English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Former Pakistan PM Imran Khan says Army should return to its constitutional limits

Posted on X, the letter details allegations of mistreatment during his incarceration, including 20 days in solitary confinement within a death-row cell, devoid of sunlight and electricity.

Published

on

Imran Khan, the imprisoned former Prime Minister of Pakistan, addressed Army Chief Gen Asim Munir in an open letter on Sunday, criticizing the military’s illegal actions and political involvement, while urging a return to constitutional boundaries.

Posted on X, the letter details allegations of mistreatment during his incarceration, including 20 days in solitary confinement within a death-row cell, devoid of sunlight and electricity.

Khan has spent over a year in Adiala Jail, with this letter following an earlier correspondence on February 3, where he called on the military to reassess its stance regarding national security and governance. After the initial letter, security sources stated the military had not acknowledged it and dismissed media reports about it.

In his recent communication, Khan described the military’s response to his first letter as “dismissive and irresponsible” and expressed concern over the military’s reputation and the widening divide between it and the public.

Khan lamented the dire political instability and how the “might is right” mentality has destabilized the economy, pointing out that his party, the largest in Pakistan, is being targeted while state institutions are used for political manipulation and retribution.

He asserted that, in a public referendum on the six points he raised, he believes around 90% of Pakistanis would support them. Khan emphasized that the actions of the military not only undermine public sentiment but also contribute to the growing divide with the army.

For the sake of Pakistan’s stability, he insisted it is crucial for the military to rein in its political engagements and adhere to its constitutional role. The letter follows the arrest of several leaders from Khan’s party on February 8, designated as ‘Black Day’ to protest alleged election rigging.

Khan described the military as a vital institution but pointed out that a few individuals within it are damaging its reputation. He accused a military officer at Adiala Jail of orchestrating harassment and violations of his rights, claiming this officer acts like an ‘occupying’ force, ignoring court orders.

Detailing his treatment in jail, Khan stated he was kept in complete isolation, without sunlight for 20 days, experienced prolonged darkness due to power cuts, and had his personal items confiscated. He asserted that his communication with family was heavily restricted, and court mandates for meetings with his wife, Bushra Bibi, were disregarded.

Khan claimed his convictions were politically motivated, with judges allegedly coerced into delivering predetermined verdicts, and described instances of brutal crackdowns on peaceful PTI supporters on two dates in 2023 and 2024.

He highlighted the widespread targeting of female family members of politicians as unprecedented and shameful, warning this fuels rising resentment towards the military. He cautioned that unless urgent reforms are enacted, the consequences for both the military and the nation could be dire.

Khan wrapped up his letter by emphasizing the sacrifices made by soldiers for Pakistan and the importance of public support for military success in counter-terrorism efforts. He condemned the establishment’s policies and unlawful actions for increasing public resentment towards the military, warning that this could create a perilous divide in national security if left unaddressed.

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com