English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Down but not out

Published

on

Sasikala has the last laugh

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]After spending night at Golden Bay Resorts, Sasikala delivers twin masterstrokes in wake of SC verdict—OPS ouster, nomination of loyalist

By Sujit Bhar

With the Supreme Court on February 14 sending chief minister aspirant Sasikala Natarajan and the late Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa’s relatives Sudhakaran and Ilavarasi to jail for four years each (they will be serving the remaining three years and six months), in the disproportionate assets case, one would have expected the path being cleared for O Panneerselvam, the acting CM.

But as it was seen, Sasikala has learnt her politics well from her friend and mentor. Sasikala will not only be in jail and pay a fine of Rs 10 crore (as would the others jailed), she will not be able to be in active politics for 10 years. This meant that if she did not act immediately after the verdict there was a huge possibility of the hawks, DMK and BJP, swooping down into troubled waters.

There was also the possibility, god forbid, of her so-called loyalist MLAs trooping over to the Panneerselvam lobby and forming government. That would have not only left her in jail, but also powerless to have any control of proceedings within the party and in government.

But not for nothing was she a close associate of Jaya for so long. She has learnt well. She decided that she would spend the night of February 13 at the Golden Bay Resorts in Kancheepuram, where her 128-odd loyalists had been interned. This was the masterstroke. If whispers are true, she had a fair idea of which way the judgement would go. 

When the two-judge bench of the Supreme Court issued the damning verdict, the “huge number of south Indian TV and general reporters present within the packed courthouse virtually ran out to make their calls and file their reports”, says Vivek Kumar Singh, correspondent for APN, speaking to India Legal, APN’s sister concern.

Most were reporters, but some certainly were relaying the news to Sasikala.

Sasikala wasted no time. Immediately after the verdict she held a meeting with AIADMK MLAs at the resort and took some quick, critical decisions, which must have been talked through during the night. First, she expelled Panneerselvam from the primary membership of the AIADMK. Secondly, she chose her loyalist Edapadi K Palanisamy to take over as chief minister.

Edapadi later reportedly tweeted: “We have sent a letter to the governor and are awaiting his reply.” Governor Vidyasagar Rao is to take a decision soon.

A third decision was to file a review petition. AIADMK leader M Thambidurai reportedly tweeted: “We will file a review petition. A new legislature party leader has been elected. #Panneerselvam no longer party member.”

And to nail it in tight, a fourth decision was to also fire from the primary membership of the party the handful of MLAs who had dared to oppose “Chinnamma”. That left no loose ends, so to say.

So what does Panneerselvam do? His dream of chief ministership has vaporised, virtually. Governor Vidyasagar Rao has no reason to call him for any floor test, unless there is a reverse exodus, again of MLAs, in which case there will be a constitutional reading into the issue.

More details were available at the popular debate show Mudda of APN. Senior Supreme Court lawyer Pradeep Rai said: “There is no other alternative for Panneerselvam than going to BJP. It is next to impossible that he will become CM. He may well continue as MLA, but will get disqualified later. For him, it is the beginning of the end.” On Sasikala, Rai felt that even if she has to go to prison as of now, she would get parole and, more importantly, continue to influence matters from inside the prison.

That underscores the point: Indian politicians don’t recede into retirement. They are often forced to fade away, sometimes with ignominy. However, one has to rediscover a face for AIADMK. That is the critical need.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Telegram CEO Pavel Durov criticises India restriction, says leak networks shifted to other apps

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has responded to India’s temporary restriction on the platform ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination, arguing that the move affected ordinary users without stopping alleged leak networks.

Published

on

Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has criticised India’s decision to temporarily restrict access to the messaging platform, arguing that the move failed to curb alleged exam leak operations and instead affected millions of legitimate users.

The restriction was imposed ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination as authorities sought to prevent the spread of leaked exam-related material and disrupt networks allegedly involved in malpractice.

In a public response, Durov said the action had inconvenienced a large number of users across India while those responsible for sharing leaked content had simply migrated to alternative platforms.

According to Durov, restricting access to Telegram did not eliminate the problem authorities were trying to address. He claimed that groups involved in distributing exam-related leaks quickly shifted their activities elsewhere, raising questions about the effectiveness of platform-specific restrictions.

