English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

“Student protests are being politicised”

Protests mount at many places across the country against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), with violence at many places. Protests in Delhi’s Jamia Millia Islamia and Uttar Pradesh‘s Aligarh Muslim University led to violent clashes. 

Published

on

Mudda

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Panelists say administration should have ensured peaceful protests

Protests mount at many places across the country against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), with violence at many places. Protests in Delhi’s Jamia Millia Islamia and Uttar Pradesh‘s Aligarh Muslim University led to violent clashes. The apex court will hear petition regarding the protests and arson on December 18. APN’s popular debate Mudda discussed the issue. Anchorperson Parivesh Vatsayan posed the questions to the panellists, including the BJP’s Aniruddh Singh, Congress’s Manoj Tiwari, ABVP’s Ashutosh Shrivastava and noted scribe Kumar Bhavesh Chandra.

Chandra said: “In Ranchi today there’s an election, the situation is tense. Violence has to be stopped. The administration should have been alerted about such events. Isn’t it a failure of the intelligence services? Why they did not alert the government? This is the time of examinations, and students will not start the protests for nothing. There is angst and provocation as well. We cannot rule out political hand in the protests and violence. Now, Prime Minister Modi should focus on sabka vishwas (confidence of all).”

Singh said: “Section 144 is clamped in parts of UP.  There is a way to hold a protest. It does not mean that you shall be allowed to burn public transport. CAA was introduced by an elected government. Please feel free to debate on any subject. Students should understand that. But politicians are stoking communal fires. We have video tapes, stones were hurled on the cops.”

Tiwari said: “I would appeal to the students to hold peaceful protests. This is a country of Gandhi, let’s live as per his ideals. Yesterday’s protests in Delhi were peaceful; nearby Okhla people joined it, but suddenly the issue flared up. Students were beaten about mercilessly, look at the footage for that. A Ranchi student stated that the police came suddenly and started beating students. See, we may agree or not agree with the government. It is the government’s job to get consensus, to talk to all factions, and interested groups. If the BJP had the consensus, why its ally parties are protesting? The government has got a huge mandate, but appears to have forgotten the definition of democracy.”

Singh said:”We are not compromising on democracy. Our manifesto mentioned scrapping of Art 370, and so on. People read the manifesto and voted for us. The students are post-graduate students, not children. Now how can you say students were studying in the library on a Sunday? We have footage regarding that.”

Tiwari said: “In University library, students do go on Sundays to study. Delhi Police saw students in the library, now where was the provocation to start beating them? Sometime back in BHU, students were beaten. And when such incidents happen, the blame is laid on opposition parties. There is nothing wrong in the protests. Holding protests is perfectly democratic.”

Chandra said: “I can definitely see a political script behind some incidents. But of course, wherever there are minority elements, there is anger against the government. Semester exams are going on, and such events are disturbing the students. The government needs to tackle the situation delicately. It looks as if both opposition and the ruling parties are out to milk the situation.”

Shrivastav said: “Students do join protests when things get out of hand. India’s resources are limited, so why should we allow outsiders to come in.”

Chandra said: ”Students have the right to be worried about their future. This youth is the future of tomorrow.”

Singh said:”But students need to be told not to get violent.”

Shrivastav said: “Students will protest, it is the administration job to ensure peace. It is not fair to beat agitating groups.”

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Continue Reading

India News

Jammu and Kashmir: CRPF vans damaged, stones hurled amid protests against Vaishno Devi ropeway project

The residents have been complaining that the project would negatively impact the environment and their livelihoods.

Published

on

Jammu and Kashmir: CRPF vans damaged, stones hurled amid protests against Vaishno Devi ropeway project

Massive violence broke out in Jammu and Kashmir’s Katra after the protestors pelted stones and clashed with the security forces during their protests against the proposed ropeway project along the trek route to the holy shrine of Vaishno Devi atop Trikuta hills. 

Reports said that the protestors hurled stones at the security personnel and damaged a CRPF vehicle. Paramvir Singh, Reasi SSP told media that the protest was going on peacefully for the past three days but on Monday some protesters pelted stones at the security forces. 

In Jammu and Kashmir’s Katra, the shopkeepers and labourers on Sunday took out a protest rally on the third day of their strike and held a sit-in outside the office of the subdivisional magistrate and Shalimar Park in Katra, the base camp for pilgrims visiting the shrine. 

A member of the joint committee of shopkeepers and pony and palanquin owners had said that the 72-hour strike has been extended by another 24 hours, adding that they will meet again and announce our future course of action. Notably, the three-day strike called by them began on Friday. 

Reports stated that while the businesses located at the base camp of Katra remained operational, shops lining the pilgrimage route from Ban Ganga to Charan Paduka observed closures. Nonetheless, the suspension of pony and palanquin services is causing hardships for the pilgrims, especially the elderly and differently-abled, to continue their sacred journey.

