English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Jaitley rushes in to defend demonetisation after RBI says 99 per cent banned notes back with banks

Published

on

Arun Jaitley

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Finance minister admits that not all money deposited with banks post noteban was legal, claims objective of demonetisation was to gradually reduce cash flow and move towards a digitised economy

With the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) declaring that 99 per cent of the banned Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes were deposited into various banks across the country after demonetisation, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s claim that his sudden and radical move had crushed the shadow economy and eradicated black money is once again under scrutiny.

On Thursday, Union finance minister Arun Jaitley attempted to launch the Modi government’s refurbished defense of demonetisation that, from the time the Prime Minister announced it on November 8, has been attributed various motives by the Centre.

Insisting that the impact of noteban was “extremely positive”, the finance minister said on Thursday, “Confiscation of money was not the objective of demonetisation… It is needed to be seen in the context of a wider tax base, a more digitalised economy, lesser use of cash and an integration of the informal economy with the formal”.

“The object of demonetisation was not confiscation of money. The object was that India is predominantly a high cash economy therefore that scenario requires to be significantly altered… So rely more on banking transaction and digitisation. The RBI report says the volume of cash currency has come down by 17 per cent,” Jaitley said.

But then the finance minister also added that “My next step would be to end black money in polls”, clearly indicating that the shadow economy was still in operation. Though Jaitley claimed that “terrorist and Naxalite financing stopped almost entirely due to demonetisation”, he or the Modi government have failed to provide any evidence substantiating this claim so far.

Demonetization

Modi’s originally stated goals of demonetisation were mainly three – clampdown on the black money in the system, ending cash-based corruption and strapping terrorists off funding. Of these, there is no visible evidence to show that the latter two have been achieved – terror strikes, especially in the strife-torn Jammu and Kashmir have only seen a steady increase over the past year while systemic corruption has clearly remained untouched.

That leaves the goal of eradicating black money from the system. If provisional figures released by the RBI – 10 months after the demonetisation exercise – are to be believed then “the estimated value of SBNs (specified bank notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1000) received as on 30 June 2017 is Rs 15.28 trillion (or Rs 15.28 lakh crore).”

Now a back of the envelope calculation would show that if the RBI’s estimate of invalidated Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes at the time of demonetisation being pegged at Rs 15.44 lakh crore or around 86 percent of the currency in circulation was correct then, as much as 99 percent of the demonetised currency has found its way back to India’s banking system. Only a little over Rs 16,000 crore of the demonetised Rs 15.44 lakh crore was not returned and could be termed as black money – though a large part of this money too could be what people failed to deposit in the banks due to various reasons, including the time-bar on returning the demonetised notes to banks and the overburdened banking system that saw serpentine queues of haggard citizens lining up at cash deposit counters everyday and often returning home without managing to reach the cashier.

Demonetization

It is also pertinent to mention here that the Rs 15.28 lakh crore in demonetised notes that the RBI claims was back in the banking system is still a provisional figure. The RBI is still in the process of counting old notes received at cooperative banks and old notes submitted by citizens in institutions of Nepal. By the time these numbers are formalised, the final figure of demonetised notes that were deposited back with banks might even reach 100 per cent.

Jaitley underscored on Thursday that one of the objectives of demonetisation was also to check circulation of counterfeit currency. Now, the RBI report shows that the number of counterfeit notes detected during the exercise is only minuscule, just about 7.6 lakh pieces, as compared with 6.3 lakh pieces in the year ahead.

Defending the indefensible is often the test of a good lawyer and Jaitley is, in his professional life a senior and accomplished advocate. No wonder then that the finance minister used this skill in defense of noteban.

“It’s nobody’s case that black money has been completely eliminated after demonetisation… The fallout of demonetisation is on predicted lines… the fact that money got deposited in banks doesn’t make it legitimate money,” Jaitley claimed.

The clear admission of the finance minister about illicit money making its way back into the banking system shows that not only was demonetisation as a tool for eradicating black money an utter failure but also that those who possessed the illicit wealth were able to turn it into ‘white money’.

The RBI report also turns at least two claims made by the Modi government – one by Jaitley himself and the other by Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi – into clear instances of misleading the country.

Senior journalist MK Venu points out: “The finance minister had claimed in November that going by past experience about 15-20 per cent of the demonetised currency, roughly Rs 3 lakh crore, was likely to get extinguished and would not return to the system. It would be tantamount to confiscation and become RBI property, to be eventually handed over to government for the welfare of the poor. The then attorney general Mukul Rohatgi stated this before the Supreme Court. So how can Jaitley now say the confiscation of black money was never the objective? The cash that does not return to the system stands automatically confiscated. It is like money taxed at 100%.”

