English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

DoT to withdraw AGR related dues against PSUs.

The Supreme Court on Thursday has directed the Department of Telecommunications to consider payment proposals by telecom companies who must furnish their books of accounts and balance sheets of last 10 years to show their financial capacity.

Published

on

The Supreme Court on Thursday has directed the Department of Telecommunications to consider payment proposals by telecom companies who must furnish their books of accounts and balance sheets of last 10 years to show their financial capacity.

A three judge Bench of Justices Arun Mishra, Abdul Nazeer and MR Shah was hearing a plea of the Department of Telecommunications seeking NV staggered payment of AGR Dues by Telecom companies.

During the hearing today, the Court was informed that the Department of Telecommunications has decided to withdraw 96 per cent of the Rs 4 lakh crore demand raised against non-telecom PSU’s based on the Supreme Court’s October 2019 verdict that had altered the definition of Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR).

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta stated that an affidavit has been filed explaining why AGR dues were raised against PSUs and 96% of Rs 4 lakh crore bill has been withdrawn. He also informed the Court that while the Telecom Companies have filed their response, the Department of Telecommunications needs some more time to file their response.

Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi appearing on behalf of Vodafone, submitted that the company’s position is extremely precarious and it is not in a position to give any fresh bank guarantee. It has already paid Rs 7,000 crore to the DoT. Over Rs 10,000 crore of bank guarantees are lying with the DOT, which should be considered as security. According to Rohatgi, payment of all the AGR can only be made through instalments over 20 years since the company can only earn and pay.

The bench responded to Rohatgi’s submission stating that Vodafone was a larger foreign player, and some amount must be deposited especially when during the pandemic the government needs this money. Senior Advocate Arvind Datar on behalf of Tata Teleservices, informed the Court that Rs 37000 crores has been paid, and the company has been hit by the pandemic.

Senior Advocate Dr AM Singhvi, appearing for the third telco Bharti Airtel, and informed that 18,000 crores out of over 21000 crores have been paid and bank Guarantees of Rs 10,800 crore is pending with the DOT.

The Supreme Court in its hearing last Thursday had directed the Department of Telecommunication to reconsider the claims raised on Public Sector Undertakings based on SC’s October 19 verdict regarding the telecom companies and their AGR dues, stating that the Court’s judgment could not be the basis for demands on PSUs.

The telecom companies were also asked to file affidavits regarding the time that they need to clear their dues. According to the Court, raising demand on PSUs based on the verdict for AGR wasn’t required since licenses of PSUs and telcos are of different nature, and PSUs don’t intend commercial exploitation.

The Department of Telecommunications moved an application before the Apex Court seeking permission to pay their AGR dues of 1.43 lakh crore according to the verdict, in a staggered manner over the time period of 20 years.

The Apex Court in April had already rejected pleas of the three telcos including Vodafone Idea, Bharti Airtel and Tata Teleservices seeking review of the October 2019 verdict of the Supreme Court that had widened the definition of AGR and directed the telcos to pay their dues.

India News

Telegram CEO Pavel Durov criticises India restriction, says leak networks shifted to other apps

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has responded to India’s temporary restriction on the platform ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination, arguing that the move affected ordinary users without stopping alleged leak networks.

Published

on

Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has criticised India’s decision to temporarily restrict access to the messaging platform, arguing that the move failed to curb alleged exam leak operations and instead affected millions of legitimate users.

The restriction was imposed ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination as authorities sought to prevent the spread of leaked exam-related material and disrupt networks allegedly involved in malpractice.

In a public response, Durov said the action had inconvenienced a large number of users across India while those responsible for sharing leaked content had simply migrated to alternative platforms.

According to Durov, restricting access to Telegram did not eliminate the problem authorities were trying to address. He claimed that groups involved in distributing exam-related leaks quickly shifted their activities elsewhere, raising questions about the effectiveness of platform-specific restrictions.

The temporary curbs were announced by the government in the lead-up to the NEET-UG re-test scheduled for June 21. Officials said the move was aimed at safeguarding the integrity of the examination process following concerns about the circulation of leaked material online.