The residents have been complaining that the project would negatively impact the environment and their livelihoods. They asserted that the ropeway project would render them jobless, and also accused the authorities of pushing through the development without adequate consultation.

Meanwhile, Jammu and Kashmir Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha has assured the protestors of their employment. He mentioned that the committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner has been deliberating on the ropeway project and the rehabilitation of the locals. Furthermore, he also emphasised that the genuine concerns of the locals would be considered while the development of the region would not be ignored.

The Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board (SMVDSB) had announced implementation of the long-awaited ropeway project to facilitate a safer and faster journey for the pilgrims. As per the project details, the ropeway will be developed with a cost of Rs 250 crore between Tarakote Marg to Sanji Chhat along the 12-kilometre track.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi Pollution: GRAP IV restrictions to continue in national capital, says Supreme Court

The court also pulled up the Delhi Police over no checkpoints at the borders of the city for checking the pollution measures and said that it was a serious lapse.

Published

on

Delhi Pollution: GRAP IV restrictions to continue in national capital, says Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to relax GRAP IV measures in Delhi and ordered the CAQM to consider relaxing norms for students. The apex court observed that several students cannot avail midday meals, online classes and cannot access air purifiers.

The court also pulled up the Delhi Police over no checkpoints at the borders of the city for checking the pollution measures and said that it was a serious lapse. A bench headed by Justice AS Oka stated that they would consider prosecution of the Delhi Police Commissioner under the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) Act for deploying police personnel at only 23 checkpoints, when Stage 4 of the GRAP was implemented.

Earlier, the court has also appointed 13 members from the court as commissioners to check whether the GRAP IV measures are being implemented or not. On Monday, the commissioners submitted their report to the court.

Subsequently, the court told the Delhi government that there were no checkposts at borders of the city and that the ban on trucks entering into the capital was not being followed properly.

The top court bench said that they were informed that no police or government personnel were present at the border checkpoints, and they were only manned by toll collection staff of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi. Mentioning that they will direct prosecution against all officials, the court questioned why the police were not directed to take action under Stage IV of the GRAP.

Responding, Advocate Shadan Farasat representing the Delhi government said that the CAQM had issued directions. Consecutively, the court asked him to show what written instructions were given by the state and the central government to the police on November 18. To this, Advocate Farasat said that directions were issued to post police personnel at 23 checkpoints where trucks could enter the city.

The court continued that this was negligence, adding that it will direct CAQM to prosecute the Delhi Police Commissioner.

Continue Reading

India News

Maharashtra elections: Ajit Pawar criticises Sharad Pawar’s decision to field Yugender Pawar against him

Ajit Pawar said that Yugendra is a business person, and he had no connection with politics.

Published

on

Maharashtra elections: Ajit Pawar criticises Sharad Pawar’s decision to field Yugender Pawar against him

After the Maharashtra Assembly Elections results, NCP leader Ajit Pawar criticized NCP faction led by Sharad Pawar for its decision to field his nephew Yugender Pawar against him in the family bastion of Baramati. Ajit Pawar also mentioned that his decision to field wife Sunetra Pawar against his sister Supriya Sule in the Lok Sabha election was a mistake. 

Sharad Pawar led NCP had fielded Yugender Pawar, son of Ajit Pawar’s elder brother Shrinivas Anantrao Pawar, in the Baramati Assembly segment. The constituency was represented by Sharad Pawar for over two decades, followed by Ajit Pawar for over three. In this assembly election, 33-year-old Yugendra Pawar was backed by Sharad Pawar and four-time Baramati MP Supriya Sule. However, Yugender Pawar lost out against his formidable uncle by a margin of over 1 lakh votes.

While addressing the media, Ajit Pawar said that Yugendra is a business person, and he had no connection with politics. He added that there was no reason to field his own nephew against him in the elections.

Earlier in the Lok Sabha elections 2024, Ajit Pawar had fielded his wife Sunetra Pawar against his cousin and Sharad Pawar’s daughter Supriya Sule, who won the contest by a 1.5 lakh votes margin. Later, Ajit Pawar admitted that it was a mistake.

Sharad Pawar had defended the decision to field Yugendra Pawar, mentioning that someone had to contest the polls. He had also said there was no comparison between Ajit Pawar and Yugendra Pawar. 

Notably, a 2023 rebellion led by Ajit Pawar against his uncle split the NCP founded by Sharad Pawar. Since then, the senior Pawar has been fighting to win his party’s name and symbol back. 

Previously In the Lok Sabha election, the veteran had trumped his nephew, with his faction winning 8 seats compared to Ajit Pawar’s score of 1. However this time, the tables turned as NCP (Sharad Pawar) scored 10, but Ajit Pawar’s party won 41.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com