Forget Rs 3 lakh crore that Jaitley claimed would be ‘extinguished’ due to demonetisation, the banned notes that didn’t finds their way back to the banks – provisionally – account for just Rs 16000 crore.

As former finance minister P Chidambaram points out: “the RBI ‘gained’ Rs 16000 crore but ‘lost’ Rs 21000 crore in printing new notes (of Rs 500 and Rs 2000 that were introduced post noteban). The economist deserves a Nobel Prize!”

Chidambaram took a series of digs at the Centre and its demonetisation drive through his tweets.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]JTNDYmxvY2txdW90ZSUyMGNsYXNzJTNEJTIydHdpdHRlci10d2VldCUyMiUyMGRhdGEtbGFuZyUzRCUyMmVuJTIyJTNFJTNDcCUyMGxhbmclM0QlMjJlbiUyMiUyMGRpciUzRCUyMmx0ciUyMiUzRVJzJTIwMTYwMDAlMjBjciUyMG91dCUyMG9mJTIwZGVtb25ldGlzZWQlMjBub3RlcyUyMG9mJTIwUnMlMjAxNTQ0JTJDMDAwJTIwY3IlMjBkaWQlMjBub3QlMjBjb21lJTIwYmFjayUyMHRvJTIwUkJJLiUyMFRoYXQlMjBpcyUyMDElMjUuJTIwU2hhbWUlMjBvbiUyMFJCSSUyMHdoaWNoJTIwJTI2JTIzMzklM0JyZWNvbW1lbmRlZCUyNiUyMzM5JTNCJTIwZGVtb25ldGlzYXRpb24lM0MlMkZwJTNFJTI2bWRhc2glM0IlMjBQLiUyMENoaWRhbWJhcmFtJTIwJTI4JTQwUENoaWRhbWJhcmFtX0lOJTI5JTIwJTNDYSUyMGhyZWYlM0QlMjJodHRwcyUzQSUyRiUyRnR3aXR0ZXIuY29tJTJGUENoaWRhbWJhcmFtX0lOJTJGc3RhdHVzJTJGOTAyODcxNTY1NDM5NzA1MDg4JTIyJTNFQXVndXN0JTIwMzAlMkMlMjAyMDE3JTNDJTJGYSUzRSUzQyUyRmJsb2NrcXVvdGUlM0UlMEElM0NzY3JpcHQlMjBhc3luYyUyMHNyYyUzRCUyMiUyRiUyRnBsYXRmb3JtLnR3aXR0ZXIuY29tJTJGd2lkZ2V0cy5qcyUyMiUyMGNoYXJzZXQlM0QlMjJ1dGYtOCUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRnNjcmlwdCUzRQ==[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]The Twitteratti too gave a big thumbs down to demonetisation as well as Jaitley’s claims over the RBI report. All through Thursday hastags like #DeMonetisationFailed, #DeMonetisationDisaster and #DeMonetisationScam were trending on the micro-blogging website.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi too joined the Twitteratti to hit out at the Centre over demonetisation.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Cockroach Janta Party gives CEC Gyanesh Kumar 48 hours to resign, warns of nationwide protests

Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke has demanded the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar within 48 hours, warning of a nationwide agitation if the demand is not met.

Published

on

Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) founder Abhijeet Dipke has demanded that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar resign within 48 hours, warning that the organisation will launch a nationwide agitation if he does not step down.

The demand was made during a press conference on Thursday amid a wider controversy surrounding the Election Commission’s handling of electoral-roll-related matters and the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR).

Dipke alleged that the functioning of the Election Commission under Kumar had raised concerns over the electoral process. These claims are allegations made by Dipke and should not be treated as established facts.

What did Abhijeet Dipke demand?

Dipke called for Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation within 48 hours. He warned that the CJP would begin a nationwide protest if the Chief Election Commissioner did not step down within the deadline.

The organisation said the proposed agitation would follow the lines of its earlier protest at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar.

The CJP also raised other demands related to the electoral process, including a halt to ongoing electoral exercises and the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.

Why is CJP demanding Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation?

The demand comes amid a controversy over the Election Commission’s electoral-roll processes.

The demand came amid a controversy over the Election Commission’s handling of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, following a report that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had raised questions about the exercise. 

However, the Election Commission has rejected the suggestion that these differences represented a division within the three-member poll panel. The Commission said that differing views, written notes and internal checks are part of its deliberative process and maintained that decisions, including those concerning SIR, were taken unanimously.

What has Abhijeet Dipke alleged?

