English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Parliament Monsoon Session: Digital Data Protection Bill 2023 passed in Lok Sabha

The primary objective of the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2023 is to form a comprehensive framework for the protection of personal data. 

Published

on

Parliament Monsoon Session

The Lok Sabha passed the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2023 on August 7, Monday. The major objective of the bill is to protect the privacy of the Indian citizens. It imposes a penalty of up to Rs 250 crore on entities for misusing or failing to protect digital data. Furthermore, the primary objective of the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2023 is to form a comprehensive framework for the protection of personal data. 

The aforesaid framework extends its jurisdiction to personal data collected within India, both online and offline. Notably, if data processing occurs outside the country but involves offering goods or services to individuals within the country, then the bill’s regulations will be implemented. Ashwini Vaishnaw, Union Minister of Communications, Electronics and Information Technology put forward the bill in the Lok Sabha on August 3.

As per reports, the bill will address six points which states that collection and usage of personal data will be legal, nonetheless it is strictly protected from breach; data collection must be undertaken for legal purpose and safe storage of data; store and collect only relevant data; will provide data protection and accountability;  accuracy of data and lay down rules regarding reporting a data breach.

Reports claimed that the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2023 was passed despite calls from the opposition parties to refer the bill to the standing committee for further examination. The bill was passed within 45 minutes as the opposition continued to raise slogans demanding Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s statement on Manipur. However, the concerned minister defended the newly passed bill as a ‘normal bill’ and moved it for discussion. 

Narrating the bill, the Union Minister said that they have used ‘she’ instead of ‘he’ to define a person in the bill. The Minister also assured the house that the consent form for all data usage will be in 22 languages so that people of the country can understand. Additionally, the Bill has legal innovation and alternate dispute resolution. In case an organisation makes an error it can approach the data protection board, which can thereby impose a penalty and let both parties move further.

While addressing concerns of the opposition that the government had been given too many exemptions, Ashwini Vaishnaw asserted that they cannot wait to get consent to use data of a person in case of disaster such as flood or cyclone. He also noted the example of Europe stating that a similar law has provided 16 exemptions and they have provided only 4 exemptions. Notability, the bill has provisions that kids can use certain apps only in a graded manner. 

India News

YouTuber Jaspreet Singh questioned by Assam Police over case for promoting obscenity

Of the accused, only Apoorva Makhija has yet to appear, having previously cited being out of the country alongside Singh in emails to the police, prompting fresh summons.

Published

on

Stand-up comedian and YouTuber Jaspreet Singh appeared before the Assam Police’s Crime Branch in Guwahati on Saturday, April 12, for questioning in a case accusing him and four others of promoting obscenity through a publicly accessible online show. The case, filed on February 10, alleges that the content featured sexually explicit and vulgar discussions, offending public decency and morality.

A police officer confirmed that Singh met with the investigating officer (IO) in the afternoon, where his statement was recorded. “He was examined thoroughly as part of the ongoing probe,” the officer stated. Singh’s appearance follows that of fellow YouTuber Samay Raina, who was questioned on April 5.

Of the accused, only Apoorva Makhija has yet to appear, having previously cited being out of the country alongside Singh in emails to the police, prompting fresh summons.

The Guwahati Police initiated the case against Singh, Raina, Ranveer Allahabadia, Ashish Chanchlani, Makhija, and others, including the owner of the venue where the controversial show was filmed.

The charges fall under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the Information Technology Act, the Cinematograph Act of 1952, and the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act of 1986, reflecting the severity of the allegations.

Allahabadia faced questioning on March 7, cooperating fully during a session lasting over four hours and pledging continued assistance, including future visits to Guwahati if required.

The Supreme Court granted him protection from arrest but labeled his remarks in the show as “vulgar.” Chanchlani, the first to appear on February 27, secured anticipatory bail from the Gauhati High Court on February 7.

Continue Reading

India News

Sukhbir Singh Badal elected SAD president again

Badal had initially stepped down on November 16; however, the committee urged him to withdraw his resignation, indicating that they would collectively resign if he did not reconsider.

Published

on

Sukhbir Singh Badal, who previously resigned from his position in November of last year, was re-elected unopposed as the president of the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) on Saturday, April 12.

