English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Deoband issues fatwa to curb triple talaq

Published

on

Deoband issues fatwa to curb triple talaq

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The edict from Deoband comes when the arguments in the Supreme Court are about to end.

By Abu Turab

At a time when the Supreme Court is hearing petitions against triple talaq, the Darul Uloom Deoband, a seminary of Sunni Muslims, has issued a fatwa, which could pave the way for resolving the religio-political issue. The fatwa says misuse of triple talaq could be curbed if conditions against the use of undesired custom were included in the Nikahnama (marriage contract).

According to Urdu daily Inquilab, former Madhya Pradesh High Court Justice Suhel Ejaz Siddiqui, who has been concerned at the ongoing dispute, said the fatwa issued on March 30, 2017, can be helpful in preparing a model Nikahnama, which may be accepted by the Supreme Court. He said Maulana Arshad Madani, president of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind has played an instrumental role in getting the fatwa issued. It clearly says conditions put by both parties in Nikahnama would be an acceptable solution.

In the new Nikahnama conditions of denying right of triple talaq to the husband and if somebody exercises the triple talaq in a single sitting, he will be bound to pay 10 times of mehr amount fixed at the time of the Nikah.

Justice Ejaz Siddiqui said the Nikahnama is a civil contract and cannot be without conditions. If tough conditions were included in the contract, the misuse of triple talaq can be minimised.

Reacting to the fatwa issued by Darul Uloom Deoband, Dr. Mufti Mukarram Ahmed, imam of the historic Masjid Fatehpuri in Delhi, said multiplying mehr amount by 10 times would be a  fine.  However, he said the Supreme Court, at the end of the ongoing hearing on petitions against triple talaq, may fix a three-month jail term for anybody giving triple talaq to his wife.

He was of the opinion that a man should spend three months in jail while the wife will go through a duration of four months and ten days iddat (roughly three menstrual cycles).[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

In Manipur, Kuki-Zo groups launch counter-economic blockade

Published

on

By

Kuki-Zo organisations on Thursday launched a counter-economic blockade in Manipur, demanding that the Centre and the state government ensure uninterrupted movement of essential commodities to the hill districts amid renewed tensions over access to the highways.

The counter-blockade comes in response to the ongoing disruption of traffic on Manipur’s major transport routes with Kuki-Zo groups alleging restrictions on goods have hit residents of hill areas. They urged authorities to restore the free movement of food, medicines, fuel and other essential supplies, saying civilians should not bear the weight of the ongoing ethnic conflict.

In a joint statement, the organisations said the protest would continue until the government took concrete steps to guarantee safe passage for essential commodities and secure national highways. They also appealed to the authorities to prevent any further obstruction to the supply chain and ensure that relief and emergency services remain unaffected.

The development follows heightened tensions over the movement of vehicles on Manipur’s trunk routes, which serve as the primary lifeline for transporting goods across the state. The blockade is expected to impact logistics and transportation if the deadlock continues.

Security has been tightened along vulnerable stretches of highways, with additional personnel deployed to maintain law and order and facilitate the movement of essential supplies. Officials said the administration is monitoring the situation and is making efforts to prevent further escalation while ensuring that basic commodities continue to reach affected areas.

Manipur has witnessed repeated disruptions to road connectivity since ethnic violence erupted in the state, with competing blockades affecting supply of essential goods and normal life. The latest counter-blockade highlights the continuing challenges facing the administration in restoring stability and maintaining uninterrupted access to critical transport routes.

Continue Reading

India News

Can’t lathicharge a peaceful protest, says Supreme Court

Published

on

By

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Monday questioned the Delhi Police action leading to lathicharges during the student protest at Jantar Mantar on July 20.

The bench of Chief Justice of India Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V. Mohana observed that a peaceful protest can’t be net with a lathicharge. The court made the remarks while hearing petitions against excessive force used by Delhi Police against students protesting irregularities in the NEET-UG 2026 examination and other public examinations.

The court said the right to peaceful and lawful protest is under the protection of the Constitution. The court observed that the presence of a protest can’t be a ground for police action and said that any allegation of police excess has to be independently examined.

The petitions concern the events of July 20, when thousands of students and supporters of the Cockroach Janta Party tried to march from at Jantar Mantar to Parliament as the Monsoon Session opened. The protesters were demanding action on paper leaks, examination system reforms and government accountability.

Police said they had stopped the march because of security concerns and restrictions in central Delhi. There was a clash later and police used tear gas and lathi charge to disperse the crowd. Over a 100 protesters and a similar number of police were injured in the incident.

The petitioners had sought an independent probe into the police action during the hearing. They also demanded the retention of CCTV footage, body-camera recordings and other electronic evidence, as well as compensation for those injured in the crackdown.

The case comes amid a nationwide debate over reforms of examinations and the handling of student protests. The Centre has brought in legislative measures to strengthen anti-paper leak laws, even as student organizations continue to demand greater accountability.

Continue Reading

India News

Bill against paper leaks eclipsed by Opposition push for Amit Shah reply

Published

on

By

Amit Shah

The Monsoon Session of Parliament witnessed Opposition-Government scenes on Monday as Union Minister Dr. Jitendra Singh introduced the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 in the Lok Sabha.

The Bill aims to strengthen laws against examination paper leaks and organized cheating following the NEET-UG 2026 controversy.

During the discussions, the Opposition Congress demanded Home Minister Amit Shah’s reply to allegations of police excesses on July 20 during the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) march to Parliament. Over 100 students were treated for injuries ranging from fractures to pellet wounds. CRPF personnel have confirmed seven rounds of pellets were fired and five rounds were fired at the students.

Congress leader Pawan Khera said such force should not have been used against the students and the Home Minister must reply to the allegations. Following disruptions, the House was adjourned several times.

The legislation seeks to impose stricter penalties for paper leaks, organized examination fraud, and other unfair practices. It also provides for faster investigations, time-bound trials, and the establishment of a STF to investigate major examination-related offenses. According to the government, the amendments are intended to improve transparency, protect the credibility of public examinations, and restore students’ confidence in the system.

The Congress and several Opposition parties demanded a detailed discussion in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, arguing that the government must be held accountable for both the examination irregularities and the police response.

The debate comes days after the resignation of former Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, following weeks of nationwide protests over paper leaks and examination malpractice. While the Centre has announced reforms and introduced the amendment Bill, Opposition leaders maintain that legislative changes alone are insufficient without fixing responsibility for the controversy and the police action against students.

The government defended its response, stating that it has initiated investigations into examination fraud, introduced stricter legal provisions, and taken steps to strengthen the security of public examinations. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju urged MPs to participate in the debate and allow the House to function smoothly instead of disrupting proceedings.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com