The restriction is currently expected to remain in place until June 22.

Durov also stressed that millions of Indian users rely on Telegram for communication, education, business activities and community engagement. He argued that measures targeting an entire platform can have wider consequences for users who have no connection to alleged wrongdoing.

The government’s action came amid broader efforts to prevent cheating and malpractice in competitive examinations. Authorities have been closely monitoring digital platforms and messaging services after reports that exam-related content was being circulated through online channels.

The debate has sparked discussions about how governments and technology platforms should balance examination security with access to digital communication services. While officials maintain that strong measures are necessary to protect the fairness of high-stakes examinations, critics argue that restrictions on entire platforms may not effectively stop determined offenders.

For now, Telegram remains at the centre of the discussion as authorities continue efforts to ensure a fair and secure conduct of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination.

Continue Reading

India News

Telegram restricted ahead of NEET-UG re-exam, NTA backs move to curb exam fraud

NTA has welcomed the Centre’s decision to temporarily restrict Telegram ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination, citing the need to prevent fraud and misinformation.

Published

on

NEET

The Centre has imposed temporary restrictions on messaging platform Telegram ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination, with the National Testing Agency (NTA) welcoming the decision as part of efforts to prevent exam-related fraud and misinformation.

The temporary curbs will remain in place until June 22, a day after the NEET-UG re-exam scheduled for June 21. Authorities said the action was taken following concerns that the platform was being misused by cheating networks and individuals circulating misleading claims related to the examination.

NTA says move aimed at protecting exam integrity

According to the NTA, the restrictions are intended to safeguard candidates from fraudulent activities and false information that could affect the fairness of the examination process. The agency stated that maintaining the integrity of the re-examination remains a priority as lakhs of students prepare to appear for the test.

The NEET-UG re-exam is being conducted after the original examination was cancelled amid allegations of question paper leaks and irregularities. Since then, authorities have been monitoring online platforms for suspicious activity and misleading content targeting candidates.

Restrictions linked to concerns over fake paper leak claims

In recent weeks, several reports surfaced about Telegram channels allegedly offering access to leaked examination papers. The NTA had repeatedly advised students not to trust such claims and referred suspicious links and posts for verification by cybercrime authorities. No official confirmation of any genuine leaked re-exam paper had been issued.

Authorities believe the temporary restrictions will help limit the spread of fake content and reduce opportunities for organised exam fraud in the days leading up to the re-test.

Wider efforts to secure the re-examination

The government and examination authorities have introduced several measures ahead of the re-exam, including monitoring social media platforms and creating channels for reporting suspicious claims related to NEET-UG 2026. The NTA has also urged candidates to rely only on official communications for updates regarding the examination.

With the re-examination approaching, officials say the latest action is part of a broader effort to ensure a fair and transparent process for all candidates.

Continue Reading

India News

Abhishek Banerjee says will not bow to BJP after nearly 11 hours of ED questioning

After spending nearly 11 hours before the Enforcement Directorate, TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee said he would not bow to the BJP and accused the ruling party of using investigative agencies for political purposes.

Published

on

Abhishek Banerjee

Trinamool Congress leader and Diamond Harbour MP Abhishek Banerjee on Tuesday said he would not bow to the BJP after spending nearly 11 hours being questioned by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with an ongoing investigation.

Speaking after the questioning, Banerjee alleged that central agencies were being used to target opposition leaders and asserted that he would continue his political fight despite what he described as sustained pressure.

The TMC leader has repeatedly maintained that investigations involving him are politically motivated, a charge he has made on several previous occasions while appearing before central agencies.

His appearance before the ED comes amid a period of heightened political activity and multiple investigations involving leaders in West Bengal. Recent days have also seen Banerjee face summons and questioning in separate matters by state investigative agencies.

After leaving the ED office, Banerjee reiterated that he would not be intimidated and said he remained committed to his political responsibilities. He also accused the BJP of attempting to weaken opposition parties through investigative action, an allegation that the BJP has rejected in the past.

The Enforcement Directorate has not publicly commented on Banerjee’s remarks. The investigation related to the questioning remains ongoing.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com