India News

Chanting Vande Mataram: If not mother, will you salute Afzal Guru: Vice President Naidu

Published

9 years ago

December 8, 2017

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Addressing an event after launching a book on Hindu extremist and VHP leader, late Ashok Singhal, Vice President Venkaiah Naidu rakes up Vande Mataram row again

Vice President Venkaiah Naidu believes that the late Ashok Singhal, former working president of RSS-affiliate Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and a rabid Muslim-baiter, was one of the “finest proponents of Hinduism” but wonders whether those who object to chanting Vande Mataram would rather salute Afzal Guru, the suspected terrorist who was hanged in February 2013 for allegedly plotting the Parliament attack in December 2001.

Addressing an event in New Delhi on Thursday evening after he released a book on the late Ashok Singhal, Naidu responded to questions on the continued opposition that chanting of Vande Mataram – a song dedicated to the motherland, literally meaning salute to the mother – faces from sections within the Muslim community.

[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]

The Muslim voices who oppose the singing of Vande Mataram claim that as per the Quran, the community can only salute Allah and no one else.

However, Naidu seemed to take an extreme view on the subject, one that seemed closer to the arguments propagated by the BJP – the political outfit that Naidu was affiliated with before assuming the office of Vice President of India – and its parent organisation, the RSS.

“Vande Mataram ke baare mein vivaad hota hai, ‘Maa tujhe salaam’. Maa ko salaam nahi karenge toh kisko karenge? Afzal Guru ko karenge kya? (Vande Mataram is an ode to the motherland, what is the problem with it? if you don’t salute your mother, who would you salute, Afzal Guru),” Naidu asked.

A former fruit merchant from Sopore, north Kashmir, Afzal Guru was convicted for conspiring with and sheltering the terrorists who attacked the Parliament on December 13, 2001. Five terrorists had driven through a gate of Parliament House and opened fire, killing nine people on that fateful day. While all five terrorists were gunned down during the attack, Afzal Guru was arrested two days laterby the Delhi Police’s special cell.

Guru was sentenced to death by a trial court on December 18, 2002 along with Delhi University professor SAR Gilani and Shaukat Hussain. Gilani was, however, let off by the Delhi High Court in October 2003 while the sentence of Guru and Hussain was upheld. Later, the Supreme Court upheld the death penalty of Guru in August 2005 but commuted Hussain’s sentence to 10 years imprisonment. Hussain was released from Tihar in December 2010.

While Guru was scheduled to be hanged in October 2006, his wife Tabassum filed a mercy petition with the then President APJ Abdul Kalam. The BJP had stridently accused the Congress-led UPA government of deliberately delaying a decision on Guru’s mercy petition and accused the Congress party of “appeasing its minority vote-back”. Guru’s plea for clemency had finally been rejected by then President Pranab Mukherjee on February 3. 2013. On February 9, early in the morning, Guru was hanged within the premises of the Tihar Jail, where he had been lodged since his conviction. There had been no prior information from Tihar authorities or the government about carrying out Guru’s death penalty on that day and the hanging had evoked sharp criticism from social and human rights activists and people in Jammu & Kashmir over the secrecy that was maintained in hanging Guru and then burying him within the Tihar Jail premises near Jail Number 3.

The Vice President spoke at length about Hinduism, Hindutva and, in comments that once again were reminiscent of his days as a BJP leader, the chanting of Bharat Mata ki Jai – another issue that some Muslims have reservations over.

“Bharat Mata ki jai, is not about some goddess in a photo. It is about all 125 crore people living in this country irrespective of their caste, colour, creed and religion. They all are Indians,” Naidu said.

Referring to Hinduism, Naidu cited the Supreme Court’s 1995 verdict, which said Hinduism is not a narrow concept but a broader cultural connotation of India. “Hinduism is our culture our tradition which has been passed on from various generations. There could be different ways of worship, but there is only one way of life that in Hinduism,” the Vice President said.

Perhaps because he was at the event to unveil a book on Ashok Singhal or because of his association with the late VHP chief during his stint in the BJP, Naidu heaped high praise on the Hindutva leader.

While Singhal was known for his extremist right-wing Hindutva views – the high point of his public life was the riotous mobs he led in his quest for demolishing the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya and getting a Ram Mandir built at the spot – these aspects of his life predictably found no mention in Naidu’s address.

Instead, the Vice President termed Singhal as one of the “finest proponents of Hinduism” who “sacrificed” 75 years of his life for the benefit of future generations. Naidu added that Singhal was “an exemplary individual who selflessly dedicated himself as a (RSS) pracharak and served the society”.

Speaking at the same event, RSS general secretary Suresh Bhaiyyaji Joshi said Singhal worked hard to realise the dream of building a Ram Temple in Ayodhya. “Now he might have gone but we should not forget his goal,” Joshi added.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Related Topics:Afzal Guru Ayodhya Babri Masjid

Up Next

Govt extends deadline for linking PAN with Aadhaar to March 31

Don't Miss

Government moves National Company Law Tribunal to take control of Unitech

India News

Veeramani POCSO case: Vijay questions Stalin over earlier probe

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay has questioned MK Stalin over the handling of the Veeramani POCSO case, while Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected anyone.

Published

10 mins ago

September 25, 2026

APNLive Desk

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) president C Joseph Vijay has questioned DMK president MK Stalin over the handling of the POCSO case involving Gem Granites founder R Veeramani. The political exchange follows renewed investigation into allegations involving minor girls.

