English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Why is Nation with Lavanya trending? What is the case all about? Know the latest update

M Lavanya, a class 12 student’s suicide has sparked a political uproar in the southern state as well as on social media. Know the latest update here

Published

on

Lavanya trending

M Lavanya, a class 12 student of Sacred Hearts High School in Thanjavur district of Tamil Nadu had committed suicide on January 19. Her death has sparked a political uproar in the southern state as well as on social media.

Why did M Lavanya commit suicide?

According to Lavanya’s parents, the 17-year-old consumed an insecticide on her school campus because she was being regularly tortured by the two nuns of her school staff to change her religion. Her parents have accused the school authorities of pressuring her to convert to Christianity which compelled her to take her life.

Before her suicide, the girl claimed in a video that the school authorities were to blame for her death.

What is Lavanya’s statement?

According to one of her video statements, Sister Raquel Mary allegedly pressured the deceased student’s parents to convert to Christianity, and still, the State government has taken no action despite the footage and her mother’s testimony.

She further informed the authorities that she was forced to clean rooms and toilets on campus by the hostel warden.

Lavanya in a video said that they (school officials) had asked my parents in my presence if they can convert me to Christianity and help her for further studies. Since I did not accept, they kept scolding me.

Police investigation in the Lavanya case

Meanwhile, the warden, Sakayamari, has been arrested by local police, who are conducting their investigation from various angles.

Unidentified people have also been charged under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Juvenile Justice Act for capturing the video.

Several Hindu organisations and members of the public, on the other hand, have called for an investigation by the National Investigation Agency (NIA).

What do Lavanya’s parents have to say?

S Muruganantham, Lavanya’s father, told the Madras High Court that the police were attempting to find the person who had filmed the video.

He claimed that the cops were attempting to protect the people who tortured his daughter in order to convert her religion.

The deceased’s mother said that we have lost our daughter but we do not want the same to happen with anyone else’s child.

Political leaders views on Lavanya’s case

The Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad condemned the act and demanded that the government should undertake a fair and open investigation into the incident.

ABVP’s National Media Convenor and Delhi State Secretary Sidharth Yadav said that the suicide of a girl student at Sacred Hearts High School in Thanjavur district of Tamil Nadu due to pressure of conversion is heartbreaking. We are in this fight for justice. We stand with the family of the deceased. We have also submitted a memorandum to the Governor and urged him for a fair trial and transparent investigation of the matter. We demand to introduce new laws as soon as possible to prohibit religious conversions across the Nation.

What is the court’s order on Lavnaya’s case?

The Madras High Court has directed the Thanjavur Police to investigate the viral video vigorously.

It also requested officers not to harass the person who took the video, an allegation levelled by the girl’s family.

Police authorities should focus their efforts on the situation that led to the child’s suicide, the HC stated.

What are peoples opinions to Lavanya’s case on social media?

https://twitter.com/HarshVa10930758/status/1485860157104193542

Continue Reading

India News

DU VC Prof Yogesh Singh entrusted with additional charge of AICTE Chairman

Published

on

By

Prof. Yogesh Singh, Vice Chancellor of the University of Delhi, has been entrusted with the additional charge of the post of Chairman, AICTE till the appointment of a Chairman of AICTE or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

It is noteworthy that AICTE Chairman Prof. TG Sitharam was relieved of his duties after his term ended on December 20, 2025. According to a letter issued by the Ministry of Education, Government of India, on Monday, Prof. Yogesh Singh’s appointment is until the appointment of a regular AICTE Chairman or until further orders whichever is earlier.

Prof. Yogesh Singh is a renowned academician with excellent administrative capabilities, who has been the Vice-Chancellor of University of Delhi since October 2021. He has also served as the Chairperson of the National Council for Teacher Education. In August 2023, he was also given the additional charge of Director of the School of Planning and Architecture (SPA).

Prof. Yogesh Singh served as the Vice-Chancellor of Delhi Technological University from 2015 to 2021; Director of Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Delhi from 2014 to 2017, and before that, he was the Vice-Chancellor of Maharaja Sayajirao University, Baroda (Gujarat) from 2011 to 2014. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from the National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra. He has a distinguished track record in quality teaching, innovation, and research in the field of software engineering.

Continue Reading

India News

Goa nightclub fire case: Court extends police custody of Luthra brothers by five days

A Goa court has extended the police custody of Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra, owners of the nightclub where a deadly fire killed 25 people, by five more days.

Published

on

Luthra brothers

A court in Goa on Monday extended the police custody of Saurabh Luthra and Gaurav Luthra, the owners of the Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub, by five more days in connection with the deadly fire incident that claimed 25 lives on December 6.

The order was passed as investigators sought additional time to question the two accused in the case linked to the blaze at the Anjuna-based nightclub.

Owners were deported after fleeing abroad

According to details placed before the court, the Luthra brothers had left the country following the incident and travelled to Thailand. They were subsequently deported and brought back to India on December 17, after which they were taken into police custody.

Advocate Vishnu Joshi, representing the families of the victims, confirmed that the court granted a five-day extension of police custody for both Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra.

Another co-owner sent to judicial custody

The court also remanded Ajay Gupta, another owner of the nightclub, to judicial custody. Police did not seek an extension of his custody, following which the court passed the order, the victims’ counsel said.

The Anjuna police have registered a case against the Luthra brothers for culpable homicide not amounting to murder along with other relevant offences related to the fire incident.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi High Court issues notice to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi in National Herald case

Delhi High Court has sought responses from Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on the ED’s plea challenging a trial court order in the National Herald case.

Published

on

The Delhi High Court has sought responses from Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on a petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the National Herald case. The petition challenges a trial court order that refused to take cognisance of the agency’s prosecution complaint.

Justice Ravinder Dudeja issued notices to the Gandhis and other accused on the main petition, as well as on the ED’s application seeking a stay on the trial court’s December 16 order. The high court has listed the matter for further hearing on March 12, 2026.

The trial court had ruled that taking cognisance of the ED’s complaint was “impermissible in law” because the investigation was not based on a registered First Information Report (FIR). It observed that the prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) was not maintainable in the absence of an FIR for a scheduled offence.

According to the order, the ED’s probe originated from a private complaint rather than an FIR. The court further noted that since cognisance was declined on a legal question, it was not necessary to examine the merits of the allegations at that stage.

The trial court also referred to the complaint filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy and the summoning order issued in 2014, stating that despite these developments, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) did not register an FIR in relation to the alleged scheduled offence.

The ED has accused Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, and a private company, Young Indian, of conspiracy and money laundering. The agency has alleged that properties worth around Rs 2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Limited (AJL), which publishes the National Herald newspaper, were acquired through Young Indian.

The agency further claimed that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi held a majority 76 per cent shareholding in Young Indian, which allegedly took over AJL’s assets in exchange for a Rs 90 crore loan.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com