English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Rafale deal: French Govt, Dassault refute ex French Prez Hollande’s reported statement, he stands by it

Published

on

Rafale deal

The bombshell of former French President Francois Hollande’s reported statement about Indian government proposing Reliance as Dassault’s partner company for offset contract set off a spate of claims and denials.

While the French government and Dassault aviation sought to refute Hollande’s claim, the former President stood by his statement, reported NDTV.

France’s Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs said that the French government had no role to play in choosing partner companies in India for the purpose of offsets contracts in the Rafale deal.

The French government clarified that they were not involved in the choice of Indian partners. The French government said their role was just to ensure the delivery and quality of the aircraft. “The French government is in no manner involved in the choice of Indian industrial partners who have been, are being, or will be selected by French companies,” the French government said.

Dassault Aviation also reacted, issuing a statement to say, “This offsets contract is delivered in compliance with the Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) 2016 regulations. In this framework, and in accordance with the policy of Make in India, Dassault Aviation has decided to make a partnership with India’s Reliance Group. This is Dassault Aviation’s choice…”

Francois Hollande’s reported statement

France’s former President Hollande had reportedly told French media that the Indian government proposed Reliance Defence as the partner for Dassault Aviation in the Rs 58,000 crore Rafale deal and France did not have a choice.

The former French President’s remarks contradict the Indian government’s claim that the deal between Dassault and Reliance was a commercial pact between two private parties and the government had nothing to do with it.

The deal for 36 Rafale aircraft in a government-to-government agreement was announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on April 10, 2015 during his visit to Paris, which led to the cancellation of the 126 aircraft deal being negotiated by the previous government. The deal was eventually signed on September 23, 2016 in Delhi between then Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar and his French counterpart.

The Congress has been accusing massive irregularities in the deal, alleging that the government was procuring each aircraft at a cost of over Rs.1,670 crore as against Rs.526 crore finalised by the UPA government when it was negotiating procurement of 126 Rafale jets.

According to Mediapart, a French language publication, Hollande said the original deal was to be 126 aircraft, “but with the change of government (in India in 2014), the Indians reformulated their proposal, which was less attractive for us, since it was 36 aircraft only. But the manufacture was planned in France, contrary to the previous proposal. So we lost on one side, but we won the other.”

Opposition parties, including the Congress, have also alleged that undue favours had been granted to Ambani’s firm in this deal, a company without any defence manufacturing experience.

The report in ‘Mediapart’ quoted Hollande as saying, “It was the Indian government that proposed this service group, and Dassault which negotiated with Ambani. We had no choice, we took the interlocutor who was given to us.”

Asked who selected Reliance as a partner and why, Hollande replied, “We had no say in this regard.” Dassault Aviation, the makers of Rafale, had chosen Reliance Defence as its partner to fulfill offset obligations of the deal.

Offset clause and Reliance

Under the offsets clause, France is to invest 50 per cent of the total order cost in local contracts in India, worth Rs 30,000 crore, as per an Indian Express report. The offset obligations of the deal are to be discharged from September 2019 to September 2023, as per the contract.

The Rafale offset was the first project of this magnitude won by Reliance Defence, which placed it at the centre of a major political row. The government has been maintaining it did not have any role in selection of the offset partner by Dassault.

In a statement, the Ministry of Defence had stated on February 7 that “no Indian Offset Partner for the 2016 deal for 36 Rafale Aircraft has been so far selected by the vendor (DA) because as per the applicable guidelines, DA is free to select the Indian Offset Partners and provide their details at the time of seeking offset credits, or one year prior to discharge of offset obligation.”

The opposition parties have also alleged that the Reliance Defence was formed just 12 days before the announcement of the Rafale deal by the prime minister on 10 April 2015. The Reliance group has rejected the charges.

Former HAL chief’s statement

In an oblique justification of the government not pressing for the offset contract being given to state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), Defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman had also raised questions about the public sector company to produce Rafale fighter jets. Howvere, T Suvarna Raju, who was heading HAL till three weeks ago, told HT on September 19 that the public sector undertaking could have built Rafale fighters in India had the government managed to close the original negotiations with French aerospace firm Dassault Aviation for 126 fighters and that there was a work-share agreement between the two companies. However, he admitted that it would have cost HAL more to make the aircraft. Former air chief AY Tipnis told HT that HAL may have found it challenging to build the Rafale.

Now, as allegations flew thick and fast after Hollande’s statement, a defence ministry spokesperson tweeted that the report “is being verified” and that “neither GoI (government of India) nor the French Government had any say in the commercial decision.”

Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, who was in Cairo when Hollande’s bombshell came, called off  her visit to France for a meeting with her counterpart there this week, reported The Indian Express.

French government’s statement

As Hollande’s statement set off an intense verbal war in India, the French government came out with a statement refuting the former President.

“The intergovernmental agreement signed on 23rd September 2016 between the French and Indian governments for supplying India with 36 Rafale aircraft concerns the obligations of the French government solely with regard to ensuring the delivery and quality of this equipment,” it said.

