English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Cows happy, people aren’t

Published

on

Cows happy, people aren’t

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]People are losing jobs all over the country, including in the leather industry, but the streets are awash with happy cows

Ranjona Banerji

A month away from India and when you get back, the more things change, the more they stay the same. Short snatches of news from Twitter and Facebook give you a small inkling of what’s happening but there’s nothing like getting back home to realise that cow politics, chicanery, communalism and social discord are alive and kicking.

And, as we have understood it so far, compassion for either animals or humans or anyone else plays no part in these huge public displays for the love of cows. The opposite is true when you consider that it is open season for murderers in India as long as they claim that cow protection is their justification.

A random airplane meeting with a businessman invested in the leather tanning industry led to some interesting revelations. Or some obvious home truths, depending on how you look at life. The tanning industry in Kanpur, he said, was in a massive mess. Firstly, because of the devastating effects of demonetisation, and, secondly, because of the shutdown of slaughter houses in Uttar Pradesh. Kanpur is the world’s largest supplier of all equestrian leather. Buffalo hide is great for the furniture industry. But shoes and bags require cow leather. Both are in extreme short supply, thanks to various government schemes plus social, religious and cultural factors.

For a business already in decline because of shrinking demand and stagnation among other causes, the two recent government moves of demonetisation and protection of cattle have been a double whammy. The future of the industry and the implications for livelihood and economic impact are now hanging in the balance.

No one is unaware of the problems with tanneries – the polluting of rivers and added government pressure because of the Centre’s flagship Clean Ganga mission, although precious little has been done there. Nor can anyone justify the cruelty of illegal slaughter houses which must be legalised with improved and more human methods of killing animals.

But working to an end by taking note of all possible scenarios is not the Indian way of doing things. “Cow is our mother, Ganga is our mother” are nothing more than slogans, either to win elections or to create social discord. The intention by the Yogi Adityanath government is more to cement the Hindutva, upper caste vote than it is to either save cows or save rivers or bring order to industry. Of course, the former Samajwadi Party government did little to regularise the industry either.

The problem with stray cattle will only increase now as farmers have made it clear that they will not, and cannot support cattle once they are no longer productive and useful. There are almost no facilities for these ageing cattle, as we well know. Therefore, we will soon see a flood of cattle released on to our streets, in villages, towns and cities since the murderous “children” of these cows are not willing to house them.

Those who work at the bottom of the tanning industry and at slaughter houses are also those at the bottom of society – Dalits and Muslims. They will suffer along with the cows and buffaloes that no one wants or cares about. No one cares about them, either.

Those who have invested in the export of meat, or in leather, can and do belong to any strata, caste, religion and so on. And to be honest, one would have thought this government at least cared about them and the possible impact on the Indian economy when industries collapse.

But then we had demonetisation, the truth of which we do not yet know, months after it was foisted on us. So much for that.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com