English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Kafeel Khan walks free from Mathura jail, Sharjeel Usmani gets bail

Published

on

Dr Kafeel Khan

Almost 12 hours after the Allahabad High Court dropped charges under the National Security Act (NSA) against him, Dr Kafeel Khan was released from Mathura jail on Tuesday midnight. The HC had ordered the immediate release of Khan saying his speech at the Aligarh Muslim University didn’t promote hatred or violence and instead gave a call for national integration. Khan had vociferously protested against the Citizenship Amendment Act and the National Register of Citizens. In another development on Tuesday, Sharjeel Usmani, a former AMU student, was also released on bail by a sessions court in Aligarh.

After his release from Mathura jail, Khan told the media that the charges against him were baseless and fictitious. He also took a swipe at the UP STF for not harming him during his transit from Mumbai to Mathura, in a reference to the alleged encounter killing of don Vikas Dubey during transit in July this year.

kafeel-khan

In the Dr Kafeel Khan case, the HC bench comprising Chief Justice Govind Mathur and Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh on Tuesday had allowed the habeas corpus petition filed by Khan’s mother, seeking his release. The court had stated that Khan’s speech did not promote any kind of hatred or violence.

“A complete reading of the speech also nowhere threatens peace and tranquility of the city of Aligarh. The address gives a call for unity among citizens. The speech also deprecates any kind of violence. It appears that the District Magistrate had selective reading and selective mention for few phrases from the speech ignoring its true intent,” the judgment read.

On December 12 last year, Dr Khan had made a speech at the AMU gate against the CAA and NRC. He was arrested on January 29 by the UP STF for alleged hate speech and was lodged in Mathura jail. After his detention, the UP government had invoked the National Security Act, 1980 against Khan. Though an Aligarh court had granted Khan bail on February 10, he could not be released as the Aligarh DM had added charges under NSA against him. His NSA detention was extended by three months on May 12 and then again on August 4 for three more months.

Usmani, on the other hand, had been arrested from his home in Azamgarh in December last year. Though he had also been protesting the CAA, he had been accused of inciting violence.

Read Also: Decks cleared for Dr Kafeel Khan release as Allahabad HC drops NSA charges

In what is being hailed as the government’s going easy on dissenters including Khan and Usmani, the Delhi High Court had also granted bail to Pinjra Tod member Devangana Kalita on Tuesday. Kalita and Natasha Narwal had been arrested in the last week of May in connection with an anti-CAA protest which is being blamed as a trigger for the riots in East Delhi in late February this year.  Kalita’s bail was set on a bond of Rs 25,000.

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com