Further stating that the French government is in no manner involved in the choice of Indian industrial partners who have been, are being, or will be selected by French companies, France said, “In accordance with India’s acquisition procedure, French companies have the full freedom to choose the Indian partner companies that they consider to be the most relevant, then present for the Indian government’s approval the offsets projects that they wish to execute in India with these local partners so as to fulfil their obligations in this regard.”

“As it happens, agreements have already been signed by French companies with many Indian firms, both public and private, under the framework of Indian laws.”

Dassault Aviation

In a statement, Dassault Aviation said it has decided to make a partnership with the Reliance Defence in accordance with the policy of ‘Make in India’.

Providing clarifications regarding the contract, Dassault Aviation said, “This contract is a government-to-government agreement, it provides for a separate contract in which Dassault Aviation commits to make compensation investments (offsets) in India worth 50 per cent of the value of the purchase.”

It added, “This offsets contract is delivered in compliance with the Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) 2016 regulations. In this framework, and in accordance with the policy of Make in India, Dassault Aviation has decided to make a partnership with India’s Reliance Group. This is Dassault Aviation’s choice as CEO Eric Trappe=ier had explained in an interview published in MINT newspaper on April 17, 2018. This partnership has led to the creation of the Dassault Reliance Aerospace Ltd (DRAL) joint venture in February 2017.Dassault Aviation and Reliance have built a plant in Nagpur for manufacturing parts for Falcon and Rafale aircraft.”

Ten days after India sealed the government-to-government agreement on the Rafale deal, Reliance Defence and Dassault had announced a joint venture (JV) in the aerospace sector and a year later, the foundation stone of a manufacturing facility was laid in Mihan, Nagpur.

Dassault Aviation provides the following clarifications regarding the contract signed in 2016 for 36 Rafale aircraft to India:

  1. This contract is a government-to-government agreement. It provides for a separate contract in which Dassault Aviation commits to make compensation investments (offsets) in India worth 50% of the value of the purchase.
  2. This offsets contract is delivered in compliance with the Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) 2016 regulations. In this framework, and in accordance with the policy of Make in India, Dassault Aviation has decided to make a partnership with India’s Reliance Group. This is Dassault Aviation’s choice, as CEO Eric Trappier had explained in an interview published in MINT newspaper on April 17, 2018. This partnership has led to the creation of the Dassault Reliance Aerospace Ltd (DRAL) joint-venture in February 2017. Dassault Aviation and Reliance have built a plant in Nagpur for manufacturing parts for Falcon and Rafale aircraft. The Nagpur site was chosen because of the availability of land with direct access to an airport runway, an essential condition of aeronautic activities.
  3. Other partnerships have been signed with other companies such as BTSL, DEFSYS, Kinetic, Mahindra, Maini, SAMTEL,… Other negotiations are ongoing with a hundred-odd other potential partners.
  4. Dassault Aviation is very proud that the Indian authorities have selected the Rafale fighter.

India News

Congress accuses BJP of distributing fertilisers to farmers only in bypoll-bound areas in Madhya Pradesh

Fertilisers are needed equally everywhere but the rest of the areas are not even getting five per cent of the required DAP, he alleged.

Published

on

The Congress on Sunday accused the BJP of distributing fertilisers to farmers in Madhya Pradesh only where bypolls are taking place and said that this shows that the BJP can stoop to any level for votes.

In a post in Hindi on X, Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh shared a media report which claimed that while farmers across Madhya Pradesh are standing in queues all night long for Di-Ammonium Phosphate (DAP), the fertilizer is in abundance and even being distributed in advance to farmers of the two assembly seats Budhni (Sehore district) and Vijaypur (Sheopur district) where by-elections are being held.

“The supply of fertilizers only to the places where by-elections are being held in Madhya Pradesh is a betrayal of the farmers of the rest of the state,” Ramesh said.

Fertilisers are needed equally everywhere but the rest of the areas are not even getting five per cent of the required DAP, the Congress leader alleged.

“Supplying fertilisers in this manner for electoral gains shows the shamelessness of the BJP government. This makes it clear that they can stoop to any level for votes,” Ramesh said.

Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, on October 21, claimed that the BJP is the biggest enemy of Maharashtra’s farmers. He asserted that the state has concluded that farmers will benefit only by removing the double-engine government from power.

In a post in Hindi on X, Kharge criticized the BJP for the numerous farmer suicides in the state, stating that the promise of making the state drought-free is mere rhetoric.

“The BJP is the biggest enemy of Maharashtra’s farmers; 20,000 farmers have committed suicide. There has been a significant cut in funding for farming. The promise of a Rs 20,000 crore water grid turned out to be false. The promise of making Maharashtra drought-free is just a jumla,” he said.

Kharge also slammed the BJP for its refusal to provide compensation to farmers while showering insurance companies with Rs 8,000 crore.

On October 24, Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU) leader Rakesh Tikait criticized the BJP-led governments, stating that they are “governments for businessmen and not for farmers.”

Addressing a Mahapanchayat of farmers at the exhibition ground in Bijnor on Thursday, Tikait said, “These governments are for businessmen, not farmers. Farmers should be prepared to engage in a tough fight to have their demands met. We will continue to fight for our rights.”