Following a determination by the Akal Takht, which deemed him ‘tankhaiya’ (guilty of religious improprieties) due to “errors” made by the Shiromani Akali Dal and its administration, Badal had been engaged in voluntary service at the Golden Temple. Notably, he survived an assassination attempt in December 2024 during this challenging period.

A total of 524 delegates from Punjab and various other states cast their votes in favor of Sukhbir Singh Badal. His candidacy was put forward by Balwinder Singh Bhundar, the working president of the party, and was seconded by fellow party leader Paramjit Singh Sarna. The election took place at the Teja Singh Samundari hall located within the Sri Darbar Sahib complex in Amritsar, according to reports.

As part of its electoral process, SAD appointed a total of 567 delegates, selecting four representatives from each of the 117 Assembly constituencies across Punjab, as per the reports. Prominent party figures in attendance included Badal’s wife and Bathinda MP, Harsimrat Kaur Badal, former ministers Bikram Singh Majithia and Daljit Singh Cheema, as well as senior leader Mahesh Inder Singh Grewal.

Sukhbir Badal has been leading the Shiromani Akali Dal since 2008, when he took over from his father, the esteemed Parkash Singh Badal. He held this leadership role until his resignation in 2024.

Following his re-election, the party is scheduled to host a political conference on April 13 at Talwandi Sabo (Bathinda), where Badal will address party members, reports further suggested.

On January 10, the SAD working committee formally acknowledged Sukhbir Singh Badal’s resignation from the position of party chief. Badal had initially stepped down on November 16; however, the committee urged him to withdraw his resignation, indicating that they would collectively resign if he did not reconsider.

On December 4, 2024, during a significant security incident at the Golden Temple, Sukhbir Singh Badal was targeted in a shooting while fulfilling his duties as a volunteer (‘sevadar’). Despite being in a wheelchair at the time, he escaped injury, as the bullet struck a nearby wall.

The assailant, identified as Narayan Singh Chaura, was subdued by bystanders outside the Golden Temple. Badal was serving a religious punishment (‘tankhah’) which had been imposed by the Akal Takht—the highest authority within the Sikh community—due to “mistakes” linked to his father, Parkash Singh Badal, during his tenure as Chief Minister from 2007 to 2017.

Following the directive, Sukhbir was required to volunteer at multiple significant Sikh sites, including Takht Damdama Sahib, the Darbar Sahib in Muktsar, Fatehgarh Sahib, and the Golden Temple, dedicating two days to each location.

Continue Reading

India News

Waqf protest turn violent in Bengal, leaves 3 dead, 118 arrests after Murshidabad unrest

Three people were killed and over 100 arrested as anti-Waqf Act protests in West Bengal’s Murshidabad turned violent. CM Banerjee says the state will not implement the law.

Published

on

Bengal Waqf protest

Three people lost their lives in West Bengal’s Murshidabad district on Friday as violent clashes erupted during protests against the recently passed Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025. The situation has sparked tension across several parts of the state, including Malda, South 24 Parganas, and Hooghly.

According to police reports, 118 individuals have been arrested in connection with the violence. The protests, primarily in Muslim-majority areas like Murshidabad and Jangipur, escalated into large-scale confrontations involving arson, stone pelting, and road blockades. Police vehicles were set ablaze, and security forces were targeted with stones.

In response to the unrest, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee made it clear that her government does not support the amended law. In a post on X, she stated, “We have made our position clear on this matter — we do not support this law. This law will not be implemented in our state. So what is the riot about?”

Emphasizing the need for calm, Banerjee appealed for peace and cautioned against using religion for political ends. “Remember, we did not make the law that many are agitating against. The law was made by the central government. So the answer you want should be sought from the central government,” she said.

Director General of Police Rajeev Kumar issued a warning to protestors, stating that the state police would not allow any disruption of law and order under the guise of protests.

Meanwhile, state BJP president Sukanta Majumdar criticized the Trinamool-led administration, urging it to enforce law and order in Murshidabad. He alleged that the violence was a result of the government’s appeasement politics and claimed it was possibly a distraction from the recent Supreme Court verdict that invalidated the jobs of 26,000 school teachers.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com