Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday expressed support for the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, addressing concerns and criticisms raised by opposition lawmakers in Lok Sabha. Shah accused Opposition MPs of disseminating various misinformation, suggesting that their motives may be either unintentional or politically driven.
Addressing the Lower House, Shah emphasized that Waqf, which pertains to donations made for religious charities in the name of Allah, represents a charitable endowment made without any expectation of reclaiming the funds. He clarified that such contributions must be derived from personal property and cannot be sourced from government assets.
Shah further noted, “There is no provision to appoint any non-Muslim members to the Waqf. We do not intend to do so, as there will be no intrusion into the religious affairs of Muslims. The opposition’s resistance stems from a desire to appease their voter base.”
On this day, the Lok Sabha began deliberation on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, which includes recommendations from a Joint Parliamentary Committee that reviewed the legislation after its introduction in August of the previous year. Additionally, the House considered the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill, 2024, both introduced for discussion and approval by Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju.
Shah clarified that while non-Muslim members could be appointed to the board and administrative councils, this would be strictly for administrative functions. He questioned whether a Hindu, Jain, or Sikh could serve as a charity commissioner in a non-religious capacity, arguing that such a move is vital for national integrity.
He insisted that the necessity for the current bill arose from amendments made in 2013 that he considered extreme, highlighting the past government’s inappropriate allocation of prime land in Lutyens Delhi as Waqf properties before the 2014 elections.
Earlier in the day, Union Minister Rijiju defended the Waqf Amendment Bill, asserting that the reforms are positive and necessary, countering claims from those with no direct stake in the bill, who he alleged are being misled.
However, Congress MP KC Venugopal criticized the expedited process, claiming it deprived opposition members of the opportunity to propose amendments. Fellow Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi condemned the bill, arguing that it undermines constitutional values and further marginalizes minority communities.
Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav accused the BJP of introducing new legislation to distract from its past failures. Commenting on the government’s claims of promoting women’s empowerment through the Waqf Bill, he challenged the BJP by questioning how many women candidates they would nominate in the upcoming Uttar Pradesh elections. He expressed concern that the Waqf Bill threatens to compromise the country’s secular identity.
AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan also weighed in, questioning Shah’s claims regarding the prime locations of 130 Waqf properties, suggesting that the BJP’s true intentions may involve seizing these properties, referencing past actions against Muslim-owned graveyards and buildings. He raised concerns about the government’s plans for properties that are not officially recorded as Waqf.
Meanwhile, Eknath Shinde, Chief of Shiv Sena and Maharashtra’s Deputy Chief Minister, reiterated his party’s stance on the Waqf Board, affirming, “Our position has always been unequivocal. We will not compromise our views for the sake of power or self-interest. Our support for the Waqf Amendment Bill is firmly rooted in promoting the welfare and progress of the Muslim community.”