Continue Reading

India News

Israeli strikes have killed 22 people in northern Gaza, says Palestinian officials

On Saturday, Israeli warplanes targeted military sites in Iran—supporter of both Hamas and Hezbollah—in retaliation for an Iranian ballistic missile attack earlier this month.

Published

on

Israeli strikes in northern Gaza have resulted in the deaths of at least 22 people, stated Palestinian officials adding that the majority of the victims were women and children.

The Gaza Health Ministry’s emergency service stated that 11 women and two children were killed in strikes on several homes and buildings in the northern town of Beit Lahiya late Saturday.

It stated that another 15 people were wounded and that the death toll could rise. The Ministry listed the names of those killed, most of whom came from three families.

The Israeli military claimed it conducted a precise strike targeting militants in a structure in Beit Lahiya and took measures to avoid harming civilians. However, it disputed the casualty numbers reported by the media, without providing further elaboration or evidence to support its own claims.

Israel continues to carry out daily strikes across Gaza while also engaging in air and ground operations against the Hezbollah militant group in Lebanon. An Israeli airstrike on a southern neighborhood of Beirut early Sunday sent flames and smoke rising into the sky.

On Saturday, Israeli warplanes targeted military sites in Iran—supporter of both Hamas and Hezbollah—in retaliation for an Iranian ballistic missile attack earlier this month.

These escalating conflicts have heightened concerns about a potential all-out regional war pitting Israel and the United States against Iran and its militant proxies, which include the Houthi rebels in Yemen and armed groups in Syria and Iraq.

In a separate incident, a truck crashed into a bus stop near Tel Aviv, injuring 35 people, though the circumstances remain unclear. This event occurred near the headquarters of Israel’s Mossad spy agency, and while first responders treat it as a terrorist attack, the details of the assailant’s status remain unconfirmed.

In response to Israeli airstrikes on Iran, Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, expressed that the impacts of these strikes should not be understated or exaggerated. The exchange of fire raises concerns of a wider regional conflict involving Israel, the United States, Iran, and militant factions like Hamas and Hezbollah.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that the strikes against Iran accomplished Israel’s objectives, severely impacting Iran’s defense capabilities. Meanwhile, the supreme leader emphasized that the authorities would determine Iran’s response.

The ongoing conflict has also seen incidents of violence within Israel, such as the recent truck attack near Tel Aviv, raising tensions amidst an already volatile situation. In the Gaza Strip, the Red Cross has described the circumstances as horrific, with severe limitations on humanitarian aid exacerbating the plight of civilians in the area.

The conflict, which began with a surprise attack by Hamas-led militants in 2023, has led to widespread devastation, with significant loss of life and dire humanitarian consequences. Both sides have reported substantial casualties, but the impact on civilian populations, including displacement and shortages of essential supplies, remains a grave concern.

Continue Reading

India News

S Jaishankar says LAC patrolling agreement with China doesn’t mean everything is resolved

He commended the military for their unwavering dedication in challenging conditions and highlighted the role of astute diplomacy in reaching this agreement.

Published

on

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has said that while the recent agreement with China on patrolling along the LAC is a significant breakthrough, it does not imply a complete resolution of all issues between the two nations. The disengagement achieved paves the way for further steps to be taken.

He commended the military for their unwavering dedication in challenging conditions and highlighted the role of astute diplomacy in reaching this agreement.

During an event in Pune, Jaishankar outlined the importance of the understanding reached on October 21, specifically concerning patrolling in areas like Depsang and Demchok. This development signals progress but does not signify the end of all challenges. The disengagement marks the initial phase towards a potential resolution.

Addressing a query from students, Jaishankar mentioned that while steps have been taken towards normalisation, it will take time to fully restore trust and cooperation between India and China. The decision for the foreign ministers and National Security Advisors of both countries to meet reflects a commitment to chart a path forward.

Reflecting on the developments, Jaishankar acknowledged the diligent efforts made by India to enhance its border infrastructure over the past decade. The increased investment in infrastructure has significantly strengthened the military’s capabilities, complemented by effective diplomacy, contributing to the current progress.

The meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping at the BRICS summit in Kazan laid the groundwork for further engagements at diplomatic levels. The concerted efforts from both sides have culminated in the current positive developments.

The recent agreement on patrolling along the LAC in eastern Ladakh marks a crucial breakthrough after the prolonged military standoff. The situation since 2020 has posed challenges to the bilateral relationship, prompting negotiations to seek resolutions.

Primarily focusing on disengagement and de-escalation due to the proximity of troops, the ongoing discussions are vital for managing the border effectively. The recent progress in patrolling agreements signifies a significant step towards normalisation.

The agreement reached on October 21 specifically addresses the resumption of patrolling in crucial areas like Depsang and Demchok, enhancing mutual understandings and potentially easing tensions further.

As both countries initiate troop disengagement at the identified friction points, the process is expected to conclude shortly, fostering a more stable environment along the LAC.

On the strategic implications of the “string of pearls” concept, emphasising Chinese military and commercial expansions, Jaishankar highlighted the need for India to be vigilant and prepared to effectively respond to such strategic developments.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com