English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Kanjhawala killing: 6 accused sent to judicial custody for 2 weeks, Delhi court reprimands police for delay in collecting evidence

On the other hand, the accused confessed during police interrogation that they knew that Anjali was trapped under their car but kept on driving out of fear

Published

on

Kanjhawala killing: 6 accused sent to judicial custody for 2 weeks, Delhi court reprimands police for delay in collecting evidence

In the Kanjhawala killing, the Rohini Court has sent all the six accused to judicial custody for 14 days. Before this, these accused were in police custody for a few days. But this time when the accused were produced on Monday, the court reprimanded the police. The court asked why the police does not collect all the CCTV footage at one go.

In fact, during the hearing held on Monday, the police said before the court that a CCTV has come to the fore, in which it is seen that once the accused got down from the car, and showing the others that something was stuck under the car, but they still kept driving. The police also told the court that they have collected 6 CCTV footage so far. But the court was not satisfied with this type of investigation by the police. The court bluntly asked the police as why all the footage were not collected at once.

Were you waiting for evidence to get tampered: Court asks Delhi police

The court asked the police if they knew how many government CCTV cameras were installed in that area? How long will it take the police to collect evidence? What were the police waiting for? Were they waiting for the evidence to get tampered? On this rebuke of the court, the police could only say that they were not getting full cooperation. The arrested accused were continuously misleading the police. The police also informed the court that more investigation is being done on the role of accused Ashutosh in the case. It has even been said that the conspiracy angle cannot be ruled out and investigation is going on in this direction as well. At this time, the accused are being interrogated by confronting them. At the same time, face recognition is also being done from CCTV footage.

Accused knew that Anjali was stuck under their car

On the other hand, the accused arrested in this case had made a big disclosure on Sunday. They confessed during police interrogation that they knew that Anjali was trapped under their car but kept on driving out of fear. During this, on the route till Kanjhawala, they took several U-turns. The accused told the police during interrogation that they were afraid that if the girl was taken out of the car, a case of murder would be filed. They will get caught on the bad side in this case, so after the accident, the accused did not try to get the girl out from under their car. They said that they were very scared, so they kept rotating the car again and again and had no idea where to go. They waited till the girl drops from the car and kept driving.

Scope of suspicion increased

Now then the role of many people in this matter is being considered suspicious. On one hand, the role of Ashutosh among the accused is raising many questions in the mind of the police, while on the other hand, Anjali’s friend Nidhi is also under the scanner. More questions about Nidhi because she is the biggest eyewitness of this case. This whole incident happened in front of her eyes. The great thing is that despite knowing everything, she did not help her friend and ran away from the spot. The way she has claimed that Anjali was drunk, seems like she is also trying to twist the case.

India News

DU VC Prof Yogesh Singh entrusted with additional charge of AICTE Chairman

Published

on

By

Prof. Yogesh Singh, Vice Chancellor of the University of Delhi, has been entrusted with the additional charge of the post of Chairman, AICTE till the appointment of a Chairman of AICTE or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

It is noteworthy that AICTE Chairman Prof. TG Sitharam was relieved of his duties after his term ended on December 20, 2025. According to a letter issued by the Ministry of Education, Government of India, on Monday, Prof. Yogesh Singh’s appointment is until the appointment of a regular AICTE Chairman or until further orders whichever is earlier.

Prof. Yogesh Singh is a renowned academician with excellent administrative capabilities, who has been the Vice-Chancellor of University of Delhi since October 2021. He has also served as the Chairperson of the National Council for Teacher Education. In August 2023, he was also given the additional charge of Director of the School of Planning and Architecture (SPA).

Prof. Yogesh Singh served as the Vice-Chancellor of Delhi Technological University from 2015 to 2021; Director of Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Delhi from 2014 to 2017, and before that, he was the Vice-Chancellor of Maharaja Sayajirao University, Baroda (Gujarat) from 2011 to 2014. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from the National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra. He has a distinguished track record in quality teaching, innovation, and research in the field of software engineering.

Continue Reading

India News

Goa nightclub fire case: Court extends police custody of Luthra brothers by five days

A Goa court has extended the police custody of Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra, owners of the nightclub where a deadly fire killed 25 people, by five more days.

Published

on

Luthra brothers

A court in Goa on Monday extended the police custody of Saurabh Luthra and Gaurav Luthra, the owners of the Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub, by five more days in connection with the deadly fire incident that claimed 25 lives on December 6.

The order was passed as investigators sought additional time to question the two accused in the case linked to the blaze at the Anjuna-based nightclub.

Owners were deported after fleeing abroad

According to details placed before the court, the Luthra brothers had left the country following the incident and travelled to Thailand. They were subsequently deported and brought back to India on December 17, after which they were taken into police custody.

Advocate Vishnu Joshi, representing the families of the victims, confirmed that the court granted a five-day extension of police custody for both Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra.

Another co-owner sent to judicial custody

The court also remanded Ajay Gupta, another owner of the nightclub, to judicial custody. Police did not seek an extension of his custody, following which the court passed the order, the victims’ counsel said.

The Anjuna police have registered a case against the Luthra brothers for culpable homicide not amounting to murder along with other relevant offences related to the fire incident.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi High Court issues notice to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi in National Herald case

Delhi High Court has sought responses from Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on the ED’s plea challenging a trial court order in the National Herald case.

Published

on

The Delhi High Court has sought responses from Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on a petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the National Herald case. The petition challenges a trial court order that refused to take cognisance of the agency’s prosecution complaint.

Justice Ravinder Dudeja issued notices to the Gandhis and other accused on the main petition, as well as on the ED’s application seeking a stay on the trial court’s December 16 order. The high court has listed the matter for further hearing on March 12, 2026.

The trial court had ruled that taking cognisance of the ED’s complaint was “impermissible in law” because the investigation was not based on a registered First Information Report (FIR). It observed that the prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) was not maintainable in the absence of an FIR for a scheduled offence.

According to the order, the ED’s probe originated from a private complaint rather than an FIR. The court further noted that since cognisance was declined on a legal question, it was not necessary to examine the merits of the allegations at that stage.

The trial court also referred to the complaint filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy and the summoning order issued in 2014, stating that despite these developments, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) did not register an FIR in relation to the alleged scheduled offence.

The ED has accused Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, and a private company, Young Indian, of conspiracy and money laundering. The agency has alleged that properties worth around Rs 2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Limited (AJL), which publishes the National Herald newspaper, were acquired through Young Indian.

The agency further claimed that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi held a majority 76 per cent shareholding in Young Indian, which allegedly took over AJL’s assets in exchange for a Rs 90 crore loan.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com