hypocrisy, pointing out that while the party criticizes events like the Kumbh Mela, it glorifies Aurangzeb, a ruler known for his intolerance and destruction of temples. “On one hand, you criticize the Kumbh, and on the other, you glorify Aurangzeb—a ruthless, fanatical ruler who crushed India’s faith. What is stopping you from taking action against this leader?” Adityanath asked.

The Chief Minister also criticized the SP for deviating from the principles of socialist leader Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia, who upheld India’s cultural unity despite being a political rival of the Congress. “Even if you do not take pride in India’s heritage, at least follow the ideology of the leader whose name you use for political gain,” Adityanath said, quoting Lohia’s belief that India stands on the pillars of Lord Ram, Lord Krishna, and Lord Shiva.

Adityanath further highlighted Aurangzeb’s tyrannical rule, including his imprisonment of his father, Shah Jahan, in Agra Fort. “Aurangzeb left his own father to die of thirst. If the SP feels proud of Aurangzeb, they should read Shah Jahan’s autobiography, where he laments that even a Hindu son is better than Aurangzeb,” he said.

The Chief Minister also questioned why the SP venerates a ruler who imposed the jizya tax, persecuted non-Muslims, and attempted to Islamize India. “The SP must answer whether it truly considers a tyrant like Aurangzeb its role model, a ruler who attacked India’s faith and traditions,” he said.

Adityanath’s attack comes amid an ongoing controversy in Maharashtra, where Azmi was suspended from the state Assembly until the end of the Budget Session for his remarks eulogizing Aurangzeb. The Chief Minister’s remarks have intensified the political debate over the SP’s stance on historical figures and its commitment to India’s cultural heritage.

As the controversy unfolds, Adityanath’s challenge to the SP to clarify its position and take action against Azmi has put the party in a tight spot, with the BJP aiming to capitalize on the issue ahead of upcoming elections.

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com