English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Down but not out

Published

on

Sasikala has the last laugh

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]After spending night at Golden Bay Resorts, Sasikala delivers twin masterstrokes in wake of SC verdict—OPS ouster, nomination of loyalist

By Sujit Bhar

With the Supreme Court on February 14 sending chief minister aspirant Sasikala Natarajan and the late Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa’s relatives Sudhakaran and Ilavarasi to jail for four years each (they will be serving the remaining three years and six months), in the disproportionate assets case, one would have expected the path being cleared for O Panneerselvam, the acting CM.

But as it was seen, Sasikala has learnt her politics well from her friend and mentor. Sasikala will not only be in jail and pay a fine of Rs 10 crore (as would the others jailed), she will not be able to be in active politics for 10 years. This meant that if she did not act immediately after the verdict there was a huge possibility of the hawks, DMK and BJP, swooping down into troubled waters.

There was also the possibility, god forbid, of her so-called loyalist MLAs trooping over to the Panneerselvam lobby and forming government. That would have not only left her in jail, but also powerless to have any control of proceedings within the party and in government.

But not for nothing was she a close associate of Jaya for so long. She has learnt well. She decided that she would spend the night of February 13 at the Golden Bay Resorts in Kancheepuram, where her 128-odd loyalists had been interned. This was the masterstroke. If whispers are true, she had a fair idea of which way the judgement would go. 

When the two-judge bench of the Supreme Court issued the damning verdict, the “huge number of south Indian TV and general reporters present within the packed courthouse virtually ran out to make their calls and file their reports”, says Vivek Kumar Singh, correspondent for APN, speaking to India Legal, APN’s sister concern.

Most were reporters, but some certainly were relaying the news to Sasikala.

Sasikala wasted no time. Immediately after the verdict she held a meeting with AIADMK MLAs at the resort and took some quick, critical decisions, which must have been talked through during the night. First, she expelled Panneerselvam from the primary membership of the AIADMK. Secondly, she chose her loyalist Edapadi K Palanisamy to take over as chief minister.

Edapadi later reportedly tweeted: “We have sent a letter to the governor and are awaiting his reply.” Governor Vidyasagar Rao is to take a decision soon.

A third decision was to file a review petition. AIADMK leader M Thambidurai reportedly tweeted: “We will file a review petition. A new legislature party leader has been elected. #Panneerselvam no longer party member.”

And to nail it in tight, a fourth decision was to also fire from the primary membership of the party the handful of MLAs who had dared to oppose “Chinnamma”. That left no loose ends, so to say.

So what does Panneerselvam do? His dream of chief ministership has vaporised, virtually. Governor Vidyasagar Rao has no reason to call him for any floor test, unless there is a reverse exodus, again of MLAs, in which case there will be a constitutional reading into the issue.

More details were available at the popular debate show Mudda of APN. Senior Supreme Court lawyer Pradeep Rai said: “There is no other alternative for Panneerselvam than going to BJP. It is next to impossible that he will become CM. He may well continue as MLA, but will get disqualified later. For him, it is the beginning of the end.” On Sasikala, Rai felt that even if she has to go to prison as of now, she would get parole and, more importantly, continue to influence matters from inside the prison.

That underscores the point: Indian politicians don’t recede into retirement. They are often forced to fade away, sometimes with ignominy. However, one has to rediscover a face for AIADMK. That is the critical need.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com