English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Ban circulation of video of Regar killing Afrazul Khan, appeals Afrazul’s widow to SC

Published

on

Ban circulation of video of Regar killing Afrazul Khan, appeals Afrazul’s widow to SC

Gulbahar Bibi also asks for compensation and for an independent public prosecutor not aligned to the state of Rajasthan

The pain of Gulbahar Bibi, whose husband Afrazul Khan was brutally hacked to death by Shambhulal Regar (currently under arrest), on December 6, 2017 in Rajsamand District, Rajasthan over false allegations of love-jihad, is not over.

It was not enough that Gulbahar had to endure the horrific incident when the family’s only breadwinner was hacked in a field by the sick-minded Regar with his young nephew even video recording it.

Now social media hacks, probably as sick as Regar, are continuously forwarding and sharing the horrific video that Regar had uploaded on the internet.

Now Gulbahar Bibi has petitioned the Supreme Court, naming the Union of India (Through Ministry of Home Affairs) and the State of Rajasthan (Through its Chief Secretary) as respondents to ban the video’s online circulation.

The demand in the petition is that the apex court should direct the Union government and the state governments to stop such viral video being shared and forwarded.

The petition also says that this video also promotes hostility between two communities and all websites hosting the video should be immediately banned.

The petitioner has approached the court “under Article 32 of the Constitution of India in order to also demand an impartial investigation from an independent national agency and also to look at the spreading of hate speech of a communal nature targeting a whole religious community and discriminating against them, demonizing them and encouraging violence against them and creating a communal divide.”

Says the petition: “Such propaganda is resulting in hate crimes which hit at the very root of our pluralistic and inclusive society.”

Regar is the murderer, but the petitioner has also sought an inquiry into the factors that “acted as a catalyst and motivated him to commit such a heinous act, the factors and people responsible for spreading such hatred in the name of a communal myth/fiction being propagated as ‘Love Jihad’”, the petition says.

The petition, which addresses the bigger picture in this barbaric act, says: “Such a vile act is reprehensible by all standards of humanity and violates the fundamental rights of the petitioner to live with dignity and in peace without the threat of being persecuted on the basis of her race, caste, creed, gender or religion, as such rights are bestowed upon the citizens of this country by the mandate of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The Petitioner is also seeking the immediate removal of all videos of the heinous killing circulating on several websites including YouTube and the Respondent No 1 is duty bound to ensure that the service providers do not upload the said videos which are a form of hate speech encouraging others to indulge in copycat crimes.”

It has to be remembered in this context that the top court is already hearing petitions regarding obscene and reprehensible videos of sexual crimes against children that have been uploaded on the Internet and are circulating on social media. The issue has been heard in detail, but so far little progress has been made in finding a foolproof formula on how to segregate such videos and messages by either Google or WhatsApp or Facebook or other social media platforms.

This particular video presents yet another problem for the top court to sort out.

Compensation

Through the petition Gulbahar Bibi has also sought adequate compensation from the state (Rajasthan) for its failure to prevent the spread of communal violence. She has received a sum of Rs 2 lakh from the State of West Bengal and Rs 3 lakhs from the Rajasthan government, “but she has three daughters to provide for and the amount is by no means adequate for her maintenance and to take care of their future.”

That fear still stalks the widow was clear from the next part of the petition, which states that “The Petitioner is also seeking access to justice in a free and fair atmosphere and the appointment of a special public prosecutor unrelated to the ruling party of the state (Rajasthan) and functioning under the supervision of the (apex) court. This is particularly important since the petitioner resides in West Bengal and is unable to be physically present at the trial. There is an atmosphere of mass hysteria at the hearings as is evident from news reports that orange flags were hoisted on court house building by supporters of the accused on the date of hearing.”

Gulbahar Bibi and her late husband are from Kaliachak in the Maldah district of West Bengal and the 48-year-old Afrazul had been working as a daily wage labourer in the area for over ten years.

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com