English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Operation Sindoor: India hits terror infrastructure in Pakistan and PoK in response to Pahalgam massacre

India retaliated to the Pahalgam terror attack with Operation Sindoor, targeting nine terror sites across Pakistan and PoK in a tri-service military operation.

Published

on

Indian Air Force jets during Operation Sindoor mission

In a decisive and coordinated military operation named Operation Sindoor, India struck nine terror-related sites located in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (PoK) early Wednesday morning. The strikes were launched in retaliation to the deadly terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam on April 22, where 26 civilians lost their lives. This is the most significant retaliatory action since the 2019 Pulwama attack.

The Indian Army, Navy, and Air Force jointly executed the strikes at approximately 1:44 am. According to sources, Prime Minister Narendra Modi personally monitored the developments of the mission as it unfolded. The Indian government emphasized that the strikes were focused, measured, and aimed strictly at terror infrastructure, with no Pakistani military facilities being targeted.

Nine locations targeted with precision, including key terror hubs

India targeted nine locations, which included areas across both the Line of Control (LoC) and the international border. As per reports from Pakistani military sources, the strikes hit locations in Kotli, Bhimber, Gulpur, Muzaffarabad (two sites), Sialkot, Bahawalpur, Muridke, and Chak Amru. Muridke is known to house the headquarters of the terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba, while Bahawalpur is associated with Jaish-e-Mohammed operations.

Sources familiar with the mission stated that the Indian Air Force used SCALP (Storm Shadow) cruise missiles, carried by Rafale jets, along with Hammer Smart Bombs to carry out the precision strikes.

Pakistan retaliates along LoC, civilian casualties reported

Following the operation, Pakistan initiated cross-border firing and artillery shelling across the Line of Control. In one such incident in the Bhimber Gali sector of the Poonch-Rajauri region, three Indian civilians were reported killed due to shelling. Indian troops responded in a calibrated and appropriate manner, defence sources confirmed.

Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif termed the strikes as an “act of war” and vowed a strong response. Pakistan’s military also raised concerns about the future of the Simla Agreement and the LoC framework.

Diplomatic fallout precedes military action

Before the military response, India had taken a series of diplomatic steps to signal its displeasure over the Pahalgam killings. These included suspending the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960, cancelling visas issued to Pakistani nationals, halting bilateral diplomatic movements, and shutting its airspace to Pakistani aircraft. PM Modi also declared that India would no longer allow its rightful share of water to flow out of the country.

He reiterated this stance during a public address, stating that India’s water resources will now be used solely for domestic progress and interests.

Airspace disruption, military drills intensify preparedness

The strikes have also affected air operations across the northern region. IndiGo and SpiceJet issued advisories, stating that flights to and from Srinagar, Jammu, Amritsar, Chandigarh, and Dharamsala may be disrupted due to airspace restrictions.

Air India announced the cancellation of flights operating to and from several cities including Jammu, Leh, Amritsar, Bhuj, Jamnagar, and Rajkot. Srinagar airport has been completely shut for civilian flights for the day.

Simultaneously, the Indian Air Force began a two-day military drill in Rajasthan near the international border with Pakistan, further signalling preparedness. A NOTAM (Notice to Airmen) was issued, restricting flight operations over the Thar desert region from 9:30 pm until 3 am on Friday.

Nationwide civil defence drill marks first since 1971 war

Coinciding with the strikes, India began a national-scale civil defence exercise covering 244 districts. This marks the first such mock drill since the 1971 India-Pakistan war and is aimed at enhancing readiness for any hostile eventuality.

Historic parallels with previous Indian responses to terror

India’s move draws comparisons with past retaliatory actions. In 2016, India carried out surgical strikes across the LoC following the Uri attack. In 2019, after the Pulwama suicide bombing, India conducted airstrikes on a terror training camp in Balakot, marking the first time since 1971 that the Indian Air Force crossed the international border for military action.

That response had resulted in an aerial dogfight between Indian and Pakistani jets, with Wing Commander Abhinandan famously shooting down a Pakistani F-16 before being captured and later released by Pakistan.

“Justice is served”: Government and armed forces stand united

Following the successful operation, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh posted “Bharat Mata Ki Jai” on X. The Indian Army echoed the sentiment with a statement reading, “Justice is served. Jai Hind.” The Indian Embassy in the US also confirmed that National Security Advisor Ajit Doval briefed his American counterpart and Secretary of State Marco Rubio after the strikes.

Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump commented that the US was aware of an impending response and expressed hope that the situation de-escalates quickly.

India News

LPU students protest over reported rape allegation, police call it rumour

Students at Lovely Professional University protested over a reported rape allegation involving a worker, with police describing the claim as a rumour.

Published

on

Students of Lovely Professional University (LPU) in Punjab staged a protest after an allegation involving the reported rape of a student by a worker at the university surfaced.

The protest led to disruption around the university, with students taking to the streets and blocking the Jalandhar-Phagwara National Highway, according to the report.

The allegation triggered anger among students, who demanded action over the reported incident.