Vijay’s remarks came as the ruling TVK stepped up its questions about how the case was handled during the previous DMK government. The party’s IT wing has alleged that the earlier investigation was weakened and questioned why a final report was filed.

The allegations have been rejected by the DMK. Stalin has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to protect anyone in the case and has called the allegations false and defamatory.

What did Vijay say about the Veeramani case?

Vijay questioned Stalin over the handling of the case and demanded an explanation from the former chief minister.

The TVK has specifically questioned why action was not taken against Veeramani during the previous administration and why the earlier investigation resulted in a closure report.

The party has also raised questions about the role of officials involved in the earlier investigation. These are political allegations made by the TVK and have not been established as facts.

What is the Veeramani POCSO case?

The case concerns allegations of sexual abuse of minors involving R Veeramani, the founder of Gem Granites.

The case came under renewed scrutiny after a special POCSO court rejected an earlier closure report and ordered further investigation. The expanded probe has subsequently identified additional alleged survivors who were minors at the time of the alleged offences, according to current reporting.

The investigation is also examining the circumstances surrounding the earlier probe and whether there were any lapses in how the case was handled.

What has MK Stalin said?

Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected Veeramani.

He has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to shield anyone in the case. Stalin has also said that everyone responsible for the alleged offences, including anyone who aided or attempted to protect the accused, should face the law.

The DMK president has further said that the focus should remain on securing justice for the affected girls rather than making political allegations.

Why has the case become a political issue?

The Veeramani case has become the subject of a political dispute between the ruling TVK and the DMK over the handling of the earlier investigation.

The TVK is questioning the previous government’s handling of the case, while the DMK has denied that it intervened to protect the accused.

At this stage, claims about political interference or deliberate weakening of the earlier investigation should be treated as allegations unless established by the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

India News

Women wrestlers challenge Brij Bhushan’s acquittal in sexual harassment case

Four women wrestlers have challenged the acquittal of former WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and co-accused Vinod Tomar in a sexual harassment case.

Published

47 mins ago

September 25, 2026

APNLive Desk

Four women wrestlers have approached a Delhi court challenging the acquittal of former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief and BJP leader Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in a sexual harassment case.

The wrestlers have also challenged the acquittal of co-accused Vinod Tomar. The matter is scheduled to be heard by a Special Judge at the Rouse Avenue Courts.

The appeal challenges the order passed by an Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on August 3, 2026, when Brij Bhushan and Tomar were acquitted in the case.

Wrestlers challenge court’s reasoning

In their appeal, the wrestlers have argued that the acquittal order is legally unsustainable and that the evidence was not assessed appropriately.

They have also alleged that the order relied on assumptions about how victims of sexual assault and harassment were expected to behave instead of assessing the evidence and circumstances of the complainants.

The challenge seeks judicial scrutiny of the findings that resulted in the acquittal of Brij Bhushan and Tomar.

Brij Bhushan was acquitted in August

The Rouse Avenue court acquitted Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh on August 3 in the sexual harassment case involving women wrestlers. The court’s decision followed consideration of the evidence and statements presented during the proceedings.

The case had emerged after several women wrestlers accused the former WFI chief of sexual harassment. The allegations had led to a major protest by wrestlers in 2023.

The latest appeal means the acquittal is now being challenged before a higher court.

India News

Congress protests against Gyanesh Kumar, demands Election chief’s resignation

Congress workers took to the streets against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, with protests and demonstrations held over the party’s allegations concerning the Election Commission.

Published

2 hours ago

September 25, 2026

APNLive Desk

Congress stepped up its campaign against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, with party workers taking to the streets and demanding his resignation amid the ongoing row over the Election Commission.

The protests followed repeated criticism by Congress leaders of the poll panel and its functioning. The party has alleged irregularities in the electoral process and has sought accountability from the Election Commission.

Congress leaders have also targeted Gyanesh Kumar personally, with Rahul Gandhi among those calling for the Chief Election Commissioner to step down.

Congress takes protest to streets

Congress workers staged demonstrations in different places as part of the party’s campaign against the Election Commission.

The protests featured sharp symbolism, including masks and handcuffs, as Congress sought to highlight its allegations against the poll panel and demand action against Gyanesh Kumar.

The demonstrations are part of a wider confrontation between the Congress and the Election Commission over issues related to electoral rolls and the conduct of elections.

Congress demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation

The Congress has repeatedly demanded the resignation of Gyanesh Kumar, accusing the Election Commission of failing to adequately address the concerns raised by the opposition party.

Rahul Gandhi has also stepped up his criticism of the poll panel. In a statement on Thursday, he demanded that Gyanesh Kumar resign and alleged that the Election Commission had acknowledged the issue of “vote theft”. These are allegations made by the Congress and should not be treated as an established finding unless confirmed by the relevant authority.

The dispute comes amid a broader political debate over electoral rolls, voter verification and the functioning of the Election Commission.

Election Commission under opposition scrutiny

The Congress has intensified its campaign against the poll body in recent weeks, with party leaders repeatedly questioning its decisions and procedures.

The Election Commission, meanwhile, has maintained that India’s electoral process is conducted according to the Constitution, electoral laws and prescribed procedures. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar has previously defended the integrity of the electoral system and rejected claims that electronic voting machines can be remotely hacked.

The latest protests add to the continuing political confrontation over the Election Commission and the opposition’s demands concerning the poll panel’s functioning.