The temporary curbs were announced by the government in the lead-up to the NEET-UG re-test scheduled for June 21. Officials said the move was aimed at safeguarding the integrity of the examination process following concerns about the circulation of leaked material online.

The restriction is currently expected to remain in place until June 22.

Durov also stressed that millions of Indian users rely on Telegram for communication, education, business activities and community engagement. He argued that measures targeting an entire platform can have wider consequences for users who have no connection to alleged wrongdoing.

The government’s action came amid broader efforts to prevent cheating and malpractice in competitive examinations. Authorities have been closely monitoring digital platforms and messaging services after reports that exam-related content was being circulated through online channels.

The debate has sparked discussions about how governments and technology platforms should balance examination security with access to digital communication services. While officials maintain that strong measures are necessary to protect the fairness of high-stakes examinations, critics argue that restrictions on entire platforms may not effectively stop determined offenders.

For now, Telegram remains at the centre of the discussion as authorities continue efforts to ensure a fair and secure conduct of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination.

Continue Reading

India News

Telegram restricted ahead of NEET-UG re-exam, NTA backs move to curb exam fraud

NTA has welcomed the Centre’s decision to temporarily restrict Telegram ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination, citing the need to prevent fraud and misinformation.

Published

on

NEET

The Centre has imposed temporary restrictions on messaging platform Telegram ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination, with the National Testing Agency (NTA) welcoming the decision as part of efforts to prevent exam-related fraud and misinformation.

The temporary curbs will remain in place until June 22, a day after the NEET-UG re-exam scheduled for June 21. Authorities said the action was taken following concerns that the platform was being misused by cheating networks and individuals circulating misleading claims related to the examination.

NTA says move aimed at protecting exam integrity

According to the NTA, the restrictions are intended to safeguard candidates from fraudulent activities and false information that could affect the fairness of the examination process. The agency stated that maintaining the integrity of the re-examination remains a priority as lakhs of students prepare to appear for the test.

The NEET-UG re-exam is being conducted after the original examination was cancelled amid allegations of question paper leaks and irregularities. Since then, authorities have been monitoring online platforms for suspicious activity and misleading content targeting candidates.

Restrictions linked to concerns over fake paper leak claims

In recent weeks, several reports surfaced about Telegram channels allegedly offering access to leaked examination papers. The NTA had repeatedly advised students not to trust such claims and referred suspicious links and posts for verification by cybercrime authorities. No official confirmation of any genuine leaked re-exam paper had been issued.

Authorities believe the temporary restrictions will help limit the spread of fake content and reduce opportunities for organised exam fraud in the days leading up to the re-test.

Wider efforts to secure the re-examination

The government and examination authorities have introduced several measures ahead of the re-exam, including monitoring social media platforms and creating channels for reporting suspicious claims related to NEET-UG 2026. The NTA has also urged candidates to rely only on official communications for updates regarding the examination.

With the re-examination approaching, officials say the latest action is part of a broader effort to ensure a fair and transparent process for all candidates.

Continue Reading

India News

Abhishek Banerjee says will not bow to BJP after nearly 11 hours of ED questioning

After spending nearly 11 hours before the Enforcement Directorate, TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee said he would not bow to the BJP and accused the ruling party of using investigative agencies for political purposes.

Published

on

Abhishek Banerjee

Trinamool Congress leader and Diamond Harbour MP Abhishek Banerjee on Tuesday said he would not bow to the BJP after spending nearly 11 hours being questioned by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with an ongoing investigation.

Speaking after the questioning, Banerjee alleged that central agencies were being used to target opposition leaders and asserted that he would continue his political fight despite what he described as sustained pressure.

The TMC leader has repeatedly maintained that investigations involving him are politically motivated, a charge he has made on several previous occasions while appearing before central agencies.

His appearance before the ED comes amid a period of heightened political activity and multiple investigations involving leaders in West Bengal. Recent days have also seen Banerjee face summons and questioning in separate matters by state investigative agencies.

After leaving the ED office, Banerjee reiterated that he would not be intimidated and said he remained committed to his political responsibilities. He also accused the BJP of attempting to weaken opposition parties through investigative action, an allegation that the BJP has rejected in the past.

The Enforcement Directorate has not publicly commented on Banerjee’s remarks. The investigation related to the questioning remains ongoing.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com