Dipke has alleged that more than 13 crore votes were deleted from electoral rolls and questioned the reasons behind the deletions.

He also alleged that voter deletions had affected Opposition leaders and referred to several political figures while making his claims.

These figures and allegations were presented by Dipke during the press conference. They should therefore be attributed to him rather than stated as independently verified facts.

Dipke also questioned whether the alleged deletions could affect the political balance in elections.

What happens if Gyanesh Kumar does not resign?

According to Dipke, the CJP will launch a nationwide agitation if the Chief Election Commissioner does not resign within 48 hours.

He said the organisation would continue its campaign until its demand for Kumar’s resignation was met.

The CJP has also announced a broader campaign against the Election Commission, while warning of further protests.

Continue Reading

India News

Rahul Gandhi attacks CEC Gyanesh Kumar, says vote chori leads to kanoon chori

Rahul Gandhi accused the Election Commission of failing to protect voters and linked his “vote chori” allegation to what he called “kanoon chori”.

Published

on

Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Thursday launched a fresh attack on Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and the Narendra Modi government, alleging irregularities in India’s electoral process.

Addressing a press conference in Delhi, Mr Gandhi linked his earlier allegations of “vote chori” with what he described as “kanoon chori”, arguing that alleged manipulation of votes would have consequences for the country’s law-making and institutional systems.

“From vote chori comes kanoon chori,” Mr Gandhi said, arguing that if votes had been stolen, laws and institutional changes made by lawmakers elected through those votes would also be affected.

Rahul Gandhi attacks Gyanesh Kumar

Mr Gandhi specifically targeted Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and questioned the Election Commission’s handling of the electoral process.

His remarks came amid reports of differences within the poll body over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise. Mr Gandhi referred to reported concerns involving the Election Commission and alleged that questions raised about the functioning of the poll panel had not been adequately addressed.

He also alleged that the Election Commission had failed in its responsibility to protect the vote, which he described as the foundation of India’s democratic and constitutional system.

‘Vote chori’ claim

Mr Gandhi reiterated his allegations of irregularities in elections and said the issue went beyond individual voters.

He argued that the vote gives power to the Constitution, while the Constitution provides the basis for laws and institutions. On that basis, he said alleged destruction of the voting process would have wider consequences for the country’s constitutional system.

Mr Gandhi also questioned what he described as the disappearance of anti-incumbency in elections involving the BJP, comparing recent electoral outcomes with earlier political trends.

He alleged that the 2024 Lok Sabha and Assembly elections had been manipulated. These remain allegations made by Mr Gandhi and should not be presented as established facts.

Attack on Modi and Amit Shah

During the press conference, Mr Gandhi also targeted Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah while making his allegations about the electoral process.

He questioned the role of the Election Commission and its leadership, and called for accountability over what he described as irregularities affecting India’s voting system.

Mr Gandhi said he was presenting evidence for his allegations and maintained that the issue concerned not only elections but also the functioning of democratic institutions.

The Election Commission’s reported internal differences over the SIR exercise formed part of the backdrop to his remarks. The claims made by Mr Gandhi concern his interpretation of those developments and are distinct from established findings about election manipulation.

Continue Reading

India News

Ram Temple donation theft case chargesheet filed, trustees not named

A chargesheet has been filed in the Ram Temple donation-theft case in Ayodhya. The temple trust’s trustees have not been named as accused.

Published

on

A chargesheet has been filed in the case involving alleged theft of donations at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. The chargesheet, however, does not name the trustees of the temple trust as accused.

The development comes after an investigation into several instances of alleged theft of donations at the temple complex. The probe had examined CCTV footage and other evidence related to the incidents.

Chargesheet filed in donation theft case

The chargesheet has been submitted against those accused in connection with the alleged theft of donations at the Ram Temple.

Importantly, the trustees of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust have not been named as accused in the chargesheet.

The investigation had focused on incidents in which donations were allegedly stolen from the temple premises. CCTV footage was examined as part of the probe into the reported thefts.

Investigation into 105 theft incidents

An earlier investigation had identified 105 instances of alleged donation theft through CCTV footage. The probe examined the incidents and the people allegedly involved in them.

The case had also led to arrests of accused persons named in the FIR. The investigation subsequently examined the role of individuals connected with the incidents.

The filing of the chargesheet marks a further step in the criminal proceedings related to the alleged theft of donations at the Ram Temple.

Trustees not named as accused

The chargesheet does not name the temple trust’s trustees as accused. This distinction is significant because the filing concerns the individuals against whom the investigating agency has proceeded in the case.

The chargesheet will now form part of the legal proceedings, while the matter will be dealt with through the appropriate judicial process.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com