Police describe rape claim as rumour

Police, however, described the rape claim as a rumour, indicating that the allegation had not been established as a confirmed incident.

The distinction is important because the reported sexual assault allegation should not be treated as a confirmed rape unless investigators or other authoritative sources establish that fact.

The protests nevertheless continued as students sought clarity and action over the issue.

Protest disrupts traffic

The student demonstration also affected traffic on the Jalandhar-Phagwara National Highway. The protest brought attention to the allegations and the concerns being raised by students at the university.

With police calling the claim a rumour, further verification and investigation would be necessary to establish what actually happened.

Continue Reading

India News

INDIA bloc likely to meet on September 30 over Gyanesh Kumar row

INDIA bloc parties are likely to meet in New Delhi on September 30 amid growing opposition to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.

Published

on

Rahul-Gandhi

Opposition parties belonging to the INDIA bloc are set to meet in New Delhi on September 30 to discuss concerns surrounding the Election Commission, the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and a proposed removal motion against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

The proposed meeting comes amid growing coordination among opposition parties over the functioning of the poll panel and demands for action against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The parties are also discussing a possible joint response to the developments.

Why is the INDIA bloc meeting being planned?

The INDIA bloc meeting on September 30 comes amid reports of objections within the Election Commission over certain decisions and orders related to the SIR exercise. 

According to the report, Opposition leaders have been discussing a coordinated response to their concerns over the Election Commission and the electoral-roll revision process. 

The issue is also expected to be discussed at the Congress Working Committee meeting scheduled for September 29, a day before the proposed INDIA bloc meeting.

Gyanesh Kumar removal demand in focus

The demand for the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar has become a major point of contention between the Opposition and the Election Commission.

The CPI(M), CPI and CPI(ML)-Liberation have demanded Kumar’s removal and an immediate halt to the SIR exercise. Congress has also intensified its criticism of the CEC.

Opposition parties are also working on a fresh removal motion against Gyanesh Kumar. The September 30 meeting is expected to finalise the strategy for the motion, including the collection of signatures. According to the report, this would be the Opposition’s third such attempt. 

What is the SIR controversy?

The political dispute is linked to the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, or SIR.

The controversy intensified following a report that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had recorded objections on several occasions concerning decisions and orders related to the SIR process.

The Election Commission has said that differing views and observations are part of normal deliberations in a multi-member constitutional body. The poll panel has also maintained that its orders have legal sanction and follow statutory procedures, while stating that the final decisions on the SIR were taken unanimously. 

TMC and Left parties coordinate over the issue

The developments have also brought the Trinamool Congress and the CPI(M) together on the Election Commission issue, despite their political differences in West Bengal.

CPI(M) general secretary M A Baby proposed an immediate meeting to discuss a joint strategy. According to the report, Mamata Banerjee spoke with M A Baby and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, after which the leaders settled on September 30 for the meeting. 

What could be discussed at the September 30 meeting?

The proposed meeting is expected to focus on:

  • Concerns surrounding the Election Commission
  • The Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls
  • Opposition demands concerning CEC Gyanesh Kumar
  • A possible fresh removal notice against the CEC
  • A coordinated response by INDIA bloc parties

The exact agenda and participation will depend on the discussions among the opposition parties before the proposed meeting.

Continue Reading

India News

“Will die but won’t give up”: Sahil Wakode’s parents urge IIT students to continue fight 

Sahil Wakode’s parents have appealed to IIT Bombay students to continue their fight for justice amid the ongoing investigation into their son’s death.

Published

on

Sahil Wakode

The parents of IIT Bombay student Sahil Wakode have appealed to students to continue raising their voices and fighting for justice following their son’s death.

Sahil Wakode, a second-year student at IIT Bombay, died in his hostel room on September 18. His death has led to student protests and an ongoing investigation by the Mumbai Crime Branch.

What Sahil Wakode’s parents have alleged

Sahil’s parents have alleged that their son faced caste-based discrimination and harassment at IIT Bombay before his death. They have sought action against those they hold responsible and have demanded a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death.

The family has also called for a CBI inquiry and has sought the arrest of officials named in the case. These remain allegations and are part of the ongoing investigation.

The Mumbai Crime Branch took over the probe after an FIR was registered following the complaint by Sahil’s parents.

IIT Bombay’s position

IIT Bombay has said that Sahil was allegedly caught using a mobile phone during a mid-semester examination and had uploaded the question paper to ChatGPT to seek answers.

The institute has maintained that no disciplinary action had been initiated against him. It said the matter had been discussed with him by the instructor and the Head of the Department, who counselled him and assured him that the incident would not adversely affect his academic career.

The circumstances surrounding Sahil’s death are being investigated by the appropriate authorities.

Investigation continues

The case remains under investigation, with the Mumbai Crime Branch examining the circumstances surrounding Sahil’s death and the allegations made by his family.

His parents have continued to demand justice and action against those they believe were responsible, while the investigation is expected to establish the facts surrounding the case.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com